Inter-organizational cooperation across the service design process based on Intangible Cultural Heritage exploitation

• Autorzy: Trojan Lubomira , Kurowska-Pysz Joanna , Taverner Cristina

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17512/pjms.2023.28.2.22

Warianty tytułu

PL

Współpraca międzyorganizacyjna w procesie projektowania usług bazujących na wykorzystaniu niematerialnego dziedzictwa kulturowego

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper discusses the impact of inter-organizational cooperation on the development of a region’s Intangible Cultural Heritage (ICH). Based on the results of quantitative and qualitative research conducted in 2023, the authors characterized interorganizational cooperation in the process of creating services based on the Intangible Cultural Heritage (ICH), as well as identified the stages of the creation of such services and the added value that results from the use of a participatory approach in this process. The authors also identified those elements of ICH management that involve the cooperation of partners. The paper helps to understand the role of inter-organizational cooperation in designing ICH-based services, while also showing how ICH can be managed based on services designed as part of inter-organizational cooperation. The study presents the features of inter-organizational cooperation in the process of designing an ICH-based service is distinguished. It has been proven that the inter-organizational cooperation in designing an ICH-based service highlights the innovation aspect of this activity and it has a positive impact on ICH development.

PL

Praca dotyczy wpływu współpracy międzyorganizacyjnej na rozwój niematerialnego dziedzictwa kulturowego regionu (ang. Intangible Cultural Heritage, ICH) Opierając się na wynikach badań ilościowych i jakościowych przeprowadzonych w 2023 r. autorki scharakteryzowały współpracę międzyorganizacyjną w procesie tworzenia usług opartych na ICH (ang. Intangible Cultural Heritage, ICH), a także określiły etapy tworzenia tego typu usług i wartość dodaną, jaka wynika z zastosowania podejścia partycypacyjnego w tym procesie. Autorki zidentyfikowały także te elementy zarządzania ICH, które wiążą się ze współpracą partnerów. Praca pomaga w zrozumieniu roli współpracy międzyorganizacyjnej w procesach projektowania usług bazujących na ICH, a jednocześnie wskazuje w jaki sposób można zarządzać ICH w oparciu o usługi projektowane we współpracy międzyorganizacyjnej. W pracy przedstawiono cechy współpracy międzyorganizacyjnej w procesie projektowania usługi opartej na ICH. Udowodniono, że współpraca międzyorganizacyjna przy projektowaniu usługi opartej na ICH podkreśla innowacyjny aspekt tej działalności i pozytywnie wpływa na rozwój ICH.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

inter-organizational cooperation; service design; intangible cultural heritage; craft; management of design process

PL

współpraca międzyorganizacyjna; projektowanie usług; niematerialne dziedzictwo kulturowe; rzemiosło; zarządzanie procesem projektowania

• Wydawca: Czestochowa University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Management Studies
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: Vol. 28, No. 2
• Strony: 384--405
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 52 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Trojan Lubomira

• WSB University, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9883-1117

autor

Kurowska-Pysz Joanna

• WSB University, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3967-9263

autor

Taverner Cristina

• School of Design and Engineering, Barcelona Spain
• CIAUD, Lisbon School of Architeture, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
• TGRAF Center, ISEC Lisbon, Portugal

