Tender evaluation criteria in the public procurement of works

• Autorzy: Kozik R.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5604/17318157.1226142

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The amendment to the Public Procurement Law (PPL) [7], which came into effect on 19 October 2014, introduced new principles of tender evaluation. The price may no longer be the sole criterion, unless the conditions listed in the PPL occur. The purpose of the article is to analyze the tender evaluation process in the public procurement of works in the situation where contracting authorities are obliged to apply also other criteria apart from price. Undoubtedly, it will result in a reduced number of procedures where price is the only criterion. The paper presents the results of the research illustrating the scale of this phenomenon and the way of using the new regulations by contracting authorities. The paper contains a brief description of legal bases, new principles of applying tender evaluation criteria and the present practice in this area. The article presents the results of the analysis of notices of contracts on works, published in the Public Procurement Bulletin (PPB) [2] after the amendment to the PPL. The analysis focused on the type, number and frequency of applying the criteria and on their weightings in contracts on works concerning different types of building structures. The conducted research shows that the type of the subject matter of the contract does not influence the choice of criteria. The main criteria, apart from price, include guarantee (period and conditions) and time limit for completion. The number of procedures in which price is the only criterion has decreased significantly. The research reveals that in the tender evaluation process regarding contracts on works contracting authorities take practically no account of life cycle costs and do not apply the so-called environmental criteria.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

evaluation criteria; public procurement; works

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Akademii Wojsk Lądowych imienia generała Tadeusza Kościuszki
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe / Wyższa Szkoła Oficerska Wojsk Lądowych im. gen. T. Kościuszki
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: Nr 4
• Strony: 135--145
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 11 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Kozik R.

• Faculty of Civil Engineering, T. Kosciuszko Cracow University of Technology

Bibliografia

• 1. Banaitiene, N., Banaitis, A., Analysis of criteria for contractors’ qualification evaluation, Technological and economic development of economy (Ukio Technologinis ir Ekonominis Vystymas), 12:4, 2006, 276-282, [online]. [access : 17.11.2014], Available on the Internet: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13928619.2006.9637754.
• 2. Biuletyn Zamówień Publicznych, [online]. [access: 20.04.2015]. Available on the Internet: www.uzp.gov.pl.
• 3. Favie, R., Abdalla, G& Maas, G. J., The best criteria for the selection of contrators in the Dutch construction industry, In W. Hughes (Ed.), Proceedings of the CME25: Construction Management and Economics: Past, Present and Future, Reading (UK), July 2007, p. 1-7. [online]. [access: 17.11.2014]: Available on the Internet: (http:/ /alexandria.tue.nl/openaccess/Metis221192.pdf.
• 4. Hanák, T., Korytárova, J., Kozik, R., Radziszewska-Zielina, E., Exploration of contractor evaluation process in the management of public works contracts, Project management as spectrum of scientific problems in engineering and management, Military Academy of Land Forces, Wrocław 2015, p. 55-65. ISBN 978-83-63900-63-2.
• 5. Kozik, R., Problems of the Contractors with Preparing a Tender for Works According to the Design and Build System, Scientific Problems in Management, red. Skorupka D., Flieger M., Military Academy of Land Forces, Wrocław 2013, p. 23-32. ISBN 978-83-63900-93-9.
• 6. Salama, M.,Ab d El Aziz, H., El Sawah, H., El Samadony, A., Investigating the criteria for Contractors’ selection and bid evaluation in Egypt, 2006 [online]. [access: 14 .11. 2014]. Dostępny w Internecie: http://www.arcom.ac.uk/-docs/proceedings/ar2006-0531-0540_Salama_et_al.pdf.
• 7. Ustawa z dnia 29 stycznia 2004 r. – Prawo zamówień publicznych (Dz. U. z 2013 r. 907, 984, 1047 i 1473, z 2014 r. poz. 423, 768, 811, 915, 1146 i 1232 oraz z 2015 r. poz. 349).
• 8. Wong, C. H., Holt, G. D., Cooper, P. A., Lowest price or value? Investigation of UK construction clients’ tender selection process, Construction Management & Economics, Vol. 18, Issue 7, 2000, p. 767–774.
• 9. Wong, C. H., Holt, G. D., Harris, P., Multi-criteria selection or lowest price? Investigation of UK construction clients’ tender evaluation preferences, Engineering Construction & Architectural, Management, Vol. 8, Issue 4, 2001, p. 257–271.
• 10. [online]. [access: 20.04.2015]. Available on the Internet: http://www.uzp.gov.pl /cmsws/page/?D;3088.
• 11. [online]. [access: 20.04.201] Available on the Internet: http://ted.europa.eu /TED /search/searchResult.do Tenders Electronic Daily.

Uwagi

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (zadania 2017).