National culture as modality in managing the carbon economy in Southeast Asia

Rajiani, I.; Pypłacz, P.

doi:10.17512/pjms.2018.18.1.22

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

National culture as modality in managing the carbon economy in Southeast Asia

Autorzy

Rajiani I. , Pypłacz P.

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17512/pjms.2018.18.1.22

Warianty tytułu

Kultura narodowa jako modalność w zarządzaniu gospodarką węgla w Azji Południowej

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

A new approach to alleviating terrestrial emissions related to climate change called 'REDD+' (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation) or recently known as carbon economy has been familiarized all over the world. Although Southeast Asia hosts some early REDD+ projects, there have been notable differences between countries that have managed to implement REDD+. Thus, this paper aims to discuss the challenges faced in managing the carbon economy by using the frameworks of national culture. For that purpose, interviewees have been chosen to be interviewed using semi-structured questions from two categories; facilitator and implementer. Qualitative finding from the interview was utilized to confirm the result of quantitative data on world national culture scores for Indonesia and Malaysia. The countries are chosen as the first is the leading and the later has the least involvement in the REDD+ project in Southeast Asia. This study has identified that out of six dimensions; Indonesia is mostly compatible in all aspect while Malaysia is only fit into one category implementing the carbon economy is tremendous in Indonesia.

Nowe podejście do łagodzenia emisji naziemnych związanych ze zmianami klimatu o nazwie "REDD +" (redukcja emisji z wylesiania i degradacji lasów) lub ostatnio znane jako gospodarka węglowa zostały już poznane na całym świecie. Chociaż w Azji Południowo-Wschodniej odbywają się niektóre wczesne projekty REDD +, zauważalne są różnice między krajami, którym udało się wdrożyć REDD +. Tak, więc niniejszy dokument ma na celu omówienie wyzwań stojących przed zarządzaniem gospodarką opartą na węglu poprzez wykorzystanie ram kultury narodowej. W tym celu respondenci zostali wybrani do przeprowadzania wywiadów z wykorzystaniem półstrukturalnych pytań z dwóch kategorii; moderator i realizator. Jakościowe wyniki wywiadu wykorzystano w celu potwierdzenia wyników ilościowych danych na temat wyników ogólnokrajowej kultury narodowej w Indonezji i Malezji. Kraje wybierane są jako pierwsze, a później mają najmniejszy udział w projekcie REDD + w Azji Południowo-Wschodniej. Badanie to wykazało, że z sześciu wymiarów Indonezja jest w większości zgodna pod każdym względem, podczas gdy Malezja pasuje tylko do jednej kategorii, a wdrażanie gospodarki opartej na węglu jest ogromne w Indonezji.

Słowa kluczowe

carbon economy forest REDD+ national culture Indonesia Malaysia

gospodarka węglowa las REDD + kultura narodowa Indonezja Malezja

Wydawca

Czestochowa University of Technology

Czasopismo

Polish Journal of Management Studies

Rocznik

2018

Tom

Vol. 18, No. 1

Strony

296--310

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 57 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Rajiani I.

ismi.rajiani@stiamak.ac.id

STIA Dan Manajemen Kepelabuhan Barunawati Surabaya, Indonesia

autor

Pypłacz P.

