Electricity and biogas production in portable biodigester-microbial fuel cells: Optimum substrate composition and ratio from organic waste

Astuti, Septin Puji; Purwono, Purwono; Ulya, Annida Unnatiq

doi:10.12912/27197050/199508

Powiadomienia systemowe

Sesja wygasła!

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Electricity and biogas production in portable biodigester-microbial fuel cells: Optimum substrate composition and ratio from organic waste

Autorzy

Astuti Septin Puji , Purwono Purwono , Ulya Annida Unnatiq

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

30_astuti_electricity_and_biogas_eeet_2_2025.pdf

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12912/27197050/199508

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

Organic waste comes from various sources, such as food or vegetable waste and animal manurequickly decomposes in nature, but it significantly impacts the environment and human health, with methane (CH₄) and carbon dioxide (CO₂) from organic waste contributing to global warming, and further harming the environment. This study aims to determine the optimal substrate composition of organic waste from vegetable and cow manure for generating electricity using an integrated anaerobic digestion (AD) and microbial fuel cells (MFCs) system. The experiment used portable biodigester-MFCs systems for households and was conducted for eight weeks. Four biodigester reactors using different ratios of vegetable waste to cow manure were applied: R1 (100%:0%), R2 (75%:25%), R3 (50%:50%), and R4 (0%:100%). The result shows the highest electrical voltage in the third reactor (R3), registering at 0.62 mV, consisting of 50% cow manure and 50% vegetable waste. The highest biogas yield (13,192 ml) comes from the second reactor (R2), with a composition of 25% cow manure and 75% vegetable waste. The addition of cow manure to vegetable waste enhanced electricity production through CH₄production in an anaerobic digestion process. Based on the above result, substrate composition and ratios are needed to influence the optimum pH and temperature to optimise the metabolic activity of bacteria in portable MFCs efficiently. Among the four biodigester tested, R2, with a 75% vegetable waste to 25% cow manure ratio, achieved the highest biogas yield of 13.192 ml and highest CH₄content. Conversely, R4, comprising 100% cow manure, produced the smallest biogas volume but achieved the highest CH₄. These findings highlight the significant role of cow manure in biogas production and the challenges of utilising vegetable and organic waste effectively.

Słowa kluczowe

microbial fuel cells electricity production biogas biodigester organic waste

Wydawca

Lubelski Oddział Polskiego Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej
Lublin University of Technology
WNGB Wydawnictwo Naukowe

Czasopismo

Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology

Rocznik

2025

Tom

Vol. 26, iss. 2

Strony

379--391

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 64 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Astuti Septin Puji

septin.astuti@staff.uinsaid.ac.id

Department of Environmental Science, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta, Jl. Pandawa Pucangan Kartasura, Sukoharjo, Indonesia

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9988-9975

autor

Purwono Purwono

Department of Environmental Science, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta, Jl. Pandawa Pucangan Kartasura, Sukoharjo, Indonesia

https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5661-1577

autor

Ulya Annida Unnatiq

Department of Environmental Science, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta, Jl. Pandawa Pucangan Kartasura, Sukoharjo, Indonesia

