MCDA model approach to the Business Process Modeling methods evaluation

• Autorzy: Szarafińska M. , Konys A. , Piwowarski M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The purpose of this paper is a recapitulation of research conducted hitherto on the evaluation of business process modeling methods and techniques. Due to the systemizing the recognized knowledge of existing modeling method it is necessary to identify the information that allow further specification. Multitude of available solutions as well as wide applicable area indicates that the synthesis of current state condition is being required as well. This paper present comparative analysis which has been processed at use of the modeling concept which is based on proposes of levels of abstraction. Furthermore the results of presented estimates have been transformed into a Multi Criteria Decision-Making process and explore for further research using the AHP method implementation. The methodology used in this paper refers to criteria of business process modeling method. Finally based on the conducted research, conclusion and direction for further research ends the study.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

business process modelling; BPM; modeling concept of levels of abstraction; multi-criteria decision making; MCDM; AHP; analytic hierarchy process

• Wydawca: Komisja Informatyki Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Oddział w Gdańsku
• Czasopismo: Metody Informatyki Stosowanej
• Rocznik: 2008
• Tom: nr 3 (Tom 16)
• Strony: 237--246
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 11 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Szarafińska M.

• Szczecin University of Technology, Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology

autor

Konys A.

• Szczecin University of Technology, Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology

autor

Piwowarski M.

• Szczecin University of Technology, Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology

Bibliografia

• [1] Bosilj-Vuksic V., Ceric V. Criteria for the Evaluation of Business Process Simulation Tools, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Economics and Business, Zagreb, Croatia 2007.
• [2] Carloson W. L., Thorne B. Applied Statistical Methods for business, Economics, and the Social Sciences, Prentice Hall, 1997.
• [3] Currie W., Hlupic V. Simulation modelling: The link between change management panaceas, Proceedings of the 2000 Winter Simulation Conference, 2000.
• [4] Greasley A., Barlow S. Using simulation modelling for BPR: Resource allocation in a police custody process. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 18(9/10), 1998.
• [5] Hlupic V. Criteria for the Evaluation of Business Process Simulation Tools, University of Westminster Westminster Business School, London, UK, 2007.
• [6] Nieto Ariza E. M., Hernández J.O. Evaluation of tools for business process in three levels of abstraction, Centro Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Tecnológico, Interior internado Palmira s/n, Cuernavaca, Morelos, 62490 México, 2007.
• [7] Ortiz G. R. Evaluation of tools for business process in three levels of abstraction, Instituto de Investigaciones Eléctricas Reforma 113. Palmira, Cuernavaca, Morelos, 62490 México, 2007.
• [8] Saaty T.L. Multicriteria Decision Making – The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Technical report, University of Pittsburgh, RWS Publications, 1992.
• [9] Saaty T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1980.
• [10] White S.A. Miers D. BPMN Modeling and Reference Guide Understanding and Using BPM, Future Strategies Inc., Lighthouse Pt, FL 2008.
• [11] Żeliński J. Modelowanie biznesowe, czy to już dojrzała dyscyplina? [online], http://www.it-consulting.pl/ [dostęp: 2008]