paula.pyplacz@wz.pcz.pl

The Management Faculty, Czestochowa University of Technology, Poland

Bibliografia

1. Alam Siddiquee N., 2010, Managing for results: lessons from public management reform in Malaysia, “International Journal of Public Sector Management”, 23(1).
2. Blodgett J.G., Lu L.C., Rose G.M., Vitell S.J., 2001, Ethical sensitivity to stakeholder interests: A cross-cultural comparison, “Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science”, 29(2).
3. Blunt P., Turner M., Lindroth H., 2012, Patronage’s progress in post-Soeharto Indonesia, “Public Administration and Development”, 32(1).
4. Brockhaus M., Angelsen A., 2012, Seeing REDD+ through 4Is: a political economy framework, “Analysing REDD+: challenges and choices”, Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia.
5. Calza F., Cannavale C., Tutore I., 2016, The important effects of national culture on the environmental proactivity of firms, “Journal of Management Development”, 35(8).
6. Corbera E., Schroeder H., 2011, Governing and implementing REDD+, “Environmental Science & Policy”, 14(2).
7. Chui A.C., Kwok C.C., 2009, Cultural practices and life insurance consumption: An international analysis using GLOBE scores, “Journal of Multinational Financial Management”, 19(4).
8. Dobrowolski Z., Kożuch A.J., Pypłacz P., Sasak J., Szczudlińska-Kanoś A., Zukovskis J., 2016, Participation as a Management Tool in Local Government Units, Wyd. Towarzystwo Naukowe Współczesnego Zarządzania, Kraków.
9. Dorfman P., Javidan M., Hanges P., Dastmalchian A., House R., 2012, GLOBE: A twenty year journey into the intriguing world of culture and leadership, ”Journal of World Business”, 47(4).
10. Grabara J., Dura C., Driga I., 2016, Corporate social responsibility awareness in Romania and Poland: A comparative analysis, “Economics & Sociology”, 9(4).
11. Hackert A.M., Krumwiede D., Tokle J., Vokurka R.J., 2012, Global corporate social responsibility practices and cultural dimensions, “SAM Advanced Management Journal”, 77(4).
12. Healy B., 2016, Malaysia: 1MDB scandal haunts PM, “Green Left Weekly”, (1105), 15.
13. Ho F.N., Wang H.M.D., Vitell S.J., 2012, A global analysis of corporate social performance: The effects of cultural and geographic environments, “Journal of Business Ethics”, 107(4).
14. Hofstede G., Hofstede G.J., Minkov M., 2015, Cultures and organizations: pyramids, machines, markets, and families: organizing across nations, “Classics of Organization Theory”, 314(23).
15. Hofstede Insights, 2018, Compare countries, Available at: https://www.hofstede-insights.com/product/compare-countries/
16. House R., Javidan M., Hanges P., Dorfman P., 2002, Understanding cultures and implicit leadership theories across the globe: an introduction to project GLOBE, “Journal of World Business”, 37(1).
17. House R.J., Hanges P.J., Javidan M., Dorfman P.W., Gupta V., (Eds.), 2004, Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies, Sage publications.
18. Husted B.W., 2005, Culture and ecology: A cross-national study of the determinants of environmental sustainability, MIR: Management International Review.
19. Gallego-Álvarez I., Ortas E., 2017, Corporate environmental sustainability reporting in the context of national cultures: A quantile regression approach, “International Business Review”, 26(2).
20. García-Sánchez I.M., Cuadrado-Ballesteros B., Frias-Aceituno J.V., 2016, Impact of the Institutional Macro Context on the Voluntary Disclosure of CSR Information, “Long Range Planning”, 49(1).
21. Jackson T., 2015, 15 Managing managers across cultures: different values, different ethics, “Handbook of Research on Managing Managers”, 283.
22. Johnson S., Mitton T., 2003, Cronyism and capital controls: evidence from Malaysia, “Journal of Financial Economics”, 67(2).
23. Karsenty A., Ongolo S., 2012, Can “fragile states” decide to reduce their deforestation? The inappropriate use of the theory of incentives with respect to the REDD mechanism, “Forest Policy and Economics”, 18.
24. Lim L., 2001, Work-related values of Malays and Chinese Malaysians, “International Journal of Cross Cultural Management”, 1(2).
25. Liu Y., Almor T., 2016, How culture influences the way entrepreneurs deal with uncertainty in inter-organizational relationships: The case of returnee versus local entrepreneurs in China, “International Business Review”, 25(1).
26. Lyall C., 2017, New models of governance: developing an integrated policy approach to science, technology, risk, and the environment, Routledge.
27. Mei N.S., Wai C.W., Ahamad R., 2016, Environmental awareness and behavior index for Malaysia, “Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences”, 222.
28. Midor K., 2017, Innovation in coal mining management as an intelligent specialization, “Production Engineering Archives”, 15.
29. Miska C., Hilbe C., Mayer S., 2014, Reconciling different views on responsible leadership: A rationality-based approach, “Journal of Business Ethics”, 125(2).
30. Miska C., Szőcs I., Schiffinger M., 2018, Culture’s effects on corporate sustainability practices: A multi-domain and multi-level view, “Journal of World Business”, 53(2).
