Building SME performance through relationship quality. The role of supply chain flexibility

Cyfert, Szymon; Szumowski, Witold; Glabiszewski, Waldemar

doi:10.17270/J.LOG.000946

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Building SME performance through relationship quality. The role of supply chain flexibility

Autorzy

Cyfert Szymon , Szumowski Witold , Glabiszewski Waldemar

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17270/J.LOG.000946

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

Background: Although the existing literature has examined the connection between relationship quality and SME performance, no attempt has been made to assess the impact of supply chain flexibility on this association. The impact of supply chain flexibility is important because although SMEs are inherently more flexible than large firms, allowing them to respond more quickly to changing customer needs and environmental conditions, they seek to build their advantage on relational resources due to their limited financial and human resources. However, previous research suggests that maintaining relationship quality is costly and not always cost-effective. This raises the question of whether relationship quality affects SME performance per se or whether it has an indirect effect through supply chain flexibility. The purpose of this article is to examine the role that supply chain flexibility plays in the connection between relationship quality and SME performance. Methods: Combining relationship quality with SME performance, we analysed how supply chain flexibility moderates this association. Data collected from 1286 Polish SMEs using the CAPI method were analysed using SEM modelling. Results: The results confirm the direct impact of relationship quality on both supply chain flexibility and SME performance. The study also provides empirical evidence that supply chain flexibility moderates the impact of relationship quality on SME performance and that this impact is stronger than the direct impact of relationship quality on SME performance. Conclusions: Our findings have important implications for SME managers, providing arguments for the desirability of managing relationship quality in conjunction with supply chain flexibility. While previous research suggests that relationship quality is important for SMEs because it can be treated as a substitute for limited tangible assets as well as financial, infrastructural and human resources, our research has demonstrated the desirability of building relationship quality in conjunction with supply chain flexibility, which seems to be an important insight given the limited resources of SMEs.

Słowa kluczowe

relationship quality supply chain flexibility performance SME

jakość relacji elastyczność łańcucha dostaw wydajność SME

Wydawca

Wyższa Szkoła Logistyki

Czasopismo

LogForum

Rocznik

2024

Tom

Vol. 20, no. 1

Strony

71--80

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 24 poz., rys. tab.

Twórcy

autor

Cyfert Szymon

s.cyfert@ue.poznan.pl

Department of Organisation and Management Theory, Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poznań, Poland

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5563-1403

autor

Szumowski Witold

witold.szumowski@ue.wroc.pl

Department of Management and Entrepreneurship, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, Wrocław, Poland

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0709-2978

autor

Glabiszewski Waldemar

waldemar.glabiszewski@umk.pl

Department of Business Excellence, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland

Bibliografia

1. Amit Chandak. 2018. The Impact of Supply Chain Strategy and Supply Chain Flexibility on the Performance of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) In Indian Automobile Sector. American Based Research Journal, 7(2018–09): 42–47.
2. Benzidia, S., & Makaoui, N. 2020. Improving SMEs performance through supply chain flexibility and market agility: IT orchestration perspective. Supply Chain Forum, 21(3): 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2020.1801108
3. Cardoni, A., Kiseleva, E., & Bellucci, A. 2023. The quality of SMEs stakeholder communication during strategic crises: The case of Italian unlisted SMEs. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(6): 3292–3308. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3300
4. Chu, Z., Wang, Q., & Lado, A. A. 2016. Customer orientation, relationship quality, and performance: The third-party logistics provider-s perspective. International Journal of Logistics Management, 27(3): 738–754. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-08-2013-0093
5. Commission, E., Directorate-General for Internal Market Entrepreneurship and SMEs, I., Centre, J. R., Di Bella, L., Katsinis, A., et al. 2023. Annual report on European SMEs 2022/2023 – SME performance review 2022/2023. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/doi/10.2760/028705
6. Enrique, D. V., Lerman, L. V., Sousa, P. R. de, Benitez, G. B., Bigares Charrua Santos, F. M., et al. 2022. Being digital and flexible to navigate the storm: How digital transformation enhances supply chain flexibility in turbulent environments. International Journal of Production Economics, 250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108668
7. Fynes, B., De Búrca, S., & Voss, C. 2005. Supply chain relationship quality, the competitive environment and performance. International Journal of Production Research, 43(16): 3303–3320. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540500095894
8. Gottfredson, R. K., Wright, S. L., & Heaphy, E. D. 2022. A critical review of relationship quality measures: Is a fresh start needed? An agenda to move forward. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 95(3): 624–659. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12395
9. Han, S. L., Sung, H. S., & Shim, H. S. 2014. Antecedents and performance outcomes of flexibility in industrial customer-supplier relationships. Journal of Business Research, 67(10): 2115–2122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.04.020
10. Ismail, M. D., Domil, A. K. A., & Isa, A. M. 2014. Managerial Competence, Relationship Quality and Competitive Advantage among SME Exporters. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 115: 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.422
11. Kuhlmeier, D. B., & Knight, G. 2010. The critical role of relationship quality in small- and medium-sized enterprise internationalization. Journal of Global Marketing, 23(1): 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911760903439636
12. Kumar, R., Singh, R. K., & Shankar, R. 2013. Study on coordination issues for flexibility in supply chain of SMEs: A case study. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 14(2): 81–92.
13. Kwiatek, P., Morgan, Z., & Thanasi-Boçe, M. 2020. The role of relationship quality and loyalty programs in building customer loyalty. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 35(11): 1645–1657. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-02-2019-0093
14. Lages, C., Lages, C. R., & Lages, L. F. 2011. The Relqual Scale: A Measure of Relationship Quality in Export Market Ventures. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.882428
15. Liao, Y., & Barnes, J. 2015. Knowledge acquisition and product innovation flexibility in SMEs. Business Process Management Journal, 21(6): 1257–1278. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-05-2014-0039
16. Liu, H. M. 2021. Effect of partnership quality on SMEs success: Mediating role of coordination capability and organisational agility. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 32(15–16): 1786–1802. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2020.1773782
17. Lu, Q., Deng, Y., Liu, B., & Chen, J. 2023. Promoting supply chain financing performance of SMEs based on the extended resource-based perspective. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 38(9): 1865–1879. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-05-2021-0261
18. Mansor, M. F., Abu, N. H., Halim, H. A., & Ahmad, N. H. 2022. Revisiting SMEs’ Business Strategy: Shifting Outsourcing to Crowdsourcing Practices to Enhance SMEs’ Performance. Jurnal Pengurusan, 66. https://doi.org/10.17576/pengurusan-2022-66-07
19. Quoc Trung, N. K. 2021. Determinants of small and medium-sized enterprises performance: The evidence from Vietnam. Cogent Business and Management, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1984626
20. Rohieszan, R. M., Liza, A. N., Mat, I. R., & Hizan, H. M. 2021. Organizational ambidexterity within supply chain management: a scoping review. LogForum, 17(4): 351–546. https://doi.org/10.17270/J.LOG.2021.618
21. Tipu, S. A. A., & Fantazy, K. A. 2014. Supply chain strategy, flexibility, and performance: A comparative study of SMEs in Pakistan and Canada. International Journal of Logistics Management, 25(2): 399–416. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-01-2013-0001
22. Trapp, N. L., Jørgensen, P. E. F., Svendsen, G. T., & Skov, L. 2023. Relationship Quality Between Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Partners During Threatening Times: The Role of Contact Frequency and Social Exchanges. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 30(2): 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051712X.2023.2214551
23. Yumurtacı Hüseyinoğlu, I. Ö., Kotzab, H., & Teller, C. 2020. Supply chain relationship quality and its impact on firm performance. Production Planning and Control, 31(6): 470–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1647365
24. Zastempowski, M., & Cyfert, S. 2023. A new angle on SMEs’ competitiveness. How do agility capabilities affect a firm’s competitive position? Journal of Organizational Change Management, 36(4): 635–662. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-09-2022-0255

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr POPUL/SP/0154/2024/02 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki II" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki (2025).

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-2e2e6a5a-a8b2-43ab-9682-2d5a1d45a8f9