PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Modern Issues of Development of the System of Specially Protected Natural Areas in the Context of the Concept of Sustainable Development

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
PL
Współczesna problematyka rozwoju systemu specjalnych obszarów ochrony w kontekście koncepcji rozwoju zrównoważonego
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The article proposes a new perspective on the issues of development of the system of specially protected natural areas (SPNAs) in the context of the concept of sustainable development. The authors suggest ways of finding a balance of economic, environmental and social interests in SPNAs, which will not lead to a decrease in their number or area, however, prevent a number of economic and social problems. The change in approaches to the management of the system of SPNAs including in terms of their creation, modification of their boundaries or termination of their operation will allow including SPNAs in the system of social economic relations of regions and certain countries, provide an opportunity to withdraw from the current one-sided bias solely in favor of environmental factors. This will ensure the necessary balance of the interests of the local population, business and protection of nature.
PL
W artykule zaproponowano nowe podejście do zagadnień rozwoju obszarów specjalnej ochrony w kontekście rozwoju zrównoważonego. Autorzy wskazują na sposoby równoważenia ekonomicznych, środowiskowych i społecznych celów na terenach chronionych, które nie będą prowadziły do zmniejszenia ich ilości bądź obszaru, zapobiegając zarazem powstawaniu ekonomicznych i społecznych problemów. Sugerowane zmiany w zarządzaniu obszarami chronionymi w kontekście ich tworzenia, zmiany granic czy ich zniesienia pozwolą na włączenie tych obszarów do systemu społeczno-ekonomicznych zależności w poszczególnych regionach i krajach, co oznaczać będzie wycofanie się z obecnego jednostronnego podejścia ograniczającego się wyłącznie do kwestii środowiskowych. W ten sposób zapewniona zostanie równowaga pomiędzy potrzebami lokalnych społeczności, biznesu i ochrony przyrody.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Strony
47--58
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 34 poz.
Twórcy
autor
  • Kalmyk State University, Russian Federation
autor
  • Kalmyk State University, Russian Federation
autor
  • Kalmyk State University, Russian Federation
Bibliografia
  • 1. ANTOLINI D.E., 2009, National Park Law in the U.S.: Conservation, Conflict, and Centennial Values, in: William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review, vol. 33, p. 881-882.
  • 2. AUSLANDER J.M., 2006, Reversing the flow: the interconnectivity of environmental law in addressing external threats to protected lands and waters, in: Harvard Environmental Law Review, vol. 30, p. 482.
  • 3. BRYNER G.C., 2002, Policy Devolution and environmental law: exploring the transition to sustainable development, in: Environs, vol. 26, p. 10-11.
  • 4. BUTLER R.W., 1999, Sustainable tourism: A state-of-the-art review, in: Tourism Geographies, vol. 1:1, p. 7-25.
  • 5. DECISION of the Supreme Commercial Court of the Russian Federation of November 21, 2011 No. ВАС-14339/11 On Refusal to Transfer the Case to the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of the Russian Federation.
  • 6. DECISION of the Supreme Commercial Court of the Russian Federation of June 26, 2013 No. ВАС-7692/13 On the Refusal to Transfer the Case to the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of the Russian Federation.
  • 7. DECISION of Torzhok Town Court of Tver Region of August 1, 2013 in case no. 2-521/2013, https://rospravosudie.com/court-torzhokskij-go rodskoj-sud-tverskaya-oblast-s/act-434126673/ (19.01.2017).
  • 8. DECISION of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of September 11, 2013 No. 16-АПГ13-8, in: Legal Reference System ‘Consultant Plus’ (19.01.2017).
  • 9. DECISION of the Supreme Commercial Court of the Russian Federation of July 14, 2014 г. No. ВАС-8722/14 On the Refusal to Transfer the Case to the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of the Russian Federation.
  • 10. DIKUSAR V.M., 2007, International legal issues of environmental protection: thesis of the doctor of jurisprudence, Institute of the state and law of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, p.152.
  • 11. EISEN J.B., 2010, Brownfields Policies for Sustainable cities, in: Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum, vol. 9, p.197.
  • 12. FRETWELL H.L., PODOLSKY M.J., 2003, A Strategy for Restoring America’s National Parks, in: Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum, vol. 13:2, p.153.
