Business targets and corporate governance models

• Autorzy: Samborski Adam

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2022.157.27

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to compare the management practices of American, German and Polish enterprises in the cross-section of business objectives analysed. Design/methodology/approach: The paper assumes that the differences in setting business objectives result from the differences in corporate governance models. The study used the Kruskal-Wallis One-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks and multiple comparisons of mean ranks for all samples. Findings: The study found that some of the management practices of German, Polish and American enterprises differed across business objectives. However, differences in management practices did not always coincide with differences in corporate governance models. The research shows that corporate governance institutions do not always explain existing differences in management practices, and that the setting of business objectives also depends on other factors. Originality/value: The conducted research enriches the literature in the area of strategic management by issues concerning the determinants of setting business goals in enterprises.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

practices; business target; corporate governance models; differences in management

PL

praktyki

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: z. 157
• Strony: 431--445
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 48 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Samborski Adam

• University of Economics in Katowice, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7330-5866

Bibliografia

• 1. Digit SIC (Standard Industrial Classification) Codes, https://mckimmoncenter.ncsu.edu/2digitsiccodes-2/, 05.02.2022.
• 2. Adamska, A. (2013). Własność i kontrola. Perspektywa akcjonariuszy spółek publicznych.Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza, Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie.
• 3. Adungo, B.I. (2012). Are Corporate Governance Systems Converging Towards a Model Based on Shareholder Primacy and Dispersed Ownership Structure? The IUP Journal of Corporate Governance, Vol. XI, No. 4, pp. 69-79.
• 4. Aluchna, M., and Tomczyk, E. (2016). Dynamika struktury własności. Przypadek spółek notowanych na GPW w Warszawie. Management Forum, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 26-32, DOI: 10.15611/mf.2016.4.04 .
• 5. Bloom, N., Lemos, R., Sadun, R., Scur, D., and Van Reenen, J. (2021a). World Management Survey – Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/OY6CBK, Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:6:k5xYE9W6U534XDiWu3RjrA== [fileUNF].
• 6. Bloom, N., Lemos, R., Sadun, R., Scur, D., and Van Reenen, J. (2021b). World Management Survey – Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/OY6CBK, Harvard Dataverse, V1; readme.txt [fileName].
• 7. Bloom, N., Lemos, R., Sadun, R., Scur, D., and Van Reenen, J. (2021c). World Management Survey – Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/OY6CBK, Harvard Dataverse, V1; wmsdata_2004_2015.tab [fileName], UNF:6:k5xYE9W6U534XDiWu3RjrA==[fileUNF].
• 8. Bloom, N., Lemos, R., Sadun, R., Scur, D., and Van Reenen, J. (2021d). World Management Survey – Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/OY6CBK, Harvard Dataverse, V1; wms_manufacturing_2010surveyinstrument.pdf [fileName].
• 9. Casper, S. (2001, Reprinted 2004). The Legal Framework for Corporate Governance: The Influence of Contract Law on Company Strategies in Germany and the United States. In: P.A. Hall, D. Soskice, Varieties of Capitalism, The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (pp. 387-416). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
• 10. Desender, K.A., LópezPuertas-Lamy, M., Pattitoni, P., and Petracci, B. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and cost of financing – The importance of the international corporate governance system. Corp. Govern. Int. Rev., Vol. 28, pp. 207-234. DOI: 10.1111/corg.12312.
• 11. Edwards, T. (2004). Corporate Governance, Industrial Relations and Trends in Company 19 Level Restructuring in Europe: Convergence Towards The Anglo-American Model? Industrial Relations Journal, Vol. 35, Iss. 6, pp. 518-535.
• 12. Franks, J.R. and Mayer, C. (2017). Evolution of Ownership and Control Around the World: The Changing Face of Capitalism. European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI) – Finance Working Paper No. 503/2017, Retrieved from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2954589 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2954589 , 28.12.2021.
• 13. Gilson, R.J. (2000). Globalizing Corporate Governance: Convergence of Form or Function. Columbia Law School, The Center for Law and Economic Studies, Working Paper No. 174, Stanford Law School, John M. Olin Program in Law and Economics, Working Paper No. 192, Retrieved from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=229517 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.229517, 30.12.2021.
• 14. Hansmann, H., and Kraakman, R.H. (2000). The End of History for Corporate Law. Retrieved from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=204528 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.204528 , 30.12.2021.
• 15. Harvard Dataverse, World Management Survey – Manufacturing. Available online https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/OY6CBK, 1.02.2022.
• 16. Hofstede, G. (2004). Business Goals and Corporate Governance. Asia Pacific Business Review, Vol. 10, Iss. 3/4, pp. 292-301, DOI: 10.1080/1360238042000264379.
• 17. Holmes, A., Illowsky, B., and Dean, S. (2018). Introductory Business Statistics. Houston: Rice University, OpenStax. Retrieved from https://openstax.org/details/books/introductory 3 business-statistics , 03.02.2022.
• 18. Howe, W.S. (1986). Corporate Strategy. Hampshire, London: Macmillan.
• 19. Jackson, G., and Moerke, A. (2005), Continuity and Change in Corporate Governance: comparing Germany and Japan. Corporate Governance, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 351-361.
