Frigram : a French Interaction Grammar

• Autorzy: Perrier G. , Guillaume B.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15398/jlm.v3i1.93

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

We present Frigram, a French grammar with a large coverage, written in the formalism of Interaction Grammars. The originality of the formalism lies in its system of polarities which expresses the resource sensitivity of natural languages and which is used to guide syntactic composition. We present the principles underlying grammar design, highlight its modular architecture and show that the lexicon used is independent of the grammar formalism. We also introduce the “companion property”, and show that it helps to enforce grammar consistency.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

formal grammar; model theoretic syntax; polarity; Interaction Grammar

• Wydawca: Instytut Podstaw Informatyki PAN
• Czasopismo: Journal of Language Modelling
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: Vol. 3, No. 1
• Strony: 265--316
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 49 poz., rys., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Perrier G.

• LORIA, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France

autor

Guillaume B.

• LORIA, Inria Nancy Grand-Est, France

Bibliografia

• [1] Anne Abeillé, Lionel Clément, and François Toussenel (2003), Building a Treebank for French, in Treebanks. Building and Using Parsed Corpora, pp. 165-187, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• [2] Anne Abeillé and Danièle Godard (1997), The Syntax of French Negative Adverbs, in Negation and polarity: syntax and semantics, pp. 1-27, John Benjamins publishing Company.
• [3] Anne Abeillé, Danièle Godard, and Philip Miller (1997), Les causatives en français, un cas de compétition syntaxique, Langue française, 115: 62-74.
• [4] Jason Baldridge, Sudipta Chatterjee, Alexis Palmer, and Ben Wing (2007), DotCCG and VisCCG: Wiki and Programming Paradigms for Improved Grammar Engineering with OpenCCG, in Proceedings of the Grammar Engineering Across Frameworks Workshop (GEAF 07), pp. 5-25, CSLI Studies in Computational Linguistics ONLINE, Dagstuhl, Germany.
• [5] Emily Bender (2008), Grammar Engineering for Linguistic Hypothesis Testing, in Proceedings of the Texas Linguistics Society X Conference: Computational Linguistics for Less-Studied Languages, pp. 16-36.
• [6] Guillaume Bonfante, Bruno Guillaume, and Mathieu Morey (2009), Dependency Constraints for Lexical Disambiguation, in Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Parsing Technology (IWPT 2009), pp. 242-253, Paris, France, http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W09-3840.
• [7] Joan Bresnan (2001), Lexical-Functional Syntax, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.
• [8] Miriam Butt, Helge Dyvik, Tracy H. King, Hiroshi Masuichi, and Christian Rohrer (2002), The Parallel Grammar Project, in Proceedings of the Workshop on Grammar Engineering and Evaluation (COLING 2002), pp. 1-7, Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA.
• [9] Marie Candito and Djamé Seddah (2012), Le corpus Sequoia : annotation syntaxique et exploitation pour l’adaptation d’analyseur par pont lexical, in Proceedings of the Joint Conference JEP-TALN-RECITAL 2012, pp. 321-334, ATALA/AFCP, Grenoble, France, http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/F12-2024.
• [10] Marie-Hélène Candito (1999), Organisation modulaire et paramétrable de grammaires électroniques lexicalisées. Application au français et à l’italien, Ph.D. thesis, Université Paris 7.
• [11] Jinho D. Choi and Martha Palmer (2010), Robust Constituent-to-Dependency Conversion for Multiple Corpora in English, in Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT-9), pp. 55-66, Tartu, Estonia.
• [12] Ann Copestake and Dan Flickinger (2000), An Open Source Grammar Development Environment and Broad-coverage English Grammar Using HPSG, in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2000), pp. 591-600, Athens, Greece.
• [13] Benoit Crabbé (2005), Représentation informatique de grammaires fortement lexicalisées: application à la grammaire d’arbres adjoints, Ph.D. thesis, Université Nancy2.
• [14] Benoit Crabbé, Denys Duchier, Claire Gardent, Joseph Le Roux, and Yannick Parmentier (2013), XMG: eXtensible MetaGrammar, Computational Linguistics, 39 (3): 1-66.
• [15] Valmi Dufour-Lussier, Bruno Guillaume, and Guy Perrier (2014), Parsing Coordination Extragrammatically, in Zygmunt Vetulani and Joseph Mariani, editors, Human Language Technology. Challenges for Computer Science and Linguistics. 5th Language and Technology Conference, LTC 2011, Poznań, Poland, November 25-27, 2011, Revised Selected Papers, Human Language Technology Challenges for Computer Science and Linguistics, pp. 55-66, Springer International Publishing.
• [16] Catherine Fuchs, Nathalie Fournier, and Pierre Le Goffic (2008), Structures à subordonnée comparative en français. Problèmes de représentations syntaxiques et sémantiques, Lingvisticæ Investigationes, 31 (1): 11-61.
• [17] Claire Gardent and Yannick Parmentier (2007), SemTAG: a platform for specifying Tree Adjoining Grammars and performing TAG-based Semantic Construction, in Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2007), pp. 13-16, Prague, Czech Republic.
• [18] Danièle Godard (2004), French Negative Dependency, in Francis Corblin and Henriëtte de Swart, editors, Handbook of French Semantics, pp. 351-390, Center for the Study of Language and Information.
• [19] Maurice Grevisse and André Goosse (2008), Le bon usage: et son édition Internet, Grevisse langue française, De Boeck Supérieur.
