Ecological, Economic and Social Issues of Implementing Carbon Dioxide Sequestration Technologies in the Oil and Gas Industry In Russia

• Autorzy: Cherepovitsyn A. , Ilinova A.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12911/22998993/62281

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The objective of this paper is to define the main approaches to the implementation of carbon dioxide sequestration technologies in the oil and gas industry in Russia, and also to identify ecological, economic and social issues of their usage. Promotion of the technology of carbon dioxide (CO₂) sequestration by means of capturing and injecting it into underground reservoirs is a promising mechanism of reducing carbon dioxide concentration. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies might be used to enhance oil recovery (EOR-CO₂) and production by means of oil extraction and decreasing oil viscosity. Conceptual view of the potential of EOR-СО₂ technologies within the context of oil and gas industry sustainable development are presented. Incentives of the CCS projects implementation are identified. On the basis of the conducted research a number of scientific research and practical areas of the CCS technology development are presented.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

carbon dioxide; sequestration; carbon capture and storage; oil recovery; EOR-CO2 technology; oil and gas; Russia

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej ; Lublin University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Journal of Ecological Engineering
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: Vol. 17, nr 2
• Strony: 19--23
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr, 17 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Cherepovitsyn A.

• National Mineral Resources University (Mining University), Vasil’evsky Ostrov, 21 liniya 2, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 199106

autor

Ilinova A.

• National Mineral Resources University (Mining University), Vasil’evsky Ostrov, 21 liniya 2, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 199106

Bibliografia

• 1. Beecy D., Kuuskraa V. 2004. Basin strategies for linking CO2 enhanced oil recovery and storage of CO2 emissions. 7th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Vancouver, Canada.
• 2. Cherepovitsyn A. 2009. The strategy of innovational development of the Russian Northwestern oil and gas industry. Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Economic Sciences, St. Petersburg
• 3. Cherepovitsyn A., Ilinsky A. 2011. Geological disposal of carbon dioxide and radioactive waste: A comparative assessment. Comparison of the Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste in European Russia. International Atomic Energy Agency; Springer Dordrecht London Heidelberg New York, 513 p.
• 4. Cherepovitsyn A., Smirnova N., Ilinova A. 2013. On the storage of СО2 in geological formations: economic and social aspects. RISC: Resources, Information, Supply, Competition, 4, 171–174.
• 5. Energy strategy of Russian Federation to 2030. URL: http://www.energystrategy.ru/
• 6. Energy technology prospects. Strategies and scenarios to 2050. International Energy Agency, 2011. URL: http://www.iea.org
• 7. European Commission – Reference Document on Best Available Techniques (BREF) in Mineral Oil & Gas Refineries. Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC), 2013, 730 p. URL: http://eippcb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/reference/BREF/ FD_REF_July_2013online.pdf
• 8. Global CCS Institute – Strategic Analysis of the Global Status of Carbon Capture and Storage. Report 3: Russia. 2009, 35 p. URL: http://cdn. globalccsinstitute.com/sites/default/files/publications/8622/strategic-analysis-global-status-ccs-country-study-russia.pdf
• 9. Greenpeace – False Hope – Why Carbon Capture and Storage Won’t Save the Climate. Greenpeace International. 2008, 44 p. URL: http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/Global/usa/report/2008/5/false-hope-why-carbon-capture.pdf
• 10. IEA – Energy Technology Perspectives. Scenarios and Strategies to 2050. OECD/IEA, Paris. 2010. 710 p. URL: http://www.iea.org/publications/ freepublications/publication/etp2010.pdf
• 11. IPCC – Renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation. Special report, New York. 2012. 1088 p. URL: http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/special-reports/srren/SRREN_Full_Report.pdf
• 12. Naucler T., Campbell W., Ruijs J. 2008. Carbon Capture & Storage: Assessing the Economics. Report of McKinsey & Company. 53 p. URL: http:// assets.wwf.ch/downloads/mckinsey2008.pdf
• 13. Rubin E.S. et al. 2005. Comparative Assessments of Fossil Fuel Power Plants with CO2 Capture and Storage. 7th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-7), Т.1, Elsevier, 9 p. URL: http://repository.cmu.edu/cgi/ viewcontent.cgi?article=1082&context=epp
• 14. Shapovalov A., Davydova A. 2012. The climatic unconscious. Kommersant news paper. No. 232 (5017). URL: http://www.kommersant.ru/ doc/2084514
• 15. Toth F.L., Miketa A. 2011. Costs of the Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste. Springer, 215–262.
• 16. Van Egmond S., Hekkert M.P. 2012. Argument Map for Carbon Capture and Storage. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 12 p. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.08.010
• 17. WWF – The Energy Report, 100% Renewable Energy by 2050. WWF/Ecofys/OMA, Gland, Switzerland. 2011. 256 p. URL: http://www.wwf.or.jp/ activities/lib/pdf_climate/green-energy/WWF_ EnergyVisionReport.pdf

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę.