Sustainable Livelihoods a Foundation for Rural Development Leads to Sustainability

Kumar, Abhijeet; Kumar, Avinash; Kumari, Swati; Kumari, Neha; Kumari, Sneha; Mishra, Puja

doi:10.35784/preko.3951

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Sustainable Livelihoods a Foundation for Rural Development Leads to Sustainability

Autorzy

Kumar Abhijeet , Kumar Avinash , Kumari Swati , Kumari Neha , Kumari Sneha , Mishra Puja

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.35784/preko.3951

Warianty tytułu

Zrównoważone źródła utrzymania FundacjiRozwoju Obszarów Wiejskich jako droga do zrównoważonego rozwoju

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate and analyse the significance of the Sustainable Livelihoods Approach (SLA) and its application to rural development projects and policies. A literature review is conducted, with the primary focus being on the primary components of the SLA. The researchers noted that the SLA effectively interrogates the livelihoods of the poor and the various mechanisms in the approach. These mechanisms include all forms of capital, the vulnerability aspect, livelihood strategies, and outcomes, as well as the different laws and regulations governing the access and use of resources. The research also noted that the SLA effectively addresses the poor’s vulnerabilities. Scholarly heavy hitters like Chambers and Scoones (1992) have pointed out that this method is all-encompassing and hierarchical. The methodology has demonstrated in a theoretical sense that it is beneficial in understanding the livelihoods problem of the less fortunate in rural communities. It is strongly suggested that the government and its development partners adopt and incorporate the SLA into their policies to ensure sustainable livelihoods leading to sustainable development.

Głównym celem tego badania jest ocena i analiza znaczenia zrównoważonych źródeł utrzymania (SLA) i ich zastosowania w projektach i politykach rozwoju obszarów wiejskich. Przegląd literatury skupia się przede wszystkim na głównych składnikach umowy SLA. Zauważono, że SLA skutecznie bada źródła utrzymania ubogich i różne mechanizmy w tym podejściu. Mechanizmy te obejmują wszystkie formy kapitału, aspekt podatności na zagrożenia, strategie utrzymania i wyniki, a także różne prawa i regulacje regulujące dostęp do zasobów i korzystanie z nich. W badaniu zauważono również, że umowa SLA skutecznie eliminuje słabe punkty biednych. Badacze, tacy jak Chambers i Scoones (1992), zwrócili uwagę, że ta metoda obejmuje całość problematykii jest hierarchiczna. Od strony teoretycznej wykazano, że jest ona korzystna dla zrozumienia problemu środków do życia osób mniej szczęśliwych w społecznościach wiejskich. Stanowczo zaleca się, aby rząd i jego partnerzy rozwojowi przyjęli i włączyli umowę SLA do swoich polityk w celu zapewnienia zrównoważonych źródeł utrzymania prowadzących do zrównoważonego rozwoju

Słowa kluczowe

Sustainable Livelihood Approach SLA rural development rural livelihoods sustainable development

zrównoważone źródła utrzymania SLA rozwój obszarów wiejskich źródła utrzymania na wsi rozwój zrównoważony

Wydawca

Lublin University of Technology

Czasopismo

Problemy Ekorozwoju

Rocznik

2023

Tom

Vol. 18, nr 2

Strony

128--140

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 63 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Kumar Abhijeet

Sarala Birla University, Faculty of Commerce and Management, Ranchi, India

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4649-3117

autor

Kumar Avinash

1988avinashsingh@gmail.com

Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines), Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Dhanbad, India

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7115-7425

autor

Kumari Swati

Indian Institute of Technology, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Bhilai, India

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1614-6237

autor

Kumari Neha

Rani Durgavati Vishwavidyalaya, School of Education, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4525-367X

