PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Powiadomienia systemowe
  • Sesja wygasła!
  • Sesja wygasła!
  • Sesja wygasła!
Tytuł artykułu

Enhancing supply chain resilience in the coal mining sector: a qualitative study

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
PL
Wzmacnianie odporności łańcucha dostaw w sektorze górnictwa węglowego: badanie jakościowe
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
This study addresses the critical need for a specialized supply chain resilience (SCR) framework tailored to the coal mining industry, an area that has received limited attention despite the sector's inherent challenges. The research aims to fill this gap by developing a resilience framework specifically designed for the coal mining sector, considering unique factors such as geological uncertainties, weather disruptions, and market volatility. Utilizing a qualitative methodology, the study conducted in-depth interviews with 22 industry professionals to gain insights into the intricacies of SCR within this context. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis, resulting in the identification of five key themes crucial to enhancing resilience in the coal supply chain: Vulnerabilities, Capabilities, Engineering Resilience, Ecological Resilience, and Evolutionary Resilience-that collectively enhance the sector's ability to withstand and adapt to disruptions. The developed framework offers actionable strategies for coal mining companies to improve operational continuity, mitigate risks, and ensure long-term sustainability in a volatile market.
PL
Niniejsze badanie odnosi się do kluczowej potrzeby opracowania specjalistycznego modelu odporności łańcucha dostaw (SCR), dostosowanego do sektora górnictwa węglowego, który mimo swoistych wyzwań zyskał dotychczas niewielką uwagę badawczą. Celem pracy jest wypełnienie tej luki poprzez stworzenie modelu odporności dostosowanego do specyfiki sektora górnictwa węglowego, z uwzględnieniem unikalnych czynników, takich jak niepewność geologiczna, zakłócenia pogodowe oraz zmienność rynkowa. Wykorzystując metodologię jakościową, przeprowadzono dogłębne wywiady z 22 specjalistami z branży, aby uzyskać wgląd w złożoności SCR w tym kontekście. Dane zostały przeanalizowane za pomocą analizy tematycznej, co pozwoliło na wyodrębnienie pięciu kluczowych tematów istotnych dla wzmacniania odporności łańcucha dostaw węgla: podatności, zdolności, odporności inżynieryjnej, odporności ekologicznej oraz odporności ewolucyjnej. Elementy te wspólnie wzmacniają zdolność sektora do wytrzymywania i adaptowania się do zakłóceń. Opracowany model oferuje praktyczne strategie dla firm zajmujących się wydobyciem węgla, mające na celu poprawę ciągłości operacyjnej, ograniczenie ryzyka oraz zapewnienie długoterminowej zrównoważoności w niestabilnych warunkach rynkowych.
Rocznik
Strony
282--296
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 49 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
  • School of Business Management, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia
  • School of Business Management, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia
  • School of Business Management, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia
Bibliografia
  • 1.Akkaş, M. A., (2018). Using wireless underground sensor networks for mine and miner safety. Wireless Networks, 24(1), 17-26.
  • 2.Ali, I., Gölgeci, I., (2019). Where is supply chain resilience research heading? A systematic and co-occurrence analysis. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 49(8), 793-815.
  • 3.Amalina, N. N., Larasati, H. E., (2020). The implementation of contractor safety management system to prevent work accidents at coal mining company. The Indonesian Journal of Occupational Safety and Health, 9(3), 338-348.
  • 4.Arabsheybani, A., Arshadi Khasmeh, A., (2021). Robust and resilient supply chain network design considering risks in food industry: flavour industry in Iran. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 16(3), 197-208.
  • 5.Barney, J., (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
  • 6.Batugina, N. S., Gavrilov, V. L. and Khoiutanov, E. A., (2020). A proposed approach in estimating the profit of coal mines under fluctuating prices. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 138, 357-366.
  • 7.Bhattacharyya, S. S., Kulkarni, O. and Mishra, A., (2022). Study of emerging avenues in supply chain resilience; the case of integration of additive manufacturing with spare parts procurement. Benchmarking.
  • 8.Brandon-Jones, E., Squire, B., Autry, C. W. and Petersen, K. J., (2014). A contingent resource-based perspective of supply chain resilience and robustness. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50(3), 55-73.
  • 9.Breeze, P., (2015). Coal-fired generation. Coal-Fired Generation, 1-92.
