PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

The role of the ECDIS on the development of situational awareness – a study on grounding accidents

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Vessel grounding accidents can potentially cause catastrophic marine accidents with environmental pollution and loss of life and economy. New systems introduced to improve safety of navigation should not be cause them. Today, the ECDIS is the main cartographic system and must therefore be an appropriate aid to support seafarers in building situational awareness with the relevant information needed for safe navigation. This paper describes the development of situational awareness and its features after which the maritime grounding accidents, in the period from 2008 to 2019 are analysed. Due to importance of the ECDIS, only ECDIS related accidents were considered. The aim of this paper was to determine which error ceased the development of good situational awareness and to determine whether there is a certain pattern by which to predict future errors and thus act preventively on them. This study shows at which situation awareness level those errors occurred and which SA demon affected the seafarers to perform an error.
Twórcy
autor
  • University of Zadar, Zadar, Croatia
autor
  • University of Zadar, Zadar, Croatia
autor
  • Zadar County, Zadar, Croatia
autor
  • University of Zadar, Zadar, Croatia
Bibliografia
  • 1. Asyali, E., 2012, ʹThe Role of ECDIS in Improving Situation Awarenessʹ, The 13th Annual General Assembly of the IAMU: Expanding Frontiers ‐ Challenges and Opportunities in Maritime Education and Training.
  • 2. Sharma, A., Nazir, S., Ernstsen, J., 2019, ‘Situation awareness information requirements for maritime navigation: A goal directed task analysis’, Safety Science 120 745–752, University of South‐Eastern Norway.
  • 3. Endsley, M. R., 1995, ‘Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems’, Human Factors Journal 37(1), 32‐64.
  • 4. Francis T. Durso et al. 1999, Handbook of Applied Cognition, The University of Michigan, Wiley, Chichester.
  • 5. Van de Laar, P., Tretmans, J., Borth, M. 2013, Situation Awareness with Systems of Systems, Springer Science & Business Media, New York.
  • 6. Dominguez, C. 1994, ʹCan SA be definedʹ, Situation Awareness: Papers and annotated bibliography, Wright‐ Patterson AFB, OH: Armstrong Laboratory 225.
  • 7. Francis T. Durso et al. 2007, Handbook of Applied Cognition, 2nd edn, John Wiley & Sons Lid, Chichester.
  • 8. Wickens C. D. Et al., 2015, Engineering Psychology and Human Performance, Psychology Press, Hove.
  • 9. Endsley, M. R., Jones, D. G., 2017, Designing for Situation Awareness: An Approach to User‐Centered Design, 2nd edn, Taylor & Francis, Milton Park.
  • 10. Pietrzykowski, Z., Uriasz, J., 2009, ‘The Ship Domain – A Criterion of Navigational Safety Assessment in an Open Sea Area’, The Journal Of Navigation, 62, 93–108.
  • 11. Rowley, J., 2007, ‘The wisdom hierarchy: representations of the DIKW hierarchy’, Journal of Information Science, 33 (2), pp. 163–180, University of Wales.
  • 12. International Maritime Organization. 2009, Resolution MSC.282 (86): adoption of amendments to the international convention for the safety of life at sea, 1974, as amended. [Accessed 2017 Dec 27].
  • 13. Cole, S. J., Asyali, E., 2018, ‘Role of ECDIS Training On Improving Situational Awareness’, 19th Annual General Assembly ‐ AGA 2018, International Association of Maritime Universities (IAMU), Barcelona.
  • 14. Brčić, D., Žuškin, S., Barić, M., 2017, ‘Observations on ECDIS Education and Training’, Marine Navigation: Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, CRC Press; Taylor & Francis Group, Croydon, pp. 29‐38.
  • 15. Car, M. et al., 2019, ‘Human Machine Interface: Interaction of OOWs with the ECDIS’, 1st International conference of maritime science & technology, Naše more, Dubrovnik, University of Dubrovnik, Maritime Department.
  • 16. International Maritime Organization. 2019, Resolution MSC.1/Circ.1609, “Guidelines for the standardization of user interface design for navigation equipment”.
  • 17. Marine accident investigation branch (MAIB), 2020, Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/marineaccident‐investigation‐branch.
  • 18. The Federal Bureau of Maritime Casualty Investigation (BSU), 2020. Available from: https://www.bsubund. de/EN/Home/home_node.html.
  • 19. The Marine Safety Investigation Unit (MSIU), 2020, Available from: https://mtip.gov.mt/en/pages/msiu/marine‐safetyinvestigation‐unit.aspx.
  • 20. The Dutch Safety Board (DSB), 2020, Available from: https://www.onderzoeksraad.nl/.
  • 21. The Transportation Safety Board of Canada (TSB), 2020, Available from: https://www.tsb.gc.ca/eng.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-2f1e3386-2fd9-4a1e-beae-4561338a6aee
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.