Cyclic behavior of precast concrete beam-column connection using steel fiber reinforced cast-in-place concrete

• Autorzy: Noorhidana Vera Agustriana , Forth John P.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/msp-2021-0021

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Three equivalent exterior precast concrete beam-column (PCBC) connections have been investigated in this study in orderto analyze the effect of steel fiber reinforced concrete (SFRC) as cast-in-place (CIP) on the seismic performance of the PCBC connection. The connection was designed as a ductile connection for a moment-resisting frame and consists of a precast U-beam, precast column with corbel, interlocking bars, and CIP-concrete to connect the precast beam to precast column. The volume fractions of steel fiber incorporated within the CIP-concrete were 0%, 0.5% and 1%. A quasi-static load was applied vertically to the beam tip of the PCBC specimen. The results showed that the steel fibers contained within the CIP-concrete provided 2% increase of the maximum load, 17.7% increase of the energy dissipation, and increase in the joint stiffness of the PCBC connection. The steel fibers delayed the onset of cracking and slowed down the crack propagation, resulting in shorter cracks in the joint core of PCBC specimen, which correlates well with the deflection-hardening characteristic found from the modulus of rupture test.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

precast concrete; beam-column; connection; steel fibre; cast-in-place; energy dissipation

• Wydawca: De Gruyter
• Czasopismo: Materials Science Poland
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 39, No. 2
• Strony: 240--251
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 21 poz., rys., tab

Twórcy

autor

Noorhidana Vera Agustriana

• Department of Civil Engineering, Universitas Lampung, Indonesia

autor

Forth John P.

• School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, The United Kingdom

Bibliografia

• [1] Ezeldin AS, Balaguru PN. Normal and high strength fiber-reinforced concrete under compression. J Mater Civil Eng. 1992; https://doi.org/10.1061/ (ASCE)0899-1561(1992)4:4(415).
• [2] Lee MK, Barr BIG. An overview of the fatigue behavior of plain and fiber reinforced concrete. Cem Concr Compos. 2004; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(02)00139-7.
• [3] Altun F, Haktanir T, Ari K. Effects of steel fiber addition on mechanical properties of concrete and RC beams. Constr Build Mater. 2007; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.12.006.
• [4] Chao SH, Naaman AE, Montesinos GJP. Bond behavior of reinforcing bars in tensile strain-hardening fiber reinforced cement composites. ACI Struct J. 2009;106(6):897–906.
• [5] Ganesan N, Indira PV, Sabeena MV. Behavior of hybrid fiber reinforced concrete beam-column joints under reverse cyclic loads. Mater Des. 2014; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.08.076.
• [6] ACI 544.1R-96. State-of-the-art report on fiber reinforced concrete. American Concrete Institute-ACI Committee; 1996.
• [7] Soroushian P, Bayasi Z. Fiber type effects on the performance of steel fiber reinforced concrete. Mater J. 1991; https://doi.org/10.14359/1883.
• [8] Marthong C, Marthong S. An experimental study on the effect of PET fibers on the behavior of exterior RC beam-column connection subjected to reversed cyclic loading. Structures. 2016; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2015.11.003.
• [9] Ganesan N, Indira PV, Ruby A. Steel fiber reinforced high performance concrete beam-column joints subjected to cyclic loading. ISET J Earthq Technol. 2007;44(3–4):445–56.
• [10] Maya F, Zanuy C, Albajar L, Lopez C, Portabella J. Experimental assessment of connections for precast concrete frames using ultra high performance fibre reinforced concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2013; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.07.002.
• [11] Bull DK, Park R. Seismic resistance frames incorporating precast prestressed concrete beam shells. PCI J. 1986; https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij. 07011986.54.93.
• [12] Parastesh H, Hajirasouliha I, Ramezani R. A new ductile moment-resisting connection for precast concrete frames in seismic regions: an experimental investigation. Eng Struct. 2014; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.04.001.
• [13] Bhatt P, Kirk DW. Test on an improved beam column connection for precast concrete. ACI J. 1985;82(6):834–843.
• [14] Ertas O, Ozden S, Ozturan T. Ductile connections in precast concrete moment resisting frames. PCI J. 2006; https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.05012006.66.76.
• [15] Li B, Yip WK, Leong CL. Hybrid-steel concrete connections under reversed cyclic loadings. In: Pasific Conference on Earthquake Engineering; 2003.
• [16] Noorhidana VA, Forth JP. Precast concrete beam-tocolumn connection using interlocking bars, An alternative. Concr Plant Int. 2016;6:200–4.
• [17] Park R. Simulated seismic load tests on reinforced concrete elements and structures. In: Earthquake Engineering, 10th World Conference, Rotterdam; 1994.
• [18] Oh BH. Flexural analysis of reinforced concrete beams containing steel fibers. J Struct Eng. 1992; https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE) 0733-9445(1992)118:10(2821).
• [19] Shannag MJ, Ziyyad TB. Flexural response of ferrocement with fibrous cementitious matrices. Constr Build Mater. 2007; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.06.021.
• [20] Said AM, Nehdi ML. Behavior of beam-column joints cast using self-consolidating concrete under reversed cyclic loading. In: 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Canada; 2004.
• [21] Hidalgo PA, Jordan RM. Strength and energy dissipation characteristics of reinforced concrete walls under shear failure. In: Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco; 1996.