ADD, HKD i ADHD w świetle hipotezy dipolowej

Walecki, P.; Trąbka, J.

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

ADD, HKD i ADHD w świetle hipotezy dipolowej

Autorzy

Walecki P. , Trąbka J.

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma

Identyfikatory

Warianty tytułu

ADD, HKD and ADHD in dipole hypothesis

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

W pracy zostało zaprezentowane oryginalne podejście do diagnozy oraz różnicowania zaburzeń aktywności i uwagi (ADD, HKD i ADHD) w kontekście analizy minimalnych uszkodzeń mózgu (MBD) i klinicznej teorii dipolowej. Zaburzona elektrogeneza mózgowa, która przejawia się w zapisie hrEEG, tłumaczona w świetle hipotezy dipolowej pozwala na szczegółową analizę zmian w elektrycznej czynności mózgu pod wpływem farmakoterapii i terapii neurofeedback (NF). Dipol przedstawia patologiczną organizację elektrogenezy mózgu, ujmowanego jako całość. Gdy elektrogenezę rozpatrujemy w kategoriach sieci neuronalnej, czyli w płaszczyźnie dwuwymiarowej, to „skok napięciowy" w przestrzeni trójwymiarowej przekształca się w makroskopową organizację dipola. Uszkodzenie anatomiczne OUN o małych rozmiarach (MBD), które nie manifestuje się pod postacią objawów ubytkowych, staje się miejscem powstania dipola elektro-magnetycznego. Od umiejscowienia oraz orientacji geometryczno-przestrzennej dipola zależy rozkład pola elektro-magnetycznego, który warunkuje sektory lub kwadranty mózgu zakłócone, a nawet wyłączone z normalnego planu czynnościowego. Rozszerzające się w głębi mózgu pole elektro-magnetyczne staje się czynnikiem hipersynchronizującym, zakłócającym autochtoniczną elektrogenezę korową, z kolei to zakłócenie produkcji fal mózgowych, uwidaczniając się w obrazie QEEG oraz MEG, staje się wyrazem czynnościowych zaburzeń.

This paper presents innovative approach to the diagnosis and differentiation of activity and attention disorders (ADD, HKD and ADHD). Research was undertaken in the perspective of analysis of minimal brain dysfunctions (MBD) and clinical dipole hypothesis. Disorder of brain electrogenesis, which manifests itself in high resolution EEG, explained in dipole hypothesis makes possible detailed analysis of changes in electrical brain activity under the influence of pharmacotherapy or neurofeedback therapy (NF). The dipole shows pathological electrogenesis of the brain, considered as a whole. As the electrogenesis was considered in the neural nets category, that is a two dimensional plane, then "voltage jump" in three dimensional space transforms into the macroscopic organization of the dipole. Minimal brain damage that shows no loss function symptoms became the electromagnetic dipole. The dipole localization and three-dimensional orientation determine distribution of electromagnetic field, which specifies brain sectors or quadrants exclusion with normal neuronal activity. Electromagnetic field spreading in the depth of brain becomes a hipersynchronizating feature that disrupts native cortex electrogenesis. Disruption of brain waves (demonstrated in QEEG and MEG) causes activity disorders.

Słowa kluczowe

ADD HKD ADHD hipoteza dipolowa EEG

ADD HKD ADHD dipole hypothesis EEG

Wydawca

Uniwersytet Jagielloński - Collegium Medicum
Index Copernicus Sp. z o.o.

Czasopismo

Bio-Algorithms and Med-Systems

Rocznik

2005

Tom

Vol. 1, no. 1/2

Strony

267--272

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 73 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Walecki P.

Zakład Bioinformatyki i Telemedycyny, Collegium Medicum Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, 31-501 Kraków, ul. Kopernika 17

autor

Trąbka J.