https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9629-3804

Bibliografia

1. Abdel-Shafy, H. I., & Mansour, M. S. M. (2018). Solid waste issue: Sources, composition, disposal, recycling, and valorization. Egyptian Journal of Petroleum, 27(4), 1275–1290). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2018.07.003
2. Amigun, B., Parawira, W., & Musango, J. K. (2008). Anaerobic Biogas Generation for Rural Area Energy Provision in Africa. https://doi.org/10.5772/32630
3. Andriamanohiarisoamanana, F. J., Saikawa, A., Kan, T., Qi, G., Pan, Z., Yamashiro, T., Iwasaki, M., Ihara, I., Nishida, T., & Umetsu, K. (2018). Semi-continuous anaerobic co-digestion of dairy manure, meat and bone meal and crude glycerol: Process performance and digestate valorization. Renewable Energy, 128, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.05.056
4. Andriani, D., Rajani, A., Kusnadi, Santosa, A., Saepudin, A., Wresta, A., & Atmaja, T. D. (2020). A review on biogas purification through hydrogen sulphide removal. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 483(1), 12034. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/483/1/012034
5. Bajracharya, S. (2020). Microbial fuel cell coupled with anaerobic treatment processes for wastewater treatment. Integrated Microbial Fuel Cells for Wastewater Treatment, 2020, 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817493-7.00014-X.
6. Balagurusamy, N., & Chandel, A. K. (2020). Biogas Production. From Anaerobic Digestion to a Sustainable Bioenergy Industry. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58827-4
7. Beniche, I., Hungría, J., El Bari, H., Siles, J. A., Chica, A. F., & Martín, M. A. (2021). Effects of C/N ratio on anaerobic co-digestion of cabbage, cauliflower, and restaurant food waste. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 11(5), 2133–2145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00733-x
8. BPS. (2019). Kajian Lingkungan Hidup: Kualitas Lingkungan Hidup Perkotaan (Vol. 3305010, Issue 04320.1901). Badan Pusat Statistik.
9. BPS. (2020). Statistik Lingkungan Hidup Indonesia Air dan Lingkungan. Badan Pusat Statistik.
10. BPS. (2023a). Indikator Tujuan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan Indonesia 2023. Badan Pusat Statistik.
11. BPS. (2023b). Kota Surakarta Dalam Angka 2023. Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Surakarta.
12. Dankawu, U. M., Usman, F. M., Musa, I. M., Safana, A. A., Ndikilar, C. E., Shuaibu, H. Y., Yakubu, A., Uzair, M., Lariski, F. M., Silikwa, N. W., & Ahmadu, M. (2022). Assessment of biogas production from mixtures of poultry waste and cow manure. Dutse Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 8(1b), 138–145. https://doi.org/10.4314/dujopas.v8i1b.16
13. Dasti, Z. A., Ahmed, I., & Sarwar, S. (2021). Monitoring & assessment of N2O, NOX emissions from fertilizer plant (Nitrit acid) for the environmental sustainability. Pakistan Journal of Science, 73(1), 120–129. https://doi.org/10.57041/pjs.v73i1.651
14. Du, Z., Li, H., & Gu, T. (2007). A state-of-the-art review on microbial fuel cells: A promising technology for wastewater treatment and bioenergy. Biotechnology Advances, 25(5), 464–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.05.004
15. Eseohe, A. O., Oji, A., & Da-silva, A. (2022). Monitoring of produced biogas volume and composition from co-digestion of Cow- dung and organic-kitchen-waste. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 13(1), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.30574/4/ gscarr.2022.13.1.0265
16. Fang, W., Huang, Y., Ding, Y., Qi, G., Liu, Y., & Bi, J. (2022). Health risks of odorous compounds during the whole process of municipal solid waste collection and treatment in China. Environment International, 158, 106951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. envint.2021.106951
17. Frankowski, J., & Czekała, W. (2023). Agricultural Plant Residues as Potential Co-Substrates for Biogas Production. Energies, 16(11), 4396. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16114396
18. García-Depraect, O., Martínez-Mendoza, L. J., Diaz, I., & Muñoz, R. (2022). Two-stage anaerobic digestion of food waste: Enhanced bioenergy production rate by steering lactate-type fermentation during hydrolysis-acidogenesis. Bioresource Technology, 358, 127358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. biortech.2022.127358
