PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

The concept of multi-hierarchical assessment of process orientation implementation - production organization experience

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Purpose: The main objective of the article is to present the concept of assessing the level of an organization’s utilization of its potential for transformation towards process orientation, using a practical implementation example. Design/methodology/approach: The structure of the research procedure was based on the theoretical assumptions regarding the methodological procedures involving development of a model of process maturity assessment. Such research methods as bibliometric analysis, systematic literature review, participant observation, opinion survey and semi-structured interview were used to achieve the research objectives formulated. Findings: The value of the article entails the combination of quantitative and qualitative methods to determine an organization’s propensity for transition towards higher levels of process maturity. This effect has been achieved using a method of multi-hierarchical process maturity assessment. It has been determined that the organization under examination is at the second level of process maturity, although many of the elements diagnosed show third-level process maturity potential. An authorial research method has been additionally verified, as well as the examined organization’s real and utilized potential has been determined, which constitute the basis for assessing the level of process maturity. Research limitations/implications: inability to fully objectify the research results obtained. Practical implications: The article shows the basis and the method for identifying the examined company’s real and utilized potential of process maturity as well as for determining the level of process maturity, based on which the company’s strategy towards a higher level of process maturity can be formulated. Originality/value: The unique nature of this article lies in the proposed method of multi-hierarchical assessment of an organization’s process maturity. In order to deepen the interpretation of the results obtained from a quantitative study, qualitative research was used. This allows development of a strategy for achievement of higher levels of maturity.
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
201--227
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 55 poz.
Bibliografia
  • 1. Bandura, A. (2001). Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 1-26.
  • 2. Becker, J., Knackstedt, R. and Pöppelbuß, J. (2009). Developing Maturity Models for IT Management: A Procedure Model and its Application. Business & Information Systems Engineering, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 213-222.
  • 3. Bispo, G., Relim, T.E., Bittencourt eis, A.C., Mariano, A.M., Ladeira, M. and Marques Serrano, A.L. (2019). Measurement of Maturity in Process Management in The Brazilian Public Sector: A Multicriteria Approach. The 34th IBIMA Conference, Madrid, Spain, pp. 5855-5868.
  • 4. Britsch, J., Bulander, R. and Morelli, F. (2012). Evaluation of Maturity Models for Business Process Management, Vol. 2. The International conference on e-business, SciTePress, pp. 180-186.
  • 5. Christiansson, M.-T. and Rentzhog, O. (2019). Lessons from the ‘BPO journey’ in a public housing company: toward a strategy for BPO. Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 373-404.
  • 6. Cleveland, W.S. and Devlin, S.J. (1988). Locally Weighted Regression: An Approach to Regression Analysis by Local Fitting. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 83, No. 403, pp. 596-610.
  • 7. Cleven, A., Winter, R. and Wortmann, F. (2011). Process Performance Management as a Basic Concept for Sustainable Business Process Management - Empirical Investigation and Research Agenda. In: M. zur Muehlen, J. Su (Eds.), Business Process Management Workshops, Vol. 66 (pp. 479-488). Berlin: Springer Berlin-Heidelberg.
  • 8. de Boer, F.G., Müller, C.J. and ten Caten, C.S. (2015). Assessment model for organizational business process maturity with a focus on BPM governance practices. Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 908-927.
  • 9. de Bruin, T. (2007). Insights into the Evolution of BPM in Organisations, Vol. 42. The 18th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, ACIS 2007 Proceedings, Toowoomba, pp. 632-642.
  • 10. de Bruin, T. and Rosemann, M. (2007). Using the Delphi Technique to Identify BPM Capability Areas, Vol. 42. The 18th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, ACIS 2007 Proceedings, Toowoomba, pp. 643-653.
  • 11. de Waal, B., Joku, S. and Ravesteijn, P. (2017). Do differences between managers and employees matter? A case study on BPM maturity and process performance. The 5th International Conference on Management, Leadership and Governance ICMLG 2017, acpi, Johannesburg, South Africa, pp. 101-110.
  • 12. de Waal, B., Valladares, R. and Ravesteyn, P. (2017). BPM maturity and process performance: the case of the Peruvian Air Force. The Twenty-third Americas Conference on Information System, Boston, USA, pp. 1-10.
  • 13. Er, M. and Nurmadewi, D. (2021). Analysis of business process management capability and information technology in small and medium enterprises in the garment industry (multiple case studies in East Java, Indonesia). The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, Vol. 87, No. 1, available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12154.
  • 14. Felch, V. and Asdecker, B. (2020). Quo Vadis, Business Process Maturity Model? Learning from the Past to Envision the Future. In: D. Fahland, C. Ghidini, J. Becker, M. Dumas (Eds.), Business Process Management, Vol. 12168 (pp. 368-383). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • 15. Feldbacher, P., Suppan, P., Schweiger, C. and Singer, R. (2011). Business Process Management: A Survey among Small and Medium Sized Enterprises. In: W. Schmidt (Ed.), S-BPM ONE - Learning by Doing - Doing by Learning, Vol. 213 (pp. 296-312). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin-Heidelberg.
