Trends of change in the development of sustainable cities and communities in Poland in comparison with European Union countries

Murawska, Anna

doi:10.29119/1641-3466.2022.156.22

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Trends of change in the development of sustainable cities and communities in Poland in comparison with European Union countries

Autorzy

Murawska Anna

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2022.156.22

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

Purpose: The main purpose of this paper is to present the diversity and trends of changes taking place in cities and communities in Poland and in other European Union countries with respect of implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Design/methodology/approach: The indicators included in Eurostat, which are collected to analyse the implementation of Objective 11: Sustainable cities and communities, have been used to assess the problem. 10 indicators and 27 European Union countries were analysed. The research period was 2010-2019 and the data was statistically analysed. Variations and distances between countries, trends in the changes taking place, ranking of countries, and relationships between the analysed indicators and the scale of their changes were calculated. Findings: EU Member States (27) are significantly differentiated in terms of household living conditions, environmental conditions, and safety at home. In Poland, dwellings are overcrowded but in relatively good condition. The Polish population is more often exposed to noise and air pollution, and they are at a higher risk of dying in a traffic accident, but they are less likely to report the occurrence of crime and vandalism. The results of the study confirmed important trends towards the development of sustainable cities and communities in Poland and in other EU countries. Research limitations/implications: The study resulted in a confirmation of the hypothesis that sustainable cities and communities have developed in EU countries in the last decade. There has been an improvement in the living conditions, safety, and environment of the population, especially in those countries where 10 years ago the variables describing sustainable cities and communities were the lowest. One of the countries where sustainable development was a priority was Poland, where the dynamics of improvement of almost every indicator was higher than the EU average. Practical implications: The conclusions may be useful for managers of economic entities for making more effective decisions regarding allocation of financial resources and making investments in social and technical infrastructure or safety regarding sustainable development of cities and communities. Social implications: The paper provides useful information for city and community managers and citizens of EU countries and cities about living conditions, quality of life, and safety of inhabitants. Originality/value: The article presents the latest information regarding the conditions of cities and communities in EU countries and compares that data with indicators from previous years. The value of the article lies in identifying and recognising the significance of differences between EU countries and in verifying whether any positive changes towards sustainable development of cities and communities are occurring.

Słowa kluczowe

cities communities sustainable development trends indicators EU countries

miasta społeczność zrównoważony rozwój trendy wskaźniki kraje UE

Wydawca

Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej

Czasopismo

Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska

Rocznik

2022

Tom

z. 156

Strony

303--320

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 50 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Murawska Anna

anna.murawska@pbs.edu.pl

Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management; Department of Economics and Marketing, 430 Fordońska street, 85-790 Bydgoszcz

