Sustainable social development manufacturing enterprises in selected countries Central and Eastern Europe

• Autorzy: Fajczak-Kowalska Anita , Tokarski Daniel

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2023.172.12

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The main aim of this paper is to assess the impact of macroeconomic conditions on the social development of manufacturing enterprises in selected countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Design/methodology/approach: Due to the implemented goal, the following research hypothesis was formulated as follows: Macroeconomic factors are statistically significant for the social development of manufacturing enterprises in Czechia, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia. Due to the implemented research issues, the paper was divided into two main parts. The first part presents selected theoretical problems related to social development. The second part contains the methodology and the results of the study and a summary. In the analysis, we used synthetic indicators of social development of enterprises and synthetic macroeconomic indicators. The relationship between variables was measured using the Pearson's linear correlation index and the method of least squares. Findings: The results of the study indicate that in all analyses countries there is a statistically significant relationship between the indicator of social development and the indicator of macroeconomic development. The highest level of impact of macroeconomic factors on the social development of manufacturing enterprises in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe is recorded in Estonia, while the lowest in Lithuania. Research limitations/implications: Research limitations result from the analysis of a deliberately selected case, which does not allow for formulating general conclusions. Nevertheless, the article refers to sustainable development of manufacturing enterprises. Practical implications: The information contained in the publication may be of interest to business representatives, students and doctoral students of technical, economic and social faculties; analysing the impact of sustainable social development on the operations of manufacturing enterprises in the national and international dimension. Originality/value: The publication covers the topic of sustainable social development of manufacturing enterprises in the macroeconomic aspect. Interdisciplinary research combining the areas of management and quality science with economics and finance.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Central and Eastern Europe; manufacturing enterprise; social sustainability

PL

Centralna i Wschodnia Europa; przedsiębiorstwo produkcyjne; zrównoważony rozwój społeczny

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: z. 172
• Strony: 185--199
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 34 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Fajczak-Kowalska Anita