  • 16. Fernando Sentanin, O., César Almada Santos, F. and José Chiappetta Jabbour, C. (2008). Business process management in a Brazilian public research centre. Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 483-496.
  • 17. Hair, J.F., Black, W., Babin, B. and Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. NJ: Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
  • 18. Houy, C., Fettke, P. and Loos, P. (2012). On Theoretical Foundations of Empirical Business Process Management Research. In: F. Daniel, K. Barkaoui, S. Dustdar, S. (Eds.), Business Process Management Workshops, Vol. 99 (pp. 320-332). Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer Berlin-Heidelberg.
  • 19. Jurczuk, A. (2016). Towards process maturity - triggers of change. 9th International Scientific Conference “Business and Management 2016”. The Business and Management 2016, VGTU Technika, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Lithuania, available at: https://doi.org/10.3846/bm.2016.77.
  • 20. Kahrovic, E. and Vignjevic Djordjevic, N. (2019). The five stages of business process management maturity model. MEST Journal, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 49-54.
  • 21. Kalinowski, T. (2018). Business process maturity models research-a systematic literature review. The 33rd International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social Development - “Managerial Issues in Modern Business”, Varazdin Development and Entrepreneurship Agency, Warsaw, pp. 476-483.
  • 22. Krukowski, K., and Raczyńska, M. (2019). Attributes of Process Maturity of Public Administration Units in Poland. Administrative Sciences, Vol. 9, No. 4, p. 84.
  • 23. Lee, J., Lee, D. and Kang, S. (2007). An Overview of the Business Process Maturity Model (BPMM). In: K.C.-C. Chang, W. Wang, L. Chen, C.A. Ellis, C.-H. Hsu, A.C. Tsoi, and H. Wang (Eds.), Advances in Web and Network Technologies, and Information Management, Vol. 4537 (pp. 384-395). Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer Berlin-Heidelberg.
  • 24. Looy, A.V., Backer, M.D. and Poels, G. (2014). A conceptual framework and classification of capability areas for business process maturity. Enterprise Information Systems, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 188-224.
  • 25. Marton, F. (1988). Phenomenography: Exploring different conceptions of reality. Qualitative Approaches to Evaluation in Education: The Silent Revolution. New York: Praeger, pp. 176-205.
  • 26. McCormack, K., Willems, J., van den Bergh, J., Deschoolmeester, D., Willaert, P., Indihar Štemberger, M., Škrinjar, R., et al. (2009). A global investigation of key turning points in business process maturity. Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 15, No. 5, pp. 792-815.
  • 27. Mens, J. and Ravesteyn, P. (2016). Using the Delphi Method to Identify Hospital-Specific Business Process Management Capabilities in The Netherlands. The 29th Bled eConference Digital Economy, Bled, Slovenia, pp. 369-381.
  • 28. Mielcarek, P. (2018). Processes Maturity of an Organization - Concept and Implementation. Business and Non-Profit Organizations Facing Increased Competition and Growing Customers’ Demands, Vol. 17, pp. 37-49.
  • 29. Milanović Glavan, L., Bosilj Vukšić, V. and Vlahović, N. (2015). Decision tree learning for detecting turning points in business process orientation: a case of Croatian companies. Croatian Operational Research Review, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 207-224.
  • 30. Niehaves, B. and Plattfaut, R. (n.d.). Market, Network, Hierarchy: Emerging Mechanisms of Governance in Business Process Management, August 2011. International Conference on Electronic Government EGOV 2011: Electronic Government. Berlin: Springer, pp. 185-197.
  • 31. Niehaves, B., Poeppelbuss, J., Plattfaut, R. and Becker, J. (2014). BPM capability development - a matter of contingencies. Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 90-106.
  • 32. Nikolova-Alexieva, V. (2013). Process Maturity Analysis of the Bulgarian Enterprises. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 92, pp. 632-636.
  • 33. Novotny, S. and Rohmann, N. (2015). Toward a Global Process Management System: The ThyssenKrupp Presta Case. In: J. vom Brocke, M. Rosemann (Eds.), Handbook on Business Process Management, No. 2 (pp. 471-483). Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer Berlin-Heidelberg.
  • 34. Okręglicka, M., Mynarzova, M. and Kana, R. (2015). Business process maturity in small and medium-sized enterprises. Polish Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 121-131.
  • 35. Păunescu, C. and Acatrinei Pantea, C. (2012). Managing maturity in process-based improvement organizations: a perspective of the Romanian companies. Journal of Business Economics and Management, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 223-241.
  • 36. Pidun, T. and Felden, C. (2010). A Reference Model Catalog of Models for Business Process Analysis, Vol. 169 The Proceedings of the Sixteenth Americas Conference on Information System, AMCIS 2010 Proceeding, Lima, Peru, pp. 1-10.
