The moderating role of resource accessibility to the Theory of Planned Behaviour components: a study of e-entrepreneurship intention among Saudi women

• Autorzy: Alzamel Samar

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17512/pjms.2021.24.1.02

Warianty tytułu

PL

Moderatorska rola dostępności zasobów w teorii planowanych komponentów zachowania:badanie intencji e-przedsiębiorczości wśród kobiet saudyjskich

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This study investigated the impact of the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) components on Saudi women’s e-entrepreneurial intentions. Five hundred thirty-four female undergraduate students from different universities in Saudi Arabia completed survey questionnaires to understand the moderating role of resource accessibility in influencing entrepreneurial intentions. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was used to test the model. The study reveals that attitude towards entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial self-efficacy are significantly related to e-entrepreneurial intention, while the subjective norm was insignificant. The moderation role of Resource Accessibility (RA) positively impacted the relationship between the TPB components and e-entrepreneurial intention. The findings of this study develop a base for supporting women’s entrepreneurial intention through resource accessibility.

PL

W artykule zbadano wpływ elementów teorii planowanego zachowania (TPB) na intencje e-przedsiębiorcze saudyjskich kobiet. Pięćset trzydzieści cztery studentki studiów licencjackich z różnych uniwersytetów w Arabii Saudyjskiej wypełniły ankiety, aby zrozumieć moderującą rolę dostępności zasobów we wpływaniu na intencje przedsiębiorcze. Do przetestowania modelu wykorzystano modelowanie równań strukturalnych (SEM). Z badania wynika, że stosunek do przedsiębiorczości i przedsiębiorczego poczucia własnej skuteczności są istotnie związane z intencją e-przedsiębiorczą, podczas gdy norma subiektywna była nieistotna. Moderacyjna rola dostępności zasobów (RZ) pozytywnie wpłynęła na relacje między komponentami TPB a intencją e-przedsiębiorcy. Wyniki tego badania tworzą podstawę do wspierania przedsiębiorczych zamiarów kobiet poprzez dostępność zasobów.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

theory of planned behaviour; TPB; entrepreneurship; e-entrepreneurial Intention; resource accessibility; intention; attitude

PL

teoria planowanych zachowań; TPB; przedsiębiorczość; intencja e-przedsiębiorcza; dostępność zasobów; intencja; postawa

• Wydawca: Czestochowa University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Management Studies
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 24, No. 1
• Strony: 30--44
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 62 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Alzamel Samar

• Department of Business Administration, College of Business & Economics (CBE), Qassim University, Saudi Arabia

