Empowering Theory of Poverty Reduction for Sustainable Development: Does the Welfare of Descendants Matter?

• Autorzy: Piwowarski Juliusz , Yankovska Larysa , Koshovyi Bohdan Petro , Von-Nagy Ira , Yevstakhevych Andrii

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.35784/pe.2022.1.05

Warianty tytułu

PL

Wspieranie teorii ograniczania ubóstwa dla zrównoważonego rozwoju: czy dobro przyszłych pokoleń ma znaczenie?

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The first Sustainable Development Goal expresses the global concern in poverty eradication. We looked at the theory of poverty reduction with a long-term perspective in mind to confirm the congruence of modern approaches and their compliance with the principles of sustainable development. Despite clear signs of targeting Sustainable development goals to the future, we have found that future poverty needs deep discussion. We researched legal acts, policies and scientific sources to prove the possibility and suitability of recognising future poverty as a valid form of poverty. We considered the main possible difficulties that will challenge initiatives of future poverty exhausting. Finally, we proposed several perspective directions of further research to include the future poverty concept into the agenda of governments and supranational organisations.

PL

Pierwszy Cel Zrównoważonego Rozwoju wyraża globalną troskę o eliminację ubóstwa. W tej pracy przyjrzeliśmy się teorii ograniczania ubóstwa w perspektywie długoterminowej, aby potwierdzić zgodność nowoczesnych podejść i ich zgodność z zasadami zrównoważonego rozwoju. Pomimo wyraźnych oznak ukierunkowania Celów zrównoważonego rozwoju na przyszłość, stwierdziliśmy, że kwestia przyszłego ubóstwa wymaga dodatkowej uwagi. Przeanalizowaliśmy akty prawne, polityki i źródła naukowe, aby udowodnić możliwość i stosowność uznania przyszłego ubóstwa za ważną formę ubóstwa. Zastanowiliśmy się nad głównymi możliwymi trudnościami, które będą wyzwaniem dla przyszłych inicjatyw ograniczających ubóstwo. W końcu zaproponowaliśmy kilka perspektywicznych kierunków dalszych badań, aby włączyć koncepcję przyszłego ubóstwa do programu rządów i organizacji ponadnarodowych.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

future poverty; sustainable development goals; forms of poverty; poverty reduction policy

PL

przyszłe ubóstwo; cele zrównoważonego rozwoju; typy ubóstwa; polityka zmniejszania ubóstwa

• Wydawca: Lublin University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Problemy Ekorozwoju
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Vol. 17, nr 1
• Strony: 52--63
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 67 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Piwowarski Juliusz

• University of Public and Individual Security “Apeiron” in Cracow, Krupnicza 3, 31-123 Kraków, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9196-1194

autor

Yankovska Larysa

• Lviv University of Business and Law, Kulparkivska, 99, 79021 Lviv, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1855-0169

autor

Koshovyi Bohdan Petro

• Lviv University of Business and Law, Department of Demography, Labor Relations and Social Policy, Kulparkivska str., 99, 79021 Lviv, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8550-0028

autor

Von-Nagy Ira

• Fachärztin für HNO-Heilkunde, Chiemgauerstraße 144, 81549 München, Germany

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2748-7766

autor

Yevstakhevych Andrii

• Lviv University of Business and Law, Department of Business Economics and Information Technology, Kulparkivska, 99, 79021 Lviv, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1058-5359se