Zakład Bioinformatyki i Telemedycyny, Collegium Medicum Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, 31-501 Kraków, ul. Kopernika 17

Bibliografia

1. Wender P.H.: Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults. New York: Oxford University Press. 1995.
2. Weiss M., Hechtman L.T., Weiss G.: ADHD in adulthood: A guide to current theory, diagnosis, and treatment. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ Press. 1999.
3. Clement S.D.: Minimal Brain Dysfunction in Children. NINDS Monograph No. 3, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare 1966.
4. Paine R.: Syndrome of minimal cerebral damage, Ped. Clin. Of N Am, 15, 1968.
5. Small L.: The Minimal Brain Dysfunctions. Diagnosis and Treatment, Collier Macmillan Publishers, London 1982.
6. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3th ed.). Washington, DC: 1980.
7. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: 1994.
8. Faraone S.V., Biederman J., Friedman D.: Validity of DSM-IV subtypes of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A family study perspective. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 39: 300-307, 2000.
9. Weiss G., Hechtman L.T.: Hyperactive children grown up: ADHD in children, adolescence, and adults (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press. 1993.
10. The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioral Disorders: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines, tenth revision. Geneva: WHO, 1992.
11. Murphy K.R.: Psychological counseling of adults with ADHD. In R.A. Barkley (ed.), Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A handbook for diagnosis and treatment (pp.582-591). New York: Guilford Press. 1998.
12. Murphy K., Barkley R.: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder adults: Comobidities and adaptive impairments. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 37(6), 393-401, 1996.
13. Millstein R.B., Wilens T.E., Biederman J., Spencer T.J.: Presenting ADHD symptoms and subtypes in clinically referred adults with ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders, 2 (3), 159-166, 1997.
14. Lahey B.B., Applegate B., McBurnett K., Biederman J., Greenhill L., Hynd G.W., Barkley R.A., Newcorn J., Jensen P., Richters J., Garfinkel B., Kerdyk L., Frick P.J., Ollendick T., Perez D., Hart E. L., Waldman I., Schaffer D.: DSM-IV field trials for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents. American Journal of Psychiatry, 151 (11), 1673-1685. 1994.
15. Heiligenstein E., Conyers L.M., Berns A.R., Smith M.A.: Preliminary normative data on DSM-IV attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in college students. Journal of American College Health, 46: 185-188, 1998.
16. Ratey J.J., Greenberg M.S., Bemporad J.R., Lindem K.J.: Unrecognized attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults presenting for outpatient psychotherapy. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology, 2 (4): 267-275, 1992.
17. Mannuzza S., Klein R.G., Bessler A., Malloy P., LaPadula M.: Adult outcome of hyperactive boys: Educational achievement, occupational rank, and psychiatric status. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50: 565-576, 1993.
18. Mannuzza S., Klein R.G., Bessler A., Malloy P., LaPadula M.: Adult psychiatric status of hyperactive boys grown up. Am J of Psychiatry, 155: 493-498, 1998.
19. Silver L.: Attention deficit/hyperactivity in adult lives. Child & Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 9: 511-523, 2000.
20. Barkley R.A., ed. Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Handbook for Diagnosis and Treatment. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2001: 596-606.
21. Goldman L.S., Genel M., Bezman R.J., et al. Diagnosis and treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association. Journal of the American Medical Association. 279 (14): 1100-1107, 1998.
22. Wolf L.E., Wasserstein J.: Adult ADHD: concluding thoughts. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 931: 396-408, 2001.
23. Greenberg L. M., T.O.V.A. continuous performance test manual. Los Alamitos, CA: Universal Attention Disorders 1996.
24. Pennington B. F., Ozonoff S., Executive functions and developmental psychopathology. J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 1996, 37:51-87.
25. Conners C.K., Ernhardt D., Sparrow E.: Conners' adult ADHD rating scales. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems 1999.
