Long-term relationship estimation and coupling/decoupling analysis between motorway traffic and Gross Value Added. Specification of an ARDL cointegration approach and application to the Italian case study

• Autorzy: Pampigna Andrea , Mauro Raffaele

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0015.5393

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

As transportation is an activity derived from spatial complementarities between a certain supply at an origin and a certain demand at a destination, according to a general axiom it seems that economic activities entail transport demand. In this perspective, an essential analysis deals with the quantification of the relationships between transport demand and certain socioeconomic variables. Elasticity is a concept widely used in transport economics as a measure of the responsiveness of transport demand concerning different factors represented as independent variables in an econometric model and coupling/decoupling concepts have been proposed in literature. This paper deals with the estimation of elasticities of motorway traffic demand based on Gross Value Added (GVA), and the consequent investigation of coupling/decoupling situation. The analysis is based on the application of an Autoregressive-Distributed Lag (ARDL) cointegration model with the F-bound test and of the related Error Correction model. Starting from the general ARDL model and the methodology for the verification of its robustness, the same model is applied to the Italian toll road network. The time series of GVA for goods and services and the overall length of the toll network from 1995 to 2019 are considered as explanatory variables of the total annual distance traveled by light and heavy vehicles. The various tests in the ARDL framework show a cointegration between the variables, under the fulfillment of all the diagnostic requirements. In this way, the long-term elasticities and the short-term adjustment dynamics are estimated separately for the goods and services components of GVA, and light and heavy vehicles. Starting from stable estimates of elasticities, the long-term coupling and decoupling effects between motorway traffic of light and heavy vehicles and the national production of goods and services can be shown. The paper, as well as providing an updated picture of the Italian situation, identifies a methodological framework that can be transferred to other contexts for a sector of great interest to investors, such as the motorway sector. All this can be useful to meet the needs of numerous stakeholders, who want to deepen the links between the economic cycle and traffic demand on toll motorways.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

toll roads; motorway; traffic; cointegration; transport studies; error-correction model; Italian case study

PL

drogi płatne; ruch na autostradzie; kointegracja; badania transportowe; model korekcji błędów; studium przypadku włoskie

• Wydawca: Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Transport
• Czasopismo: Archives of Transport
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 60, iss. 4
• Strony: 39--56
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 70 poz., tab., wykr., wzory

