Tytuł artykułu
Autorzy
Treść / Zawartość
Pełne teksty:
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
The article examines the potential of buckwheat cultivation as an ecologically oriented crop, which, due to its biological and economic characteristics, can generate profits and contribute to improving the ecological state of production. Buckwheat, being a high-yielding and environmentally friendly crop, has the potential to become an important component of the agricultural sector. Currently, it may not yield as high as corn, sunflower, or soybeans, but buckwheat cultivation allows for profit generation that surpasses most other grain and legume crops, particularly when compared to winter wheat production. Due to its unique properties, buckwheat is valuable in many aspects: it can be used as a soil precursor and improver in agriculture, is an important source of honey, and contains many nutrients that can be utilized to create functional products with medicinal and health properties. The use of organic cultivation methods and the application of organic biostimulant fertilisers, such as “Vermimag”, can significantly improve the growth and development of buckwheat, increase its competitiveness, yield, and the economic efficiency of organic production. According to research results, the best conditions for the growth and development of plants, increasing branching and the number of inflorescences, fruit set, and productivity of buckwheat were achieved by combining buckwheat seed treatment with two-time spraying of crops with the organic fertilizer “Vermimag”. Variants where organic fertilizer was applied showed better development of buckwheat plants, increased branching, and ultimately increased buckwheat yield.
Słowa kluczowe
Wydawca
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
235--242
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 31 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
autor
- Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University 57 Shevchenko Street, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76018, Ukraine
autor
- Precarpathian State Agricultural Research Station of the Institute of Agriculture of the Carpathian Region, National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, 21a Stepan Bandera Street, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76014, Ukraine
autor
- Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University 57 Shevchenko Street, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76018, Ukraine
- Precarpathian State Agricultural Research Station of the Institute of Agriculture of the Carpathian Region, National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, 21a Stepan Bandera Street, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76014, Ukraine
autor
- Bila Tserkva National Agrarian University 8/1, Soborna Square, Bila Tserkva, Kyiv region, Ukraine
autor
- National Scientific Agricultural Library of NAAS, 10, Heroiv Oborony Street, Kyiv, 03127, Ukraine
autor
- National Scientific Agricultural Library of NAAS, 10, Heroiv Oborony Street, Kyiv, 03127, Ukraine
autor
- Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University 57 Shevchenko Street, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76018, Ukraine
autor
- Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University 57 Shevchenko Street, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76018, Ukraine
autor
- Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University 57 Shevchenko Street, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76018, Ukraine
autor
- Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University 57 Shevchenko Street, Ivano-Frankivsk, 76018, Ukraine
Bibliografia
- 1. Arai Y., Watanabe S., Kimura M., Shimoi K., Mochizuki R., Kinae N. 2000. Dietary intakes of flavonols, flavones and isoflavones by Japanese women and the inverse correlation between quercetin intake and plasma LDL cholesterol concentration. The Journal of Nutrition, 130(9), 2243–2250. doi: 10.1093/jn/130.9.2243
- 2. Burdyha V.M. 2017. Podilska tekhnolohiia vyroshchuvannia hrechky. Ahrobiznes Sohodni, 10, 56–59 [in Ukrainian].
- 3. Buzynnyi M.V. 2015. Produktyvnist pshenytsi ozymoi zalezhno vid poperednykiv. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats NNTs “Instytut zemlerobstva NAAN”, 2, 106– 116 [in Ukrainian].
- 4. De Ponti T., Rijk B., Van Ittersum M.K. 2012. The crop yield gap between organic and conventional agriculture. Agric. Syst., 108, 1–9. [CrossRef].
- 5. Farooq S., UlRehman R., Pirzadah T.B., Malik B., AhmadDar F., Tahir I. 2016. Chapter twenty three – Cultivation, Agronomic Practices, and Growth Performance of Buckwheat. Mol. Breed. Nutr. Asp. Buckwheat, 16, 299–319. [CrossRef].
- 6. Gebremedhn H., Tadesse A., Belay T. 2014. Relating climatic factors to foraging behavior of honeybees (Apis mellifera) during blooming period of Guizotia abyssinica (L.F.). Livest. Res. Rural Dev. 26, 2–7. Available online: http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd26/4/haft260 60.html (accessed on 1 August 2022).
- 7. Gondola I., Papp P. 2010. Origin, geographical distribution and phylogenic relationships of common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench.). Eur. J. Plant Sci. Biotechnol. 4, 17–32.
- 8. Grahi´c J., Ðiki´c M., Gadžo D., Uzonovi´c M., Oki´c A., Kurtovi´c M., Gaši F. 2016. Analysis of agronomic practices of buckwheat producers in Bosnia and Hercogovina. Rad. Poljopr. Fac. Univ. U Sarajev. 61, 21–30.
- 9. Horiuchi T., Mizuno T., Umenura M., Ando Y. 1996. Fertilizer response of buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) in comparison between chemical fertilizers and farmyard manure at diferent altitudes. Curr. Adv. Buckwheat Res. 615–626.
- 10. Hryshchenko, R. Liubchych, O. 2016. Vyroshchuvannia hrechky v pisliaukisnykh posivakh. Propozytsiia, 6, 46–48 [in Ukrainian].
- 11. Iezerkovskyi A.V. 2017. Vplyv tekhnolo hichnykh zakhodiv vyroshchuvannia na vyrobnytstvo orhanichnoi produktsii zernovykh kultur na torfovykh gruntakh. Zb. nauk. prats Umanskoho NU sadivnytstva; ch.1. silskohospodarski nauky. Uman, UNUS, 91(1), 226–235.
