Optimal retrofit strategy using viscous dampers between adjacent RC and SMRFs prone to earthquake‑induced pounding

• Autorzy: Asgarkhani N. , Kazemi F. , Jankowski R.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1007/s43452-022-00542-1

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Nowadays, retrofitting-damaged buildings is an important challenge for engineers. Finding the optimal placement of Viscous Dampers (VDs) between adjacent structures prone to earthquake-induced pounding can help designers to implement VDs with optimizing the cost of construction and achieving higher performance levels for both structures. In this research, the optimal placement of linear and nonlinear VDs between the 3-story, 5-story, and 9-story Steel and RC Moment-Resisting Frames (SMRFs and RC MRFs) is investigated. It is shown that the pounding phenomenon can significantly affect the seismic performance capacities of buildings during earthquakes, and using VDs can improve the seismic limit-state capacities of buildings for retrofitting purposes. For this goal, the seismic limit-state capacities of both colliding structures were assessed using Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) assuming Near-fault Pulse-Like, Near-fault No-Pulse, and Far-Fault seismic records suggested by FEMA-P695. To perform IDAs, structures were modeled according to the seismic codes using a developed algorithm in Matlab and OpenSees software with the ability to remove a collapsed structure during the analysis. The results present an optimal placement for using VDs between structures and also compare the possible conditions to implement VDs. Using these results, engineers can approximately predict the seismic performance levels of both structures prone to earthquake-induced pounding and their final performance after retrofitting. Finally, retrofitting modification factors were proposed to help designers to predict the limit-state performance levels of retrofitted colliding structures without involving complicated and time-consuming analyses.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

viscous damper; structural pounding; seismic retrofitting; retrofitting modification factor; seismic limit state capacity; incremental dynamic analysis

PL

konstrukcja budowlana; modernizacja sejsmiczna; analiza dynamiczna przyrostowa

• Wydawca: Springer ; Wrocław University of Science and Technology
• Czasopismo: Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: Vol. 23, no. 1
• Strony: art. no. e7, 2023
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 66 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Asgarkhani N.

• Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Gdańsk University of Technology, ul. Narutowicza 11/12, 80‑233 Gdansk, Poland

autor

Kazemi F.

• Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Gdańsk University of Technology, ul. Narutowicza 11/12, 80‑233 Gdansk, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2448-1465

autor

Jankowski R.

• Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Gdańsk University of Technology, ul. Narutowicza 11/12, 80‑233 Gdansk, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Sołtysik B, Jankowski R. Non-linear strain rate analysis of earthquake-induced pounding between steel buildings. Int J Earth Sci Eng. 2013;6(3):429-33.
• 2. Elwardany H, Seleemah A, Jankowski R, El-Khoriby S. Influence of soil-structure interaction on seismic pounding between steel frame buildings considering the effect of infill panels. Bull Earthq Eng. 2019;17(11):6165-202.
• 3. Rezaei H, Moayyedi SA, Jankowski R. Probabilistic seismic assessment of RC box-girder highway bridges with unequal-height piers subjected to earthquake-induced pounding. Bull Earthq Eng. 2020;18(4):1547-78.
• 4. Kazemi F, Asgarkhani N, Manguri A, Jankowski R. Investigating an optimal computational strategy to retrofit buildings with implementing viscous dampers. Int Conf Comput Sci ICCS Proc, Lecture Notes in Compu Sci, vol. 13351. 2022. p. 184-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08754-7_25.
• 5. Kazemi F, Mohebi B, Yakhchalian M. Predicting the seismic collapse capacity of adjacent structures prone to pounding. Can J Civ Eng. 2020;47(6):663-77.
• 6. Cole G, Dhakal RP, Carr AJ, Bull D. Building pounding state of the art: Identifying structures vulnerable to pounding damage. In: Proceedings of New Zealand society for earthquake engineering annual conference, 2010.
• 7. Kazemi F, Mohebi B, Yakhchalian M. Evaluation the P-delta effect on collapse capacity of adjacent structures subjected to far-field ground motions. Civ Eng J. 2018;4(5):1066. https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-0309156.
• 8. Favvata MJ. Minimum required separation gap for adjacent RC frames with potential inter-story seismic pounding. Eng Struct. 2017;152:643-59.
• 9. Mohebi B, Kazemi F, Yakhchalian M. Investigating the P-Delta effects on the seismic collapse capacity of adjacent structures. In: 16th European conference on earthquake engineering (16ECEE), 18-21, June, Thessaloniki, Greece, 2018.
• 10. Jankowski R. Experimental study on earthquake-induced pounding between structural elements made of different building materials. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2010;39(3):343-54.
• 11. Leibovich E, Rutenberg A, Yankelevsky DZ. On eccentric seismic pounding of symmetric buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 1996;25(3):219-33.
• 12. Polycarpou PC, Papaloizou L, Komodromos P. An efficient methodology for simulating earthquake-induced 3D pounding of buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2014;43(7):985-1003.
• 13. Skrekas P, Sextos A, Giaralis A. Influence of bi-directional seismic pounding on the inelastic demand distribution of three adjacent multi-storey R/C buildings. Earthq Struct. 2014;6(1):71-87.
• 14. Raheem SEA, Fooly MY, Shafy AGA, Taha AM, Abbas YA, Latif MMA. Numerical simulation of potential seismic pounding among adjacent buildings in series. Bull Earthq Eng. 2019;17(1):439-71.
• 15. Yahyazadeh A, Yakhchalian M. Probabilistic residual drift assessment of SMRFs with linear and nonlinear viscous dampers. J Constr Steel Res. 2018;148:409-21.
• 16. Pavlou E, Constantinou MC. Response of nonstructural components in structures with damping systems. J Struc Eng. 2006;132(7):1108-17.
• 17. Lavan O, Dargush GF. Multi-objective evolutionary seismic design with passive energy dissipation systems. J Earthq Eng. 2009;13(6):758-90.
• 18. Raheem SEA. Mitigation measures for earthquake induced pounding effects on seismic performance of adjacent buildings. Bull Earthq Eng. 2014;12(4):1705-24.
• 19. Raheem SEA, Fooly MY, Omar M, Zaher AKA. Seismic pounding effects on the adjacent symmetric buildings with eccentric alignment. Earthq Struct. 2019;16(6):715-26.
• 20. Rezavandi A, Moghadam AS. Experimental and numerical study on pounding effects and mitigation techniques for adjacent structures. Adv Struct Eng. 2007;10(2):121-34.
• 21. Lasowicz N, Kwiecień A, Jankowski R. Experimental study on the effectiveness of polymer damper in damage reduction of temporary steel grandstand. J Phys Conf Ser. 2015;628(1):012051.
• 22. Stręk AM, Lasowicz N, Kwiecień A, Zając B, Jankowski R. Highly dissipative materials for damage protection against earthquake-induced structural pounding. Materials. 2021;14(12):3231.
• 23. Polycarpou PC, Komodromos P, Polycarpou AC. A nonlinear impact model for simulating the use of rubber shock absorbers for mitigating the effects of structural pounding during earthquakes. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2013;42(1):81-100.
• 24. Takabatake H, Yasui M, Nakagawa Y, Kishida A. Relaxation method for pounding action between adjacent buildings at expansion joint. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2014;43(9):1381-400.
• 25. Jankowski R, Mahmoud S. Linking of adjacent three-storey buildings for mitigation of structural pounding during earthquakes. Bull Earthq Eng. 2016;14(11):3075-97.
• 26. Patel CC, Jangid RS. Seismic response of dynamically similar adjacent structures connected with viscous dampers. IES J Part A Civ Struct Eng. 2010;3(1):1-13.
• 27. Pratesi F, Sorace S, Terenzi G. Seismic pounding mitigation of a modern heritage R/C bell tower. WIT Trans Built Environ. 2013;131:303-14.
• 28. Sorace S, Terenzi G. Damped interconnection-based mitigation of seismic pounding between adjacent R/C buildings. Int J Eng Technol. 2013;5(3):406.
• 29. Pratesi F, Sorace S, Terenzi G. Analysis and mitigation of seismic pounding of a slender R/C bell tower. Eng Struct. 2014;71:23-34.
• 30. Kandemir-Mazanoglu EC, Mazanoglu K. An optimization study for viscous dampers between adjacent buildings. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2017;89:88-96.
• 31. Kazemi F, Mohebi B, Yakhchalian M. Enhancing the seismic performance of adjacent pounding structures using viscous dampers. In: The 16th European conference on earthquake engineering (16ECEE); 2018, pp. 18-21.
• 32. Bekdaş G, Nigdeli SM. Preventing the pounding of adjacent buildings with harmony search optimized tuned mass damper. In: 3rd European conference of civil engineering; 2012, pp. 2-4.