• https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3009-1137

Bibliografia

• 1.Andrusiv, U., Popadynets, I., Zelinska, H., Lagodiienko,V., Kupalova, H. and Goncharenko, N., (2023). Labor potential as a factor of ensuring competitive advantages of business entities in Ukraine. Production Engineering Archives, 29(3) 263-270.
• 2.Al-Gasawneh, J. A., Anuar, M. M., Dacko-Pikiewicz, Z. and Saputra, J., (2021). The impact of customer relationship management dimensions on service quality. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 23(2), 24-41.
• 3.Ashworth, G. J., Larkham, P. J., (1994). Building a new heritage. Tourism, Culture and Identity in the New Europe. London-New York: Routledge.
• 4.Badr, Y., (2023). Collaborative design methods driven by business artifacts. Smart Digital Service Ecosystems, 49-71.
• 5.Besana, D., (2019). Cultural Heritage Design: Theories and methods for the project complexity management. EGE-Expresión Gráfica En La Edificación, 11, 31.
• 6.Biesta G., (2010). Pragmatism and the Philosophical Foundations of Mixed Methods Research. W: A. Tashakkori, C. Teddlie (red.), SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, 95-118.
• 7.Brandsen T., Steen T. and Verschuere B., (2018). Co-production and co-creation: engaging citizens in public services. 1st ed. London: Routledge.
• 8.Brenna, L., The Italian Design Research and Practice in Cultural Heritage Exploitation, https://designview.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/the-italian-design-research-andpractice-in-cultural-heritage-exploitation.pdf, 2009, [15.09.2023].
• 9.Brown, T., (2009). Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. New York: HarperBusiness.
• 10.Cap, J. P., Blaich, E., Kohl, H., Raesfeld, A. von, Harms, R. and Will, M., (2019). Multilevel network management: A method for managing inter-organizational innovation networks. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 51, 21-32.
• 11.Cerquetti, M., Ferrara, C., Romagnoli, A. and Vagnarelli, G., (2022). Enhancing intangible cultural heritage for sustainable tourism development in rural areas: The case of the “Marche Food and wine memories” project (Italy). Sustainability, 14(24), 16893.
• 12.Collins, H, (2019). Creative research: The theory and practice of research for the Creative Industries. Bloomsbury Visual Arts, Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.
• 13.Cricelli, L., Greco, M. and Grimaldi, M., (2021). An investigation on the effect of interorganizational collaboration on reverse logistics. International Journal of Production Economics, 240, 108216.
• 14.Czakon, W., (2005). Istota relacji sieciowych przedsiębiorstwa. Przegląd Organizacji, 9, 10-13.
• 15.Deja, A., Ślączka, W., Dzhuguryan, L., Dzhuguryan, T. and Ulewicz, R., (2023). Green technologies in smart city multifloor manufacturing clusters: A framework for additive manufacturing management. Production Engineering Archives, 29(4) 428-443.
• 16.Dan, H., (2019). Culturally green-an investigation into the cultural determinants of environmental performance. In Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 7(2), 107-126.
• 17.Wydawnictwo Naukowe Akademii WSB. Eichler, J., (2021). Intangible cultural heritage, inequalities and participation: who decides on heritage?. The International Journal of Human Rights, 25(5), 793-814.
• 18.Gil-Garcia, J. R., Guler, A., Pardo, T. A. and Burke, G. B., (2019). Characterizing the importance of clarity of roles and responsibilities in government inter-organizational collaboration and information sharing initiatives. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101393.
• 19.Guilford, J. P., (1968). Intelligence, Creativity, and their Educational Implications. San Diego: R.R. Knapp.
• 20.Hanington, B. M., Martin, B., (2019). Universal Methods of Design: 125 ways to research complex problems, develop innovative ideas, and Design Effective Solutions. Rockport Publishers. Home. Design Council - Design for Planet. (n.d.).
• 21.https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/ourresources/framework-for-innovation/ [17.09.2023].
• 22.Huang, H., (2018). Exploring the Dilemma and Turn of Chinese Ceramic Art Creation. Lit. Life Wenhai Art Gard., 1, 21-29.
• 23.Jiartana, I. W., Riana, I. G., Wibawa I. M. A. and Surya, I. B. K., (2023). Organisational Citizenship Behaviour In Public Service: Integrating Public Service Motivation and Sense of Community. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 27(1), 117-132.
• 24.Keahey, J., (2019). Sustainable Heritage Development in the South African cederberg. Geoforum, 104, 36-45.
• 25.Kimbell, L., (2011). Rethinking Design Thinking: Part I. Design and Culture, 3(3), 285-306.
• 26.Kurowska-Pysz, J., Ulrich, P., (2019). Polish-German Cooperation in the Field of Cultural Heritage: The Case of the European Park Association of Lusatia. Cultural Management: Science and Education, 3(2), 123-143.
• 27.Kuzior, A., Pidorycheva, I., Liashenko, V., Shevtsova, H. and Shvets, N., (2022). Assessment of National Innovation Ecosystems of the EU Countries and Ukraine in the Interests of Their Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 14, 8487.