- 12. Ikanovic J., Rakic S., Popovi´c V., Jankovic S., Glamoclija D., Kuzevski J. 2013. Agro-ecological conditions and morpho-productive properties of buckwheat. Biotechnol. Anim. Husb. 29, 555–562. [CrossRef].
- 13. Inoue N., Hagiwara M., Kim H.Y., Matano T. 1998. A preliminary study for modeling seed production in common buckwheat. Fagopyrum. 15, 35–41.
- 14. Ivanyshyn V.V., Shuvar I.A., Tsentylo L.V., Kolisnyk N.M. Sendetskyi, V.M. 2016. Vyroshchuvannia hrechky u promizhnykh posivakh. Ahrobiznes sohodni, 11, 44–46 [in Ukrainian].
- 15. Jacquemart A.L., Cawoy V., Kinet J.M., Ledent J.F., Quinet M. 2012. Is Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) Still a Valuable Crop Today? Eur. J. Plant Sci. Biotechnol. 6, 1–10. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/120564 (accessed on 1 August 2022).
- 16. Kvasnitska L.S., Tymoshchuk P.M. 2018. Buckwheat productivity in short-rotation crop rotations of the Right Bank Forest Steppe. Scientific horizons. 7–8(70), 83–90.
- 17. Maleti´c R., Jevdjovi´c R. 2003. The influence of meteorological conditions on major quantitative and qulitative traits of buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench.). J. Agric. Sci. 48, 11–19. [CrossRef].
- 18. Malynka L.V., Shyshkina K.I. Kozak L.A. 2020. Stan ta vyrobnyctvo organichnoi’ produkcii v Ukraini. Vyroshhuvannja grechky za zastosuvannja biopreparativ. Zbirnyk naukovyh prac «Agrobiologija», 2, 90–97.
- 19. Park C.H., Kim Y.B., Choi Y.S. Lee, H.B. 2000. Rutin content in food, products processed-from groats, leaves and-flowers of buckwheat. Fagopyrum, 17, 63–66.
- 20. Poltoretskyi S.P. 2012. Vplyv osoblyvostei ahrotekhniky na urozhainist i yakist zerna riznykh sortiv hrechky v umovakh Pravoberezhnoho Lisostepu Ukrainy [Influence of peculiarities of agrotechnics on yield and quality of grain of various varieties of buckwheat in the conditions of the Right Bank Forest-steppe of Ukraine]. Visnyk Poltavskoi derzhavnoi ahrarnoi akademii, 1, 55–59 [in Ukrainian].
- 21. Popovi´c V., Sikora V., Glamoclija D., Simic D. 2013. Influence of agro-ecological conditions and foliar fertilization on yield and yield components of buckwheat in conventional and organic cropping system. Biotechnol. Anim. Husb., 29, 537–546. [CrossRef].
- 22. Popovic V., Sikora V., Berenji, J. Janoš B. 2014. Analysis of buckwheat production in the world and Serbia. Econ. Agric. 6, 53–62. [CrossRef].
- 23. Romanovskaja D., Razukas A., Asakaviciute R. 2016. Impact of hydrothermal conditions on common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench.) productivity. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 14, 137–150. [CrossRef].
- 24. Romanovskaja D., Razukas A., Asakaviciute R. 2022. Influence of Morphostructural Elements for Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) Productivity in Different Agricultural Systems. Plants. 11, 23–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11182382
- 25. Shuvar A.M., Rudanska N.M., Begen L.L., Dorota H.M. 2019. The influence of biological preparations for seed treatment under the organic technology of buckwheat cultivation. Foothill and mountain agriculture and animal husbandry. 66, 184–194.
- 26. Trygub O.V., Kutsenko O.M., Lyashenko V.V., Nogin V.V. 2022. The importance of growing buckwheat as a unique and ecologically oriented crop. PDAA Bulletin. 1, 69–76.
- 27. Tryhub O.V., Zaika Ye. V., Karazhbei, P.P. 2018. Tetraploidna hrechka yak syderalna kultura v orhanichnomu zemlerobstvi. Zemlerobstvo, 1, 51–54. [In Ukrainian].
- 28. Ushkarenko V.O., Vozhegova R.A., Holoborodko S.P., Kokovihin S.V. 2020. Metodyka polovogo doslidu (Zroshuvalne zemlerobstvo). Navchalnyi posibnyk. Kherson: Oldi-Plus. 448. [In Ukrainian].
- 29. Woo S.H., Kamal A.H., Choi J.-S. 2010. Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench.): Concepts, Prospects and Potential. Eur. J. Plant Sci. Biotechnol. 4, 1–16.
- 30. Ya. Hryhoriv, U. Karbivska, O. Turak, Y. Chernevyi, V. Oliinyk, I. Koliadzhyn, A. Savchyn, P. Dmytryk, V. Gniezdilova, N. Asanishvili. 2023. Study of the Qualitative State of Podzolized Black Soil in Short-Term Crop Rotations. Ecological Engineering and Environmental Technology, 24(7), 98–104.
- 31. Žvikas V., Pukeleviˇciene V., Ivanauskas L., Romanovskaja D., Jakštas V. 2017. Evaluation of phenolic antioxidant content in organically and conventionally grown buckwheat herb crop and its regrowth. J. Sci. Food Agric. 97, 3278–3283. doi:10.1002/jsfa.8176
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-36f89b75-0efd-4b0d-b1ca-ed7141626f39