• 33. Licari M, Sorace S, Terenzi G. Nonlinear modeling and mitigation of seismic pounding between R/C frame buildings. J Earthq Eng. 2015;19(3):431-60.
• 34. Tubaldi E, Barbato M, Ghazizadeh S. A probabilistic performance-based risk assessment approach for seismic pounding with efficient application to linear systems. Struct Saf. 2012;36:14-22.
• 35. Martinez-Rodrigo M, Romero ML. An optimum retrofit strategy for moment resisting frames with nonlinear viscous dampers for seismic applications. Eng Struct. 2003;25(7):913-25.
• 36. Bigdeli K, Hare W, Tesfamariam S. Configuration optimization of dampers for adjacent buildings under seismic excitations. Eng Optim. 2012;44(12):1491-509.
• 37. Dall′Asta A, Tubaldi E, Ragni L. Influence of the nonlinear behavior of viscous dampers on the seismic demand hazard of building frames. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2015;45(1):149-69.
• 38. Mansoori MR, Moghadam AS. Using viscous damper distribution to reduce multiple seismic responses of asymmetric structures. J Constr Steel Res. 2009;65(12):2176-85.
• 39. Kazemi F, Miari M, Jankowski R. Investigating the effects of structural pounding on the seismic performance of adjacent RC and steel MRFs. Bull Earthq Eng. 2021;19(1):317-43.
• 40. ASCE 7‐16. Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers; 2017.
• 41. AISC Committee. Specification for structural steel buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-16). Chicago-Illinois: American Institute of Steel Construction; 2016.
• 42. AISC A. AISC 341-16, seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. Chicago, IL: American Institute of Steel Construction; 2016.
• 43. ACI Committee, International Organization for Standardization. Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-14) and commentary. American Concrete Institute; 2014.
• 44. Kitayama S, Constantinou MC. Seismic performance of buildings with viscous damping systems designed by the procedures of ASCE/SEI 7-16. J Struct Eng. 2018;144(6):04018050.
• 45. Haselton CB. Assessing seismic collapse safety of modern reinforced concrete moment frame buildings. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University; 2006.
• 46. Kazemi F, Mohebi B, Jankowski R. Predicting the seismic collapse capacity of adjacent SMRFs retrofitted with fluid viscous 2021;161: 107939.
• 47. Lignos DG, Krawinkler H. Deterioration modeling of steel components in support of collapse prediction of steel moment frames under earthquake loading. J Struct Eng. 2010;137(11):1291-302.
• 48. Ibarra LF, Medina RA, Krawinkler H. Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2005;34(12):1489-511.
• 49. McKenna F, Fenves GL, Filippou FC, Scott MH. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation (OpenSees). Berkeley: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California; 2016.
• 50. Altoontash A. Simulation and damage models for performance assessment of reinforced concrete beam-column joints. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University; 2004.
• 51. Fardis MN, Biskinis DE. Deformation capacity of RC members, as controlled by flexure or shear. In: Otani symposium, vol. 511530; 2003.
• 52. Berry M, Parrish M, Eberhard M. PEER structural performance database user’s manual. Berkeley: University of California; 2004.
• 53. Deierlein GG, Haselton CB. Benchmarking the collapse safety of code-compliant reinforced concrete moment frame building systems. In: ATC/JSCA US-Japan workshop on improvement of structural design and construction practices, proceedings of an international workshop; 2005, pp. 17-9.
• 54. Mohebi B, Yazdanpanah O, Kazemi F, Formisano A. Seismic damage diagnosis in adjacent steel and RC MRFs considering pounding effects through improved wavelet-based damage-sensitive feature. J Build Eng. 2021;33:101847.
• 55. Mahmoud S, Jankowski R. Modified linear viscoelastic model of earthquake-induced structural pounding. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng. 2011;35(C1):51-62.
• 56. Yazdanpanah O, Mohebi B, Kazemi F, Mansouri I, Jankowski R. Development of fragility curves in adjacent steel moment-resisting frames considering pounding effects through improved wavelet-based refined damage-sensitive feature. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2022;173: 109038.
• 57. Anagnostopoulos SA. Equivalent viscous damping for modeling inelastic impacts in earthquake pounding problems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2004;33(8):897-902.
• 58. Mahmoud S, Jankowski R. Elastic and inelastic multi-storey buildings under earthquake excitation with the effect of pounding. J Appl Sci. 2009;9(18):3250-62.
• 59. Polycarpou PC, Komodromos P. Earthquake-induced poundings of a seismically isolated building with adjacent structures. Eng Struct. 2010;32(7):1937-51.
• 60. Karayannis CG, Naoum MC. Torsional behavior of multistory RC frame structures due to asymmetric seismic interaction. Eng Struct. 2018;163:93-111.
• 61. Applied Technology Council, United States. Federal Emergency Management Agency. Quantification of building seismic performance factors. US Department of Homeland Security, FEMA; 2009.
• 62. Asgarkhani N, Yakhchalian M, Mohebi B. Evaluation of approximate methods for estimating residual drift demands in BRBFs. Eng Struct. 2020;224: 110849.
• 63. Kazemi F, Jankowski R. Enhancing seismic performance of rigid and semi-rigid connections equipped with SMA bolts incorporating nonlinear soil-structure interaction. Eng Struct. 2022;114896.
• 64. Kazemi F, Jankowski R. Machine learning-based prediction of seismic limit-state capacity of steel moment-resisting frames considering soil-structure interaction. Comput Struct. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2022.106886.
• 65. MATLAB. Simulink as a Technical Computing Language. Engineering Computations and Modeling in MATLAB; 2018.
• 66. FEMA-356. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency; 2000.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023)