19. Guo, H., Li, Q., Wang, L., Chen, Q., Hu, H., Cheng, D., & He, J. (2022). Semi-solid state promotes the methane production during anaerobic co-digestion of chicken manure with corn straw comparison to wet and high-solid state. Journal of Environmental Management, 316, 115264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115264
20. Hadin, Å., & Eriksson, O. (2016). Horse manure as feedstock for anaerobic digestion. Waste Management, 56, 506–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. wasman.2016.06.023
21. Hilkiah Igoni, A., Ayotamuno, M. J., Eze, C. L., Ogaji, S. O. T., & Probert, S. D. (2008). Designs of anaerobic digesters for producing biogas from municipal solid-waste. Applied Energy, 85(6), 430–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2007.07.013
22. Hilmi, N. A. M., Zakarya, I. A., Gunny, A. A. N., Izhar, T. N. T., Zaaba, S. K., Samah, M. F., Daud, Z. A. A. M., & Beson, M. R. C. (2023). Co-digestion of food waste with cow manure by anaerobic digestion for biogas production. Co-digestion of food waste with cow manure by anaerobic digestion for biogas production. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1135. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1135/1/012034
23. Jafar, R., & Awad, A. (2021). State and development of anaerobic technology for biogas production in Syria. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 5, 100253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2021.100253
24. Juntupally, S., Begum, S., & Arelli, V. (2024). Microbial coculture to enhance biogas production. In Biogas to Biomethane. LTD. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-18479-6.00011-9
25. Kaza, S., Yao, L., Bhada-Tata, P., & Woerden, F. Van. (2018). What a Waste 2.0. A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050. Urban Development Series. World Bank Group.
26. Khan, M. D., Khan, N., Sultana, S., Joshi, R., Ahmed, S., Yu, E., Scott, K., Ahmad, A., & Khan, M. Z. (2017). Bioelectrochemical conversion of waste to energy using microbial fuel cell technology. Process Biochemistry, 57, 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2017.04.001
27. Kumar, S., Binti, F., Zain, S., & Kumar, B. (2019). The anaerobic digestion process of biogas production from food waste: Prospects and constraints. Bioresource Technology Reports, 8(July), 100310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2019.100310
28. Leytem, A. B., Bjorneberg, D. L., Koehn, A. C., Moraes, L. E., Kebreab, E., & Dungan, R. S. (2017). Methane emissions from dairy lagoons in the western United States. Journal of Dairy Science, 100(8), 6785–6803. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-12777
29. Leytem, A. B., Dungan, R. S., Bjorneberg, D. L., & Koehn, A. C. (2011). Emissions of Ammonia, Methane, Carbon Dioxide, and Nitrous Oxide from Dairy Cattle Housing and Manure Management Systems. Journal of Environmental Quality, 40, 1383–1394. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2009.0515
30. Liu, J., Zhan, L., Wang, Q., Wu, M., Ye, W., Zhang, J., Li, Y., Wen, J., & Chen, L. (2022). Distribution and Driving Mechanism of N2 O in Sea Ice and Its Underlying Seawater during Arctic Melt Season. Water (Switzerland), 14(2), 145. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14020145
31. Mu, D., Horowitz, N., Casey, M., & Jones, K. (2017). Environmental and economic analysis of an in-vessel food waste composting system at Kean University in the U.S. Waste Management, 59, 476– 486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.10.026
32. Mukhuba, M., Roopnarain, A., Moeletsi, M. E., & Adeleke, R. (2020). Metagenomic insights into the microbial community and biogas production pattern during anaerobic digestion of cow manure and mixed food waste. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 95(1), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.6217
33. Mulbry, W., & Ahn, H. (2014). Greenhouse gas emissions during composting of dairy manure: Influence of the timing of pile mixing on total emissions. Biosystems Engineering, 126, 117–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2014.08.003
34. Obileke, K., Onyeaka, H., Meyer, E. L., & Nwokolo, N. (2021). Electrochemistry Communications Microbial fuel cells, a renewable energy technology for bio-electricity generation: A mini-review. Electrochemistry Communications, 125, 107003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2021.107003
35. Oliveira, V. B., Simões, M., Melo, L. F., & Pinto, A. M. F. R. (2013). Overview on the developments of microbial fuel cells. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 73, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2013.01.012
36. Owen, J. J., & Silver, W. L. (2015). Greenhouse gas emissions from dairy manure management: A review of field-based studies. Global Change Biology, 21, 550–565. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12687
37. Pasvadoglou, E., Kourtidis, G., Mamolos, A., Menexes, G., Papatheodorou, E., & Giannopoulos, G. (2023). Combined application of urea and cow manure results in similar cumulative N2O emissions relative to conventional fertilization, in two types of soil. Copernicus Meetings.
38. Prasad, R. K. (2023). The Implementation of Waste Biomass Substrates as Feedstock for The Production of Bio-Electricity Through Microbial Fuel Cells (MFCS): A Short Review. International Journal of Biomass and Renewables, 12(2), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.61762/ijbrvol12iss2art24517
39. Purwono, P., Hermawan, H., & Hadiyanto, H. (2015). Penggunaan Teknologi Reaktor Microbial Fuel Cells (Mfcs) Dalam Pengolahan Limbah Cair Industri Tahu Untuk Menghasilkan Energi Listrik. Jurnal Presipitasi: Media Komunikasi Dan Pengembangan Teknik Lingkungan, 12(2), 57. https://doi.org/10.14710/presipitasi.v12i2.57-65
40. R, M., Soeroso, F., Pradana, S. A., Utomo, S., & Wardhana, I. W. (2016). Pengaruh Pengenceran Dan Pengadukan Terhadap Produksi Biogas Pada Anaerobic Digestion Dengan Menggunakan Ekstrak Rumen Sapi Sebagai Starter Dan Limbah Dapur Sebagai Substrat. Jurnal Presipitasi: Media Komunikasi Dan Pengembangan Teknik Lingkungan, 13(2), 88. https://doi.org/10.14710/presipitasi.v13i2.88-93
41. Rahimnejad, M., Adhami, A., Darvari, S., Zirepour, A., & Oh, S.-E. (2015). Microbial fuel cell as new technology for bioelectricity generation: A review. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 54(3), 745–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2015.03.031
42. Ramatsa, I. M., Akinlabi, E. T., Madyira, D. M., & Huberts, R. (2014). Design of the bio-digester for biogas production: A review. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2014 Vol II. WCECS 2014, 22-24 October, 2014, San Francisco, USA.
43. Rismani-Yazdi, H., Christy, A. D., Dehority, B. A., Morrison, M., Yu, Z., & Tuovinen, O. H. (2007). Electricity generation from cellulose by rumen microorganisms in microbial fuel cells. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 97(6). 1398-1407. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.21366
44. Saggar, S., Bolan, N. S., Bhandral, R., Hedley, C. B., & Luo, J. (2004). A review of emissions of methane, ammonia, and nitrous oxide from animal excreta deposition and farm effluent application in grazed pastures. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 47, 513–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/0028 8233.2004.9513618
45. Saha, S. S., & Mondal, Md. I. H. (2023). Production and Kinetic Study of biogas formation from cow manure and utilization of biogas effluent as bio-fertilizer. Asian Journal of Chemical Sciences, 13(1), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajocs/2023/ v13i1233
46. Sarangi, U. (2023). Impact of Climate Change on Global Ecosystem and SDGs. International Journal of New Economics and Social Sciences, 1(17), 49–71. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0053.9604
47. Schiffman, S. S., & Williams, C. M. (2005). Science of Odor as a Potential Health Issue. Journal of Environmental Qualityuality, 34(1), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2005.0129a
48. Scott, K., & Yu, E. H. (2015). Microbial Electrochemical and Fuel Cells: Fundamentals and Applications. In: Microbial Electrochemical and Fuel Cells: Fundamentals and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2014-0-01767-4
49. Scott, S. L., McSpirit, S., Breheny, P., & Howell, B. M. (2012). The long-term effects of a coal waste disaster on social trust in Appalachian Kentucky. Organization and Environment, 25(4), 402–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026612467983
50. Shah, A. A., Seehar, T. H., Sharma, K., & Toor, S. S. (2022). Chapter 7 - Biomass pretreatment technologies (S. K. Maity, K. Gayen, & T. K. B. T.-H. B. Bhowmick, Eds.; pp. 203–228). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823306-1.00014-5
51. Shen, L., Guan, Y., Wu, G., & Zhan, X. (2014). N2O emission from a sequencing batch reactor for biological N and P removal from wastewater. Frontiers of Environmental Science and Engineering, 8(5), 776–783. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11783-013-0586-0
52. SIPSN-KLHK. (2023). Sistem Informasi Pengelolaan Sampah Nasional (SIPSN).
53. Stegenta-Dąbrowska, S., Drabczyński, G., Sobieraj, K., Koziel, J. A., & Białowiec, A. (2019). The biotic and abiotic carbon monoxide formation during aerobic co-digestion of dairy cattle manure with green waste and sawdust. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 7, 283. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fbioe.2019.00283
54. Stenström, F., Baresel, C., & La Cour Jansen, J. (2013). Nitrous oxide production under varied C/N-ratio and DO in an SBR treating digester supernatant. 13th Nordic Wastewater Treatment Conference (NORDIWA2013).
55. Taylor, P., Li, R., Chen, S., & Li, X. (2009). Anaerobic co-digestion of kitchen waste and cattle manure for methane production anaerobic co-digestion of kitchen waste and cattle manure for methane production. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 31, 1845–1856. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567030802606038
56. Thakur, H., Ira, R., Kumar, N., & Sharma, V. (2023). Environmental Technology & Innovation Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste, bio-flocculated sewage sludge, and cow manure in CSTR using E(C2)Tx synthetic consortia. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 32, 103263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. eti.2023.103263
57. Torbira, M. S., & Saturday, E. G. (2021). Biogas production from cow manures using a modified fixed-dome digester. Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Advances, 7(3), 224–230. https://doi.org/10.30574/gjeta.2021.7.3.0066
58. Vasantha, T., & Jyothi, N. V. V. (2020). Green Technologies for Wastewater Treatment. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16427-0_9
59. Viswanath, P., Devi, S. S., & Nand, K. (1992). Anaerobic Digestion of Fruit and Vegetable Processing Wastes for Biogas Production. Bioresource Technology, 40, 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-8524(92)90117-G
60. Wang, X., Yang, G., Feng, Y., Ren, G., & Han, X. (2012). Optimizing feeding composition and carbon – nitrogen ratios for improved methane yield during anaerobic co-digestion of dairy, chicken manure and wheat straw. Bioresource Technology, 120, 78–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. biortech.2012.06.058
61. Wassmann, R., Neue, H., Lantin, R. S., Buendia, L. V, & Rennenberg, H. (2000). Characterization of methane emissions from rice fields in Asia. I . Comparison among field sites in five countries. In: Methane Emissions from Major Rice Ecosystems in Asia.
62. Yan, X., Zheng, J., Han, Y., Liu, J., & Sun, J. (2017). Effect of influent C/N ratio on N2O emissions from anaerobic/anoxic/oxic biological nitrogen removal processes. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(30), 23714–23724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0019-x
63. Zhang, Y. (2012). Energy Recovery from Waste Streams with Microbial Fuel Cell (MFC)-based Technologies. In: Technical University of Denmark (Issue September).
64. Zhao, Y., Sun, F., Yu, J., Cai, Y., Luo, X., Cui, Z., Hu, Y., & Wang, X. (2018). Co-digestion of oat straw and cow manure during anaerobic digestion: Stimulative and inhibitory effects on fermentation. Bioresource Technology, 269, 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.08.040

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-3434a486-4c1f-4812-a677-b8f84cb6d803