PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Innovative application of quality methods in the homogeneity assessment of the F-16 aircraft group in terms of generated noise

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Given the high-power concentration of combustion engines used in military aviation, it is reasonable to measure the instantaneous surges in the sound pressure level. Therefore, a research question was raised regarding the differences in this level for various aircraft engines of the same type (F100-PW-229) to assess their size and statistical significance. The aim of the paper is to discuss the attempt to check the significant difference between the parameters of the acoustic level generated by the aircraft engines. The measurements were carried out for 32 engines of the F-16 Block 52+ multirole aircraft during takeoff process. The parameters of noise in the point system and in the octave distribution were subject to analysis. Statistical methods dedicated to assessing production stability, i.e. the Shewhart chart, were applied. The results of the analysis showed that the discrepancies generally do not exceed a value of +/− 3σ . Therefore, it can be concluded that the analogous results for F-16 noise are homogeneous. Thus, the Shewhart chart method proved useful for assessing the homogeneity of these measurements.
Rocznik
Strony
187--199
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 60 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
  • Poznan University of Technology, Faculty of Engineering Management, ul. Rychlewskiego 2, 60-965 Poznan, Poland
  • Poznan University of Technology, Faculty of Civil and Transport Engineering, ul. Piotrowo 3, 60-965 Poznan, Poland
  • Poznan University of Technology, Faculty of Civil and Transport Engineering, ul. Piotrowo 3, 60-965 Poznan, Poland
  • Poznan University of Technology, Faculty of Civil and Transport Engineering, ul. Piotrowo 3, 60-965 Poznan, Poland
Bibliografia
  • 1. Alina P, Claudia T, Florin N et al. Review on the road traffic noise assessment. Journal of Engineering Studies and Research 2016; 22(1): 81-89, https://doi.org/10.29081/jesr.v22i1.186.
  • 2. Allen R W, Davies H, Cohen M A et al. The spatial relationship between traffic-generated air pollution and noise in 2 US cities. Environmental Research 2009; 109(3): 334-342, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2008.12.006.
  • 3. Alonso G, Benito A, Boto L. The efficiency of noise mitigation measures at European airports. Transportation Research Procedia 2017; 25: 103-135, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.385.
  • 4. Antunes A C L, Jensen D, Halasa T, Toft N. A simulation study to evaluate the performance of five statistical monitoring methods when applied to different time series components in the context of control programs for endemic diseases. PLoS ONE 2017; 12(3): 1-18, https:// doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173099.
  • 5. Băjenescu T I, Bâzu M I. Noise and reliability. Reliability of Electronic Components, Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer Berlin Heidelberg: 1999; 16(5): 329-338, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58505-0_11.
  • 6. Barreaud B, Illina I, Fohr D. On-line compensation for non-stationary noise. 2003: 375-380.
  • 7. Bertsch L, Snellen M, Enghardt L, Hillenherms C. Aircraft noise generation and assessment: executive summary. CEAS Aeronautical Journal 2019; 10(1): 3-9, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-019-00384-3.
  • 8. Campos Leoni R, Fernando Branco Costa A. A Shewhart chart with alternated charting statistic to control multivariate Poisson processes. Computers and Industrial Engineering 2020; 145(April): 106523, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106523.
  • 9. Chi C-F, Dewi R S, Huang M-H. Psychophysical evaluation of auditory signals in passenger vehicles. Applied Ergonomics 2017; 59: 153-164, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.08.019.
  • 10. Famfulik J, Richtar M, Smiraus J et al. Internal combustion engine diagnostics using statistically processed wiebe function. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc - Maintenance and Reliability 2021; 23(3): 505-511, https://doi.org/10.17531/ein.2021.3.11.
  • 11. Fastl H, Zwicker E. Psychoacoustics: Facts and models. New York, Springer: 2007, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68888-4.
  • 12. Filippone A. Aircraft noise prediction. Progress in Aerospace Sciences 2014; 68: 27-63, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2014.02.001.
  • 13. Freitas L L G, Henning E, Kalbusch A et al. Analysis of water consumption in toilets employing Shewhart, EWMA, and Shewhart-EWMA combined control charts. Journal of Cleaner Production 2019; 233: 1146-1157, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.114.
  • 14. Frendi A, Dorland W D, Maung T et al. A jet engine noise measurement and prediction tool. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2002; 112(5): 2036-2042, https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1506690.
  • 15. Fu X, Wang R, Dong Z. Application of a Shewhart control chart to monitor clean ash during coal preparation. International Journal of Mineral Processing 2017; 158: 45-54, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.minpro.2016.11.019.
  • 16. Gagliardi P, Teti L, Licitra G. A statistical evaluation on flight operational characteristics affecting aircraft noise during take-off. Applied Acoustics 2018; 134(September 2017): 8-15, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.12.024.
