The space industry - mapping the challenges for management science The space industry - mapping the challenges for management science

• Autorzy: Pachura Piotr

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17512/pjms.2024.30.1.14

Warianty tytułu

PL

Przemysł kosmiczny - perspektywy wyzwań dla nauk o zarządzaniu

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper addresses an issue of the growing space industry sector in the context of possible challenges for management theory and practice. The space industry is one of the most dynamic economic and technological sectors today. The purpose of the article is to present the results of conceptual research on key management challenges in the implementation of space sector projects. The research was based on the analysis of the existing state of knowledge of a scoping review conducted towards to conceptualizing the research potential in academic management sciences. The methodology of secondary source research based on a scoping review was to exploratory map the research potential from the point of view of the development of academic management science and thus identify research gaps. The review was undertaken based on a review of sources largely outside the management discipline such as the Aerospace Engineering and Space and Planetary Science subject categories. Following this review, a theoretical map of the relationship between the areas of research potential for management science in the space industry and the classical management sub-disciplines identified in the structure of the Divisions and Interest Groups of the Academy of Management was proposed. This seems to have made it possible to identify preliminary directions for future research and applications. The results of the research indicate that the greatest exploratory potential can be associated with the issues of management of large-scale, interdisciplinary, international projects, astropreneurship development, risk and supply chain management in space industry and highly qualified human resources management.

PL

Artykuł porusza kwestię rozwijającego się sektora przemysłu kosmicznego w kontekście możliwych wyzwań dla teorii i praktyki zarządzania. Przemysł kosmiczny jest obecnie jednym z najbardziej dynamicznych sektorów gospodarczych i technologicznych. Celem artykułu jest przedstawienie wyników badań koncepcyjnych dotyczących kluczowych wyzwań zarządczych w realizacji projektów sektora kosmicznego. Badania oparto na analizie istniejącego stanu wiedzy w ramach scoping review przeprowadzonego w celu konceptualizacji potencjału badawczego w akademickich naukach o zarządzaniu. Metodologia badań źródeł wtórnych oparta na przeglądzie zakresowym miała na celu eksploracyjne mapowanie potencjału badawczego z punktu widzenia rozwoju akademickich nauk o zarządzaniu, a tym samym identyfikację luk badawczych. Przegląd został przeprowadzony w oparciu o przegląd źródeł w dużej mierze spoza dyscypliny zarządzania, takich jak kategorie tematyczne Aerospace Engineering oraz Space and Planetary Science. W następstwie badań teoretycznych zaproponowano teoretyczną mapę relacji między obszarami potencjału badawczego nauk o zarządzaniu w przemyśle kosmicznym a klasycznymi subdyscyplinami zarządzania zidentyfikowanymi w strukturze Divisions and Interest Groups of the Academy of Management. Wydaje się, że pozwoliło to na określenie wstępnych kierunków przyszłych badań i zastosowań. Wyniki badań wskazują, że największy potencjał eksploracyjny można wiązać z zagadnieniami zarządzania wielkoskalowymi, interdyscyplinarnymi, międzynarodowymi projektami, rozwojem astroprzedsiębiorczości, zarządzaniem ryzykiem i łańcuchem dostaw w przemyśle kosmicznym oraz zarządzaniem wysoko wykwalifikowanymi zasobami ludzkimi.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

space industry; management; astropreneurship; space research

PL

przemysł kosmiczny; zarządzanie; astroprzedsiębiorczość; badania kosmiczne

• Wydawca: Czestochowa University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Management Studies
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: Vol. 30, No. 1
• Strony: 240--255
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 61 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Pachura Piotr

• Department of Management and Entrepreneurship, Faculty of Management, Częstochowa University of Technology, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2007-6005