31. Nain Z., Kim W.L., 2018, Much ado about nothing? Mainstream research, Malaysian media and moral panics, “Jurnal Komunikasi, Malaysian Journal of Communication”, 15.
32. Niiyama K., Ismail H., 2013, Overview to FRIM/FFPRI REDD+ Project, [In:] Workshop on REDD+ Research Project in Peninsular Malaysia 4 February 2013 Kuala Lumpur.
33. Onyusheva I., Thammashote L., Kot S., 2018, ASEAN: Problems of regional integration, “Espacios”, 39 (36).
34. Orij R., 2010, Corporate social disclosures in the context of national cultures and stakeholder theory, “Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal”, 23(7).
35. Ormston R., Spencer L., Barnard M., Snape D., 2013, The foundations of qualitative research, “Qualitative Research Practice a Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers”, SAGE Publications Ltd.
36. Pacana A., Ulewicz R., 2017, Research of determinants motiving to implement the environmental management system, “Polish Journal of Management Studies”, 16(1).
37. Parboteeah K.P., Addae H.M., Cullen J.B., 2012, Propensity to support sustainability initiatives: A cross-national model, “Journal of Business Ethics”, 105(3).
38. Park H., Russell C., Lee J., 2007, National culture and environmental sustainability: A cross-national analysis, “Journal of Economics and Finance”, 31(1).
39. Peng Y.S., Lin S.S., 2009, National culture, economic development, population growth and environmental performance: The mediating role of education, “Journal of Business Ethics”, 90(2).
40. Popp J., Kot S., Lakner Z., Oláh J., 2018, Biofuel use: Peculiarities and implications, “Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues”, 7 (3).
41. Power D., Klassen R., Kull T.J., Simpson D., 2015, Competitive Goals and Plant Investment in Environment and Safety Practices: Moderating Effect of National Culture, “Decision Sciences”, 46(1).
42. Pustejovska P., Brozova S., Jursová S., 2016, Statistical Assessment of Coal Charge Effect on Metallurgical Coke Quality, “Production Engineering Archives”, 11(2).
43. Rajiani I., Kot S., 2018, The Prospective Consumers of the Indonesian Green Aviation Initiative for Sustainable Development in Air Transportation, “Sustainability”, 10(6).
44. Ringov D., Zollo M., 2007, The impact of national culture on corporate social performance, “Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society”, 7(4).
45. Rossberger R.J., Krause D.E., 2015, Participative and team-oriented leadership styles, countries’ education level, and national innovation: the mediating role of economic factors and national cultural practices, “Cross-Cultural Research”, 49(1).
46. Rossberger R.J., Krause D.E., 2017, National Culture, Heterogeneity and Innovation New Insights into the Relationship between the GLOBE Dimensions and National Level Innovation, “GSTF Journal of Law and Social Sciences (JLSS)”, 2(1).
47. Sasak J., Pypłacz P., 2016, Crowdsourcing in local government units, Hyperion University of Bucharest, The International Conference Econophysics, New Economy & Complexity, Bukareszt, Rumunia
48. Schwartz S.H., Caprara G.V., Vecchione M., Bain P., Bianchi G., Caprara M.G., Mamali C., 2014, Basic personal values underlie and give coherence to political values: A cross national study in 15 countries, “Political Behavior”, 36(4).
49. Scholtens B., Dam L., 2007, Cultural values and international differences in business ethics, “Journal of Business Ethics”, 75(3).
50. Stevens M., 2012, The youth, modernity and morality in Malaysia, “Questioning modernity in Indonesia and Malaysia”, 169-200.
51. Sunderlin W.D., Sills E.O., Duchelle A.E., Ekaputri A.D., Kweka D., Toniolo M.A., ... & Enright A., 2015, REDD+ at a critical juncture: assessing the limits of polycentric governance for achieving climate change mitigation, “International Forestry Review”, 17(4).
52. Ślusarczyk B., Baryń M., Kot S., 2016, Tire industry products as an alternative fuel, “Polish Journal of Environmental Studies”, 25(3).
53. Štefko R., Fedorko R., Bačík R., 2015, Website Content Quality in Terms of Perceived Image of Higher Education Institution, “Polish Journal of Management Studies”, 13(2).
54. Tobey Sr D.H., Yasanthi Perera B., 2012, Corporate social responsibility initiatives: a stakeholder model for aligning competing values in West Africa, “African Journal of Economic and Management Studies”, 3(1).
55. Turner M., 2002, Choosing items from the menu: New public management in Southeast Asia, “International Journal of Public Administration”, 25(12).
56. Tvaronavičiene M., Nesterova K., Kováčik V., 2017, Energy ecurity and long-term energy efficiency: Case of selected counties, “Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues”, 7(2)
57. Vastola V., Russo A., Vurro C., 2017, Dealing with cultural differences in environmental management: Exploring the CEP-CFP relationship, “Ecological Economics”, 134.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2018).

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-2d457750-1a54-4aed-8b29-6f0f84b508e5