PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Treatment of Petroleum Refinery Wastewater by Activated Carbon Assisted Electrocoagulation Process

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The removal of COD from wastewater generated by petroleum refinery has been investigated by adopting electrocoagulation (EC) combined with adsorption using activated carbon (AC) derived from avocado seeds. The process variables influencing COD removal were studied: current density (2–10 mA/cm2), pH (4–9), and AC dosage (0.2–1 g/L). Response surface methodology (RSM) based on Box–Behnken design (BBD) was used to construct a mathematical model of the EC/AC process. Results showed that current density has the major effect on the COD removal with a percent of contribution 32.78% followed by pH while AC dosage has not a remarkable effect due to the good characteristics of AC derived from avocado seeds. Increasing current density gives better results while neutral conditions are suitable for EC/AC. The optimized conditions for higher removal of COD adopting the combined process were a current density of 10 mA/cm2, AC dosage of 0.2 g/L, and pH of 6.8 in which a removal efficiency of 81.6% was attained. The combining of EC with adsorption showed that adding a suitable amount of AC derived from avocado seeds resulted in enhancement of COD removal from 63.45% to 81.4%. Based on this high removal efficiency, the EC/AC could be adopted instead of traditional EC.
Rocznik
Strony
239--251
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 52 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
  • Department of Biochemical Engineering, Al-Khwarizmi College of Engineering, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq
  • Department of Biochemical Engineering, Al-Khwarizmi College of Engineering, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq
  • Department of Biochemical Engineering, Al-Khwarizmi College of Engineering, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq
autor
  • Department of Biochemical Engineering, Al-Khwarizmi College of Engineering, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq
Bibliografia
  • 1. Chen, Y.-C., 2018. Evaluating greenhouse gas emissions and energy recovery from municipal and industrial solid waste using waste-to energy technology. J. Clean. Prod., 192, 262–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.260
  • 2. Putatunda, S., Bhattacharya, S., Sen, D., Bhattacharjee, C., 2019. A review on the application of different treatment processes for emulsified oily wastewater. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 16, 2525–2536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-2055-6
  • 3. Varjani, S.J., Gnansounou, E., Pandey, A., 2017. Comprehensive review on toxicity of persistent organic pollutants from petroleum refinery waste and their degradation by microorganisms. Chemosphere, 188, 280–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.09.005
  • 4. Manyuchi, M.M., Ketiwa, E., 2013. Distillery effluent treatment using membrane bioreactor technology utilising pseudomonas fluorescens. International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Technology, 2(12), 1252–1254.
  • 5. Singh, B., Kumar, P., 2020. Pre-treatment of petroleum refinery wastewater by coagulation and flocculation using mixed coagulant: Optimization of process parameters using response surface methodology (RSM). Journal of Water Process Engineering, 36, 101317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101317
  • 6. Hussain, Z., Fadhil, Z., Kareem, S., Mohammed, S., Yousif, E. 2020, August. Removal of organic contaminants from textile wastewater by adsorption on natural biosorbent. In: Materials Science Forum 1002, 489–497.
  • 7. Aljuboury, D., Palaniandy, P., Abdul Aziz, H.B., Feroz, S., 2017. Treatment of petroleum wastewater by conventional and new technologies – A review. Glob. Nest J., 19(3), 439–452. https://doi.org/10.30955/gnj.002239
  • 8. Parashar, V., Thakur, C., 2024. Challenges, opportunities, and strategies for effective petroleum hydrocarbon waste management. Impact of Petroleum Waste on Environmental Pollution and its Sustainable Management Through Circular Economy, 67–90.
  • 9. Meng, X., Wu, J., Kang, J., Gao, J., Liu, R., Gao, Y., Hu, Y., 2018. Comparison of the reduction of chemical oxygen demand in wastewater from mineral processing using the coagulation-flocculation, adsorption and Fenton processes. Minerals Engineering, 128, 275–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2018.09.009
  • 10. Bayramoglu, M., Kobya, M., Can, O.T., Sozbir, M. 2004. Operating cost analysis of electrocoagulation of textile dye wastewater. Separation and Purification Technology, 37(2), 117–125.
  • 11. Raju, G.B., Karuppiah, M.T., Latha, S.S., Parvathy, S., Prabhakar, S. 2008. Treatment of wastewater from synthetic textile industry by electrocoagulation–electrooxidation. Chemical Engineering Journal, 144(1), 51–58.
  • 12. Guvenc, S.Y., Okut, Y., Ozak, M., Haktanir, B., Bilgili, M.S. 2017. Process optimization via response surface methodology in the treatment of metal working industry wastewater with electrocoagulation. Water Science and Technology, 75(4), 833–846.
  • 13. Kumar, P.R., Chaudhari, S., Khilar, K.C., Mahajan, S.P. 2004. Removal of arsenic from water by electrocoagulation. Chemosphere, 55(9), 1245–1252.
