Analysis of reservoir properties and parameters of oil fields suitable for the application of CO₂-EOR method

• Autorzy: Uliasz-Misiak B. , Kosowski P. , Lewandowska-Śmierzchalska J.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.7494/drill.2015.32.L33

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The criteria worked out on the basis of the literature study were used for indicating oil fields, where carbon dioxide can be injected for the purpose of storing or to enhance the production of oil. The preliminary selection of oil fields, where the miscible CO₂-EOR method can be applied was based on the following criteria: depth of deposition, density of oil, reservoir temperature and oil saturation. From among 68 analyzed oil fields, 35 were used for the analyses: 3 fields in the Carpathians, 6 in the Carpathian Foredeep and the remaining 26 fields in the Polish Lowland. The statistical analysis methods were used for analyzing reservoir parameters of fields preselected for the CO₂-EOR method, i.e. depth of deposition of the roof of the horizon, average thickness, initial reservoir pressure and reservoir temperature. The reservoir properties of these fields were also analyzed, i.e. average permeability, average porosity and average saturation with oil.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

oil field; reservoir properties; reservoir parameters; CO2-EOR method

• Wydawca: AGH University of Science and Technology Press
• Czasopismo: AGH Drilling, Oil, Gas
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: Vol. 32, no. 1
• Strony: 33--48
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 32 poz., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Uliasz-Misiak B.

• AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Drilling, Oil and Gas, Kraków, Poland

autor

Kosowski P.

• AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Drilling, Oil and Gas, Kraków, Poland

autor

Lewandowska-Śmierzchalska J.

• AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Drilling, Oil and Gas, Kraków, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] Alvarado V., Manriąue E.: Enhanced Oil Recovery: An Update Review. Energies, 3, 2010, 1529-1575.
• [2] Bachu S., Shaw J.C.: CO2 storage in oil and gas reservoirs in western Canada: Effect of aguifers, potential for CO2~flood enhanced oil recovery, and practical capacity. In: Rubin, E.S., Keith, D.W., Gilboy, C.F. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, vol. 1, Peer--Reviewed Papers and Overviews. Elsevier, 361-369.
• [3] Bergman P.D., Winter E.M.: Disposal ofcarbon dioxide in aguifers in the US. Ener¬gy Convers Manage, 36(6-9), 1995, 523-6.
• [4] Best practice for the storage ofCO2 in saline aguifers. Observations and guidelines from the SACS and CO2STORE projects. Chadwick A., Arts R., Bernstone C, May K, Thibeau S., Zweigel R, eds., 2006. http://www.ngu.no/FileArchive/91/ CO2STORE_BPM_fmal_small.pdf [September 15, 2014], 289.
• [5] Bilans zasobów złóż kopalin w Polsce wg stanu na 31 XII 2013 r. Państwowy Insty¬tut Geologiczny-Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, Warszawa 2014, 468.
• [6] Blunt M., Fayers F.J., Orr F.M.: Carbon dioxide in enhanced oil recovery. Energy Convers Manage, 34, 1993, 1197-204.
• [7] Brashear J.R, Kuuskraa V.A.: The Potential and Economics of Enhanced Oil Recovery. Journal Pet. Tech., SPE 06350, Sept, 1978, 1231.
• [8] Carcoana A.: Enhanced Oil Recovery in Romania. Proceedings Third Joint SPE/DOE Symposium on Enhanced Oil Recovery, SPE of AIME, Dallas, TX, 1982, 367-379.
• [9] CO2CRC, 2008. Storage Capacity Estimation, Site Selection and Characterisation for CO2 Storage Projects. Cooperative Research Centre for Greenhouse Gas Technologies, Canberra. CO2CRC Report No. RPT08-1001.
• [10] Diaz D., Bassiouni Z., Kimbrell W., Wolcott J.: Screening Criteria for Application of Carbon Dioxide Miscible Displacement in Waterflooded Reservoirs Containing Light Oil. SPE/DŚ 35431, presented 1996 SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, OK (1996).
• [11] Geffen T. M.: Improved Oil Recovery Could Ease Energy Shortage. World Oil, Vol. 177, No. 5, 1977, 84-88.
• [12] GEO-SEQ Best Practices Manuał: Geologie Carbon Dioxide Seąuestration: Site Evaluation to Implementation. Earth Sciences Division, Ernest Orlando, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, 2004.
• [13] Ghomian Y.: Reservoir Simulation Studies for Coupled CO2 Sequestration and Enhanced Oil Recovery. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Texas at Austin, 2008.
• [14] Gunter W.D., Perkins E.H., McCann T.J.: Aquifer disposal of CO2-rich gases: Reaction designfor added capacity. Energy Convers Manage, 34, 1993, 941-8.
• [15] Hendriks C.A., Blok K.: Underground storage of carbon dioxide. Energy Convers Manage, 34, 1993, 949-57.
• [16] Holloway S., Savage D.: The potential for aquifer disposal of carbon dioxide in the UK. Energy Convers Manage, 34, 1993, 925-32.
• [17] Iyoho A.W.: Selecting Enhanced Recovery Processes. World Oil, VO, 187, No. 6, 1978, 61-64.
• [18] Klins M.A.: Carbon Dioxide Flooding, Basic Mechanisms and Project Design. International Human Resources Development Corporation, Boston, MA, 1984.
• [19] Koide H.G., Tazaki Y., Noguchi Y, Nakayama S., Iijima M., Ito K., et al.: Subterra-nean containment and long-term storage of carbon dioxide in unused aąuifers and in depleted natur al gas reservoirs. Energy Convers Manage, 33(5-8), 1992, 619-26.
• [20] Kovscek A.R.: Screening criteria for CO2 storage in oil reservoirs. Petr. Sci. &Techn. 20(7-8), 2002, 841-866.
• [21] Lewin S.: The Potential and Economics of Enhanced Oil Recovery. Report US FEA Contract Np. CO-03-50222-000. Washington DC, 1976, 274.
• [22] McRee B.C.: CO2: how it works, where it works. Petroleum Engineering, 1977, 52-63.
• [23] NPC (National Petroleum Council): Enhanced Oil Recovery - An Analysis of the Potential for Enhanced Oil Recovery from Known Fields in the United States. Washington, DC, 1976, 231.
• [24] OTA (Office of Technology Assessment): Enhanced Oil Recovery Potential in the United States. Congress of the United States, US Government Printing Office
• [25] Patii S.B., Patii S.L., Dandekar A.Y.: Screening of oil pools on Alaska North Slope Washington DC, 1978, 235. and phase behavior study of viscous oil and CO2 system in conjunction with CO2 sequestration. Petr. Sci. & Techn., 26(7), 2008, 844-855.
• [26] Rivas O., Embid S., Bolivar F.: Ranking reservoirs for carbon dioxide flooding processes. SPE Paper 23641, SPE Advanced Technology Series, vol. 2, 1994, 95-103.
• [27] Rychlicki R., Stopa J., Uliasz-Misiak B., Zawisza L.: Kryteria typowania złóż do zastosowania zaawansowanej metody wydobycia ropy naftowej poprzez zatłaczanie CO2. Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi, T27/3, 2011, 126-139.
• [28] Taber J.J., Martin F.D.: Technical Screening Guides for the Enhanced Recovery of Oil. SPE 12069, presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 5-8 October 1983, San Francisco, California.
• [29] Taber J J., Martin F.D., Seright R.S.: EOR Screening Criteria Revisited. Part 1: Introduction to Screening Criteria and Enhanced Recovery Field Projects. SPE Reservoir Engineering, Aug. 1997, 189-198.
• [30] Tarkowski R., Marek S., Uliasz-Misiak B.: Wstępna geologiczna analiza struktur do składowania CO2 w rejonie Bełchatowa. Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi, T25/2, 2009, 37-45.
• [31] Trivedi J.J., Babadagli T.: CO2 and flue gas sequestration during tertiary oil recovery: Optima! injection strategies and importance of operational parameters. CIM Paper 2005-42, 2005 CIPĆ Conference, June 7-9, Calgary, AB, Canada.
• [32] Uliasz-Misiak B.: Klasyfikacje pojemności i kryteria wyboru miejsc składowania CO2. Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi, T25/3, 2009, 97-108.