Human rights as a factor in the AI alignmen

Strzępek, Kamil

doi:10.57599/gisoj.2024.4.1.66

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Human rights as a factor in the AI alignmen

Autorzy

Strzępek Kamil

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

_4_1_5_Strzępek+Kamil_66-77_accepted_06.07.2024.pdf

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.57599/gisoj.2024.4.1.66

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

One of the most important issues in the AI field is the alignment of AI goals with human goals. This paper examines the role of human rights in the AI alignment process. The subject of the analysis was acts adopted at the level of two European intergovernmental organisations, namely the European Union and the Council of Europe. The analysis aimed to describe the situations (their nature) in which references to human rights were made. This analysis showed that human rights may be considered a guide in European regulations related to AI. Both the AI Act and the Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law are examples of third-generation human rights regulation acts. This means that the human-centric approach adopted in the context of activities within the AI lifecycle is not just a slogan. However, some studies have indicated that regulations may slow down the development of AI in Europe. There is also a question regarding the relationship between European regulations and those of other regions of the world. In particular, the provisions of the Convention clearly show the aspiration that human rights will be a factor in the alignment of goals between AI and humans worldwide.

Słowa kluczowe

artificial intelligence the AI act the Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights Democracy and the Rule of Law AI alignment human rights

sztuczna inteligencja Ustawa o sztucznej inteligencji Konwencja ramowa Rady Europy w sprawie sztucznej inteligencji, praw człowieka, demokracji i praworządności dostosowanie do sztucznej inteligencji prawa człowieka

Wydawca

SILGIS Association
Croatian-Polish Scientific Network

Czasopismo

GIS Odyssey Journal

Rocznik

2024

Tom

Vol. 4, no. 1

Strony

66--77

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 32 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Strzępek Kamil

k.strzepek@uksw.edu.pl

Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Faculty of Law and Administration, Poland