Bibliografia

• 1.Ajzen, I., (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
• 2.Akinwale, Y. O., Ababtain, A. K. and Alaraifi, A. A., (2019). Structural equation model analysis of factors influencing entrepreneurial interest among university students in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 22(4), 1-14.
• 3.Alzamel, S., Nor, M. N. M., Omar, S. B. and Mohammed, M. M., (2019). The Mediation Role of Resource Accessibility between Perceived Social Support and e-Entrepreneurial Intention of Female Students in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Technology Management and Business, 6(3).
• 4.Amirat, A., Zaidi, M., (2019). Estimating GDP Growth in Saudi Arabia Under the Government’s Vision 2030: a Knowledge-based Economy Approach. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1-26.
• 5.Armitage, C. J., Conner, M., (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta‐ analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(4), 471-499.
• 6.Arniati, T., Puspita, D., Amin, A. and Pirzada, K., (2019). The implementation of good corporate governance model and auditor independence in earnings’ quality improvement, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(1): 188-200.
• 7.Autio, E., H. Keeley, R., Klofsten, M., GC Parker, G. and Hay, M., (2001). Entrepreneurial intent among students in Scandinavia and in the USA. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies, 2(2), 145-160.
• 8.Bacq, S., Eddleston, K. A., (2018). A resource-based view of social entrepreneurship: how stewardship culture benefits scale of social impact. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(3), 589-611.
• 9.Bandura, A., (1997). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
• 10.Bansal, S., Garg, I. and Sharma, G. D., (2019). Social entrepreneurship as a path for social change and driver of sustainable development: A systematic review and research agenda. Sustainability, 11(4), 1091.
• 11.Bursztyn, L., González, A. L. and Yanagizawa-Drott, D., (2018). Misperceived social norms: Female labor force participation in Saudi Arabia (No. w24736). National Bureau of Economic Research.
• 12.Bursztyn, L., González, A. L. and Yanagizawa-Drott, D., (2020). Misperceived social norms: Women working outside the home in Saudi Arabia. American Economic Review, 110(10), 2997-3029.
• 13.Cheng, L. J., Liao, C. C., (2017). The drivers of entrepreneurial intention: The role of social capital and overconfidence. Contemporary Management Research, 13(2).
• 14.Dawson, J. F., (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 1-19.
• 15.Farooq, M.S., (2018b). Modelling the significance of social support and entrepreneurial skills for determining entrepreneurial behaviour of individuals: A structural equation modelling approach. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 14(3), 242-266.
• 16.Farooq, M.S., Salam, M., Rehman, S., Fayolle, A., Jaafar, N. and Ayupp, K., (2018a). Impact of support from social network on entrepreneurial intention of fresh business graduates: A structural equation modelling approach. Education + Training, 60(4), 335-353.
• 17.Fitzsimmons, J.R. and Douglas, E.J., (2011). Interaction between feasibility and desirability in the formation of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(4), 431- 440.
• 18.Gantino, R., Ruswanti, E. and Rachman, T., (2020). Leadership Style, Intellectual Capital and Corporate Social Responsibility on Performance, a Comparison Model of Listed Companies in Indonesia., Acc. Fin. Review, 5 (3): 110 - 120.
• 19.Gorgievski, M. J., Stephan, U., Laguna, M. and Moriano, J. A., (2018). Predicting entrepreneurial career intentions: values and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Career Assessment, 26(3), 457-475.
• 20.Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B. & Anderson, R., (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
• 21.Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C. & Sarstedt, M., (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 2d ed. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• 22.Hanif, H., Rakhman, A., Nurkholis, M. and Pirzada, K., (2019). Intellectual capital: extended VAIC model and building of a new HCE concept: the case of Padang Restaurant Indonesia. African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure, 8 (S), 1-15.
• 23.Harman, H. H., (1976). Modern Factor Analysis, 3d ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
• 24.Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M. and Sinkovics, R. R., (2009). The use of partial least squares path modelling in international marketing. In R. R. Sinkovics & P. N. Ghauri (Eds.), New challenges to international marketing: Advances in international marketing (pp. 277- 319). Bingley: Emerald JAI Press.
• 25.Husaini; Pirzada, K. and Saiful, (2020). Risk Management, Sustainable Governance Impact on Corporate Performance. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 9(3), 993-1004.
• 26.Hyer, K., MacDonald, G., Black, K., Badana, A. N., Murphy, S. P. and Haley, W. E., (2019). Preparing for Florida’s Older Adult Population Growth with User-friendly Demographic Maps. Florida Public Health Review, 14(1), 4.
• 27.Jones, P., Packham, G., Beckinsale, D., Pickernell, D., Thomas, B., White, G. and Willis, R., (2013). E-commerce trading activity and the SME sector: an FSB perspective. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development.
• 28.Kim, M. S., Hunter, J. E., (1993). Relationships among attitudes, behavioral intentions, and behavior: A meta-analysis of past research, part 2. Communication Research, 20(3), 331- 364.
• 29.Knauerhase, R., (1980). Saudi Arabia: Our Conservative Muslim Ally. Current History, 78(453), 17.
• 30.Krithika, J., Venkatachalam, B., (2014). A study on impact of subjective norms on entrepreneurial intention among the business students in Bangalore. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 16(5), 48-50.
• 31.Krueger Jr, N. F., Reilly, M. D. and Carsrud, A. L., (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5-6), 411-432.