Bibliografia

• 1. ALKIRE S., OLDIGES C., KANAGARATNAM U., 2021, Examining multidimensional poverty reduction in India 2005/6–2015/16: Insights and oversights of the headcount ratio, World Development, 142: 105454, DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105454.
• 2. Asian Development Bank, 1999, Fighting Poverty in Asia and the Pacific: The Poverty Reduction Strategy, https://think-asia.org/bitstream/handle/11540/48 76/Fighting%20poverty%20in%20Asia%20%26%2 0the%20Pacific%20-%20The%20poverty%20reduction%20strategy%20Nov99.pdf?sequence=1 (25.08.2021).
• 3. ATKINS M., OSBORNE R., (eds.), 2006, Poverty in the Roman World, Cambridge University Press, DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511482700.
• 4. BAI X., VAN DER LEEUW S., O’BRIEN K., BERKHOUT F., BIERMANN F., BRONDIZIO E. S., CUDENNEC C., DEARING J., DURAIAPPAH A., GLASER M., REVKIN A., STEFFEN W., SYVITSKI J., 2016, Plausible and desirable futures in the Anthropocene: A new research agenda, Global Environmental Change, 39: 351-362, DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.017.
• 5. BANERJEE A. V., DUFLO E., 2011, Poor economics: A radical rethinking of the way to fight global poverty, Public Affairs, https://search.ebscohost.com /login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db= nlabk&AN=591663 (25.08.2021).
• 6. BRANDER P., 2021, COMPASS: A manual on human rights education with young people, https:// rm.coe.int/compass-eng-rev-2020-web/1680a08e40, (25.08.2021).
• 7. BROWNING M. H. E. M., RIGOLON A., 2019, Could nature help children rise out of poverty? Green space and future earnings from a cohort in ten U.S. cities, Environmental Research, 176: 108449, DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.04.016.
• 8. CHEN S., RAVALLION M., 2007, Poverty and Hunger Special Feature: Absolute poverty measures for the developing world, 1981-2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(43): 16757- 16762, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0702930104.
• 9. COBBINAH P. B., ERDIAW-KWASIE M. O., AMOATENG P., 2015, Rethinking sustainable development within the framework of poverty and urbanisation in developing countries, Environmental Development, 13: 18-32, DOI: 10.1016/j.envdev.2014.11.001.
• 10. DAO N. T., EDENHOFER O., 2018, On the fiscal strategies of escaping poverty-environment traps towards sustainable growth, Journal of Macroeconomics, 55: 253-273, DOI: 10.1016/j.jmacro.2017.10.007.
• 11. DEATON A., 2005, Measuring Poverty in a Growing World (or Measuring Growth in a Poor World), Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(1): 1-19, DOI: 10.1162/0034653053327612.
• 12. DENG Q., LI E., ZHANG P., 2020, Livelihood sustainability and dynamic mechanisms of rural households out of poverty: An empirical analysis of Hua County, Henan Province, China, Habitat International, 99: 102160, DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102160.
• 13. DESMOND W. D., 2006, The Greek Praise of Poverty: The Origins of Ancient Cynicism, University of Notre Dame Press.
• 14. DING J., WANG Z., LIU Y., YU F., 2020, Rural households’ livelihood responses to industry-based poverty alleviation as a sustainable route out of poverty, Regional Sustainability, 1(1): 68-81, DOI: 10.1016/j.regsus.2020.07.002
• 15. EDWARD P., SUMNER A., 2014, Estimating the Scale and Geography of Global Poverty Now and in the Future: How Much Difference Do Method and Assumptions Make? World Development, 58: 67-82, DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.12.009.
• 16. EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2010, Europe 2020: a strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do? uri=COM:2010:2020:FIN:EN:PDF, (25.08.2021).
• 17. FAN S., CHO E. E., 2021, Paths out of poverty: International experience, Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 20(4): 857-867, DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63295-6.
• 18. FEDERAL SAFETY NET, n.d., U.S. Poverty Level or U.S. Poverty Rate, http://federalsafetynet.com/ uspoverty-level.html, (25.08.2021).
• 19. FRITZEN S., 2002, Growth, inequality and the future of poverty reduction in Vietnam, Journal of Asian Economics, 13(5): 635-657, DOI: 10.1016/S1049-0078(02)00173-2, (25.08.2021).
• 20. GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE UNITED NATIONS, 2015, Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol= A/RES/70/1&Lang=E (25.08.2021).
• 21. GOLUB A., MAHONEY M., HARLOW J., 2013, Sustainability and intergenerational equity: Do past injustices matter? Sustainability Science, 8(2): 269- 277, DOI: 10.1007/s11625-013-0201-0;
• 22. H.R. 5069 (116th): The Recognizing Poverty Act, https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/116/hr5069, (25.08.2021).
• 23. HAUGHTON J. H., KHANDKER S. R., 2009, Handbook on poverty and inequality, https://openknow ledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/11985/ 9780821376133.pdf?sequence=1&isallowed=y, (25.08.2021).
