Zwinne podejście projektowe a projekty badawcze

• Autorzy: Spałek S. , Zdonek D.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Agile concept vs. research projects

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

PL

W artykule przedstawiono zarys koncepcji zwinnego zarządzania projektami (ang. Agile Project Management) w odniesieniu do podejścia sekwencyjnego (ang. Waterfall). Zwrócono uwagę na cechy charakterystyczne, jakie powinny mieć projekty, realizowane na podstawie metodyki Agile. Zaproponowano kryteria oceny projektów, niezbędne dla rekomendacji zastosowania zwinnego podejścia w projektach badawczych.

EN

In the article, the concept of Agile Project Management is outlined in comparison to the Waterfall approach. The key characteristics of projects managed using the Agile method are highlighted. Criterions for the assessment of projects are proposed in order to recommend the application of the Agile method in research projects.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

zwinne zarządzanie projektami; projekt badawczy; podejście sekwencyjne

EN

Agile Project Management; research project; waterfall approach

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: z. 64
• Strony: 241--249
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 21 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Spałek S.

• Politechnika Śląska Wydział Organizacji i Zarządzania

autor

Zdonek D.

• Politechnika Śląska Wydział Organizacji i Zarządzania

Bibliografia

• 1. Abrahamsson P., Oza N., Siponen M. T.: Agile Software Development Methods: A Comparative Review. Agile Software Development: Current Research and Future Directions, 2010.
• 2. Batra D., VanderMeer D., Dutta K.: Extending Agile Principles to Larger, Dynamic Software Projects: A Theoretical Assessment. Journal of Database Management, 22(4), 2011.
• 3. Beck K., Beedle M., van Bennekum A., Cockburn A., Cunningham W., Fowler M., Grenning J., Highsmith J., Hunt A., Jeffries R., Kern J., Marick B., Martin R.C., Mellor S., Schwaber K., Sutherland J., Thomas D.: http://agilemanifesto.org/iso/en/; [dostępność: 16.10.2012]
• 4. Boehm B., Turner R.: Balancing Agility and Discipline: A guide for the Perplexed, Addison Wesley, 2004.
• 5. Fair J.: Agile versus Waterfall, PMI Global Congress Proceedings, Marseille, France 2012.
• 6. Gary K., Enquobahrie A., Ibanez L., Cheng P., Yaniv Z., Cleary K., et al.: Agile methods for open source safety-critical software. Software-Practice & Experience, 41(9), 2011.
• 7. Holzmueller-Laue S., Goede B.: Agile Business Process Management in Research Projects of Life Sciences. Perspectives in Business Informatics Research, 90, 2011.
• 8. Iqbal M., Rizwan M.: APPLICATION OF 80/20 RULE IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING WATERFALL MODEL. Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies, Karachi, PAKISTAN. 2009, Aug 15-16.
• 9. Ji F., Sedano T.: Comparing Extreme Programming and Waterfall Project Results, 2011.
• 10. Levitt R.E.: Toward Project Management 2.0, PMI Research and Education Conference, Limerick, Ireland 2012.
• 11. Macek O., Komarek M.: The Practical Method of Motivating Students to Iterative Software Development. 2011 24th Ieee-Cs Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (Cseet), 2011.
• 12. Manwani S.: The Agile Governance of Business IT Projects, 2010.
• 13. Pirola-Merlo A.: Agile innovation: The role of team climate in rapid research and development. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(4), 2010.
• 14. Pow-Sang J.A., Jolay-Vasquez E.: An approach of a technique for effort estimation of iterations in software projects, 2006.
• 15. Procter R., Rouncefield M., Poschen M., Lin Y., Voss A.: Agile Project Management: A Case Study of a Virtual Research Environment Development Project. Computer Supported Cooperative Work-the Journal of Collaborative Computing, 20(3), 2011.
• 16. Puehl S., Fahney R.: How to assign cost to "Avoidable Requirements Creep" A step towards the waterfall's agilization. Paper presented at the 19th IEEE Int Requirements Engineering Conf erence (RE)/16th Int Workshop on Formal Methods for Industrial Critical Systems (FMICS)/5th Int IStar Workshop, Trento, ITALY, 2011, Aug 29-Sep 02.
• 17. Santos R., Flentge F., Begin M.-E., Navarro, V.: Agile Technical Management of Industrial Contracts: Scrum Development of Ground Segment Software at the European Space Agency. Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming, 77, 2011.
• 18. Spałek S.: Improving Industrial Engineering Performance Through a Successful Project Management Office. Engineering Economics, 24(2), 2013.
• 19. Trocki M. (red.): Nowoczesne zarządzanie projektami. PWE, Warszawa 2012.
• 20. Valimaki A., Kaariainen J., Koskimies K.: Global Software Development Patterns for Project Management. [In:] Oconnor R.V., Baddoo N., Gallego J.C., Muslera R.R., Smolander K., Messnarz R. (Eds.), Software Process Improvement, Proceedings (Vol. 42), 2009.
• 21. Vidgen R., Wang X.: Coevolving Systems and the Organization of Agile Software Development. Information Systems Research, 20(3), 2009.