Bibliografia

• 1.Anderson, S, Allen, P, Peckham, S. and Goodwin, N., (2008). Asking the right questions: scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organisation and delivery of health services. Health Research Policy and Systems, 6(7), 1-12.
• 2.Arksey, H., O’Malley, L., (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19-32.
• 3.Armstrong, R., Hall, B., Doyle, J. and Waters, E., (2011). Scoping the scope’ of a cochrane review. Journal of Public Health, 33(1), 147-150.
• 4.Bedeian, A., (1989). Totems and taboos. Undercurrence in management discipline. The Academy of Management, 19(4).
• 5.Borowitz, M., (2017). 11 European Organization for the Exploitation of Meteorological Satellites. In M. Borowitz (Ed.). Open Space: The Global Effort for Open Access to Environmental Satellite Data (pp.175-193). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
• 6.Boston Consulting Group and European Space Policy Institute., (2023). More than a Space Programme: The Value of Space Exploration to Empower the Future of Europe. Retrieved from https://web-assets.bcg.com/77/53/02c9f25741e18e95717580379651/more-than-space-programme-value-of-space-exploration-to-empower-the-future-of europe.pdf.
• 7.Brennan, L. Vecchi, A., (2023). Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: The Evolution of the Irish Space Sector from an Institutional Perspective. Space Policy, 101551.
• 8.Ćwiklicki, M., (2020). Metodyka przeglądu zakresu literatury (scoping review). In: A. Sopińska, A. Modliński (Eds.), Współczesne zarządzanie - koncepcje i wyzwania, (pp. 53-68). Warszawa: Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie.
• 9.D’Este, P., Ramos-Vielba, I., Woolley, R. and Amara, A., (2018). How do researchers generate scientific and societal impacts? Toward an analytical and operational framework. Science and Public Policy, 45(6), 752-763.
• 10.Decadi, A., Dias, N., (2022). Safety on ground operations on Ariane 6 Launch System. Journal of Space Safety Engineering, 9(3), 355-362.
• 11.Dos Santos Paulino, V., (2020). Innovation trends in the space industry. London: Wiley.
• 12.Eaton, C., Patel, S., Glandon, L., Weger, K., Mesmer, B. and Moreland, R., (2022). Legacy of Faster, Better, Cheaper? Cost, Schedule, and Performance Objectives: Understanding the Impact of NASA Policy on Perceptions of Failures. Space Policy, 62, 101515.
• 13.European Commission., (2024). Horizon Europe strategic plan 2025-2027. Retrieved from https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/funding/funding-opportunities/funding-programmes-and-open-calls/horizon-europe/strategic-plan_en, access 10.9.24).
• 14.European Space Policy Institute., (2017). The Rise of Private Actors in the Space Sector, Executive Summary. Retrieved from https://www.espi.or.at/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/ESPI-report-The-rise-of-private-actors-Executive-Summary 1.pdf, access 22.10.24). Vienna.
• 15.European Space Policy Institute., (2019). Evolution of the Role of Space Agencies - Full Report, Retrieved from https://www.espi.or.at/wp content/uploads/2022/06/ESPI-Public-Report-70-Evolution-of-the-Role-of-Space-Agencies-Full-Report.pdf.
• 16.Evroux, C., Heflich, A. and Saulnier, J. L., (2023). Towards EU leadership in the space sector through open strategic autonomy. European Parliamentary Research Service, Brussels: European Union.
• 17.Garrett, M., A., (2024). Is artificial intelligence the great filter that makes advanced technical civilizations rare in the universe? Acta Astronautica, 219, 731-735.
• 18.Genta, G., (2014). Private space exploration: A new way for starting a spacefaring society? Acta Astronautica, 104(2), 480-486.
• 19.Gonzalez, S., (2023). The Astropreneurial Co-creation of the New Space Economy. Space Policy, 101552.
• 20.Grant, M.J., Booth, A., (2009), A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26, 91-108.
• 21.Hitchens, T., (2007). Debris, Traffic Management, and Weaponization: Opportunities for and Challenges to Cooperation in Space. The Brown Journal of World Affairs, 14(1), 173-186.
• 22.International Institute of Space Commerce., (2021). Global Space Industry Report. Retrieved from https://change.space/media/
• 23.Ireland, R. D., Reutzel, C. R. and Webb, J. W., (2007). Entrepreneurship Research in AMJ: What Has Been Published, and What Might the Future Hold? In: Á. Cuervo, D. Ribeiro, S. Roig (Eds.) Entrepreneurship. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
• 24.Kishi, N., (2027). Management analysis for the space industry. Space Policy, 39-40, 1-6.
• 25.Kot, S., Grabara, J., (2017). Publications analysis according to management disciplines based on Scopus indexed journals from Easter European countries. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 16(2), 147-159.
• 26.Krajčík, V., Novotný, O., Civelek, M. and Semrádová Zvolánková, S. (2023). Digital literacy and digital transformation activities of service and manufacturing SMEs. Journal of Tourism and Services, 14(26), 242-262.
• 27.Kuděj, M., Civelek, M., Erben, M., Masárová, J. and Kubálek, J. (2023). Navigating global markets: The role of enterprise risk management and human resource management in SME international expansions. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 18(4), 1075-1103.
• 28.Lam, A., (2011). What motivates academic scientists to engage in research commercialization: ‘gold’, ‘ribbon’ or ‘puzzle’? Research Policy, 40(10), 1354-1368.
• 29.Madani, M., Rungsrisawat, S., (2019). The knowledge sharing and the relationship between efficient team and supply chain management. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 20(1), 254-266.
• 30.Magruk, A., Kononiuk, A., (2024). Role of the Copernicus Satellite Programme in Building the Resilience of European Supply Chains: Results of a Delphi Study. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 16(3), 29-40.