• 20. Jensen, M.C. (2001). Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function. Tuck Business School Working Paper No. 01-09; Harvard NOM Research Paper No. 01-01; Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 00-058, Retrieved from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=220671 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.220671 30.12.2021.
• 21. Kozioł, L. (2008). Problemy ładu korporacyjnego w sektorze prywatnym i publicznym.
• Zeszyty Naukowe, No. 6. Kraków: Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne, pp. 305-322.
• 22. Kruskal, W.H., and Wallis W.A. (1952). Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 47, No. 260, pp. 583-621. http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0162-1459%28195212%2947%3A260%3C583%3AUORIOV%3E2.0.CO%3B2-A.
• 23. Łudzińska, K., and Zdziarski M. (2013). Interesariusze w opinii prezesów zarządów polskich przedsiębiorstw. Kwartalnik Nauk o Przedsiębiorstwie, Vol. 2, pp. 41-49.
• 24. Maassen, G.F. (2002). An International Comparison of Corporate Governance Models: A Study on the Formal Independence and Convergence of One-tier and Two-tier Corporate Boards of Directors in the Unites States of America, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. Ph.D. Series in General Management, Nr 31. Rotterdam School of Management, Amsterdam: Spencer Stuart.
• 25. Mayer, B.W., Dale, K.M., and Fox, M.L. (2020). The Effects of Goal Clarity and Goal Commitment on Performance in a Business Strategy Game. Business Education Innovation Journal, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 62-69.
• 26. Meier H.H., and Meier N.C. (2014). Corporate Governance: An Examination of U.S. and European Models. Corporate Ownership & Control, Vol. 11, Iss. 2, Continued – 3, pp. 347-351.
• 27. Mintz, S.M. (2005). Corporate Governance in an International Context: Legal Systems, Financing Patterns and Cultural Variables. Corporate Governance, Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 582-597.
• 28. North, D.C. (1992). Transaction Costs, Institutions, and Economic Performance. An International Center for Economic Growth Publication. San Francisco, California: ICS Press.
• 29. OECD (2004). Zasady nadzoru korporacyjnego OECD. OECD, Ministerstwo Skarbu Państwa. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/daf/ca/corporategovernanceprinciples/34656740.pdf, 26.01.2022.
• 30. Palepu, K., Khanna, T., and Kogan, J. (2002). Globalization and Similarities in Corporate Governance: A Cross-Country Analysis. Harvard NOM Working Paper No. 02-31; Strategy Unit Working Paper No. 02-041; Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 02-041, Retrieved from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=323621 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.323621, 30.12.2021.
• 31. Praveen Bhasa, M. (2004). Understanding the corporate governance quadrilateral. Corporate Governance, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 7-15, https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700410558844 .
• 32. Rabiej, M. (2012). Statystyka z programem Statistica. Gliwice: Helion.
• 33. Rossouw, G.J. (2009). The ethics of corporate governance. Global convergence or divergence? International Journal of Law and Management, Vol. 51, Iss. 1, pp. 43-51, DOI 10.1108/17542430910936673.
• 34. Schmidt, R.H., and Tyrell, M. (1997). Financial Systems, Corporate Finance and Corporate Governance. European Financial Management, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 333-361.
• 35. Sheskin, D. (2000). Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures. Boca Raton-London-New York-Washington DC: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.
• 36. Siegel, S. (1956). Nonparametric Statistics: For The Behavioral Sciences. New York 18 Toronto-London: Mcgraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.
• 37. Śmigielski, W. Wykonywanie analizy statystycznej z wykorzystaniem pakietu Statistica. Statistica. Odc. 6. Test ANOVA Kruskala-Wallisa, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owc6_QiIbp4, 05.02.2022.
• 38. Śmigielski, W., Gajda, R., Małek, Ł., and Drygas, W. (2020). Goalkeepers Live Longer than Field Players: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis Based on World-Class Football Players. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 17, No. 17, 6297. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176297.
• 39. Stoner, J.A.F., and Wankel, C. (1994). Kierowanie. Warszawa: PWE.
• 40. Testy, K.Y. (2002). Commentary: Convergence as Movement: Toward a Counter 28 Hegemonic Approach to Corporate Governance. Law & Policy, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 433-440.
• 41. Thomsen, S. (2003). The Convergence of Corporate Governance Systems to European and Anglo-American Standards. European Business Organization Law Review, Vol. 4, pp. 31-50.
• 42. TIBCO Software Inc. (2017). Statistica (data analysis software system), version 13. http://statistica.io.
• 43. Tricker, B. (2019). Corporate Governance: Principles, Policies, and Practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• 44. Vitols, S. (2001, Reprinted 2004). Varieties of Corporate Governance: Comparing Germany and the UK. In: P.A. Hall, and D. Soskice (Eds), Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (pp. 337-360). Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press.
• 45. Weimer, J., and Pape, J.C. (1999). A Taxonomy of Systems of Corporate Governance. Corporate Governance, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 152-166.
• 46. West, A. (2009). Corporate Governance Convergence and Moral Relativism. Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 17, Iss. 1, pp. 107-119.
• 47. Yoshikawa, T., and Rasheed, A.A. (2009). Convergence of Corporate Governance: Critical Review and Future Directions. Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 17, Iss. 3, pp. 388-404.
• 48. Yoshikawa, T., Zhu, H., and Wang, P. (2014). National Governance System, Corporate Ownership, and Roles of Outside Directors: A Corporate Governance Bundle Perspective. Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 22, Iss. 3, pp. 252-265.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).