  • 13. GELTMAN E.A., 2016, Oil & Gas Drilling in National Parks, in: Natural Resources Journal, vol. 56-1, p. 151-175.
  • 14. HORN L., 2013, Rio+20 United Nations conference on sustainable development: is this the future we want?, in: MqJICEL, vol. 9, p. 1-2.
  • 15. Judgement of the ECHR of 07.05.2002 in the case of Burdov v. Russia (application no. 59498/00), in: Legal Reference System ‘Consultant Plus’ (19.01. 2017).
  • 16. KODOLOVA A.V., 2013, Concept of sustainable and safe development of the CIS member states. Society order and modern Russian law / under the editorship of G.S. Pratsko and L.A. Spektor: collection of conference materials, Moscow, p.578-581.
  • 17. LAFFERTY W.M., 1996, The politics of sustainable development: global norms for national implementation, in: Environmental politics, Vol. 5-2, p. 185-208.
  • 18. MARX K., 1845, Theses on Feuerbach, http://lugovoy-k.narod.ru/marx/03/01.htm (19.01.2017).
  • 19. ORLOV V.P., GOLUBINSKAYA T.E., DAVYDOVA M.V., 2010, Issues of the legal status of specially protected natural areas, in: Journal of Eurasian Law, vol. 1, p. 96-100.
  • 20. PETERS K.A., 2010, Creating a Sustainable Urban Agriculture Revolution, in: Journal of Environmental Law and Litigation, vol. 25, p. 217.
  • 21. PUSHKAREVA E.F., 2008, International environmental law order and environmental human rights: thesis of the doctor of jurisprudence, Moscow State Institute of International Relations, Moscow, p.12-13.
  • 22. REPORT, 2005, On the Situation with the Protection and the Functioning of Reserves and Natural Parks in 2004, http://www.biodat. ru/db/oopt/doc/zap4.htm (19.01.2017).
  • 23. RESOLUTION of the Federal Commercial Court of Povolzhsky District of January 31, 2012 in case No. А12-7231/2011, in: Legal Reference System ‘Consultant Plus’ (19.01.2017).
  • 24. RESOLUTION of the Federal Commercial Court of Povolzhsky District of July 23, 2013 in case No. А12-17227/2012, in: Legal Reference System ‘Consultant Plus’ (19.01.2017).
  • 25. RESOLUTION of the Commercial Court of Moskovsky District of July 17, 2015 in case No. А40-104878/14, in: Legal Reference System ‘Consultant Plus’ (19.01.2017).
  • 26. RESOLUTION of the Commercial Court of the North Caucasian District of November 6, 2015 in case No. А32-9917/2015, in: in: Legal Reference System ‘Consultant Plus’ (19.01.2017).
  • 27. RESOLUTION of the Thirteenth Arbitration Court of Appeal of February 15, 2016 in case No. А21-6355/2015.
  • 28. RESOLUTION of the Commercial Court of the North-Western District of June 7, 2016 in case No. А21-6355/2015, etc., in: Legal Reference System ‘Consultant Plus’ (19.01.2017).
  • 29. ROBERTS J., 2004, Environmental Policy, Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, London and New York, p. 76.
  • 30. SKIBIN S.S., 2015, Peculiarities of legal regulation of subsurface use in terms of limited economic activities within the boundaries of specially protected natural areas: abstract of the thesis of the candidate of jurisprudence, Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, p. 4-22.
  • 31. SPECIALLY PROTECTED NATURAL AREAS OF THE WORLD, 2016, http:// lektsii.org/3-63641.html (19.01.2017).
  • 32. STATE REPORT, 2015, On the State and Protection of the Environment in the Russian Federation in 2014, Moscow, p. 29-30.
  • 33. VERSHILO N.D., 2008, Environmental legal fundamentals of sustainable development: thesis of the doctor of jurisprudence, Institute of the state and law of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, p. 9-10.
  • 34. VORONTSOVA O.V., 2013, Issues of legal regulation arising in the settlement of disputes over establishment of the boundaries of the Federal State Institution ‘Yugyd Va National Park’ issues of judicial practice, in: Business in law, Vol. 5, p.118-122.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-309b8a68-3f15-4490-9384-a97b21eeccb4
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.