Managerial-systemic profile of a tourism company

• Autorzy: Dumitru A. , Budica A. B. , Motoi A. G.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17512/pjms.2016.13.2.04

Warianty tytułu

PL

Menedżersko-systemowy profil firmy turystycznej

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This study aims to clarify managerial and systemic specific of a tourism company. Used method is meta-analytic and integrative one. Our contribution consists of detaching a functional generic profile of a tourism company takes place within organizations ontology (vocabulary, systematic and taxonomy). Tourism company is individualized on two directions: as managerial structure and as social system. It follows that the tourism company is a systemic social structure and a working-functioning managerial structure. We emphasize that as a systemic-managerial structure enhanced tourism company presents five features: 1) a set of touristic aims; 2) a series of functions for achieving the aims; 3) means for achieving touristic aims; 4) certain symbols that define the tourism company's identity; 5) internal rules and regulations for tourism company's employees.

PL

Badanie to ma na celu wyjaśnienie menedżerskiej i systemowej specyfiki firmy turystycznej. Zastosowano metodę meta-analityczną i integracyjną. Nasz wkład składa się z odłączenia funkcjonalnego ogólnego profilu firmy turystycznej, który znajduje się wewnątrz ontologii organizacji (słownictwo, systematyka i taksonomia). Firma turystyczna zindywidualizowana jest w dwóch kierunkach: jako struktura kierownicza, oraz jako system społeczny. Podkreślamy, że jako wzmocniona systemowo-menedżerską strukturą, firma turystyczna przedstawia pięć cech: 1) zestaw celów turystycznych; 2) serię funkcji dla osiągnięcia celów; 3) środki do osiągnięcia celów turystycznych; 4) pewne symbole, które definiują tożsamość firmy turystycznej; 5) wewnętrzne zasady i regulacje dla pracowników firmy turystycznej.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

tourism company; organization; system; tourism company profile

PL

firma turystyczna; organizacja; system; profil firmy turystycznej

• Wydawca: Czestochowa University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Management Studies
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: Vol. 13, No. 2
• Strony: 36--45
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 42 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Dumitru A.

• University of Craiova

autor

Budica A. B.

• University of Craiova

autor

Motoi A. G.