  • 37. Proenca, D. and Borbinha, J. (2018). Maturity Model Architect: A Tool for Maturity Assessment Support. 2018 IEEE 20th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI), presented at the 2018 IEEE 20th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI), IEEE, Vienna, pp. 42-51.
  • 38. Radosavljevic, M. (2014). Assessment of process management maturity in developing countries based on saw method. Journal of Business Economics and Management, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 599-614.
  • 39. Reijers, H. and Peeters, R.L. (2010). Process Owners in the Wild: Findings from a Multi-method Descriptive Study. ER-POIS@CAiSE. The 1st International Workshop on Empirical Research in Process-Oriented Information Systems (ER-POIS 2010), pp. 1-12.
  • 40. Rohloff, M. (2009). Case Study and Maturity Model for Business Process Management Implementation. In: U. Dayal, J. Eder, J. Koehler, H.A. Reijers (Eds.), Business Process Management, Vol. 5701 (pp. 128-142). Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer Berlin-Heidelberg.
  • 41. Rojo, J., Rivero, R., Romero-Morte, J., Fernández-González, F. and Pérez-Badia, R. (2017). Modeling pollen time series using seasonal-trend decomposition procedure based on LOESS smoothing. International Journal of Biometeorology, Vol. 61, No. 2, pp. 335-348.
  • 42. Rosemann, M. and De Bruin, T. (2005). Towards a Business Process Management Maturity Model. The Thirteenth European Conference on Information Systems, Verlag and the London School of Economics, pp. 1-12.
  • 43. Rosemann, M. and vom Brocke, J. (2015). The Six Core Elements of Business Process Management. In: J. vom Brocke, M. Rosemann, M. (Eds.), Handbook on Business Process Management, No. 1 (pp. 105-122). Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer Berlin-Heidelberg.
  • 44. Rotaru, K., Wilkin, C., Ceglowski, A. and Churilov, L. (2009). Open process innovation: A multi-method study on the involvement of customers and consultants in public sector BPM. ECIS 2009 Proceedings, Vol. 106, available at: https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1200&context=ecis2009, 29.12.2021.
  • 45. Schriek, M., Turetken, O. and Kaymak, U. (2016). A Maturity Model for Care Pathways. The Twenty-Fourth European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Association for Information Systems, Istanbul, Turkey, pp. 1-16.
  • 46. Škrinjar, R. and Trkman, P. (2013). Increasing process orientation with business process management: Critical practices. International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 48-60.
  • 47. Stojanovic, D., Simeunovic, B., Tomasevic, I. and Radovic, M. (2012). Current State of Business Process Management in Serbian Industry. Metalurgia International, Vol. 17, No. 10, pp. 222-226.
  • 48. Valenca, G., Alves, C., Frota, Santana, A., Felipe, Lemos, de Oliveira, J., Aline, Pereira and Santos, H., Ricardo, Monteiro (2013). Understanding The Adoption Of BPM Governance In Brazilian Public Sector. ECIS 2013 Completed Research, Vol. 56, available at: https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2013_cr/56, 29.12.2021.
  • 49. Van den Bergh, J. (2012). The growth path towards the process-oriented organization, Vol. 1. The International Business Information Management Association Conference, Int Business Information Management Assoc-Ibima, Istanbul, Turkey, pp. 362.
  • 50. Van Looy, A. (2013). Looking for a Fit for Purpose: Business Process Maturity Models from a User’s Perspective. In: G. Poels (Ed.), Enterprise Information Systems of the Future, Vol. 139 (pp. 182-189). Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer Berlin-Heidelberg.
  • 51. Van Looy, A. and Van Looy, A. (2013). Current Pitfalls Of Business Process Maturity Models: A Selection Perspective. ECIS 2013 Completed Research, Vol. 1, available at: https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2013_cr/1, 29.12.2021.
  • 52. Van Looy, A., de Backer, M. and Poels, G. (2010). Which Maturity Is Being Measured? A Classification of Business Process Maturity Models. The 5th SIKS/BENAIS Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, CEUR WS, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
  • 53. Vlahović, N., Milanović, G. and Škrinjar, R. (2010a). Using data mining methodology for detecting turning points in business process orientation maturity models. The 4th WSEAS International Conference on Management, Marketing and Finances, WSEAS Press, Athens, greec, pp. 35-40.
  • 54. Vlahović, N., Milanović, L. and Škrinjar, R. (2010b). Turning Points in Business Process Orientation Maturity Model: An East European Survey. Wseas Transactions on Business and Economics, Vol. 1, No. 7, pp. 22-32.
  • 55. Willaert, P., Van den Bergh, J., Willems, J. and Deschoolmeester, D. (2007). The Process-Oriented Organisation: A Holistic View Developing a Framework for Business Process Orientation Maturity. In: G. Alonso, P. Dadam, M. Rosemann (Eds.), Business Process Management, Vol. 4714 (pp. 1-15). Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer Berlin-Heidelberg.
Uwagi
PL
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-34ab899e-3526-44c1-9776-2e8041f373d1
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.