• 28.Kurowska-Pysz, J., Wienchor, D. and Woźnikowski, J., (2021). Identification of Values Shaping Inter-Organizational Relations on the Example of the Project the Metropolitan Theatres Night. Cultural Management: Science and Education, 5(2).
• 29.Li, W.-T., Ho, M.-C. and Yang, C., (2019). A design thinking-based study of the prospect of the sustainable development of traditional handicrafts. Sustainability, 11(18), 4823.
• 30.Lisiński, M., (2016). Paradygmaty Metodologiczne Nauk O Zarządzaniu (methodological paradigms of Management Science). Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego We Wrocławiu, 421, 374-385.
• 31.Nuanphromsakul, K., Szczepańska-Woszczyna, K., Kot, S., Chaveesuk, S., Chaiyasoonthorn, W. (2022). Sustainability of Rubber Farmers Cooperatives: Empirical evaluation of determining factors. AGRIS On-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 14(4), 85-96.
• 32.Otola, I., Grabowska, M., and Kozak, M. (2021). What constitutes the value in business model for social enterprises?. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 24(2), 336-353.
• 33.Pistola, T., Diplaris, S., Stentoumis, C., Stathopoulos, E. A., Loupas, G., Mandilaras, T., Kalantzis, G., Kalisperakis, I., Tellios, A., Zavraka, D., Koulali, P., Kriezi, V., Vraka, V., Venieri, F., Bacalis, S., Vrochidis, S. and Kompatsiaris, I., (2021). Creating immersive experiences based on Intangible Cultural Heritage. 2021 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Reality (ICIR).
• 34.Pouwels, I., Koster, F., (2017). Inter-organizational cooperation and organizational innovativeness: A comparative study. International Journal of Innovation Science, 9(2), 184-204.
• 35.Qi Dong, J., McCarthy, K. J. and Schoenmakers, W. W., (2017). How central is too central? Organizing interorganizational collaboration networks for breakthrough innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(4), 526-542.
• 36.Radziwon, A., Bogers, M., (2019). Open innovation in SMEs: Exploring inter-organizational relationships in an ecosystem. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 573-587.
• 37.Ranjan K., Read S., (2016). Value co-creation: concept and measurement. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(3), 290-315.
• 38.Robbins, P., Devitt, F., (2014). Collaboration and Creativity: a case study of how design thinking created a cultural cluster in Dublin. W: RandD Management Conference 2014: Conference Paper. Stuttgart.
• 39.Schruijer, S., (2020). Developing collaborative interorganizational relationships: An action research approach. Team Performance Management, 26(1/2), 17-28.
• 40.Sheppard, B., Kouyoumjian, G., Sarrazin, H. and Dore, F., (2023). The business value of design. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-design/our-insights/thebusiness-value-of-design. [17.08.2023].
• 41.Singh, D. R., Sah, R. K., Simkhada, B. and Darwin, Z., (2023). Potentials and challenges of using co-design in health services research in low- and middle-income countries. Global Health Research and Policy, 8(5).
• 42.Stickdorn M., Hormess M. E., Lawrence A. and Schneider J., (2018) This is service design doing. O’Reilly Media Inc.
• 43.Stickdorn, M., Schneider, J., (2012). This is Service Design Thinking: Basics, Tools, Cases.
• 44.Tashakkori, A., Johnson, R. B. and Teddlie, C., (2021). Foundations of mixed methods research integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and Behavioral Sciences. Sage publications.
• 45.Trojan, L., (2022). Design i dziedzictwo - niematerialne, ale zaprojektowane. P. RojekAdamek, M. Juza (ed.), Szkice z socjologii zawodów kreatywnych. Praca, design, strategie komunikacyjne. Kraków: WNUP, 111-133.
• 46.UNESCO Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of October 17, 2003, Journal of Laws of 2011, no. 172, item 1018 (2) (1) (1).
• 47.Vaitkienė, D., Juknevičienė, V. and Poškuvienė, B., (2021). The usage of social networks for citizen engagement at the local self-government level: the link between municipal councillors and citizens. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 9(2), 111-130.
• 48.Vaníčková, R., Szczepańska-Woszczyna, K., (2020). Innovation of business and marketing plan of growth strategy and competitive advantage in exhibition industry. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 21(2), 425-445.
• 49.Vink, J., Koskela-Huotari, K., (2022). Building reflexivity using service design methods. Journal of Service Research, 25(3), 371-389.
• 50.Wang, J., Wen, F. and Fang, D., (2019). Intangible Cultural Heritage Tourism and the improvement of rural environment in China: Value cocreation perspective. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 237, 052079.
• 51.Wu, H., Hou, C., (2020). Utilizing co-design approach to identify various stakeholders’ roles in the protection of intangible place-making heritage: The case of Guchengping Village. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 29(1), 22-35.
• 52.Zahoor, N., Al-Tabbaa, O., (2020). Inter-organizational collaboration and SMEs’ innovation: A systematic review and future research directions. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 36(2), 101109.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).