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9277-6057

Bibliografia

1. AI supremacy: The artificial intelligence battle between China, USA and Europe | DW Documentary. (n.d.). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Le122vas9aM [access: 17.04.2024].
2. ALEXA STAGE – Prof. Włodzisław Duch o tym czy nadal warto uczyć się języków obcych (Prof. Włodzisław Duch about whether it is still worth learning foreign languages) (2024). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=61AOh1WJlzU [access: 17.04.2024].
3. Ayers J.W., Poliak A., Dredze M., Leas E.C., Zhu Z., Kelley J.B., Faix D.J., Goodman A.M., Longhurst C.A., Hogarth M., Smith D.M. (2023). Comparing physician and artificial intelligence chatbot responses to patient questions posted to a public social media forum. JAMA Internal Medicine, 183(6), pp. 589–596. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.1838 [access: 17.04.2024].
4. Boden M.A. (2018). Artificial intelligence: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
5. CEUR-WS.org/Vol-3399 – Ongoing Research, Practitioners, Posters, Workshops, and Projects of the International Conference EGOV-CeDEM-ePart 2022. Ceur-Ws.org. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3399/ [access: 17.04.2024].
6. Coe CEPEJ European Ethical Charter on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in judicial systems and their environment (2018). European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). https://www.coe.int/en/web/cepej/cepej-european-ethical-charter-on-the-use-of-artificial-intelligence-ai-in-judicial-systems-and-their-environment [access: 17.04.2024].
7. Committee on Artificial Intelligence (CAI) (2024). Explanatory Report. https://www.coe.int/en/web/artificial-intelligence/cai [access: 17.04.2024].
8. Committee on Artificial Intelligence (CAI) (2024). The Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law. https://www.coe.int/en/web/artificial-intelligence/cai [access: 17.04.2024].
9. Council of the European Union, Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (the AI Act) and amending certain Union legislative acts – Analysis of the final compromise text with a view to agreement (2024). Interinstitutional File: 2021/0106(COD).
10. Custers B. (2023). The Right to Break the Law? Perfect Enforcement of the Law Using Technology Impedes the Development of Legal Systems. Ethics and Information Technology 25(58). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-023-09737-3 [access: 16.07.2024].
11. Debunking the EU AI Act: an overview of the new legal framework (2024). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iO0nfxxeYjE [access: 17.04.2024].
12. Dobák I. (2021). Thoughts on the evolution of national security in cyberspace. Security and Defence Quarterly, 1(33), pp. 75–85.
13. Dragan A. (2023). O sztucznej inteligencji. Tempo zmian jest niewiarygodne (About artificial intelligence. The pace of change is incredible) (2023). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-p0kRrioFWA [access: 17.04.2024].
14. Escott E. (2017). What Are The 3 Types Of AI? A Guide To Narrow, General, And Super Artificial Intelligence. Codebots. https://codebots.com/artificial-intelligence/the-3-types-of-ai-is-the-third-even-possible [access: 17.04.2024].
15. Gabriel I. (2020). Artificial Intelligence, Values, and Alignment. Minds and Machines, 30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09539-2 [access: 17.04.2024].
16. Gajos-Gržetić M., Rahmonov O., Stach S. (2017). Geospatial technologies in biology and medicine: analysis of GIS repository. In: Geographic Information Systems Conference and Exhibition "GIS Odyssey 2017". Trento-Vattaro.
17. IBM Education (2023). The benefits of AI in healthcare. IBM Blog; IBM. https://www.ibm.com/blog/the-benefits-of-ai-in-healthcare/ [access: 17.04.2024].
18. Martsenko N. (2022). Artificial intelligence and human rights: a scientific review of impacts and interactions. Studia Prawnoustrojowe, (58), pp. 315–331. https://doi.org/10.31648/sp.8245 [access: 16.07.2024].
19. Masferrer A. (2023). The Making of Dignity and Human Rights in the Western Tradition. Springer, New York City.
20. Milczarek E. (2024). Cyfrowe prawa człowieka – czy potrzebujemy ich kodyfikacji? (Digital human rights – do we need their codification?). In: J. Jaskiernia, K. Spryszak (ed.), Efektywność krajowych i międzynarodowych systemów ochrony praw człowieka drugiej generacji (The effectiveness of second-generation national and international human rights protection systems). Adam Marszałek, Toruń.
21. Montemayor C. (2023). The Prospect of a Humanitarian Artificial Intelligence. Bloomsbury Publishing, London.
22. Petrašević T., Duić D. (2023). Data Protection and Cybersecurity: Case-Law of Two European Courts. EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges Series (ECLIC 7 – Special Issue), pp. 94–118.
23. Portman C.P. (1986). Jurisprudence: A Descriptive and Normative Analysis of Law. Michigan Law Review, 84(4/5), 1041. https://doi.org/10.2307/1288875 [access: 17.04.2024].
24. Russel S., Norvig P. (2021). Artificial intelligence: a Modern approach. (4th ed.). Prentice Hall, Hoboken.
25. Sakowska-Baryła M. (2024). Sztuczna inteligencja w sektorze publicznym (Artificial Intelligence in the public sector). In: B. Fischer, A. Pązik, M. Świerczyński (ed.), Prawo sztucznej inteligencji (Artificial Intelligence law). Wolters Kluwer Polska.
26. Sieja M., Wach K. (2023). Revolutionary artificial intelligence or rogue technology? The promises and pitfalls of ChatGPT. 9(4), pp. 101–115. https://doi.org/10.15678/ier.2023.0904.07 [access: 17.04.2024].
27. Suleyman M. (2023). The Coming Wave. The Bodley Head, London.
28. Szpor G. (2023). European legal framework for the use of artificial intelligence in publicly accessible space. GIS Odyssey Journal, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 25–36. https://doi.org/10.57599/gisoj.2023.3.2.25 [access: 17.04.2024].
29. Vamplew P., Dazeley R., Foale C., Firmin S., Mummery J. (2017). Human-aligned artificial intelligence is a multiobjective problem. Ethics and Information Technology, 20(1), pp. 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-017-9440-6 [access: 17.04.2024].
30. Więckowski Z., Świerczyński M. (2021). Sztuczna inteligencja w prawie międzynarodowym. Rekomendacje wybranych rozwiązań (Artificial intelligence in international law. Recommendations for selected solutions). Difin.
31. Wiśniewski A. (2023). Sztuczna inteligencja i prawa człowieka w kontekście prawa międzynarodowego (Artificial intelligence and human rights in the context of international law). Prawo i Więź, 4(47), pp. 29–52. https://doi.org/10.36128/PRIW.VI47.785 [access: 16.07.2024].
32. Zuboff S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. NY: Public Affairs, New York.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-314dbde2-f92f-48f9-9715-6439cbaf9071