  • 14. Zhu, M.J., Yao, J., Wang, W.B., Yin, X.Q., Chen, W., Wu, X.Y. 2016. Using response surface methodology to evaluate electrocoagulation in the pretreatment of produced water from polymer-flooding well of Dagang Oilfield with bipolar aluminum electrodes. Desalination and Water Treatment, 57(33), 15314–15325.
  • 15. Kobya, M., Senturk, E., Bayramoglu, M. 2006. Treatment of poultry slaughterhouse wastewaters by electrocoagulation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 133(1–3), 172–176.
  • 16. Pi, K.W., Xiao, Q., Zhang, H.Q., Xia, M., Gerson, A.R. 2014. Decolorization of synthetic methyl orange wastewater by electrocoagulation with periodic reversal of electrodes and optimization by RSM. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 92(6), 796–806.
  • 17. Elnenay, A.M.H., Nassef, E., Malash, G.F., Magid, M.H.A. 2017. Treatment of drilling fluids wastewater by electrocoagulation. Egyptian Journal of Petroleum, 26(1), 203–208.
  • 18. Bayramoglu, M., Kobya, M., Can, O.T., Sozbir, M. 2004. Operating cost analysis of electrocoagulation of textile dye wastewater. Separation and Purification Technology, 37(2), 117125.
  • 19. Chen, X., Chen, G., Yue, P.L. 2000. Separation of pollutants from restaurant wastewater by electrocoagulation. Separation and Purification Technology, 19(1–2), 65–76.
  • 20. Zaied, M., Bellakhal, N. 2009. Electrocoagulation treatment of black liquor from paper industry. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 163(2–3), 995–1000.
  • 21. Akbal, F., Camcı, S. 2011. Copper, chromium and nickel removal from metal plating wastewater by electrocoagulation. Desalination, 269(1–3), 214–222.
  • 22. Alkurdi, S.S., Abbar, A.H. 2020, June. Removal of COD from petroleum refinery wastewater by electro-coagulation process using SS/Al electrodes. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 870, (1), 012052. IOP Publishing.
  • 23. Avsar, Y., Kurt, U., Gonullu, T. 2007. Comparison of classical chemical and electrochemical processes for treating rose processing wastewater. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 148(1–2), 340–345.
  • 24. Holt, P.K., Barton, G.W., Mitchell, C.A. 2005. The future for electrocoagulation as a localised water treatment technology. Chemosphere, 59(3), 355–367.
  • 25. Secula, M.S., Cretescu, I., Cagnon, B., Manea, L.R., Stan, C.S., Breaban, I.G. 2013. Fractional factorial design study on the performance of GAC-enhanced electrocoagulation process involved in color removal from dye solutions. Materials, 6(7), 2723–2746.
  • 26. Narayanan, N.V., Ganesan, M. 2009. Use of adsorption using granular activated carbon (GAC) for the enhancement of removal of chromium from synthetic wastewater by electrocoagulation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 161(1), 575–580.
  • 27. Secula, M.S., Cagnon, B., de Oliveira, T.F., Chedeville, O., Fauduet, H. 2012. Removal of acid dye from aqueous solutions by electrocoagulation/GAC adsorption coupling: Kinetics and electrical operating costs. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 43(5), 767–775.
  • 28. Hussin, F., Aroua, M.K., Szlachta, M. 2019. Combined solar electrocoagulation and adsorption processes for Pb(II) removal from aqueous solution. Chemical Engineering and Processing – Process Intensification, 143, 107619.
  • 29. Muryanto, M., Marlina, E., Sari, A.A., Harimawan, A., Sudarno, S. 2018, November. Treatment of beverage industry wastewater using a combination of electrocoagulation and adsorption processes. In AIP Conference Proceedings 2024(1). AIP Publishing.
  • 30. Thakur, C. 2021. Unification electrocoagulation-adsorption treatment for removal of COD and surfactant from automobile wastewater. International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering, 19(9), 961–968.
  • 31. Pizutti, J.T., Santos, R.D.C.D., Hemkemeier, M., Piccin, J.S. 2019. Electrocoagulation coupled adsorption for anaerobic wastewater post-treatment and reuse purposes. Desalination Water Treat, 160, 144–152.
  • 32. Bellebia, S., Kacha, S., Bouyakoub, A.Z., Derriche, Z. 2012. Experimental investigation of chemical oxygen demand and turbidity removal from cardboard paper mill effluents using combined electrocoagulation and adsorption processes. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 31(3), 361–370.
  • 33. Cherifi, M., Guenfoud, S., Bendaia, M., Hazourli, S., Laefer, D.F., Leclerc, J.P., Mecibah, W. 2021. Comparative study between electrocoagulation used separately and coupled with adsorption for dairy wastewater treatment using response surface methodology design. Desalination and Water Treatment, 223, 235-245.