• 31.Matejun, M., (2024). Challenges and perspectives for the development of the management sciences subdisciplinarity. International Journal of Contemporary Management, 1, 170-184.
• 32.Matejun, M., Feng, M., (2024). Sub-disciplines in management sciences: criteria of sub-division in theory and research practice. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 16(1), 1-18.
• 33.McMeekin, N., Wu, O., Germeni, E. and Briggs, A., (2020). How methodological frameworks are being developed: evidence from a scoping review. BMC Medical Research Methodology 20(173).
• 34.Mindell, D., Scott, D., Uebelhart, A., Siddiqi, A. and Gerovitch, S., (2009). The Future of Human Spaceflight: Objectives and Policy Implications in a Global Context. Cambridge: American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
• 35.Moloo, H, Selvam, R, Seguin, N, Zhang, L., Lacaille-Ranger, A., Sikora, L. and McIsaac, D. I., (2022). Integration of planetary health in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education: protocol for a scoping review. BMJ Open, 12, e057207.
• 36.Munn, Z., Peters, M.D.J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A. and Aromataris, E., (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(143).
• 37.National Aeronautics and Space Administration., (2022). Economic Impact Report. Retrieved from https://www.nasa.gov/wpcontent/uploads/2022/10/nasa_fy21_economic_impact_report_brochure.pdf.
• 38.OECD., (2019). The space economy in figures: how space contributes to the global economy. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2019/07/the-space-economy-in-figures_518092bf.html
• 39.OECD., (2023). The Space Economy in Figures: Responding to Global Challenges, Paris: OECD Publishing.
• 40.Oltrogge, D., Alfano, S., (2019). The technical challenges of better Space Situational Awareness and Space Traffic. Management, Journal of Space Safety Engineering, 6(2), 72-79.
• 41.Pace, S., (2009). Challenges to US space sustainability. Space Policy, 25(3), 156-159.
• 42.Paré, G., Trudel, M. C., Jaana, M. and Kitsiou, S., (2015). Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews. Information and Management, 52(2), 183-199.
• 43.Pate-Cornell, M. E., Dillon, R. L., (2001). Success factors and future challenges in the management of faster-better-cheaper projects: lessons learned from NASA. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48(1), 25-35.
• 44.Paxton, L. J., (2007). Faster, better, and cheaper” at NASA: Lessons learned in managing and accepting Risk. Acta Astronautica, 61(10), 954-963.
• 45.Polkowska, M., (2023). Orbital and Suborbital Tourism Challenges - Some Legal Aspects. Highlights of Sustainability, 2(2), 100-109.
• 46.Punnala, M., Punnala, S., Ojala, A. and Kuusniemi, H., (2024). The Space Economy: Review of the Current Status and Future Prospects. In: A. Ojala, W.W. Baber, (Eds.) Space Business. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
• 47.Rausser, G., Choi, E. and Bayen, A., (2023). Public-private partnerships in fostering outer space innovations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(43), e2222013120.
• 48.Sharples, R. A., (2016). Implementation of Human System Integration into the System Engineering Lifecycle and Model Based System Engineering at Airbus Defence and Space. In B. Amaba (Ed.). Advances in Human Factors, Software, and Systems Engineering. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (pp. 405-415) Cham: Springer.
• 49.Sylvester, A., Tate, M. and Johnstone, D., (2013). Beyond synthesis: re-presenting heterogeneous research literature. Behaviour and Information Technology, 32(12), 1199-1215.
• 50.Tackney, Ch., (2021). The Metascience of the Academy of Management: Supporting the Global Manager. In: Proceedings of the Eighty-first Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management. In: S. Taneja. B. Manor (Eds.) Academy of Management, Academy of Management Proceedings.
• 51.The International Space Exploration Coordination Group., (2024). Benefits stemming from space exploration, Second edition. Retrieved from https://www.globalspaceexploration.org/wp-content/isecg/bsfse2024.pdf
• 52.Torraco, R. J., (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4, 356-367.
• 53.Vecchi, A., Brennan, L., (2014) Leveraging Business Model Innovation in the International Space Industry. In: Handbook of Research on Global Business Opportunities. IGI Global, pp. 131-149.
• 54.Wee, B., Banister, D., (2023). Literature review papers: the search and selection process. Journal of Decision Systems.
• 55.Weinzierl, M., (2018). Space, the Final Economic Frontier. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(2), 173-192.
• 56.Wickert, C., Post, C., Doh, J., Prescott, J. and Prencipe, A., (2020). Management research that makes a difference: broadening the meaning of impact. Journal of Management Studies, 58(2), 297-320.
• 57.Wooten, J., O., Tang, Ch. S., (2018). Operations in Space: Exploring a New Industry. Decision Sciences.
• 58.Zancan, V., Paravano, A., Locatelli, G. and Trucco, P., (2024). Evolving governance in the space sector: From Legacy Space to New Space models. Acta Astronautica, 225, 515-523.
• 59.Zhou, M., Chen, L. and Zhao, J., (2022). Telling China’s story through reports on major manned space activities: A case study of the coverage of Shenzhou spacecraft in Chinese and Western media. Cultures of Science, 5(2), 101-118.
• 60.Zhuang, C., Liu, Z., Liu, J., Ma, H., Zhai, S. and Wu, Y. (2022). Digital Twin-based Quality Management Method for the Assembly Process of Aerospace Products with the Grey-Markov Model and Apriori Algorithm. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 35(105).
• 61.Ziemblicki, B. Oralova, Y., (2021). Private Entities in Outer Space Activities: Liability Regime Reconsidered. Space Policy, 56.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr POPUL/SP/0154/2024/02 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki II" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki (2025).