Urban tidal flow noise - case study

• Autorzy: Bąkowski Andrzej , Radziszewski Leszek

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.21008/j.0860-6897.2023.1.19

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The study carried out an analysis of the urban traffic noise from 2011 to 2016 at Kielce (Poland). The results of noise simulations according to the Cnossos-EU model were compared with the sound level calculated by monitoring station and a very good agreement was obtained. The mean absolute error was smaller than 1 dB(A). For weekdays the charts shape at individual hours of the day were shown to be similar. However, one can notice a different shape of this charts from the morning peak on Friday to the end of the weekend and especially on Saturday and Sunday.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

urban noise; traffic flow; monitoring station data

PL

hałas miejski; ruch uliczny; dane ze stacji monitoringu

• Wydawca: Poznan University of Technology. Institute of Applied Mechanics
• Czasopismo: Vibrations in Physical Systems
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: Vol. 34, nr 1
• Strony: art. no. 2023119
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 20 poz., fot. kolor., 1 mapa, wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Bąkowski Andrzej

• Kielce University of Technology, Faculty of Mechatronics and Mechanical Engineering, Aleja Tysiąclecia Państwa Polskiego 7, 25-314 Kielce, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9341-4338

autor

Radziszewski Leszek

• Kielce University of Technology, Faculty of Mechatronics and Mechanical Engineering, Aleja Tysiąclecia Państwa Polskiego 7, 25-314 Kielce, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6253-2000

Bibliografia

• 1. T. Ming et al.; Impacts of traffic tidal flow on pollutant dispersion in a non-uniform urban street canyon; Atmosphere, 2018, 9(3), 82; DOI: 10.3390/atmos9030082
• 2. A. Bąkowski, L. Radziszewski; Measurements of urban traffic parameters before and after road reconstruction; Open Engineering, 2021, 11, 365-376; DOI: 10.1515/eng- 2021- 0035
• 3. F. Crawford et al. ; A statistical method for estimating predictable differences between daily traffic flow profiles; Transportation Research Part B, 217, 95, 196-213; DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2016.11.004
• 4. A. Sfyridis, P. Agnolucci; Annual average daily traffic estimation in England and Wales: An application of clustering and regression modelling; Journal of Transport Geography, 2020, 83, 102658; DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102658
• 5. S. Domazetovska, M. Anachkova, V. Gavriloski, Z. Petreski; Influence of the traffic flow in urban noise pollution; Proceedings of the Inter Noise, Seoul, South Korea, 23-26 August 2020
• 6. R. Benocci, et al.; Reliability of DYNAMAP traffic noise prediction; App. Acoustics, 2019, 156, 142-150; DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2019.07.004
• 7. R. Sanchez-Sanchez, et al.; Noise monitoring networks as tools for smart city decision-making; Archives of Acoustics, 2018, 43(1), 103-112
• 8. E. M. Salomons, M. B. Pont; Urban traffic noise and the relation to urban density, form, and traffic elasticity; Landscape and Urban Planning, 2012,108(1), 2-16; DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.06.017
• 9. P. Mioduszewski, et al.; Noise map validation by continuous noise monitoring; Applied Acoustics, 2011, 72(8), 582-589
• 10. J. Warczek, et al.; R. Frequency analysis of noise generated by pneumatic wheels; Archives of Acoustics, 2017, 42(3), 459-467
• 11. M. Smiraglia et al.; Predicting Hourly Traffic Noise from Traffic Flow Rate Model: Underlying Concepts for the DYNAMAP Project; Noise Mapp., 2016, 3: 130-139
• 12. A. Bąkowski, L. Radziszewski; Analysis of the Traffic Parameters on a Section in the City of the National Road during Several Years of Operation; Communications - Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina, 2022, 24(1), A12-A25
• 13. J. Wei et al., Urban Environmental Sound Monitoring Network Based on Combination of Mobile and Stationary Nodes; Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Information Science and Control Engineering (ICISCE), Changsha, China, 2020, 1493-1498
• 14. F. Ibili et al.; Traffic noise models and noise guidelines: A review; Noise and Vibration Worldwide, 2021, 53(1-2); DOI: 10.1177/09574565211052693
• 15. X. Zhang et al.; Traffic Noise Prediction Applying Multivariate Bi-Directional Recurrent Neural Network; Appl. Sci., 2021, 11(6), 2714; DOI: 10.3390/app11062714
• 16. L. Xiaodong et al.; Influence of urban road characteristics on traffic noise; Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2019, 75, 136-155
• 17. M. Amran et al.; Sound-Absorbing Acoustic Concretes: A Review; Sustainability 2021, 13(19),10712; DOI: 10.3390/su131910712
• 18. D. J. Nair et al.; Characterizing multicity urban traffic conditions using crowdsourced data; PLOS ONE, 2019, 14(4), e0212845; DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212845
• 19. F. Orga at all; On the Impact of Anomalous Noise Events on Road Traffic Noise Mapping in Urban and Suburban Environments; Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2018, 15(1), 13; DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15010013
• 20. J. Pietraszek et al.; Estimation of the quantitative uncertainty for the corrosion potential and corrosion current density; Proceedings of METAL - 27th Int. Conf. on Metallurgy and Materials, Brno, Czech Republic, 23-25 May, 2018, 1204-1209

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).