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3944-7657

Bibliografia

1. Blassingame, L. (1998). Sustainable cities: Oxymoron, utopia, or inevitability? The Social Science Journal, Vol. 35, Iss. 1, pp. 1-13. DOI: 10.1016/S0362-3319(98)90055-6.
2. Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., Nijkamp, P. (2009). Smart cities in Europe, 3rd Central European Conference in Regional Science - CERS, Retrieved from http://www.um.pro.br/lab7/_conteudo/CARAGLIU2009.pdf, 1.12.2021.
3. Cisowski, T., Szymanek, A. (2006). Zrównoważony rozwój transportu miejskiego [A sustainable development of urban transport]. Eksploatacja i Niezawodność, Iss. 1, pp. 15-26.
4. Colvile, R.N., Kaur, S., Britter, R., Robins, A., Bell, M.C., Shallcross, D., Belcher, S.E. (2004). Sustainable development of urban transport systems and human exposure to air pollution. Science of the Total Environment, pp. 334-335, 481-487. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.04.052.
5. Da Silva, A.N.R., Da Silva Costa, M., Macedo, M.H. (2008). Multiple views of sustainable urban mobility: The case of Brazil. Transport Policy, Elsevier, Vol. 15, Iss. 6, pp. 350-360, DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2008.12.003.
6. Dixon, T., Woodcraft, S. (2016). Creating strong communities - measuring social sustainability in new housing development BRE Group Researcher, Retrieved from: http://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Creating_strong_communities_%E2%80%93_measuring_social_sustainability_in_new_housing_development, 2.12.2021.
7. Eurostat (2021). Database, Available online https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database, 3.11.2021.
8. Ghorbi, M., Mohammadi, H. (2017). A Critical View on New Urbanism Theory in Urban Planning: from Theory to Practice. Space Ontology International Journal, Vol. 6, Iss. 3, pp. 89-97.
9. Hanna, E., Comín, F.A. (2021). Urban Green Infrastructure and Sustainable Development: A Review. Sustainability, 13(20), pp. 11498. DOI: 10.3390/su132011498.
10. He, X., Lin, M., Chen, T.L., Lue, B., Tseng, P.C., Cao, W., Chiang, P.C. (2020). Implementation Plan for Low-carbon Resilient City towards Sustainable Development Goals: Challenges and Perspectives. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, Vol. 20, Iss. 3, pp. 444-464. DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2019.11.0568.
11. Hens, L. (2010). The challenge of the sustainable city. Environment, Development and Sustainability, Iss. 12, pp. 875-876.
12. International Organization for Standardization ISO (2019). Country Codes-ISO 3166. Available online: https://www.iso.org/iso-3166-country-codes.html, 4.11.2021.
13. Jankowska, M. (2015). Smart city jako koncepcja zrównoważonego rozwoju miasta - przykład Wiednia [Smart city as a concept of sustainable development - Vienna case study]. Studia i Prace Wydziału Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarządzania, No. 42, Vol. 2, Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarządzania, Uniwersytet Szczeciński. DOI: 10.18276/sip.2015.42/2-15; s. s. 173-182.
14. Jasiński, R., Galant-Gołębiewska, M., Nowak, M., Kurtyka, K., Kurzawska, P., Maciejewska, M., Ginter, M. (2021). Emissions and Concentrations of Particulate Matter in Poznan Compared with Other Polish and European Cities. Atmosphere, Iss. 12, pp. 533. DOI: 10.3390/atmos12050533.
15. Jenks, M., Jones, C. (2010). Dimensions of the Sustainable City, Future City 2. Springer Science+Business Media B.V., pp. 1-21. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-8647-2_1.
16. Kuddus, M.A., Tynan, E., McBryde, E. (2020). Urbanization: a problem for the rich and the poor? Public Health Reviews, Vol. 41, Iss. 1, pp. 1-4. DOI: 10.1186/s40985-019-0116-0.
17. Leruth, B., Ganzle, S., Trondal, J. (2019). Differentiated Integration and Disintegration in the EU after Brexit: Risks versus Opportunities. Journal of Common Market Studies JCMS 2019 Vol. 57. Iss. 6. pp. 1383-1394. DOI: 10.1111/jcms.12957.
18. Lewandowska, A. (2014). Koncepcja miasta zrównoważonego i próby jej wdrożenia w europejskiej przestrzeni osadniczej. In: K. Sadowy (Ed.), Miasto. Sztuka. Nauka. Gospodarka. Warszawa: Biblioteka Res Publiki Nowej, pp. 90-98.
19. Linan, Z., Bolin, Y., Mingzhi, X. (2004). Management Strategies for Ecocities of Sustainable Development. Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment, Vol. 2, Iss. 1, pp. 61-63.
20. Luszniewicz, A., Słaby, T. (2003). Statystyka z Pakietem Komputerowym STATISTICA PL. Teoria i Zastosowania. Warszawa, Poland: Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck.
21. Marszelewski, W., Piasecki, A. (2014). Analiza rozwoju infrastruktury ściekowej w Polsce w aspekcie ekologicznym i ekonomicznym [Analysis of the Development of Wastewater Infrastructure in Poland in Ecological and Economical Aspects]. Zeszyty Naukowe SGGW w Warszawie. Polityki Europejskie, Finanse i Marketing, Vol. 11, Iss. 60, pp. 127-137.
22. McGranahan, G., Satterthwaite, D. (2014). Urbanisation concepts and trends. London: IIED Working Paper. IIED.
23. McKinney, M.L. (2008). Effects of urbanization on species richness: A review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosystems, Iss. 11, pp. 161-176. DOI: 10.1007/s11252-007-0045-4.
24. McMichael, A.J. (2020). The urban environment and health in a world of increasing globalization: issues for developing countries. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, Vol. 78, Iss. 9, pp. 1117-1126.
25. Mega, V. (1996). Our city, our future: towards sustainable development in European cities. Environment and Urbanization, Vol. 8, Iss. 1, pp. 133-154, https://doi.org/10.1177/095624789600800111.