• University of Craiova

Bibliografia

• 1. Aldrich H., 1999, Organizations evolving, Sage.
• 2. Aron G., Caprarescu G., Stancu D.G., 2013, Organisation of human resources in tourism company-job evaluation, based on method score, “Calitatea”, 14(2).
• 3. Bednarska M.A., Olszewski M., 2013, Organisational determinants of Employer Image: A case of the Tourism Industry in Poland, “Turismo y Sociedad”, 14.
• 4. Bottazzi E., Ferrario R., 2005, A path to an ontology of organizations, Proceedings of International EDOC Workshop on Vocabularies, Ontologies and Rules for The Enterprise, VORTE 2005.
• 5. Budică I., Dumitru-Traistaru A., 2015, The Ascending Trend of Environmental Marketing in the Current Austerity/Crisis Period, “Polish Journal of Environmental Studies”, 24(5).
• 6. Calotă T.-O., 2015, Opinions on the impact of accounting policies on tourist entities’ competitiveness, “Research in socio-economic sciences, technologies of information society, energy and environment”, 3.
• 7. Daft R., 2012, Organization theory and design, Cengage learning.
• 8. Devine D.J., 2002, A review and integration of classification systems relevant to teams in organizations, “Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice”, 6(4).
• 9. Dietz J.L., 2006, What is Enterprise Ontology?, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
• 10. Donaldson L., 2001, The contingency theory of organizations, Sage.
• 11. Drucker P.F., Chamy J.A., Conger J.A., 2000, Organizaţia viitorului, Teora.
• 12. Goeldner C.R., Ritchie J.B., 2006, Tourism: Principles, practices, philosophies, John Wiley & Sons.
• 13. Grabara J., Man M., 2014, Assessment of logistic outlays in industrial solid waste management, “Social Sciences and Education Research Review”, 1(2).
• 14. Grabara I., 2014, The Innovative Methods of Future Professional Staff Education, “Polish Journal of Management Studies”, 10(1).
• 15. Handy C., 2006, Understanding Organizations (4th ed.), London: Penguin Books.
• 16. Hatch M.J., Cunliffe A.L., 2012, Organization theory: modern, symbolic and postmodern perspectives, Oxford University Press.
• 17. Johns G., 1996, Managerial behavior: Understanding and managing life at work, HarperCollins College Publishers.
• 18. McKelvey B., 1975, Guidelines for the empirical classification of organizations, “Administrative Science Quarterly”, 509-525.
• 19. McKelvey B., 1982, Managerial systematics--taxonomy, evolution, classification, Univ. of California Press.
• 20. Mehmetoglu M., Normann Ø., 2013, What influences tourists' overall holiday experience? Tourism company products versus destination products, “European Journal of Tourism Research”, 6(2).
• 21. Mill R.C., Morrison A.M., 2002, The tourism system, Kendall Hunt.
• 22. Mintzberg H., 1981, Organization design: fashion or fit? Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University.
• 23. Muscalu E., 2015, Human resources in the organization and their motivation, Scientific Bulletin" Mircea cel Batran" Naval Academy, 18(1).
• 24. Mutch A., 1993, Successful use of information technology in a small tourism enterprise: the case of Country Holidays, “The Journal of Strategic Information Systems”, 2(3).
• 25. Nagy A., 2010, Abordări teoretice privind practica managementului inovării în turism, “Management Intercultural”, 22.
• 26. Negrea X., 2015, Public Interest, Procedural and Discursive Limitations, “Social Sciences and Education Research Review”, 2(1).
• 27. Oprean C., Țîțu M., 2008, Quality Management in Economy and Organization Based on Knowledge, Bucharest: AGIR.
• 28. Page S., Connell J., 2006, Tourism: A modern synthesis, Cengage Learning EMEA.
• 29. Popescu M., 2007, Analiza şi evaluarea proiectelor de investiţii ale firmelor din turism, “Revista de turism-studii si cercetari in turism”, 4.
• 30. Rich P., 1992, The managerial taxonomy: Definition and design, “Academy of Management Review”, 17(4).
• 31. Scott W.R., 2013, Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities, Sage Publications.
• 32. Scutariu A.L., 2006, Aspecte referitoare la mediul extern al firmei din domeniul turismului şi principalele destinaţii turistice din România, “Revista de turism-studii si cercetari in turism”, 2.
• 33. Smarandache F., Vlăduțescu Ș., 2014, Towards a Practical Communication Intervention, “Revista de cercetare şi intervenţie socială”, 46.
• 34. Smith D.E., 2001, Texts and the ontology of organizations and institutions, “Studies in Cultures, Organizations and Societies”, 7(2).
• 35. Stănescu G.C., 2015, Breaking News and News Alert, between Information and Spectacle for Rating, “Social Sciences and Education Research Review”, 2(2).
• 36. Teodorescu B., Călin R.-A., 2015, The Base Articulations of the Liminality Concept, “Review of European Studies”, 7(12).
• 37. Thompson J.D., 2011, Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory, Vol. 1, Transaction publishers.
• 38. Turcu D., Weisz J., 2008, Economia turismului, Timişoara: Eurostampa.
• 39. Vlăduțescu Ș., Budică I., Dumitru A., Stănescu G.C., 2015, Functions and Forms of Managerial Communication, “Polish Journal of Management Studies”, 12(2).
• 40. Vlăduţescu Ş., Grabara J., Kot S., 2015, Aristotelian Opening Way and Actual Argumentation and Demonstration‘s profile, “Analele Universităţii din Craiova. Seria Filosofie”, 36.
• 41. Voinea D.V., 2015, The journalists’ obligation of protecting the victims of sexual assault, “Social Sciences and Education Research Review”, 2(1).
• 42. Weick K.E., 1995, Sensemaking in organizations, Vol. 3, Sage.

Uwagi

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę.