W poszukiwaniu zrównoważonego opakowania ze szczególnym naciskiem na emisję gazów cieplarnianych

• Autorzy: Luzan S.

Warianty tytułu

EN

In search for sustainable packaging with the focus on the emission of greenhouse gases

• Języki publikacji: PL

Słowa kluczowe

PL

opakowanie; tektura falista; papier

EN

package; corrugated cardboard; paper

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo SIGMA-NOT
• Czasopismo: Przegląd Papierniczy
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: R. 73, nr 5
• Strony: 289--297
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 23 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Luzan S.

• Vienna Austria;

Bibliografia

• [1] Twede D. 2007. “The History of corrugated fiberboard shipping containers”, Michigan State University, CHARM 2007, pp. 241-246.
• [2] Mohan A-M. 2016. “Consumers turn to brands for direction on recycling”, published on Mar 2nd 2016, http://www.greenerpackage.com/.
• [3] World Business Council for Sustainable Development “Sustainable Consumption – Facts and Trends”, ISBN 978-3-940388-30-8.
• [4] Danish Ministry of the Enviroment. “ Impact Categories, Normalization, and Weighting in LCA”, Enviromental News, no. 78, 2005.
• [5] Hansen J. et al. 2010. “Global surface temperature change”, Reviews of Geophysics. 48 (4).
• [6] European Environment Agency “Observed trends in total global concentration of the Kyoto gases, 1850-2010”. http://www.eea.europa.eu/.
• [7] Pala C. “Corals tie stronger El Niños to climate change”, Science, DOI: 10.1126/science.aal0486.
• [8] http://www.kyotoprotocol.com/
• [9] Mondi Group Sustainable Development Report for 2015. https://www.mondigroup.com/
• [10] Chapter 5, the course on “Forest Resource Management”, Penn University (USA).
• [11] “European database for corrugated board lifecycle studies” by CEPI Containerboard and by FEFCO. 2015.
• [12] “Corrugated packaging life-cycle assessment summary report” by Corrugated Packaging Alliance. 2010. http://www.corrugated.org/.
• [13] “Analysis of Eurostat packaging recycling data: a study of the years 2006-2012” by Extended Producer Responsibility Alliance EXPRA. 2015. http://www.expra.eu/.
• [14] Parker L. 2015. “Ocean trash: 5.25 trillion pieces and counting, but big questions remain”, National Geographic (published on Jan 11th 2015).
• [15] “Enviromental overview: complete life cycle assessment of north American container glass” by Glass Packaging Institute. 2010.
• [16] Harding K.G. et al. 2007. “Environmental analysis of plastic production processes: Comparing petroleum-based polypropylene and polyethylene with biologically-based poly-β-hydroxybutyric acid using life cycle analysis”. Journal of Biotechnology (130) : 57-66.
• [17] Korneliusdottir A.M. 2014. “A cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of primary aluminium production at Nordural”, Master Thesis, University of Iceland.
• [18] “Comparative life cycle assessment of reusable plastic containers and display-and non-display-ready corrugated containers used for fresh produce applications” by Franklin Associates. 2016.
• [19] “LCA comparison of two systems for bread packaging and distribution”. 2008. Research Report no. D2.5.1, by SYKE and by Stora Enso.
• [20] “Single trip or reusable packaging – considering the right choice for the environment” by WRAP. 2010. ISBN 1-84405- 437-3. www.wrap.org.uk
• [21] http://www.save-food.org/
• [22] “New Research shows fruit packed in corrugated is safer and fresher than RPCs” by FEFCO and by the University of Bologna. 2016.
• [23] “Corrugated packaging is protecting pocket of retailers, Health of Consumers” by Mondi Tire Kutsan and by the Aegean University. 2016.