• [20] Bruno Guillaume, Joseph Le Roux, Jonathan Marchand, Guy Perrier, Karën Fort, and Jenifer Planul (2008), A Toolchain for Grammarians, in Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2008) - Demonstration, pp. 9-12, Manchester, United Kingdom.
• [21] Bruno Guillaume and Guy Perrier (2009), Interaction Grammars, Research on Language and Computation, 7: 171-208.
• [22] Hélène Huot (1982), Constructions infinitives du français: le subordonnant ”de”, L’information grammaticale, 15 (1): 40-45.
• [23] Angelina Ivanova, Stephan Oepen, Lilja Øvrelid, and Dan Flickinger (2012), Who Did What to Whom?: A Contrastive Study of Syntacto-semantic Dependencies, in Proceedings of the Sixth Linguistic Annotation Workshop, LAW VI’12, pp. 2-11, Association for Computational Linguistics, Jeju, Republic of Korea.
• [24] Aravind K. Joshi, Leon S. Levy, and Masako Takahashi (1975), Tree Adjunct Grammars, Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 10 (1): 136-162.
• [25] Aravind K. Joshi and Yves Schabes (1997), Tree-Adjoining Grammars, in Handbook of formal languages, pp. 69-123, Springer.
• [26] Ronald M. Kaplan and Annie Zaenen (1995), Long-distance Dependencies, Constituent Structure, and Functional Uncertainty, Formal Issues in Lexical-Functional Grammar, 47: 137-165.
• [27] Jong-Bok Kim and Ivan A. Sag (2002), Negation without Head-Movement, Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 20 (2): 339-412.
• [28] Joachim Lambek (1958), The Mathematics of Sentence Structure, Amer. Math. Monthly, 65: 154-170.
• [29] Sabine Lehmann, Stephan Oepen, Sylvie Regnier-Prost, Klaus Netter, Veronika Lux, Judith Klein, Kirsten Falkedal, Frederik Fouvry, Dominique Estival, Eva Dauphin, Hervé Compagnion, Judith Baur, Lorna Balkan, and Doug Arnold (1996), TSNLP - Test Suites for Natural Language Processing, in Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 1996), pp. 711-716, Copenhagen, Denmark, http://aclweb.org/anthology/C96-2120.
• [30] Michael Moortgat (1996), Categorial Type Logics, in J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen, editors, Handbook of Logic and Language, pp. 93-177, Elsevier.
• [31] Richard Moot and Christian Retoré (2012), A Logic for Categorial Grammars: Lambek’s Syntactic Calculus, Springer.
• [32] Glyn V. Morrill (1994), Type Logical Grammar, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht and Hingham.
• [33] Stephan Oepen, Dan Flickinger, Jun’ichi Tsujii, and Hans Uszkoreit, editors (2002), Collaborative Language Engineering. A Case Study in Efficient Grammar-based Processing, CSLI Lecture Notes, CSLI Publications, Stanford.
• [34] Guy Perrier (2000), Interaction Grammars, in Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2000), pp. 600-606, Sarrebrücken, Germany.
• [35] Guy Perrier (2014), FRIGRAM: a French Interaction Grammar, Research Report RR-8323, Inria Nancy.
• [36] Carl J. Pollard and Ivan A. Sag (1994), Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, University of Chicago Press.
• [37] Geoffrey K. Pullum and Barbara C. Scholz (2001), On the Distinction between Model-Theoretic and Generative-Enumerative Syntactic Frameworks, in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics (LACL 2001), volume 2099 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 17-43, Le Croisic, France.
• [38] Martin Riegel, Jean-Christophe Pellat, and René Rioul (1999), Grammaire méthodique du français, Presses universitaires de France.
• [39] Laura Rimell and Stephen Clark (2008), Constructing a Parser Evaluation Scheme, in Proceedings of the Workshop on Cross-Framework and Cross-Domain Parser Evaluation (COLING 2008), pp. 44-50, Manchester, United Kingdom.
• [40] James Rogers and K. Vijay-Shanker (1994), Obtaining Trees from their Descriptions: an Application to Tree-Adjoining Grammars, Computational Intelligence, 10 (4): 401-421.
• [41] Laurent Romary, Susanne Salmon-Alt, and Gil Francopoulo (2004), Standards going concrete: from LMF to Morphalou, in Michael Zock, editor, Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2004), pp. 22-28, Geneva, Switzerland, http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/W/W04/W04-2104.bib.
• [42] Ivan A. Sag, Thomas Wasow, and Emily M. Bender (2003), Syntactic Theory: a Formal Introduction, Center for the Study of Language and Information.
• [43] Mark Steedman (2000), The Syntactic Process, Bradford Books, MIT Press.
• [44] Shohreh Tabatabayi Seifi (2012), An Interaction Grammar for English Verbs, in Rasmus K. Rendsvig and Sophia Katrenko, editors, Proceedings of the ESSLLI 2012 Student Session, pp. 160-169, Opole, Poland, http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-954/paper17.pdf.
• [45] Karel Van den Eynde and Piet Mertens (2003), La valence: l’approche pronominale et son application au lexique verbal, Journal of French Language Studies, 13: 63-104.
• [46] Éric Villemonte De La Clergerie (2010), Building factorized TAGs with meta-grammars, in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Tree Adjoining Grammars and Related Formalisms (TAG + 10), pp. 111-118, New Haven, CO, USA.
• [47] Éric Villemonte De La Clergerie (2013), Improving a symbolic parser through partially supervised learning, in The 13th International Conference on Parsing Technologies (IWPT 2013), pp. 54-62, Nara, Japan, https://hal.inria.fr/hal-00879358.
• [48] XTAG Research Group (2001), A Lexicalized Tree Adjoining Grammar for English, Technical Report IRCS-01-03, IRCS, University of Pennsylvania.
• [49] Nicholas Yates (2002), French Causatives: a Biclausal Account in LFG, in Proceedings of the LFG02 Conference, pp. 390-407, Athens, Greece.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).