• 24. International Monetary Fund, 2016, Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers, https://www.imf.org/external/ np/prsp/prsp.aspx, (25.08.2021).
• 25. IsDB Group, (2021), IsDB Group in brief 1975 – 2021 (Q1): Empowering People for a Sustainable Future, https://www.isdb.org/sites/default/files/media/ documents/2021-05/IsDBG_Brief_2021_Q1%20310 52021.pdf (25.08.2021).
• 26. IWANIEC D. M., COOK E. M., DAVIDSON M. J., BERBÉS-BLÁZQUEZ M., GEORGESCU M., KRAYENHOFF E. S., MIDDEL A., SAMPSON D. A., GRIMM N. B., 2020, The co-production of sustainable future scenarios, Landscape and Urban Planning, 197: 103744, DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103744.
• 27. IWANIEC D., CHILDERS D., VANLEHN K., WIEK A., 2014, Studying, Teaching and Applying Sustainability Visions Using Systems Modeling, Sustainability, 6(7): 4452–4469, DOI: 10.3390/su6074452.
• 28. JONES W., 2010, Philosophers and the Poor, Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory, 57(125): 99-123, http://www.jstor.org/stable/418024 88, (25.08.2021).
• 29. KARDAS E. P., 2010, Diogenes of Sinope (412-323 BCE). History of psychology: The making of a science, http://peace.saumag.edu/faculty/kardas/courses /HP/Lectures/diogenes.html, (25.08.2021).
• 30. KENNEDY A., BOUDALAOUI-BURESI Z., 2021, The fight against poverty, social exclusion and discrimination, Fact Sheets on the European Union – 2021, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/ftu/pdf/en/FT U_2.3.9.pdf (25.08.2021).
• 31. KHILUKHA O., LIPYCH L., KUSHNIR M., FATENOK-TKACHUK A., 2020, Marketing Technologies in Higher Education for Identifying the Needs of Consumers in Lifelong Learning, International Journal of Higher Education, 9(6): 298-306, DOI: 10.5430/ijhe.v9n6p298.
• 32. KOSKIMAA V., RAPELI L., HIEDANPÄÄ J., 2021, Governing through strategies: How does Finland sustain a future-oriented environmental policy for the long term? Futures, 125: 102667, DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2020.102667.
• 33. LANJOUW J. O., LANJOUW P., 2001, How to Compare Apples And Oranges: Poverty Measurement Based on Different Definitions of Consumption, Review of Income and Wealth, 47(1): 25-42, DOI: 10.1111/1475-4991.00002.
• 34. LAVALLÉE E., OLIVIER A., PASQUIER-DOUMER L., ROBILLIARD A.-S., 2010, Poverty alleviation policy targeting: a review of experiences in developing countries, https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/46165291_Poverty_alleviation_policy_ targeting_a_review_of_experiences_in_developing _countries, (25.08.2021).
• 35. LIU Y., & XU Y., 2016, A geographic identification of multidimensional poverty in rural China under the framework of sustainable livelihoods analysis, Applied Geography, 73: 62-76, DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.06.004.
• 36. MAIRECH H., LÓPEZ-BERNAL Á., MORIONDO M., DIBARI C., REGNI L., PROIETTI P., VILLALOBOS F. J., TESTI L., 2021, Sustainability of olive growing in the Mediterranean area under future climate scenarios: Exploring the effects of intensification and deficit irrigation, European Journal of Agronomy, 129: 126319, DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2021.126319.
• 37. MARTINEZ F., PEATTIE K., VAZQUEZ-BRUST D., 2021, Faith in the future: On a mission to integrate sustainability into management theory and practice, Futures, 125: 102654, DOI: 10.1016/j.futu res.2020.102654.
• 38. MASLOW A. H., 1943, A theory of human motivation, Psychological Review, 50(4): 370-396, DOI: 10.1037/h0054346.
• 39. NGUYEN T. V., LV J. H., NGO V. Q., 2021, Factors determining upland farmers’ participation in non-timber forest product value chains for sustainable poverty reduction in Vietnam, Forest Policy and Economics, 126: 102424, DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102424.
• 40. Nobel Foundation, 2019, Press release: The Prize in Economic Sciences 2019, https://www.nobelprize. org/prizes/economic-sciences/2019/press-release/, (25.08.2021).
• 41. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, 2004, Human Rights and Poverty Reduction: A Conceptual Framework, https://www. ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/PovertyReductio nen.pdf, (25.08.2021).
• 42. PANDIT A., NAKAGAWA Y., TIMILSINA R. R., KOTANI K., SAIJO T., 2021, Taking the perspectives of future generations as an effective method for achieving sustainable waste management, Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27: 1526-1536. DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2021.03.019.
• 43. PRITCHETT L., 2006, Who is Not Poor? Dreaming of a World Truly Free of Poverty, The World Bank Research Observer, 21(1): 1-23, DOI: 10.1093/wbro/lkj002.
• 44. RAMOS-MEJÍA M., FRANCO-GARCIA M.-L., JAUREGUI-BECKER J. M., 2018, Sustainability transitions in the developing world: Challenges of socio-technical transformations unfolding in contexts of poverty, Environmental Science & Policy, 84: 217- 223, DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.03.010.
• 45. RAVALLION M., 1996, Issues in Measuring and Modelling Poverty, The Economic Journal, 106(438): 1328, DOI: 10.2307/2235525.