autor

Kumari Sneha

Bank of India, Government of India (U/T), Dhanbad Zone, India

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1923-294X

autor

Mishra Puja

Sarala Birla University, Faculty of Commerce and Management, Ranchi, India

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7270-4264

Bibliografia

1. ACF, 2013, Food security and livelihoods, Policy Paper, ACF International Network.
2. BAUMANN P., 2002, Improving access to natural resources for the rural poor; A critical analysis of central concepts and emerging trends from a sustainable livelihood perspective, LSP Working Paper 1, Rome.
3. BERTOLINI P., MONTANARI M., PERAGINE V., 2008, Poverty and social exclusion in rural areas, Final study report.
4. BHAT A., KASHYAP S K., 2015, Community radio initiatives in rural development and livelihood improvement, Interaction 33(3): 34-42.
5. CAMPBELL B., SAYER J., 2003, The science of sustainable development: Local livelihoods and the Global Environment, Cambridge University Press.
6. CHAMBERS R., 2011, Sustainable Livelihoods; An opportunity for the World Commission on Environmental and Development, IDS, United Kingdom.
7. CHAMBERS R., CONWAY G., 1992, Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st Century, IDS, Discussion Paper 296, Brighton.
8. CHIGBU U. E., 2012, Village renewal as an instrument of rural development: Evidence from Weyarn, Germa-ny, Community Development 43(2): 209-224.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2011.575231
9. CLARIDGE T., 2004, Social capital and natural resource management; An important role of social capital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
10. CORNWALL A., NYAMU-MUSEMBI C., 2004, Putting the rights based approach to development into perspective, Third World Quarterly 25:8.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/0143659042000308447
11. DE HAAN L., ZOOMERS A., 2005, Exploring the frontier of livelihoods research, Development and change 36(1): 27-47.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0012-155X.2005.00401.x
12. DEPARTMENT FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 1999, Sustainable Livelihoods and poverty elimination, London, DFID.
13. DIXON J., GULLIVER A., GIBBON D., 2001, Farming systems and poverty; Improving farmers livelihood in a chang-ing world, FAO and World Bank, Rome and Washington.
14. ELLIS F., 2000, Rural livelihoods and diversity in developing countries, Oxford University Press.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198296959.001.0001
15. ELLIS F., ALLISON E., 2004, Livelihood approach and management of small scale fisheries, Marine Policy.
16. ELLIS F., BAHIIGWA G., 2001, Livelihoods and poverty reduction in Uganda, LADDER Working Paper No. 5, East-wich, University of Anglia.
17. ELLIS F., FREEMAN H. A., 2004, Rural Livelihoods and Poverty Reduction Strategies in four African countries, The Journal of Development Studies 40(4).DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380410001673175
18. EMAS R., 2015, The concept of sustainable development; Definition and defining principles, Florida International University.
19. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANISATION (FAO), 2013, Resilient Livelihood Disaster Risk Reduction for food and nutrition Security Framework Programme, Rome, Italy.
20. GIBSON-GRAHAM J. K., CAMERON J., HEALY S., 2013, Take back the economy: An ethical guide for transforming our communities. University of Minnesota Press.DOI:https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816676064.001.0001
21. HARRISON E P., DZINGIRAI V., GANDIWA E., NZIMA EP., MASIVELE B., NDLOVU H.T., 2015, Progressing Community based natural resources management in Zimbabwe, PLAAS, Institute of Poverty land and agrarian studies, University of Western Cape, South Africa.
22. HOLLAND J., BLACKBURN J., CHAMBERS R., 1998 Whose voice?, The Intermediate Technology Publications.DOI:https://doi.org/10.3362/9781780446431
23. INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMEN., 2013, What is sustainable development? Envi-ronmental, economic and social well-being for today and tomorrow, https://www.iisd.org/sd.
24. INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANISATION, 2019, Rural economy, www.ilo.org.
25. ISRAR M., KHAN H., 2010, Availability and access to capitals of rural household in Northern Pakistan, Sarhad J. Agric. 26(3): 443-450.
26. JAVED S., AZHAR A., 2017, Forecasting employee turnover for human resource based on time series analy-sis, International Journal of Economics Research 14(16): 445-456.
27. JUTTA L., KRUG J., 2013, Livelihood assessment; A participatory tool for natural resource dependent communities, Thunen Working paper No.7.
28. KAMARUDDIN R., SAMSUDIN S., 2014, The Sustainable Livelihood Index: A tool to assess the ability and prepared-ness of the rural poor in receiving entreprenual project, University of Malaysia.
29. KAPUR R., 2019, Livelihoods opportunities in rural areas, University of Delhi, India.DOI:https://doi.org/10.31080/ASAG.2019.03.0564
30. KEELEY J. 2001, Influencing policy processes for sustainable livelihoods; Strategies for change, IDS, Brighton, United Kingdom.
31. KOLLMAIR M., GAMPER S.T., 2002, The Sustainable Livelihood Approach, Development study group, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
32. KRANTZ L., 2001, The sustainable livelihood approach to poverty reduction, SIDA, Division for Policy and Socio-Economic Analysis 44: 1-38.
