Produkcja części i podzespołów technicznych środków transportu rolniczego jako osnowa dyskursu o dojrzałości eko-projektowej

• Autorzy: Niewiadomski Przemysław

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.25961/ent.manag.26.02.03

Warianty tytułu

EN

Production of technical parts and components of agricultural transport means as the basis of the discourse on design environmental maturity

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

The considerations conducted in this work are aimed at identifying the design environmental maturity of enterprises producing parts and components of technical means of agricultural transport. So far, both in Poland and abroad, no comprehensive research (based on a detailed analysis of the problem) has been undertaken on design maturity, defined through the prism of environmental dimensions, in relation to Polish producers of the agricultural machinery sector. In order to fill the existing gap in knowledge, a series of studies was undertaken to identify whether the surveyed enterprises are design-oriented, taking into account, in addition to traditional postulates (economics, society), also environmental postulates reflecting their eco-maturity. Given the empirical evidence confirming the existence of a strong relationship between a company’s market success and sustainable management throughout the product life cycle, the following line of research aggregates them into desirable ones.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

projekt ekologiczny; dojrzałość projektowa; środki transportu; części; komponenty; projektowa dojrzałość środowiskowa

EN

ecodesign; design maturity; means of transport; parts; components; designed environmental maturity

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Zarządzania Produkcją
• Czasopismo: Zarządzanie Przedsiębiorstwem
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: Vol. 26, nr 1
• Strony: 19--25
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 25 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Niewiadomski Przemysław

• Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy, Wydział Inżynierii Środowiska i Inżynierii Mechanicznej, Katedra Inżynierii Biosystemów, Zakład Inżynierii Rolniczej, Wojska Polskiego 28, 60-637 Poznań, Polska

Bibliografia

• [1] Baldassarri C., Sala S., Caverzan A., Tornaghi M.L., Environmental and Spatial Assessment for the Ecodesign of a Cladding System with Embedded Phase Change Materials, Energy Build., 156, 374–389, 2017.
• [2] Bertin I., Saadé M., Le Roy R., Jaeger J.M., Feraille A., Environmental Impacts of Design for Reuse Practices in the Building Sector, J. Clean. Prod., 349, 131228, 2022.
• [3] Bribián I.Z., Capilla A.V., Usón A.A., Life Cycle Assessment of Building Materials: Comparative Analysis of Energy and Environmental Impacts and Evaluation of the Eco-Efficiency Improvement Potential, Build. Environ., 46, 1133–1140, 2011.
• [4] Briones-Llorente R., Barbosa R., Almeida M., García E.A.M., Saiz Á.R., Ecological Design of New Efficient Energy-Performance Construction Materials with Rigid Polyurethane Foam Waste, Polymers, 12, 1048, 2020.
• [5] Budig M., Heckmann O., Hudert M., Ng A.Q.B., Xuereb Conti Z., Lork C.J.H., Computational Screening-LCA Tools for Early Design Stages, Int. J. Archit. Comput., 19, 6–22, 2021.
• [6] Bundgaard A.M., Mosgaard M.A., Remmen A., From energy efficiency towards resource efficiency within the Ecodesign Directive, J. Clean. Prod., 144, 358–374, 2017.
• [7] Eberhardt L.C.M., Birgisdóttir H., Birkved M., Life Cycle Assessment of a Danish Office Building Designed for Disassembly, Build. Res. Inf. 2019, 47, 666–680, 2019.
• [8] Felicioni L., Lupíšek A., Gaspari J., Exploring the Common Ground of Sustainability and Resilience in the Building Sector: A Systematic Literature Review and Analysis of Building Rating Systems, Sustainability, 15, 884, 2023.
• [9] Gimenez C., Tachizawa E., Extending sustainability to suppliers: a systematic literature review, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(5), 531–543, 2012.
• [10] Gray R., Does sustainability reporting improve corporate behaviour?: Wrong question? Right time?, Acc. and Busin. Resear., 36, 65–88, 2006.
• [11] Gupta J., Vegelin C., Sustainable Development Goals and Inclusive Development, Int. Environ. Agreem. Polit. Law Econ., 16, 433–448, 2016.
• [12] Gray R., Of messines, systems and sustainability: Towards a more social and environmental finance and accounting, British Acc. Rev., 34(4), 357–386, 2002.
• [13] Keiller S., Clements V., Charter M., A Guide for SMEs on Eco-Design for the Construction Industry, EISC Ltd: Southampton, UK, 2013.
• [14] Luttropp C., Lagerstedt J., Eco-Design and The Ten Golden Rules: Generic Advice for Merging Environmental Aspects into Product Development, J. of Cl. Prod., 14(15–16), 1396–1408, 2006.
• [15] Minunno R., O’Grady T., Morrison G.M., Gruner R.L., Exploring Environmental Benefits of Reuse and Recycle Practices: A Circular Economy Case Study of a Modular Building, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 160, 104855, 2020.
• [16] Niewiadomski P., Ecodesign as a sign of environmental maturity of manufacturing enterprises: the vivisection of the agricultural machinery industry, J. of Man. and Fin. Scien., 41, 33–44, 2020.
• [17] Peuportier B., Thiers S., Guiavarch A., Eco-Design of Buildings Using Thermal Simulation and Life Cycle Assessment, J. Clean. Prod., 39, 73–78, 2013.
• [18] Polverini D., Miretti U., An approach for the technoeconomic assessment of circular economy requirements under the Ecodesign Directive, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 150, 104425, 2019.
• [19] Polverini D., Regulating the circular economy within the ecodesign directive: Progress so far, methodological challenges and outlook, Sustain. Prod. Consum., 27, 1113–1123, 2021.
• [20] Rezende Leite F., Lúcia Pereira Antunes M., Aparecido Lopes Silva D., Cipriano Rangel, E., Cristino da Cruz N., An Ecodesign Method Application at the Experimental Stage of Construction Materials Development: A Case Study in the Production of Mortar Made with Ornamental Rock Wastes, Constr. Build. Mater., 293, 123505, 2021.
• [21] Schneider A., Reflexivity in Sustainability Accounting and Management: Transcending the Economic Focus of Corporate Sustainability, J. of Busin. Ethics, 127(3), 525–536, 2015.
• [22] Skele A., Repele M., Bazbauers G., Characterization of Environmental Impact of Building Materials for the Purpose of Ecodesign, Sci. J. Riga Tech. Univ. Environ. Clim. Technol, 6, 106–111, 2011.
• [23] van Stijn A., Eberhardt L.C.M., Wouterszoon Jansen B., Meijer A., Environmental Design Guidelines for Circular Building Components Based on LCA and MFA: Lessons from the Circular Kitchen and Renovation Fa¸cade, J. Clean. Prod., 357, 131375, 2022.
• [24] Zabalza I., Scarpellini S., Aranda A., Llera E., J´a˜nez A., Use of LCA as a Tool for Building Ecodesign. A Case Study of a Low Energy Building in Spain, Energies, 6, 3901–3921, 2013.
• [25] 2022/C 182/01; Communication from the Commission Ecodesign and Energy Labelling Working Plan 2022–2024 2022/C 182/01. Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2022.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).