• 32.Lai, L. S., To, W. M., (2020). E-Entrepreneurial intention among young Chinese adults. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 28(1), 119-137.
• 33.Liñán, F., Chen, Y. W., (2009). Development and cross-cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 593-617.
• 34.Low, G. S., Mohr, J. J., (2001). Factors affecting the use of information in the evaluation of marketing communications productivity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sciences, 29(1), 70-88.
• 35.Maghlouth, S.A., (2021). Metaphorical Analysis of Discourse on Early Saudi Attempts to Include Women in Unconventional Work Environments, GATR Global J. Bus. Soc. Sci. Review, 9(1): 01 - 09.
• 36.Moa-Liberty, A. W., Tunde, A. O. and Tinuola, O. L., (2016). The influence of self-efficacy and socio-demographic factors on the entrepreneurial intentions of selected Youth Corp members in Lagos, Nigeria. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, 34(34), 63- 71.
• 37.Mohamed, Z., Rezai, G., Nasir Shamsudin, M. and Mu’az Mahmud, M., (2012). Enhancing young graduates’ intention towards entrepreneurship development in Malaysia. Education + Training, 54(7), 605-618.
• 38.Naik, S; Prasad, Ch.V.V.S.N.V., (2021). Benefits of Enterprise Risk Management: A Systematic Review of Literature, J. Fin. Bank. Review, 5 (4): 28 - 35.
• 39.Newman, A., Obschonka, M., Schwarz, S., Cohen, M. and Nielsen, I., (2019). Entrepreneurial self-efficacy: A systematic review of the literature on its theoretical foundations, measurement, antecedents, and outcomes, and an agenda for future research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 110, 403-419.
• 40.Pihie, Z. A. L., Bagheri, A., (2010). Entrepreneurial attitude and entrepreneurial efficacy of technical secondary school students. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 62(3), 351-366.
• 41.Pirzada, K., (2016). Providers and users’ perception of voluntary need of human resource disclosure: A content analysis. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 14(2) 232-242.
• 42.Pirzada, K., Mustapha, M. Z. and Alfan, E., (2016). The Role of Nomination Committee in Selecting Female Directors: A Case of Malaysia. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 24 (S), pp. 105-118.
• 43.Pirzada, K., Mustapha, M.Z. and Alfan, E.B., (2017). Antecedents of Ethnic Diversity: The Role of Nomination Committees. International Journal of Economics and Management, 11(S1), 103-119
• 44.Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B. and Podsakoff, N. P., (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539-569..
• 45.Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y. and Podsakoff, N. P., (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879.
• 46.Princes E., Manurung, A. H., (2020). Taking Advantage of Social Conformity in Entrepreneurship, J. Mgt. Mkt. Review, 5(1) 64 - 73.
• 47.Ringle, C.M., Wende, S. and Becker, J.-M., (2015). SmartPLS 3. Bonningstedt: SmartPLS. Retrieved December 30, 2018, from http://www.smartpls.com.
• 48.Ristyawan; M.R., (2020). An Integrated Artificial Intelligence and Resource Base View Model for Creating Competitive Advantage, J. Bus. Econ. Review, 5(1) 28-37
• 49.Robinson, P. B., Stimpson, D. V., Huefner, J. C. and Hunt, H. K., (1991). An attitude approach to the prediction of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 15(4), 13-32.
• 50.Sadi, M. A., Al-Ghazali, B. M., (2012). The dynamics of entrepreneurial motivation among women: A comparative study of businesswomen in Saudi Arabia and Bahrain. In The GCC Economies (pp. 217-227). Springer, New York, NY.
• 51.Sahinidis, A. G., Vassiliou, E. E. and Hyz, A. B., (2014). Factors affecting entrepreneurs’ intention to start a new venture: An empirical study. International Journal on Strategic Innovative Marketing, 1(3), 148-162.
• 52.Saputra, N., Herlina, M.G., (2021). Double-Sided Perspective of Business Resilience: Leading SME Rationally and Irrationally During COVID-19, J. Mgt. Mkt. Review, 6(2) 125 - 136.
• 53.Savickas, M. L., Nota, L., Rossier, J., Dauwalder, J. P., Duarte, M. E., Guichard, J. and Van Vianen, A. E., (2009). Life designing: A paradigm for career construction in the 21st century. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75(3), 239-250.
• 54.Schjoedt, L., Craig, J.B., (2017). Development and validation of a unidimensional domainspecific entrepreneurial self-efficacy scale. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 23(1), 98-113.
• 55.Shane, S., (2012). Reflections on the 2010 AMR decade award: Delivering on the promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 37(1), 10- 20.
• 56.Shinnar, R., Hsu, D. and Powell, B., (2014). Self-efficacy, entrepreneurial intentions, and gender: Assessing the impact of entrepreneurship education longitudinally. The International Journal of Management Education, 12, 561-570.
• 57.Suryani, A., Pirzada, K., (2018). Analysis of opportunistic behavior of management to company performance. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 18(1) 379-388.
• 58.Tonday, H. R., Tigga, A. M., (2019). A Critical Study of Paradigms and Perspectives for Advancement of E-Entrepreneurship. International Journal of E-Entrepreneurship and Innovation (IJEEI), 9(2), 49-57.
• 59.Turban, E., Outland, J., King, D., Lee, J. K., Liang, T. P. & Turban, D. C., (2018). Electronic commerce 2018: A managerial and social networks perspective (9th ed., p. v). Switzerland: Springer Nature.
• 60.Younis, H., Katsioloudes, M. and Al Bakri, A., (2020). Digital Entrepreneurship Intentions of Qatar University Students Motivational Factors Identification: Digital Entrepreneurship Intentions. International Journal of E-Entrepreneurship and Innovation (IJEEI), 10(1), 56-74.
• 61.Zacher, H., Biemann, T., Gielnik, M. M. and Frese, M. (2012). Patterns of entrepreneurial career development: An optimal matching analysis approach. International Journal of Developmental Science, 6(3-4), 177-187.
• 62.Zaman, M.M.K., Othman, N. and Mansor, A.Z., (2020). Entrepreneurial Business Practices among FELCRA’s Women Entrepreneurs, Global J. Bus. Soc. Sci. Review, 8(2): 81 - 86.