33. KUMAR A., KUMAR A., BEHURA A. K., 2022, The Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) for Sustainable Corporate, Wisdom 3(23).DOI:https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v23i3.855
34. KUMAR A., KUMAR A., KUMARI S., KUMARI N., MISHRA P., KUMAR B.A., 2022, Innovation and Entrepreneurship leads to Sustainability and Peace, SMS Journal of Entrepreneurship & Innovation IX(01): 69.DOI:https://doi.org/10.21844/smsjei.v9i01.12135
35. LEE D.R., NEVES B., 2009, Rural poverty and natural resources, Improving access and sustainable management in the Food and Agriculture of the United Nations, ESA Working Paper.
36. MAO S., 2020, Rural households; Livelihoods of main ethnic minorities in Chongquing, China, Chinese Academy of Science.
37. MORSE S., MACNAMARA N., 2013, Theory behind the Sustainable Livelihood Approach, Springer, Dordrecht.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6268-8
38. MOSELEY M., 2003, Rural development: principles and practice, Sage, London, Thousand Oaks, Delhi.DOI:https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446216439
39. NDULU B., 2007, Challenges of African Growth, Opportunities, Constraints and Strategic Direction, The World Bank, Washington, DC.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-6882-4
40. OXFAM., 2014, Effectiveness Review; Promoting sustainable livelihood, Oxfam Policy and Practice, Great Britain.
41. PAWŁOWSKI A. 2009, The sustainable development revolution, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Devel-opment 4(1):65-76.
42. RITCHTER. 2011, Empowering rural communities through financial inclusion, Rural Policy Briefs, Rural Finance Team
43. ROWLEY, T. D., 1996, Rural Development Research: A Foundation for Policy. Contributions in Economics and Eco-nomic History No 170m Greenwood Publishing Group, Westport USA.
44. SALAFF J.W., GREVE A., 2003, Social networks and entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship theory and practice 28(1): 1-22.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-8520.00029
45. SCOONES I., 2009, Livelihoods perspectives and rural development; The Journal of Peasant Studies 36(1).DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150902820503
46. SERRAT O., 2017, Sustainable Livelihood Approach in Knowledge Solutions, Springer, Singapore (Asian Development Bank): 21-36.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0983-9_5
47. SERRAT O., SERRAT O., 2017, The sustainable livelihoods approach, Knowledge solutions: Tools, methods, and ap-proaches to drive organizational performance: 21-26.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0983-9_5
48. SHEETS S. L. G., 2001, SL Approaches in Practice, DFID: London, UK: 1-24.
49. TIRIVANGISI H., MUGAMBIWA S.S., 2017, A threat towards achieving sustainable development goal number 2 in South Africa; www.Pubmed.gv.
50. UNITED NATIONS STATISTICS DIVISION., 2022, SDG Indicators, New York.
51. UNITED NATIONS., 2018, What the SDGs Mean, https://www.un.org/en/chronicle/article/what-sdgs-mean.
52. VAN ASSCHE, K., 2015, Rural development: Knowledge and expertise in governance. Wageningen Academic Publishers.DOI:https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-812-4
53. VORSAH R.V., 2015, Climate change effects on small holder farmers livelihoods, The case of Ashanti Region, Ghana, University of Ghana.
54. WARD N., BROWND. L., 2009, Placing the rural in regional development, Regional studies 43(10): 1237-1244.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400903234696
55. WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987, Our common future, Oxford university Press, New York.
56. WINCHERN J., 2017, Food availability and livelihood strategies among rural households, Uganda, CA Space.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-017-0732-9
57. WORLD BANK DATA., 2022, Least developed countries: UN Classification, https://data.worldbank.org/country/XL.
58. WORLD BANK., 1975, Rural development. Sector policy paper, Washington, DC, http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/522641468766236215/Rural-development.
59. WORLD BANK., 2015, Climate change impacts in Sub-Saharan Africa, Regional Environmental Change.
60. XAXA V., SAHA D., SINGHA R., 2017, Work, Institutions and Sustainable Livelihood, Palgrave Macmillan.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5756-4
61. YUYA B.A., DABA N.A., 2018, Rural households livelihoods strategies and its impact on livelihood outcomes, The case of Eastern Oromia, Ethiopia, Agris on line papers in Economics and Informatic 10(2).DOI:https://doi.org/10.7160/aol.2018.100209
62. ZHANG J., WANG L., LIU L.M., 2010, Diversification of rural livelihood strategies and its effect on local landscape restoration in the semi-arid hilly area of the Loess, China, Land Degradation & Development 21(5): 433-445.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.978
63. ŽIČKIENĖ A., VOLKOV A., BALEŽENTIS T., ŠTREIMIKIENĖ D., 2020, Integrating Behavior Into Regional Resili-ence Concept for Sustainable Growth: An Example of Agricultural Sector, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustaina-ble Development 15(2): 61-73.DOI:https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2020.2.07

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-2cf013d4-1683-4d40-9c2d-be91aefe3edf