26. Mierzejewska, L. (2015). Zrównoważony rozwój miasta - wybrane sposoby pojmowania, koncepcje i modele [Sustainable development of a city: selected theoretical frameworks, concepts and models]. Problemy Rozwoju Miast, Kwartalnik Naukowy Instytutu Rozwoju Miast, Iss. 3, pp. 5-11.
27. Ministerstwo Funduszy i Polityki Regionalnej (2016). National Urban Policy 2023, Available online https://www.gov.pl/web/fundusze-regiony/polityka-miejska, 18.11.2021.
28. Ministry of Investment and Economic Development (2019). Sustainable urban development in Poland: national urban policy in the context of the 2030 Agenda’s Goal 11 and the New Urban Agenda, Available online https://www.funduszeeuropejskie.gov.pl/media/72570/raport_en_final.pdf, 01.12.2021.
29. Morelli, V.G., Veijnen, M., Bueren, E., Wenzler, I., Reuver, M., Salvati, L. (2013). Towards intelligently - sustainable cities? From intelligent and knowledge city programmes to the achievement of urban sustainability. TeMA Journal of Land Use Mobility and Environment, Iss. 1, pp. 73-86.
30. Nitschke, M., Tucker, G., Simon, D.L., Hansen, A.L., Pisaniello, D.L. (2014). The link between noise perception and quality of life in South Australia. Noise & Health, Vol. 16, Iss. 70, pp. 137-142, Retrieved from https://www.noiseandhealth.org/text.asp?2014/16/70/137/134913, 16.12.2021.
31. OECD (2017). The 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda: Towards A Successful Implementation By Poland. Better Policies Series, Paris: OECD, Available online https://www.oecd.org/poland/Better-Policy-Series-Poland-Nov-2017-PL.pdf, 18.11.2021.
32. Overstreet, K. (2021). Exploring New Urbanism Principles in the 21st Century, Available online https://www.archdaily.com/963314/exploring-new-urbanism-principles-in-the-21st-century, 01.12.2021.
33. Oyebanjia, A.O., Liyanageb, C., Akintoye, A. (2017). Critical Success Factors (CSFs) for achieving sustainable social housing (SSH). International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, Vol. 6, Iss. 1, pp. 216-227. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsbe.2017.03.006.
34. Paszkowski, Z. (2011). Miasto idealne w perspektywie europejskiej i jego związki z urbanistyką współczesną. Kraków, Poland: Zbigniew Paszkowski and Towarzystwo Autorów i Wydawców Prac Naukowych UNIVERSITAS.
35. Qureshi, I.A., Huapu, L. (2007). Urban Transport and Sustainable Transport Strategies: A Case Study of Karachi, Pakistan. Tsinghua Science and Technology, Vol. 12, Iss. 3, pp. 309-317. DOI: 10.1016/S1007-0214(07)70046-9.
36. Rzeńca, A. (2016). Zrównoważony rozwój miasta. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, pp. 49-61.
37. Satterthwaite, D. (1997). Sustainable Cities or Cities that Contribute to Sustainable Development? Urban Studies, Vol. 34, Iss. 10, pp. 1667-1691.
38. Statistics Poland. Local Data Bank (2021). Available online https://bdl.stat.gov.pl/BDL/dane/teryt/jednostka, 2.12.2021.
39. Stratigea, A., Leka, A., Panagiotopoulou, M. (2017). In Search of Indicators for Assessing Smart and Sustainable Cities and Communities’ Performance. International Journal of E-Planning Research Vol. 6, Iss. 1, pp. 43-64. DOI: 10.4018/IJEPR.2017010103.
40. Strulak-Wójcikiewicz, R., Lemke, J. (2019). Concept of a Simulation Model for Assessing the Sustainable Development of Urban Transport. Transportation Research Procedia, 39, pp. 502-513. DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2019.06.052.
41. United Nations (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Available online https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E, 18.11.2021.
42. United Nations Association Poland (2021). Zrównoważony rozwój miast w Polsce - od teorii do praktyki, Available online https://www.unapoland.org/post/raport, 16.12.2021.
43. United Nations-Habitat (2016). World Cities Report 2016: Urbanization and Development - Emerging Futures, Available online https://unhabitat.org/world-cities-report, 16.12.2021.
44. Wear, A. (2016). Planning, Funding and Delivering Social Infrastructure in Australia's Outer Suburban Growth Areas. Urban Policy and Research, Vol. 34, Iss. 3, pp. 284-297. DOI: 10.1080/08111146.2015.1099523.
45. Winzen, T., Schimmelfenning, F. (2016). Explaining differentiation in European Union treaties, European Union Politics, Vol. 17, Iss. 4, pp. 616-637. DOI: 10.1177/ 1465116516640386.
46. Wróblewski, W. (2016). Wykorzystanie narzędzi Nowego Urbanizmu w procesie powrotu Łodzi do centrum [The Use of the New Urbanism Tools in the Process of Returning to the Centre. Case Study of Lodz]. Studia KPZK, Iss. 168, Łódź, Poland, pp. 1-22.
47. Wysocki, F., Lira, J. (2003). Statystyka Opisowa (Descriptive Statistics). Poznań, Poland: Wydawnictwo Akademii Rolniczej im. Augusta Cieszkowskiego.
48. Zgłobicki, W., Telecka, M., Skupiński, S. (2019). Assessment of short-term changes in street dust pollution with heavy metals in Lublin (E Poland) - levels, sources and risks. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Iss. 26, pp. 35049-35060. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-06496-x.
49. Zhang, X.Q. (2016). The trends, promises and challenges of urbanisation in the world. Habitat International, Vol. 54, Iss. 3, pp. 241-252. DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.11.018.
50. Zielenkiewicz, M. (2020). Diversity in the European Union in terms of inclusive development. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, Vol. 64, Iss. 6, pp. 196-209.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-2cec15ac-5f99-4c7f-b9dc-d2affac1b0ed