Twórcy

autor

Pampigna Andrea

• DICAM, University of Trento, Trento, Italy

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8473-7936

autor

Mauro Raffaele

• DICAM, University of Trento, Trento, Italy

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1267-9335

Bibliografia

• [1] ACHOUR, H., BELLOUMI, M., 2016. Investigating the causal relationship between transport infrastructure, transport energy consumption and economic growth in Tunisia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 56, 988–998.
• [2] ADEDOYIN, F.F., BEKUN, F.V., DRIHA, O.M., BALSALOBRE-LORENTE, D., 2020. The effects of air transportation, energy, ICT and FDI on economic growth in the industry 4.0 era: Evidence from the United States. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 160, 120297.
• [3] AGNOLUCCI, P., BONILLA, D., 2009. UK freight demand: elasticities and decoupling. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy (JTEP) 43, 317–344.
• [4] AISCAT, n.d. Bollettini semestrali.
• [5] ALISES, A., VASSALLO, J.M., 2015. Comparison of road freight transport trends in Europe. Coupling and decoupling factors from an Input-Output structural decomposition analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 82, 141–157.
• [6] ALISES, A., VASSALLO, J.M., GUZMÁN, A.F., 2014. Road freight transport decoupling: A comparative analysis between the United Kingdom and Spain. Transport Policy 32, 186–193.
• [7] BADSHAH, W., BULUT, M., 2020. Model Selection Procedures in Bounds Test of Cointegration: Theoretical Comparison and Empirical Evidence. Economies 8, 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies8020049.
• [8] BALSALOBRE-LORENTE, D., DRIHA, O.M., BEKUN, F.V., ADEDOYIN, F.F., 2021. The asymmetric impact of air transport on economic growth in Spain: fresh evidence from the tourism-led growth hypothesis. Current issues in tourism 24, 503–519.
• [9] BAMFORD, C.G., 2006. Transport economics. Heinemann, London.
• [10] BANERJEE, A., LUMSDAINE, R.L., STOCK, J.H., 1992. Recursive and sequential tests of the unit-root and trend-break hypotheses: theory and international evidence. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 10, 271–287.
• [11] BANISTER, D., 2012. Transport and economic development: reviewing the evidence. Transport Reviews 32, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2011.603283.
• [12] BRIDA, J.G., BUKSTEIN, D., ZAPATA-AGUIRRE, S., 2016a. Dynamic relationship between air transport and economic growth in Italy: a time series analysis. International Journal of Aviation Management 3, 52–67.
• [13] BRIDA, J.G., RODRÍGUEZ-BRINDIS, M.A., ZAPATA-AGUIRRE, S., 2016b. Causality between economic growth and air transport expansion: empirical evidence from Mexico. World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research 6, 1–15.
• [14] BROWN, R.L., DURBIN, J., EVANS, J.M., 1975. Techniques for testing the constancy of regression relationships over time. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 37, 149–163.
• [15] CHAMIER GLISZCZYŃSKI, N., 2011. Sustainable operation of a transport system in cities. Key Engineering Materials, 486, 175-178. Trans Tech Publications Ltd. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.486.175.
• [16] CHAMIER-GLISZCZYŃSKI, N., 2012a. Modeling system mobility in urban areas. Congress Proceedings – CLC 2012: Carpathian Logistics Congress, Jesenik, 07-09 November, pp. 501-508.
• [17] CHAMIER-GLISZCZYNSKI N. 2012b. Structure analysis of system mobility in urban areas. Congress Proceedings – CLC 2012: Carpathian Logistics Congress, Jesenik, 07-09November, pp. 509-515.
• [18] CHI, J., BAEK, J., 2013. Dynamic relationship between air transport demand and economic growth in the United States: A new look. Transport Policy 29, 257–260.
• [19] DUNKERLEY, F., ROHR, C., DALY, A., 2015. Road traffic demand elasticities: A rapid evidence assessment.
• [20] ECOLA, L., WACHS, M., 2012. Exploring the Relationship Between Travel Demand and Economic Growth.
• [21] ENDERS, W., 2014. Applied Econometric Time Series. Wiley.
• [22] ENGLE, R.F., GRANGER, C.W., 1987. Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 251–276.
• [23] ERDOGAN, S., ADEDOYIN, F.F., BEKUN, F.V., SARKODIE, S.A., 2020. Testing the transport-induced environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: The role of air and railway transport. Journal of Air Transport Management 89, 101935.
