An improving the process of risk assessment occupational for industry

• Autorzy: Siwiec Dominika , Pacana Andrzej

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2021.151.41

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The aim was improving the process of risk assessment occupational for industry, by implemented in this process the fuzzy scale (and the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process, FAHP). Design/methodology/approach: The FAHP method was integrated with the PN-N-18002 method. Findings: It was demonstrated that implemented the FAHP method in PN-N-18002 method allows on more precise an assessment of the root of threats on the workplace. Research limitations/implications: This method can be used to risk assessment of each workplaces, by integrating the FAHP with any methods of occupational risk assessment. Practical implications: The assumption was to improve the method of risk assessment occupational for industry, in which as was shown the number of accidents in work was the highest. Test of the proposed method was carried out for the operator's position of a floating excavator KG-2.5 in one of Podkarpacie enterprise extracting aggregate. Social implications: This method can be helped to the entity performing the occupational risk assessment in precise identify the root of threats on the workplaces. This will ensure a safe workplace. Originality/value: The originality of the proposed method is to achieve more precise an assessment of the root of threats in the workplace than by using the traditional risk assessment methods.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

risk assessment occupational; production engineering; mechanical engineering; PN-N-18002; FAHP

PL

ocena ryzyka zawodowego; inżynieria produkcji; inżynieria mechaniczna; PN-N-18002; FAHP

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: z. 151
• Strony: 607--614
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 17 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Siwiec Dominika

• Rzeszow University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, Rzeszow, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6663-6621

autor

Pacana Andrzej

• Rzeszow University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, Rzeszow, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1121-6352

Bibliografia

• 1. Aagedal, J. et al. (2002). Model-based Risk Assessment to Improve Enterprise Security. IEEE, Proceedings of the Fifth International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, pp. 51-62, September 17-20, 2002, Lausanne, Switzerland.
• 2. Bajdur, W., and Idzikowski, A. (2012). Analiza i ocena ryzyka zawodowego wybranych stanowisk pracy w zakładzie odkrywkowym dolomitu. PTZP, pp. 691-702. Available online http://ptzp.org.pl/files/konferencje/kzz/artyk_pdf_2012/p062.pdf, 21.11.2020.
• 3. Chang, D.Y. (1996). Application of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 95(3), pp. 649-655.
• 4. Chen, T. et al. (2020). Multistage Decision Framework for the Selection of Renewable Energy Sources Based on Prospect Theory and PROMETHEE. International Journal Of Fuzzy Systems, 22(5), pp. 1535-1555. DOI: 10.1007/s40815-020-00858-1.
• 5. Duda, A., and Juzek, T. (2018). Ocena ryzyka zawodowego podczas czynności związanych z drążeniem przodka I zabudową obudowy. Systemy wspomagania w inżynierii produkcji. Górnictwo - perspektywy i zagrożenia. Węgiel, tania czysta energia i miejsca pracy, 7, 1, pp. 329-340.
• 6. Gil, M.A., and Gonzalez-Rodriguez, G. (2012). Fuzzy vs Likert scale in Statistics. In Combining Experimentation and Theory. Springer-Verlag, pp. 407-420. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-24666-1_27.
• 7. GUS (2020). Wypadki przy pracy w 2019 r. - dane wstępne, 03.11.2020.
• 8. Karkoszka, T. (2009). Improvement of the chosen process based on the occupational health and safety criterion. Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, 37(20), pp. 735-742.
• 9. Karkoszka, T., and Szewieczek, D. (2007). Risk of the processes in the aspect of quality natural environment and occupational safety. Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, 20(1-2), pp. 539-542.
• 10. Łuczak, A. (2012). Ocena ważności czynników strategicznych w gminie wiejskiej z wykorzystaniem rozmytego analitycznego procesu hierarchicznego. Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, 4(26), pp. 43-56.
• 11. Pacana, A. (2019). Systemy zarządzania bezpieczeństwem i higieną pracy zgodne z ISO 45001:2018. Rzeszów: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Rzeszowskiej.
• 12. Pacana, A., and Siwiec, D. (2020). Improving the process of analysing the causes of problem by integrating the Ishikawa diagram and FAHP method. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization and Management Series, 143, pp. 247-257. DOI: 10.29119/1641-3466.2020.143.20.
• 13. Pacana, A., Siwiec, D., and Bednarova, L. (2020). Method of Choice: A Fluorescent Penetrant Taking into Account Sustainability Criteria. Sustainability, 12, p. 5854. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145854.
• 14. PN-N-18002:2011. Systemy zarządzania bezpieczeństwem i higieną pracy - Ogólne wytyczne do oceny ryzyka zawodowego.
• 15. Siwiec, D., Bednarova, L., and Pacana, A. (2020). Metoda doboru penetrantów dla przemysłowych badań nieniszczących. Przemysł Chemiczny, 99(5), pp. 771-773. DOI: DOI: 10.15199/62.2020.5.18.
• 16. Tsai, H.-C. et al. (2020). An Application of the Fuzzy Delphi Method and Fuzzy AHP on the Discussion of Training Indicators for the Regional Competition, Taiwan National Skills Competition, in the Trade of Joinery. Sustainability, 12(10), p. 4290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104290.
• 17. Woźny, A., and Pacana, A. (2013). Ocena ryzyka zawodowego: teoria i przykłady. Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Rzeszowskiej, ISBN: 8371999054.