Use of sulfate-reducing bacteria and different organic fertilizer for bioremediation of ex-nickel mining soils

• Autorzy: Bakhtiar , Sukoso , Saida

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.22630/PNIKS.2021.30.4.47

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The microbiological activity associated with exmining soil remediation can be considered useful to accelerate the contaminant degradation. The use of sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) and organic matter exhibits potential in improving ex-nickel mining soil quality. The purpose of this study was to examine the ability of SRB in several organic fertilizers to reduce sulfate and nickel ions, and to increase pH of soil from nickel in mining areas. This study used the bacteria collection of the Soil Laboratory of the Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Muslim Indonesia. Those were previously isolated from two cultivating pond of milkfish in the Kuri area of Maros Regency, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. The soil samples were collected from ex-mining areas of the Vale Indonesia Enterprise in Soroako, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Those were mixed with organic fertilizers, generated from sugarcane sludge, manure, and Quickstick (Gliricidia sepium) leaves, each with 50 and 100 g doses. The 5 kg soil samples were put into a pot and mixed evenly with organic fertil- izers. A general linear model (GLM) repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was adopted to analyze the data. The results of this study indicate that the application of SRB and fertilizer was effective in reducing concentration of sulfate and nickel. Among the three types of organic fertilizers, manure was effective in reducing sulfate and nickel concentrations, while Quickstick fertilizer was the more effective in stabilizing pH level. Fertilizer doses exhibited a significant effect on decreasing sulfate and nickel concentrations, but it exhibited no significant effect on stabilizing pH levels. At 10 days after treatment (DAT), the sulfate concentration decreased from 2,530 ppm to 1,443 ppm in treatment of SRB and manure with dose of 50 g and 1,363 ppm with that of 100 g. At the end of the observation (30 DAT), those were decreased to 1,217 ppm in treatment of SRB and manure with doses of 50 g and 1,167 ppm with that of 100 g. Among the three types of organic fertilizers used, Quickstick demonstrates the more effective reduction rate. At 10 DAT, pH increased in SRB treatment by 7.06 at a concentration of 50 g and 7.01 at a concentration of 50 g. At the end of the observation (30 DAT), the pH became 6.67 at a concentration of 50 g and 6.82 at a concentration of 50 g. The nickel concentration decreased from an origin concentration to 1,950 ppm in treatment of SRB and manure with doses of 50 g and 1,690 ppm with that of 100 g. Thus, the application of manure fertilizer and the addition of SRB is recommended for bioremediation of sulfate and nickel from ex-mining soil.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

organic matter; pH; sulfate; nickel

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Szkoły Głównej Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie
• Czasopismo: Przegląd Naukowy Inżynieria i Kształtowanie Środowiska
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 30, No. 4
• Strony: 561--572
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 29 poz., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Bakhtiar

• Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Faculty of Agriculture, 90231 Makassar, Indonesia

autor

Sukoso

• Universitas Brawijaya, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, 65145, Malang, Indonesia

autor

Saida

• Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Faculty of Agriculture, 90231 Makassar, Indonesia