• [24] EViews, n.d., IHS Global Inc.
• [25] FLORES, A., CHANG, V., 2020. Relación entre la demanda de transporte y el crecimiento económico: Análisis dinámico mediante el uso del modelo ARDL. Cuadernos de Economía 43, 145–163.
• [26] GATELY, D., 1990. The US demand for high-way travel and motor fuel. The Energy Journal 11.
• [27] GOMEZ, J., VASSALLO, J.M., 2015. Evolution over time of heavy vehicle volume in toll roads: A dynamic panel data to identify key explanatory variables in Spain. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 74, 282–297.
• [28] GOMEZ, J., VASSALLO, J.M., HERRAIZ, I., 2016. Explaining light vehicle demand evolution in interurban toll roads: a dynamic panel data analysis in Spain. Transportation 43, 677–703.
• [29] GRANGER, C.W.J., NEWBOLD, P., 1974. Spurious regressions in econometrics. Journal of Econometrics 2, 111–120. https:// doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(74)90034-7.
• [30] HAKIM, M.M., MERKERT, R., 2016. The causal relationship between air transport and economic growth: Empirical evidence from South Asia. Journal of Transport Geography 56, 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo. 2016.09.006.
• [31] ISTAT, n.d. Complete data warehouse for experts.
• [32] JACYNA, M., WASIAK, M., LEWCZUK, K., CHAMIER-GLISZCZYŃSKI, N., DĄBROWSKI, T., 2018. Decision problems in developing proecological transport system. Rocznik Ochrona Środowiska, 20, 1007-1025. https://ros.edu.pl/images/rocz-niki/2018/059_ROS_V20_R2018.pdf.
• [33] JOHANSEN, S., 1995. Likelihood-Based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Models (OUP Catalogue). Oxford University Press.
• [34] JOHANSEN, S., JUSELIUS, K., 1990. Maxi-mum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration-With Applications to the Demand for Money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 52, 169–210.
• [35] KVEIBORG, O., FOSGERAU, M., 2005. De-composing the decoupling of freight traffic growth and economic growth. Danish Transport Research Institute.
• [36] LI, Z., HENSHER, D.A., 2009. Road freight demand in Australia: key drivers and forecasts. Road and Transport Research: A Journal of Australian and New Zealand Research and Practice 18, 15–26.
• [37] LIBARDO, A., NOCERA, S., 2008. Transportation elasticity for the analysis of Italian transportation demand on a regional scale. Traffic Engineering and Control 49, 187–192.
• [38] MAGAZZINO, C., MELE, M., 2020. On the relationship between transportation infrastructure and economic development in China. Research in Transportation Economics 100947.
• [39] MARAZZO, M., SCHERRE, R., FERNANDES, E., 2010. Air transport demand and economic growth in Brazil: A time series analysis. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 46, 261–269.
• [40] MATAS, A., RAYMOND, J.-L., 2003. Demand elasticity on tolled motorways. Journal of Transportation and Statistics 6, 91.
• [41] MATOS, F.J., SILVA, F.J., 2011. The rebound effect on road freight transport: Empirical evidence from Portugal. Energy Policy 39, 2833–2841.
• [42] MAURO, R., POMPIGNA, A., 2019. Dynamic aggregate models for forecasting of freight demand and road/railway modal split at the Brenner, Modelli aggregati dinamici per la previsione della domanda delle merci e dello split modale strada/ferrovia al Brennero. Ingegneria Ferroviaria, Ingegneria Ferroviaria 74, 555–588.
• [43] MCKINNON, A.C., 2007. Decoupling of Road Freight Transport and Economic Growth Trends in the UK: An Exploratory Analysis. Transport Reviews 27, 37–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640600825952.
• [44] MOHMAND, Y.T., WANG, A., SAEED, A., 2017. The impact of transportation infrastructure on economic growth: empirical evidence from Pakistan. Transportation Letters 9, 63–69.
• [45] MÜLLER, S., WOLFERMANN, A., BURG-SCHWEIGER, S., 2016. Analysing the Connection Between Gross Value Added of Indus-tries and Freight Transport Demand—The Merit of Supply and Use Tables in the Identification of Relevant Economic Activities for Freight Transport Demand, in: Commercial Transport. Springer, pp. 73–98.
• [46] NARAYAN, P.K., SMYTH, R., 2006. What determines migration flows from low-income to high-income countries? An empirical investigation of Fiji–Us migration 1972–2001. Contemporary economic policy 24, 332–342.