  • 17. Giladi R. Real-time identification of aircraft sound events. Transportation Research Part D 2020; 87: 102527, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102527.
  • 18. Glowacz A. Diagnostics of Direct Current machine based on analysis of acoustic signals with the use of symlet wavelet transform and modified classifier based on words. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc - Maintenance and Reliability 2014; 16(4): 554-558.
  • 19. Harker B M, Neilsen T B, Gee K L et al. Spatiotemporal-Correlation Analysis of Jet Noise from a High-Performance Military Aircraft. AIAA Journal 2016; 54(5): 1554-1566, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J054442.
  • 20. Hill T, Lewicki P. STATISTICS Methods and Applications. Tulsa, StatSoft Inc.: 2006.
  • 21. Huang T, Xiahou T, Li Y F et al. Reliability assessment of wind turbine generators by fuzzy universal generating function. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc - Maintenance and Reliability 2021; 23(2): 308-314, https://doi.org/10.17531/ein.2021.2.10.
  • 22. Ignaccolo M. Environmental capacity: noise pollution at Catania-Fontanarossa international airport. Journal of Air Transport Management 2000; 6(4): 191-199, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-6997(00)00013-2.
  • 23. International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). Guidance on Environmental Assessment of Proposed Air Traffic Management Operational Changes - Doc (10031). 2014.
  • 24. Jagniatinskis A, Fiks B, Zaporozhets O, Van Oosten N. Annual noise assessment in the vicinity of airports with different flights' intensity. Applied Acoustics 2016; 101: 168-178, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2015.08.017.
  • 25. Jia X, He L. Noise-based analysis of the reliability of silicon solar cells. AIP Advances 2021; 11(4): 045206, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0045349.
  • 26. Kawai K, Kojima T, Hirate K, Yasuoka M. Personal evaluation structure of environmental sounds: Experiments of subjective evaluation using subjects' own terms. Journal of Sound and Vibration 2004; 277(3): 523-533, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2004.03.013.
  • 27. Kerry G, Lomax C, Wheeler P D, James D J. A review of criteria used to control and assess noise from low flying military jet aircraft. Proceedings of ACTIVE 99: The 1999 International Symposium on Active Control of Sound and Vibration, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA, 1999; 3: 1379-1382.
  • 28. Kilikevičius A, Rimša V, Rucki M. Investigation of influence of aircraft propeller modal parameters on small airplane performance. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc - Maintenance and Reliability 2019; 22(1): 1-5, https://doi.org/10.17531/ein.2020.1.1.
  • 29. Komorski P, Szymanski G M, Nowakowski T, Orczyk M. Application of the wheel-flat detection algorithm using advanced acoustic signal analysis. In Awrejcewicz J, Kaźmierczak M, Mrozowski J (eds): Theoretical Approaches in Non-Linear Dynamical Systems DSTA 2019, Łódź (Poland), Wydawnictwo Politechniki Łódzkiej: 2019: 269-278.
  • 30. De la Torre Gutiérrez H, Pham D T. Identification of patterns in control charts for processes with statistically correlated noise. International Journal of Production Research 2018; 56(4): 1504-1520, https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1360530.
  • 31. Linke W. Wykorzystanie statystycznych metod oceny wyrobu do zwiększenia efektywności produkcji wysokiej jakości wyprasek technicznych (ang. The use of statistical methods of product evaluation to increase the efficiency of production of high-quality technical mold. Problemy Jakości (ang. Quality problems) 1997.
  • 32. Malska W. The Shewhart cards in the assessment in STATISTICA. Scientific Journals of Rzeszów University of Technology, Series: Electrotechnics 2015; 34(34): 31-40, https://doi.org/10.7862/re.2015.3.
  • 33. Mato R R A M, Mufuruki T . Noise pollution associated with the operation of the Dar es Salaam International Airport. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 1999; 4(2): 81-89, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(98)00024-8.
  • 34. Mazur-Dudzińska A, Dudziński J. Shewhart charts application to quality controlling of production of ammunition details. Mechanik 2015; (7): 563/525-563/532, https://doi.org/10.17814/mechanik.2015.7.268.
  • 35. McInerny S A, Gee K, Downing M, James M. Acoustical Nonlinearities in Aircraft Flyover Data. 13th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference Paper, Reston, Virigina, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics: 2007: 3654, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2007-3654.
  • 36. Misztal A, Belu N, Rachieru N. Comparative analysis of awareness and knowledge of APQP requirements in Polish and Romanian automotive industry. Applied Mechanics and Materials 2014; 657: 981-985, https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.657.981.
  • 37. Misztal W, Tomaszewski F. Źródła hałasu lotniczego i jego wpływ na otoczenie (ang. Sources of aviation noise and its influence on the environment). Journal of Mechanical and Transport Engineering (Publishing house of the Poznan University of Technology) 2011; 64: 107-117.