Bibliografia

• Ansari, M.I. & Malik, A. (2010). Seasonal variation of different microorganisms with nickel and cadmium in the industrial wastewater and agricultural soils. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 167(1), 151-163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-1038-y
• Cao, Q.Q., Liu, B., Ren, Z., Xiao, H.B., Cheng, J.M. & Xue, W.N. (2020). Temporal distribution characteristic and risk analysis of heavy metals in greenhouse vegetable soils. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 29(3), 2071-2079. https://doi.org/10.15244 pjoes/111318
• Cohen, R.R.H. (2006). Use of microbes for cost reduction of metal removal from metals and mining industry waste streams. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(12-13), 1146-1157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.10.009
• Dikinya, O. & Areola, O. (2010). Comparative analysis of heavy metal concentration in secondary treated wastewater irrigated soils cultivated by different crops. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 7(2), 337-346. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03326143
• García, C., Moreno, D.A., Ballester, A., Blázquez, M.L. & González, F. (2001). Bioremediation of an industrial acid mine water by metal-tolerant sulphate-reducing bacteria. Minerals Engineering, 14(9), 997-1008. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0892-6875(01)00107-8
• Gavrilescu, M. (2004). Removal of heavy metals from the environment by biosorption. Engineering in Life Sciences, 4(3), 219-232. https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.200420026
• Halifah, U.N., Soelistyono, R. & Santoso, M. (2014). The effect of application of organic (Blotong) and anorganic fertilizer (Za) on plant shallot (Allium ascalonicum L.). Jurnal Produksi Tanaman, 2(8), 665-672.
• Jain, R.K., Cui, Z.C. & Domen, J.K. (2016). Environmental impacts of mining and mineral processing: management, monitoring and auditing strategies. Oxford: Butterworth- -Heinemann. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804040-9.00004-8
• Juradi, M.A., Tando, E. & Saida (2020). Innova (2020). Innovation Technology of Blotong Compos to Repair Soil Fertility and Increasing Plant Sugarcane Productivity. Jurnal Agrotek, 4(1), 24-36.
• Kieu, H.T.Q., Müller, E. & Horn, H. (2011). Heavy metal removal in anaerobic semi-continuous stirred tank reactors by a consortium of sulfate-reducing bacteria. Water Research, 45(13), 3863-3870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.04.043.
• Kiran, M.G., Pakshirajan, K. & Das, G. (2016). Heavy metal removal using sulfate-reducing biomass obtained from a lab-scale upflow anaerobic-packed bed reactor. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 142(9), C4015010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001005
• Kiran, M.G., Pakshirajan, K. & Das, G. (2017). Heavy metal removal from multicomponent system by sulfate reducing bacteria: Mechanism and cell surface characterization. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 324, 62-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.12.042
• Koschorreck, M. (2008). Microbial sulphate reduction at a low pH. Microbiology Ecology, 64(3), 329-342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00482.x
• Li, X., Lan, S.M., Zhu, Z.P., Zhang, C., Zeng, G.M., Liu, Y.G., Cao, W.C., Song, B., Yang, H., Wang, S.F. & Wu, S.H. (2018). The bioenergetics mechanisms and applications of sulfate-reducing bacteria in remediation of pollutants in drainage: A review. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 158, 162-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.04.025
• Liu, H.H., Liu, G.H., Zhou, Y.F. & He, C. (2017). Spatial distribution and influence analysis of soil heavy metals in a hilly region of sichuan Basin. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 26(2), 725-732. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/65152
• Neina, D. (2019). The role of soil pH in plant nutrition and soil remediation. Applied and Environmental Soil Science, 2019, 5794869. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5794869
• Palupi, N.P. (2015). Soil Acidity and C Organic Analysis On Cogon Grass Land (Imperata cylindrica L.) by chicken and Goat manure’s Application. Media Sains, 8(2), 182-188.
• Papirio, S., Villa-Gomez, D.K., Esposito, G., Pirozzi, F. & Lens, P.N.L. (2013). Acid mine Acid mine drainage treatment in fluidized-bed bioreactors by sulfate-reducing bacteria: A Critical Review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 43(23), 2545-2580. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2012.694328
• Pistelli, L., D’Angiolillo, F. & Morelli, E., Basso, B., Rosellini, I., Posarelli, M. & Barbafieri, M. (2017). Response of spontaneous plants from an ex-mining site of Elba island (Tuscany, Italy) to metal(loid) contamination. Environmental Science Pollution Research, 24(8), 7809-7820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8488-5
• Reyes, C., Schneider, D., Thürmer, A., Kulkarni, A., Lipka, M., Sztejrenszus, S.Y., Böttcher, M.E., Daniel, R. & Friedrich, M.W. (2017). Potentially Active Iron, Sulfur, and Sulfate Reducing Bacteria in Skagerrak and Bothnian Bay Sediments. Geomicrobiology Journal, 34(10), 840-850. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490451.2017.1281360
• Sánchez-Andrea, I., Sanz, J.L., Bijmans, M.F.M. & Stams, A.J.M. (2014). Sulfate reduction at low pH to remediate acid mine drainage. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 269, 98-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.12.032
• Sandrawati, A., Suryatmana, P., Putra, I.N. & Kamaluddin, N.N. (2019). Pengaruh jenis bahan organik dan bakteri pereduksi sulfat terhadap konsentrasi Fe dan Mn dalam remediasi air asam tambang. Soilrens, 17(1), 1-8.
• Serrano, J. & Eduardo, L. (2017). Removal of arsenic using acid/metal-tolerant sulfate reducing bacteria: A new approach for bioremediation of high-arsenic acid mine waters. Water, 9(12), 994. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9120994
• Singh, J., Upadhyay, S.K., Pathak, R.K. & Gupta, V. (2011). Accumulation of heavy metals in soil and paddy crop (Oryza sativa), irrigated with water of Ramgarh Lake, Gorakhpur. India, Toxicological & Environmental Chemistry, 93(3), 462-473. https://doi.org/10.1080/02772248.2010.546559
• Syahrir, Yaqin, K., Landu, A. & Tambaru, R. (2019). Analysis of mercury and nickel con Analysis of mercury and nickel content in fish and shrimp a result aquaculture of ponds in Pomalaa, Kolaka Regency. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 382(1), 012025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/382/1/012025
• Widyati, E. (2007). The use of sulphate-reducing bacteria in bioremediation of ex-coal mining soil. Biodiversitas, 8(4), 283-286. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d080408
• Winch, S., Mills, H.J., Kostka, J.E., Fortin, D. & Lean, D.R.S. (2009). Identification of sulfate-reducing bacteria in methylmercury- -contaminated mine tailings by analysis of SSU rRNA genes. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 68(1), 94-107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2009.00658.x
• Xu, Y.N. & Chen, Y. (2020). Advances in heavy metal removal by sulfate-reducing bacteria. Water Science Technology, 81(9), 1797-1827. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2020.227
• Zhang, F.W., He, Y.L., Zhao, C.M., Kou, Y.B. & Huang, K. (2020). Heavy metals pollution characteristics and health risk assessment of farmland soils and agricultural products in a mining area of Henan Province, China. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 29(5), 3929-3941. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/115273

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023)