  • 10.Browning, T., Kumar, M., Sanders, N., Sodhi, M. S., Thürer, M. and Tortorella, G. L., (2023). From supply chain risk to system-wide disruptions: research opportunities in forecasting, risk management and product design. International Journal of Operations and Production Management.
  • 11.Brun, A., Karaosman, H. and Barresi, T., (2020). Supply chain collaboration for transparency. Sustainability, 12(11), 4429.
  • 12.Carissimi, M. C., Prataviera, L. B., Creazza, A., Melacini, M. and Dallari, F., (2023). Blurred lines: the timeline of supply chain resilience strategies in the grocery industry in the time of Covid-19. Operations Management Research, 16(1), 80-98.
  • 13.Christopher, M., Peck, H., (2004). Building the resilient supply chain. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 15(2), 1-14.
  • 14.Do, H., Budhwar, P., Shipton, H., Nguyen, H. D. and Nguyen, B., (2022). Building organizational resilience, innovation through resource-based management initiatives, organizational learning and environmental dynamism. Journal of Business Research, 141, 808-821.
  • 15.Evanthi, A., Azhar, R. M., (2023). Uncovering the relationships between strategic capability, strategic flexibility, and performance. International Journal of Science, Technology and Management, 4(1), 30-38.
  • 16.Fan, B., Guo, T., Xu, R. and Dong, W., (2021). Evolutionary game research on the impact of environmental regulation on overcapacity in coal industry. Mathematical Problems in Engineering.
  • 17.Gallopín, G. C., (2006). Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 293-303.
  • 18.Han, Y., Chong, W. K. and Li, D., (2020). A systematic literature review of the capabilities and performance metrics of supply chain resilience. International Journal of Production Research, 4541-4566.
  • 19.Heydari, S., Hoseinie, S. H., Ghodrati, B. and Kumar, U., (2020). Resilient measurement of longwall. Rudarsko-Geološko-Naftni Zbornik, 35(3), 39-44.
  • 20.Hia, A. K., Waruwu, N., Komariah, A., Kurniady, D. A., Suherlan, H., Kosov, M. E., Rykova, I., Ordov, K., Elyakova, I. and Romanenko, E., (2023). Managing coal enterprise competitiveness in the context of global challenges. Emerging Science Journal, 7(2), 589-608.
  • 21.IEA., (2020). Supply - Coal 2020 - Analysis. https://www.iea.org/reports/coal2020/supply#abstract
  • 22.Jalili-Bak, G., Bijani, M., Gholamrezai, S. and Momvandy, A., (2023). Analyzing rural people’s resilience in the face of floodwater: Evidence from Iran. Natural Hazards, 118(2), 1595-1618.
  • 23.Keenan, J., Kemp, D. and Owen, J., (2019). Corporate responsibility and the social risk of new mining technologies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(4), 752-760.
  • 24.Khaba, S., Bhar, C., (2017). Quantifying SWOT analysis for the Indian coal mining industry using Fuzzy DEMATEL. Benchmarking, 24(4), 882-902.
  • 25.Li, X., Wu, Q., Goldsby, T. J. and Holsapple, C. W., (2022). Enduring buyer-supplier relationship and buyer performance: the mediating role of buyer-supplier dyadic embeddedness and supplier external embeddedness. European Journal of Management Studies, 27(3), 291-316.
  • 26.Li, Y., Gao, J., Qian, C. and Wu, X., (2022). The mediation role of safety attitude in the impact of resilience on the safety behavior of coal miners in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022, Vol. 19, Page 15164, 19(22), 15164.
  • 27.Lim-Camacho, L., Jeanneret, T. and Hodgkinson, J. H., (2021). Towards resilient, responsive and rewarding mining: An adaptive value chains approach. Resources Policy, 74, 101465.
  • 28.Liu, Y., Gao, H., Yu, Z., Li, C., Ren, H., Zhao, Y., Huang, F., Guo, Y., Wan, M., Tian, J. and Chen, L., (2022). Managing methane emissions in abandoned coal mines: Comparison of different recovery technologies by integrating techno-economic analysis and life-cycle assessment. Environmental Science and Technology, 56(19), 13900-13908.
  • 29.Mikharji, B., (2021). India’s coal reserves hit critical lows as the global energy crisis bites. https://fortune.com/2021/10/08/india-is-on-the-brink-of-an-energy-crisis-as-coalreserves-hit-critical-lows/
  • 30.Mishra, R., Singh, R. K. and Subramanian, N., (2022). Impact of disruptions in agri-food supply chain due to COVID-19 pandemic: contextualised resilience framework to achieve operational excellence. International Journal of Logistics Management, 33(3), 926-954.