  • 38. Mohd-Yasin F, Nagel D J. Noise as Diagnostic Tool for Quality and Reliability of MEMS. Sensors 2021; 21(4): 1510, https://doi.org/10.3390/s21041510.
  • 39. Muhlemann A P, Oakland J S, Lockyer K G. Production and operations management. 6. ed. London Pitman: 1992.
  • 40. Olejnik T, Wieczorek R. Kontrola i sterowanie jakością: w przemyśle elektromaszynowym (ang. Quality and process control: in the electromechanical industry). Warsaw, PWN: 1982.
  • 41. Park B, Jeon J Y, Choi S, Park J. Short-term noise annoyance assessment in passenger compartments of high-speed trains under sudden variation. Applied Acoustics 2015; 97: 46-53, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2015.04.007.
  • 42. Paszkowski W. The assessment of acoustic effects of exploited road vehicles with the use of subjective features of sound. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc - Maintenance and Reliability 2019; 21(3): 522-529, https://doi.org/10.17531/ein.2019.3.19.
  • 43. Paszkowski W. Modeling of vibroacoustic phenomena using the method of parameterizing the audio signa. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc - Maintenance and Reliability 2020; 22(3): 501-507, https://doi.org/10.17531/ein.2020.3.13.
  • 44. Pathak V, Tripathi B D, Mishra V kumar. Evaluation of traffic noise pollution and attitudes of exposed individuals in working place. Atmospheric Environment 2008; 42(16): 3892-3898, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.12.070.
  • 45. Preis A, Kaczmarek T, Wojciechowska H et al. Polish version of standardized noise reaction questions for community noise surveys. International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health 2003; 16(2): 155-159.
  • 46. Przysucha B, Szeląg A, Pawlik P. Probability distributions of one-day noise indicators in the process of the type A uncertainty evaluation of long-term noise indicators. Applied Acoustics 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2019.107158.
  • 47. Püschel R, Evangelinos C. Evaluating noise annoyance cost recovery at Düsseldorf International Airport. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2012; 17(8): 598-604, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2012.07.002.
  • 48. Szymański G M, Misztal W, Orczyk M, Komorski P. Modeling of the octave sound spectrum emitted by the F-16 Block 52+ aircraft during takeoff. Measurement 2021; 170: 108695, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108695.
  • 49. Szymański G M, Tomaszewski F. Application of impact tests to diagnose internal combustion engines. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress on Sound and Vibration, 2010.
  • 50. Thomas C, Raper D, Upham P et al. A strategic decision support tool for indicating airport sustainability. Environmental Modelling & Software 2001; 16(3): 297-298, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(00)00069-4.
  • 51. Tomaszewski F, Misztal W. Influence of the air noise on the environment. Technical Transactions. Mechanics. 2012; 109(7): 307-316.
  • 52. Torija A J, Roberts S, Woodward R et al. On the assessment of subjective response to tonal content of contemporary aircraft noise. Applied Acoustics 2019; 146: 190-203, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2018.11.015.
  • 53. Tsuji K, Imai S, Takao R et al. A machine sound monitoring for predictive maintenance focusing on very low frequency band. SICE Journal of Control, Measurement, and System Integration 2021; 14(1): 27-38, https://doi.org/10.1080/18824889.2020.1863611.
  • 54. Vandamme L K J. Noise as a diagnostic tool for quality and reliability of electronic devices. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 1994; 41(11): 2176-2187, https://doi.org/10.1109/16.333839.
  • 55. Vardhan H, Karmakar N C, Rao Y V. Assessment of heavy earth-moving machinery noise vis-a-vis routine maintenance. Noise Control Engineering Journal 2006; 54(2): 64, https://doi.org/10.3397/1.2888383.
  • 56. Wall A T, Gee K L, James M M et al. Near-field noise measurements of a high-performance military jet aircraft. Noise Control Engineering Journal 2012; 60(4): 421-434, https://doi.org/10.3397/1.3701021.
  • 57. Wasilewski L. Podstawy zarządzania jakością (ang. Fundamentals of quality management book). Warsaw, Publishing House of the University of Entrepreneurship and Management: 1998.
  • 58. Yamato Y, Fukumoto Y, Kumazaki H. Predictive Maintenance Platform with Sound Stream Analysis in Edges. Journal of Information Processing 2017; 25: 317-320, https://doi.org/10.2197/ipsjjip.25.317.
  • 59. Zaporozhets O, Tokarev V, Attenborough K, Miller N P. Aircraft Noise Assessment, Prediction and Control. Noise Control Engineering Journal 2012; 60(2): 222, https://doi.org/10.3397/1.3696976.
  • 60. Regulation of the Polish Minister of the Environment of June 14, 2007. on permissible noise levels in the environment (Journal of Laws No. 120, item 826). 2007.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-313dcd23-4c5b-497b-9035-ad078a783d8a
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.