26. Conners C.K., Erhardt D., Epstein J.N., Parker J.D.A., Sitarenios G., Sparrow E.: Self-ratings of ADHD symptoms in adults I: Factor structure and normative data. Journal of Attention Disorders, 3 (3): 141-151. 1999.
27. McCarney, S. B., Attention Deficit Disorders Evaluation Scale. Columbia, MO: Hawthorne Press. 1995.
28. Andreasen N. C., Flaum M., Arndt S., The comprehensive assessment of symptoms and history (CASH). An instrument for assessing diagnosis and psychopathology. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry, 49: 615-623. 1992.
29. American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Practiceparameters for the assessment and treatment of children, adolescents, and adults with attention- deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 36 (suppl), 85S-121S, 1997.
30. Bussing R., Zima B.T., Belin T.R.: Variations in ADHD treatment among special education students. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 37 (9): 968-976, 1998.
31. Clinical practice guideline: treatment of the school-aged child with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Pediatrics, 108: 1033-44, 2001.
32. Greenfield B., Hechtman L., Bouffard R., Minde K., Looper K., Ochs E., Eakin L.: Correspondance between self and significant other reports of childhood and current adult ADHD symptoms. Poster presented at the International Society for Research in Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, Vancouver 2001.
33. Multimodal Treatment Study of Children With ADHD (MTA) Cooperative Group. A 14-month randomized clinical trial of treatment strategies for attentiondeficit/hyperactivity disorder, Arch. Gen. Psychiatry, 56, 1073-86, 1999.
34. Zarin D.A., Suarez A.P., Pincus H.A., et al. Clinical and treatment characteristics of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in psychiatric practice. J Am Acad of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 37 (12): 1262-1270, 1998.
35. Nadeau K.: Psychotherapy for women with ADHD. In K. Nadeau & P. Quinn (Eds.), Understanding Women with ADHD. Silver Spring, Advantage Books 2002.
36. Bemporad J., Zambenedetti M.: Psychotherapy of adults with attention-deficit disorder. Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 5 (3), 228-237, 1996.
37. Wasserstein J., Wolf L.E., LeFever F. (Eds.), Attention deficit disorder: Brain mechanisms and life outcomes. The New York Academy of Sciences, 2001.
38. Berger A., Posner M.I.: Pathologies of brain attentional networks. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 24(1): 3-5. 2000.
39. Wasserstein J., Wolf L.E., LeFever F. (Eds.), Attention deficit disorder: Brain mechanisms and life outcomes. The New York Academy of Sciences, 2001.
40. Aylward E. H., Reiss A. L..: Reader M.J., et al.: Basal ganglia volumes in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, J Child Neurol, 11(2): 112-115, 1996.
41. Filipek P.A., Semrud-Clikeman M., Steingard R.J., et al.: Volumetric MRI analysis comparing subjects having attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder with normal controls, Neurology, 48(3): 589-601, 1997.
42. Liu X., Matochik J. A., Cadet J.-L., London E. D.: Smaller Volume of Prefrontal Lobe in Polysubstance Abusers: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study, Neuropsychopharmacology, 18: 243-252, 1998.
43. Castellanos F.X., Lee P.P., Sharp W., et al.: Developmental trajectories of brain volume abnormalities in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. JAMA 288(14): 1740-1748, 2002.
44. Casey B.J., Trainor R.J., Orendi J.L., Schubert A.B., Nystrom L.E., Giedd J.N., et al.: A developmental functional MRI study of prefrontal activation during performance of a go-no-go task. J Cogn Neurosci, 9: 835-847, 1997.
45. Schildkraut J.J.: The catecholamine hypothesis of affective disorders: A review of the supporting evidence. Am J Psychiatry, 122: 509-522, 1965.
46. Kornetsky C.: Psychoactive drugs in the immature organism, Psychopharmacologia, Vol. 17: 105-136, 1970.
47. Pliszka S.R., McCracken J.T., Maas J.W.: Catecholamines in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: current perspectives, J Am Acad Child Adolesc, Psychiatry. 35, 264-72, 1996.
48. Arnstern A. F.: ADHD, Part 2: Norepinephrine has a critical modulatory influence on prefrontal cortical function, J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 39, 2000.
49. Arnsten A.F., Steere J.C., Hunt R.D.: The contribution of alpha2-noradrenergic mechanisms to prefrontal cortical cognitive function. Arch General Psychiatr, 53: 448-455, 1996/