• [47] NUZZOLO, A., COPPOLA, P., COMI, A., 2013. Freight transport modeling: review and future challenges. International Journal of Transport Economics / Rivista internazionale di economia dei trasporti 151–181.
• [48] PERRON, P., 2006. Dealing with structural breaks. Palgrave handbook of econometrics 1, 278–352.
• [49] PERRON, P., 1989. The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society 1361–1401.
• [50] PESARAN, B., PESARAN, M.H., 2009. Time series econometrics: using Microfit 5.0. Oxford University Press, Oxford; New York.
• [51] PESARAN, B., PESARAN, M.H., n.d. Microfit 5.5.
• [52] PESARAN, M.H., SHIN, Y., 1999. An Auto-regressive Distributed-Lag Modelling Approach to Cointegration Analysis, in: Strom, S. (Ed.), Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 371–413. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL521633230.011.
• [53] PESARAN, M.H., SHIN, Y., SMITH, R.J., 2001. Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J. Appl. Econ. 16, 289–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.616.
• [54] POMPIGNA, A., MAURO, R., 2020a. In-put/Output models for freight transport demand: a macro approach to traffic analysis for a freight corridor. Archives of Transport 54, 21–42.
• [55] POMPIGNA, A., MAURO, R., 2020b. A structural decomposition analysis for traffic demand assessment on a freight transport corridor. Archives of Transport 56, 19–31.
• [56] POMPIGNA, A., RIGHETTI, F., BRUNETTI, P., 2015. Domanda potenziale e rischio traffico/introiti nel Project Financing di un’infrastruttura viaria a pedaggio. Rivista di economia e politica dei trasporti 1.
• [57] POMPIGNA, A., RUPI, F., 2018. Comparing practice-ready forecast models for weekly and monthly fluctuations of average daily traffic and enhancing accuracy by weighting methods. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition) 5, 239–253.
• [58] PRADHAN, R.P., 2019. Investigating the causal relationship between transportation infrastructure, financial penetration and economic growth in G-20 countries. Research in Transportation Economics 78, 100766.
• [59] PRADHAN, R.P., 2010. Transport infrastructure, energy consumption and economic growth triangle in India: Cointegration and causality analysis. Journal of Sustainable Development 3, 167.
• [60] PRADHAN, R.P., BAGCHI, T.P., 2013. Effect of transportation infrastructure on economic growth in India: the VECM approach. Research in Transportation Economics 38, 139–148.
• [61] PRATT, R., 2013. Traveler Response to Transportation System Changes Handbook. Third Edition: Chapter 1, Introduction. TRB, Washington, D.C. https://doi.org/10.17226/22648.
• [62] PROFILLIDIS, V.A., BOTZORIS, G.N., 2018. Modeling of transport demand: Analyzing, calculating, and forecasting transport demand. Elsevier, Amsterdam – Oxford – Cambridge.
• [63] RAMSEY, J.B., 1969. Tests for specification errors in classical linear least-squares regression analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 31, 350–371.
• [64] RODRIGUE, J.-P., 2006. Challenging the derived transport-demand thesis: geographical issues in freight distribution. Environment and Planning A 38, 1449–1462.
• [65] TAPIO, P., 2005. Towards a theory of decoupling: degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001. Transport policy 12, 137–151.
• [66] VLAHINIĆ LENZ, N., PAVLIĆ SKENDER, H., MIRKOVIĆ, P.A., 2018. The macroeconomic effects of transport infrastructure on economic growth: the case of Central and Eastern EU member states. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja 31, 1953–1964.
• [67] VOGELSANG, T.J., PERRON, P., 1998. Additional Tests for a Unit Root Allowing for a Break in the Trend Function at an Unknown Time. International Economic Review 39, 1073–1100. https://doi.org/10.2307/2527353.
• [68] YANG, Y., 2015. Development of the regional freight transportation demand prediction models based on the regression analysis methods. Neurocomputing 158, 42–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2015.01.069.
• [69] ZHANG, F., GRAHAM, D.J., 2020. Air transport and economic growth: a review of the impact mechanism and causal relationships. Transport Reviews 40, 506–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2020.1738587.
• [70] ZIVOT, E., ANDREWS, D.W.K., 2002. Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. Journal of business and economic statistics 20, 25–44.