• Lodz University of Technology

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5347-9735

autor

Tokarski Daniel

• University of Lodz

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3475-1115

Bibliografia

• 1. Biadacz, R., Wysłocka, E. (2016). Terminowe regulowanie zobowiązań a społeczna odpowie-działalność biznesu. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Częstochowskiej. Zarządzanie, Vol. 2, No. 23, pp. 27-40.
• 2. Blewitt, J. (2008). Understanding sustainable development. London: Earthscan.
• 3. Boudreau, J., Ramstad, P. (2005). Talentship, talent segmentation, and sustainability: A new HR decision science paradigm for a new strategy definition. Human Resource Management, Vol. 44, Iss. 2, pp. 129-136, doi: 10.1002/hrm.20054.
• 4. Ciegis, R., Zeleniute, R. (2008). Ekonomikosplétra darnaus vystymosi aspektu. Taikomoji Ekonomika: sisteminiai tyrimai, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 37-54.
• 5. Colbert, B., Kurucz, E. (2007). Three conceptions of triple bottom line business sustainability and the role for HRM. Human Resource Planning, Vol. 30, Iss. 1, pp. 21-29.
• 6. Dernbach, J.C. (2003). Achieving sustainable development: The Centrality and multiple facets of integrated decisionmaking. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, Vol. 10, Iss. 1, pp. 247-285, doi: 10.2979/GLS.2003.10.1.247.
• 7. Duran, C.D., Gogan, L.M., Artene, A., Duran, V. (2015). The components of sustainable development - a possible approach. Procedia Economics and Finance, No. 26, pp. 806-811, doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00849-7.
• 8. Dyllick, T., Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, No. 11, Iss. 2, pp. 130-141, doi: 10.1002/bse.323.
• 9. Dziekański, P. (2014). Koncepcja wskaźnika syntetycznego oceny poziomu rozwoju gmin wiejskich województwa świętokrzyskiego w warunkach globalizacji. Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego. Zeszyty Naukowe Szkoły Głównej Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 61-70, doi: 10.22004/ag.econ.198846.
• 10. Emas, R. (2015). The Concept of Sustainable Development: Definition and Defining Principles. Brief for GSDR 2015. Retrieved from: http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/ content/documents/5839GSDR%202015_SD_concept_definiton_rev.pdf, 20.01.2023.
• 11. Ferrell, A., Liang, H., Renneboog, L. (2016). Socially responsible firms. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 122, Iss. 3, pp. 585-606, doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.12.003.
• 12. Goel, M., Ramanathan, P. E. (2014). Business ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility -Is there a dividing line? Procedia Economics and Finance, Vol. 11, pp. 49-59, doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00175-0.
• 13. Grabara, J., Bajdro, P., Mihaescu, L. (2015). Steps of sustainable development implementation into enterprise activities. Management of Sustainable Development, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 45-49, doi: 10.1515/msd-2015-0022.
• 14. Grudzewski, W.M., Hejduk, I.K., Sankowska, A., Wańtuchowicz, M. (2010). Sustainability w biznesie czyli przedsiębiorstwo przyszłości, zmiany paradygmatów i koncepcji zarządzania. Warszawa: Poltext.
• 15. Kowalska, M., Misztal, A. (2019). Ekologiczny rozwój przedsiębiorstw. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
• 16. Kożusznik, B. (2005). Wpływ społeczny w organizacji. Warszawa: PWE.
• 17. Lorenc, S., Sorokina, O. (2015). Sustainable development of mining enterprises as a strategic direction of growth of value for stakeholders. Mining Science, Vol. 22, pp. 6778, doi: 10.5277/ms150219.
• 18. Misztal, A. (2018). Zrównoważony rozwój polskich przedsiębiorstw - ewaluacja. Handel wewnętrzny, Vol. 2, Iss. 373, pp. 27-40.
• 19. Misztal, A. (2019). Stabilizacja makroekonomiczna a zrównoważony rozwój przedsiębiorstw - przypadek Bułgarii, Czech, Polski i Rumunii. Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne, Vol. 113, pp. 189-205, doi: 10.26485/SPE/2019/113/11.
• 20. Mitek, A., Miciula, I. (2012). Współczesne determinanty rozwoju przedsiębiorstw prywatnych. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Studia i Prace Wydziału Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarządzania, No. 28, pp. 53-66.
• 21. Musiał, M., Kubacki, Ł. (2017). Społeczna Odpowiedzialność biznesu w procesie zarządzania przedsiębiorstwami. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Częstochowskiej, Vol. 2, No. 25, pp. 84-93, doi: 10.17512/znpcz.2017.1.2.07.
• 22. Nowak, E. (1995). Rachunkowość menedżerska. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej im. Oskara Langego.
• 23. Oželiené, D. (2017). A review of enterprise sustainable development models: critical appraisal, scientific proceedings. International Scientific conference: High technologies. Business. Society. Retrived from: http://hightechsociety.eu/sbornik/2017/2/26.A% 20REVIEW%20OF%20ENTERPRISE%20SUSTAINABLE%20DEVELOPMENT%20 MODELS%20CRITICAL%20APPRAISAL.pdf, 20.01.2023.
• 24. Papke, L., Wooldridge, J. (2008). Panel data methods for fractional response variables with an application to test pass rates. Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 145, Iss. 1-2, pp. 121-133, doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.05.009.
• 25. Phillips, N., LeBaron, G., Wallin, S. (2018). Mapping and measuring the effectiveness of labour-related disclosure requirements for global supply chains. Working Paper, No. 32. International Labour Organizaiton, Research Department.
• 26. Porter, M.E., Kramer, M.R. (2007). Strategy and Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 84, No. 12, pp. 78-92.
• 27. Prugh, T., Assadourian, E. (2003). What is sustainability, anyway? World Watch Magazine, No. 5, Vol. 16, pp. 10-21.
• 28. Sheridan, A., Milgate, G. (2005). Accessing board positions: A comparison of female and male board members’ views. Corporate Governance An International Review, No. 6, Vol. 13, pp. 847-855, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00475.x.
• 29. Slimane, M. (2012). Role and relationship between leadership and sustainable development to release social, human, and cultural dimension. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, No. 41, pp. 92-99, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.04.013.
• 30. Stoddart, H. (2011). A Pocket Guide to Sustainable Development Governance. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
• 31. Taylor, A. (2003). Top box: Rediscovering customer satisfaction. Business Horizons, No. 5, Vol. 46, pp. 3-14, doi: 10.1016/S0007-6813(03)00065-X.
• 32. Trojanowski, T. (2015). Przedsiębiorstwa wobec wyzwań zrównoważonego rozwoju. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej. Organizacja i Zarządzanie, Iss. 77, pp. 239-246, yadda: bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171340333.
• 33. Turban, D.B., Greening, D.W. (1997). Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Attractiveness to Prospective Employees. The Academy of Management Journal, No. 3, Vol. 40, pp. 658-672, doi: 10.2307/257057.
• 34. Vare, P. Scott, W. (2007). Learning for a Change: Exploring the Relationship Between Education and Sustainable Development. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, Vol. 1, Iss. 2, pp. 191-198, doi: 10.1177/0973408207001002.