  • 34. Eulmi, A., Hazourli, S., Abrane, R., Bendaia, M., Aitbara, A., Touahria, S., Chérifi, M. 2019. Evaluation of electrocoagulation and activated carbon adsorption techniques used separately or coupled to treat wastewater from industrial dairy. International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering, 17(12), 20180229.
  • 35. Barhoumi, A., Ncib, S., Bouguerra, W., Hamrouni, B., Elaloui, E. 2017. Combining adsorption on activated carbon with electrocoagulation process for copper removal from used water. Desalination and Water Treatment, 83, 212–221.
  • 36. Rubi-Juarez H., Barrera-Diaz C., Ureña-Nuñez, F. 2017. Adsorption-assisted electrocoagulation of real car wash wastewater with equilibrium and kinetic studies. Pollut. Res, 36(2), 175–184.
  • 37. Chabani, M., Bouafia-Chergui, S., Touil, A. 2024. Removal of chemical oxygen demand from real petroleum refinery wastewater through a hybrid approach: Electrocoagulation and adsorption. Chemical Engineering and Processing – Process Intensification, 196, 109680.
  • 38. Elabbas, S., Adjeroud, N., Mandi, L., Berrekhis, F., Pons, M.N., Leclerc, J.P., Ouazzani, N. 2022. Eggshell adsorption process coupled with electrocoagulation for improvement of chromium removal from tanning wastewater. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, 102(13), 2966–2978.
  • 39. de Carvalho, H.P., Huang, J., Zhao, M., Liu, G., Dong, L., Liu, X. 2015. Improvement of Methylene Blue removal by electrocoagulation/banana peel adsorption coupling in a batch system. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 54(3), 777–786.
  • 40. Zhu, M., Yin, X., Chen, W., Yi, Z., Tian, H. 2019. Removal of sulphate from mine waters by electrocoagulation/rice straw activated carbon adsorption coupling in a batch system: optimization of process via response surface methodology. Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination, 9(2), 163–172.
  • 41. Wang, X., Ni, J., Pang, S., Li, Y. 2017.Removal of malachite green from aqueous solutions by electrocoagulation/peanut shell adsorption coupling in a batch system. Water Science and Technology, 75(8), 1830–1838.
  • 42. Atiyah, Z.Y., Muallah, S.K., Abbar, A.H. 2024. Removal of COD from petroleum refinery wastewater by adsorption using activated carbon derived from avocado plant. South African Journal of Chemical Engineering, 48, 467–483.
  • 43. Khaleel, G.F., Ismail, I., Abbar, A.H., 2023. Application of solar photo-electro-Fenton technology to petroleum refinery wastewater degradation: Optimization of operational parameters. Heliyon, 9(4), e15062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15062
  • 44. Fregue, T.T.R., Ionel, I., Gabche, A.S., Mihaiuti, A.C. 2019. Optimization of the activated carbon preparation from avocado seeds, using the response surface methodology. Rev. Chim, 70, 410–416.
  • 45. Mousavi, S.A., Shahbazi, D., Mahmoudi, A., Darvishi, P., 2022. Methylene blue removal using prepared activated carbon from grape wood wastes: adsorption process analysis and modeling. Water Quality Research Journal, 57(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2166/wqrj.2021.015
  • 46. Baş, D., Boyacı, İ.H., 2007. Modeling and optimization I: Usability of response surface methodology. Journal of Food Engineering, 78(3), 836–845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.11.024
  • 47. Hadiyat, M.A., Sopha, B.M., Wibowo, B.S., 2022. Response surface methodology using observational data: A systematic literature review. Applied Sciences, 12(20), 10663. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122010663
  • 48. Lakshmi, P.M., Sivashanmugam, P. 2013. Treatment of oil tanning effluent by electrocoagulation: Influence of ultrasound and hybrid electrode on COD removal. Separation and Purification Technology, 116, 378–384.
  • 49. Jiang, J.Q., Graham, N., André, C., Kelsall, G.H., Brandon, N. 2002. Laboratory study of electrocoagulation–flotation for water treatment. Water Research, 36(16), 4064–4078.
  • 50. Parsa, J.B., Vahidian, H.R., Soleymani, A.R., Abbasi, M. 2011. Removal of Acid Brown 14 in aqueous media by electrocoagulation: Optimization parameters and minimizing of energy consumption. Desalination, 278(1–3), 295–302.
  • 51. Jalil, S.N.A., Amri, N., Ajien, A.A., Ismail, N.F., Ballinger, B. 2019, November. A hybrid electrocoagulation-adsorption process for fluoride removal from semiconductor wastewater. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1349(1), 012056. IOP Publishing.
  • 52. Nigri, E.M., Santos, A.L., Rocha, S.D. 2020. Removal of organic compounds, calcium and strontium from petroleum industry effluent by simultaneous electrocoagulation and adsorption. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 37, 101442.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-2f935ccc-5f7c-4d64-b2f1-8c3b2e01ba62
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.