  • 31.Pancasila, I., Haryono, S. and Sulistyo, B. A., (2020). Effects of work motivation and leadership toward work satisfaction and employee performance: Evidence from Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(6), 387-397.
  • 32.Pang, C., Shi, Y., Wang, X., Li, B. and Luan, H., (2022). Study on a high-efficiency mining technology system for gas outburst in coal seams—Example of an H coal mine. Minerals, 12(7), 795.
  • 33.Poberschnigg, T. F. S., Pimenta, M. L. and Hilletofth, P., (2020). How can cross-functional integration support the development of resilience capabilities? The case of collaboration in the automotive industry. Supply Chain Management, 25(6), 789-801.
  • 34.Ponomarov, S. Y., Holcomb, M. C., (2009). Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 20(1), 124-143.
  • 35.Pratiwi, Narendra, B. H., Siregar, C. A., Turjaman, M., Hidayat, A., Rachmat, H. H., Mulyanto, B., Suwardi, Iskandar, Maharani, R., Rayadin, Y., Prayudyaningsih, R., Yuwati, T. W., Prematuri, R. and Susilowati, A., (2021). Managing and reforesting degraded post-mining landscape in Indonesia: A Review. Land, 10(6), 658.
  • 36.Pudasainee, D., Kurian, V. and Gupta, R., (2020). Coal: Past, present, and future sustainable use. Future Energy: Improved, Sustainable and Clean Options for Our Planet, 21-48.
  • 37.Qarahasanlou, A. N., Garmabaki, A. H. S., Kasraei, A. and Barabady, J., (2024). Climate change impacts on mining value chain: A systematic literature review. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, 115-128.
  • 38.Rajesh, R., Ravi, V., (2015). Modeling enablers of supply chain risk mitigation in electronic supply chains: A Grey-DEMATEL approach. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 87, 126-139.
  • 39.Scholten, K., Schilder, S., (2015). The role of collaboration in supply chain resilience. Supply Chain Management, 20(4), 471-484.
  • 40.Shin, N., Park, S., (2021). Supply chain leadership driven strategic resilience capabilities management: A leader-member exchange perspective. Journal of Business Research, 122, 1-13.
  • 41.Söderholm, K., Söderholm, P., Helenius, H., Pettersson, M., Viklund, R., Masloboev, V., Mingaleva, T. and Petrov, V., (2015). Environmental regulation and competitiveness in the mining industry: Permitting processes with special focus on Finland, Sweden and Russia. Resources Policy, 43, 130-142.
  • 42.Taseer, M. I., Ahmed, A., (2022). The most effective leadership style in pursuit of resilient supply chain: Sequential mediation of flexibility and agile supply chain. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Science, 16(3), 387-423.
  • 43.Tran, T. T. T., Pham, H. K. and Nguyen, H. M., (2022). Assessing the impact of climate change on Ha Tu coal mine, Quang Ninh province. Journal of Mining and Earth Sciences, 63(3), 17-25.
  • 44.Wang, J., Huang, Y., Zhai, W., Li, J., Ouyang, S., Gao, H., Liu, Y. and Wang, G., (2023). Research on coal mine safety management based on digital twin. Heliyon, 9(3), e13608.
  • 45.Weldy, T. G., Gillis, W. E., (2010). The learning organization: Variations at different organizational levels. Learning Organization, 17(5), 455-470.
  • 46.Wipulanusat, W., Sunkpho, J. and Stewart, R. A., (2021). Effect of cross-departmental collaboration on performance: Evidence from the Federal Highway Administration. Sustainability, 13, 6024.
  • 47.You, Q., Yao, Q., Song, R., Yu, K., Xu, C., Cao, H. and Tungsten, J., (2022). Investigation and application of multi-dimensional safety risk evaluation index system for coal mines in South China.
  • 48.Zeng, L., Liu, S. Q., Kozan, E., Corry, P. and Masoud, M., (2021). A comprehensive interdisciplinary review of mine supply chain management. Resources Policy, 74, 102274.
  • 49.Zhou, B., Hatherly, P., (2014). Fault and dyke detectability in high resolution seismic surveys for coal: A view from numerical modelling. Exploration Geophysics, 45(3), 223-233.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr POPUL/SP/0154/2024/02 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki II" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki (2025).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-3718f9f9-3260-4ea7-8f98-7567f2413dde
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.