50. Roth R., Elsworth J.: Biochemical pharmacology of midbrain dopamine neurons. In Psychopharmacology: The Fourth Generation of Progress. Edited by Bloom F., Kupfer D., New York: Raven Press; 1995: 227-243.
51. Castellanos F.X.: Toward a pathophysiology of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, Clin Pediatr, 36: 381-393, 1997.
52. Wender P.H., Reimherr F.W., Wood D., Ward M.: A controlled study of methylphenidate in the treatment of attention deficit disorder, residual type, in adults. American Journal of Psychiatry, 142 (5): 547-552, 1985.
53. Civelli O.: Molecular biology of the dopamine receptor subtypes. In Psychopharmacology: The Fourth Generation of Progress. Edited by Bloom F., Kupfer D., New York: Raven Press; 1995: 155-161.
54. Meador-Woodruff J.: Differential expression of autoreceptors in the ascending dopamine systems of the human brain. Neurobiology, 91: 8297-8301, 1994.
55. Mrzljak L., Bergson C., Pappy M., Levenson R., Goldman-Rakic P.: Localization of dopamine D4 receptors in GABAergic neurons of the primate brain. Nature, 381: 245-248, 1996.
56. Frontiers in Human Brain Topography - 15th World Congress of the International Society for Brain Electromagnetic Topography (ISBET 2004), Japan 11-14 April 2004, Eds. M. Nakagawa, et al. (Otsubo H., et al.: Dipole source localization of epileptic discharges in EEG and MEG; Horia J., Heb B.: Artefact elimination in spatiotemporal cortical dipole layer imaging with parametric projection filter).
57. Brain Topography Today - III Pan-Pacific Congress on Brain Topography (BTOPPS), Tokyo Bay, Japan, 1-4 April 1997 (Watanabe S., et al.: Dipole source modelling of pain-related brain responses: a magneto-encephalographic study; Sakurai A., et al. A study on dipole of wave V in auditory brainstem response).
58. Demos J.: Getting Started With Neurofeedback, New York, 112-119, 2005.
59. http://www.add-clinic.com/neuro/set1.html
60. Chabot, R.J., Merkin, H., Wood, L.M., Davenport, T.L., Serfontein, G.: Sensitivity and Specificity of QEEG in children with attention deficit or specific developmental learning disorders, Clinical Electroencephalography, Vol. 27, No. 1: 26-34, 1996.
61. Szelenberger W.: Potencjały wywołane, Wyd. Elmiko, 2001.
62. Wypych M., Wróbel A.: Identyfikacja stanu funkcjonalnego mózgu przy pomocy nowych metod analizy potencjałów wywołanych, Konferencja „Nowe metody w neurobiologii", 15 grudnia 2004: 4955.
63. Wróbel A., Kublik E., Musiał P.: Gating of sensory activity within barrel cortex of the awake rat, Exp. Brain Res., 123: 117-123, 1998.
64. Babiloni F., Babiloni C., Locche L., Cincotti F., Rossini P. M., Carducci F.: High Resolution EEG: Source Estimates of Laplacian-Transformed Somatosensory- Evoked Potentials Using a Realistic MRI-Constructed Subject's Head Model, Med Biol Eng & Comput, 38: 512-519, 2000.
65. Trąbka W., Stanuch H., Trąbka J.: Automatic analysis of the long latency auditory evoked potentials using harmonical analysis. XII International Congress of Electroencephal. nad Clinical Neuroph., Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 1990.
66. Pipingas A.: Steady-State Visually Evoked Potential Correlates of Object Recognition Memory, Brain Sciences Institute, Swinbourne 2003.
67. De Munck J.C., et al.: Mathematical Dipoles are Adequate to Describe Realistic Generators of Human Brain Activity. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 35: 960-6. 1988.
68. Schimpf P.H., et al.: Dipole Models for the EEG and MEG. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 49(5):409-18. 2002.
69. Trabka J., et al.: The Otiatric Syndrome of Minimal Cerebral Damage (OSMCD). Part I. Folia Medica Cracoviensis, 16, 45., 1974.
70. Paine R.: Syndrome of minimal cerebral damage, Ped. Clin. Of North America, 15, 1968.
71. Whittingstall K., Stroink G., Gates L., Connolly J.F., Finley A.: Effects of dipole position, orientation and noise on the accuracy of EEG source localization, BioMedical Engineering OnLine 2003, 2: 14. http://www.biomedical-engineering-online.com/content/2/1/14
72. Goldman-Rakic P.S.: Topography of cognition: parallel distributed networks in primate association cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci, 11: 137-156. 1988.
73. Vieth J., et al.: Slow wave and beta wave activity associated with white matter structural brain lesions, localized by the dipole density plot. In: Baumgartner C., et al., Biomagnetism: fundamental research and clinical applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier/IOS-Press; 1995, pp. 50-54.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-315cd92e-02f0-4877-a799-d957a15e1563