• 46. ROSER M., ORTIZ-OSPINA E., 2013, Global Extreme Poverty, OurWorldInData.org, https://ourwor ld indata.org/extreme-poverty, (25.08.2021).
• 47. S.2433 – Global Poverty Act of 2007, https://www. congress.gov/bill/110th-congress/senate-bill/2433/ text, (25.08.2021).
• 48. SAPENA J., ALMENAR V., APETREI A., ESCRIVÁ M., GIL M., 2018, Some reflections on poverty eradication, true development and sustainability within CST, Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 3(2): 90-92, DOI: 10.1016/j.jik.2017.12.005.
• 49. SCHLEICHER, J., SCHAAFSMA M., VIRA B., 2018, Will the Sustainable Development Goals address the links between poverty and the natural environment? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 34: 43-47, DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.09.004.
• 50. SEN A., 2001, Development as freedom, Oxford University Press, http://fs2.american.edu/dfagel/www/ Philosophers/Sen/DevelopmentAsFreedomIntroNch 1NEW.pdf, (25.08.2021).
• 51. SOPILNYK R., PIWOWARSKI J., 2021, Access to a genuinely independent and impartial trial: a review of the sixteenth sustainability goal completeness, Law, Business and Sustainability Herald, 1(1): 43-53, DOI: 10.46489/lbsh.2021-1-1-5.
• 52. STATE STATISTICAL SERVICE OF UKRAINE, 2019, Sotsialno-ekonomichne stanovyshche domohospodarstv Ukrainy u 2019 rotsi (za danymy vybirkovoho obstezhennia umov zhyttia domohospodarstv), http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/operativ 2018/gdvdg/soc_ek_stan_dom_2019.zip, (25.08.2021).
• 53. SUTTER C., BRUTON G. D., CHEN J., 2019, Entrepreneurship as a solution to extreme poverty: A review and future research directions, Journal of Business Venturing, 34(1): 197-214, DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.06.003. 54. THORBECKE E., 2013, Multidimensional Poverty: Conceptual and Measurement Issues, The Many Dimensions of Poverty, Palgrave Macmillan UK, DOI: 10.1057/9780230592407_1.
• 55. TIMILSINA R. R., KOTANI K., NAKAGAWA Y., SAIJO T., 2021, Concerns for future generations in societies: A deliberative analysis of the intergenerational sustainability dilemma, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 90: 101628, DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2020.101628.
• 56. TONN B., HAWKINS B., ROSE E., MARINCIC M., 2021, A futures perspective of health, climate change and poverty in the United States, Futures, 131: 102759, DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2021.102759.
• 57. UN Global Compact, n.d., Poverty, https://www.unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/our-work/social/poverty, (25.08.2021).
• 58. UNITED NATIONS COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS, 2001, Substantive issues arising in the implementation of the international covenant on economic, social and cultural rights: poverty and the international covenant on economic, social and cultural rights, https://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cescr/docs/ statements/E.C.12.2001.10Poverty-2001.pdf, (25.08.2021).
• 59. UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME, 2018, Beyond income: A broader picture of poverty, https://feature.undp.org/multidimensional l-poverty/, (25.08.2021).
• 60. UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME, 2020, The next frontier human development and the Anthropocene, http://hdr.undp.org/sites/ files/hdr2020.pdf, (25.08.2021).
• 61. UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMISSION FOR ASIA AND THE PACIFIC, 2013, Asia-Pacific aspirations: Perspectives for a post-2015 development agenda, https://www.adb. org/sites/default/files/publication/30414/asia-pacificregional-mdgs-report.pdf, (25.08.2021).
• 62. UNITED NATIONS, 1948, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/ files/udhr.pdf, (25.08.2021).
• 63. VAINIO A., PULKKA A., PALONIEMI R., VARHO V., TAPIO P., 2020, Citizens’ sustainable, future-oriented energy behaviours in energy transition, Journal of Cleaner Production, 245: 118801, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118801.
• 64. WANG Z., HUANG F., LIU J., SHUAI J., SHUAI C., 2020, Does solar PV bring a sustainable future to the poor? An empirical study of anti-poverty policy effects on environmental sustainability in rural China, Energy Policy, 145: 111723, DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111723.
• 65. WONG H., 2015, Chinese definition of poverty, The SAGE encyclopedia of poverty, p. 232-233, https:// web.swk.cuhk.edu.hk/~hwong/pubfile/book/2015_ Chinese_Definition_of_Poverty.pdf, (25.08.2021).
• 66. World Bank, 2020a, Poverty and Shared Prosperity 2020: Reversals of fortune, https://openknowledge. worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/34496/97814 64816024.pdf, (25.08.2021).
• 67. YANKOVSKA L., Management of socio-economic systems in Ukraine: European integration paradigm, Global Prosperity, 1(1): 31-36, DOI: 10.46489/gpj.2021-1-1-3.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).