Functional Requirements to Support Traffic Organization Service

• Autorzy: Jeong J.S. , Park G.K.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12716/1001.07.01.15

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In the era of e‐Navigation, the future VTS is anticipated to play an important role on the enhancement of maritime safety and the efficiency of maritime transport as a key stakeholder of e‐Navigation. The VTS services need the advanced Traffic Organization Service(TOS). In this paper, the VTS functions for TOS is revisited from the reports of IMO e‐Navigation Correspondence Group and IALA VTS Committee. In Korea, the research activities to enhance the existing VTS functions have been conducted. In terms of TOS, some VTS functions have been developed. In conclusion, all the past traffic data and real‐time ship data are required to provide the advanced TOS. For this, the advanced functions to support TOS should be implemented on VTS console.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

marine traffic; e-navigation; Traffic Organization Service (TOS); IALA

• Wydawca: Faculty of Navigation, Gdynia Maritime University
• Czasopismo: TransNav : International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: Vol. 7, no. 1
• Strony: 115--118
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 12 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Jeong J.S.

• Department of Maritime Transportation System, Mokpo National Maritime University, Mokpo City, Republic of Korea

autor

Park G.K.

• Department of Maritime Transportation System, Mokpo National Maritime University, Mokpo City, Republic of Korea

Bibliografia

• [1] IMO. 1997a. Guidelines for Vessel Traffic Services, Resolution A.857(20).
• [2] IALA. 2012a. VTS Manual 2012 Ed.5: 50.
• [3] IALA. 2012b. Strategy paper addressing the delivery of VTS in a rapidly changing world, VTS35/output/2.
• [4] IALA. 2012c. Guideline on Provision of Vessel Traffic Services(INS, NAS, TOS), Ed.1.
• [5] IMO. 2010b. Development of an e‐Navigation Strategy Implementation Plan, Report of the Working Group, NAV 56/WP.5.
• [6] IALA. 2012d. Report of the 35th Session of the IALA VTS Committee.
• [7] A.G.Frandsen. 1991. Evaluation of Minimum Bridge Span Openings – Applying Ship Domain Theory, Transport Research Record No.1313, Pub. No. 743B: pp.85‐86.
• [8] Y.S. Park. J.S. Kim. J.Y. Jung. J.S. Jeong. & G.K. Park. 2012. A Study in the maritime safety model in Korea, ENC 2012, 25‐25 April, Gdansk, Poland.
• [9] N.S. Son. S.Y. Kim. C.S. Lee. 2012. On the Monitoring System of Collision Risks among Multiple Ships, ENC 2012, 25‐25 April, Gdansk, Poland.
• [10] Jun Min Mou. Ceesvander Tak. & HanLigteringen. 2010. Study on collision avoidance in busy waterways by using AIS data, Ocean Engineering (37): 483‐490.
• [11] Jakub Montewka. Tomasz Hinz. Pentti Kujala. & Jerzy Matusiak. 2010. Probability modeling of vessel collisions, Reliability Engineering and System Safety (95): 573‐589.
• [12] J.S. Jeong. K.I Kim. & G.K. Park. 2012. Risk Assessment Model of Maritime Traffic in Time‐Variant CPA Environments in Waterway, Journal of Advanced Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics 16(7).