Influence of the type of adhesive on the properties of the GFRP composite adhesive joint, determined on the basis of the static T-peel test

• Autorzy: Kubit Andrzej , Katrňák Tomáš , Pytlowany Tomasz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/adms-2021-0018

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The article presents the results of experimental studies determining the influence of the type of adhesive on the static strength properties of the Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) composite joint determined on the basis of the T-peel test. As part of the static tests on peeling joints, a comparison of peak load and stiffness for individual joints was made. The fracture surfaces were also analyzed, showing various failure mechanisms. It was shown that the variant of joints made with the Enguard BP72A polyester adhesive was characterized by the highest strength properties with a mean peak load of 836.73 N.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

GFRP composites; adhesive joints; T-peel test; failure analysis

PL

kompozyty GFRP; połączenia klejone; analiza błędów

• Wydawca: Politechnika Gdańska
• Czasopismo: Advances in Materials Science
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 21, nr 3(69)
• Strony: 63--74
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 39 poz., il., wykr., zdj.

Twórcy

autor

Kubit Andrzej

• Department of Manufacturing and Production Engineering, Rzeszow University of Technology, Poland

autor

Katrňák Tomáš

• Institute of Aerospace Engineering, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic

autor

Pytlowany Tomasz

• EKOLOT, ul. Przemysłowa 3A, 38-457 Szczepańcowa, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Bledzki A.K., Seidlitz H., Krenz J., Goracy K., Urbaniak M., Rösch J.J. Recycling of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Composite Polymers—Review—Part 2: Recovery and Application of Recycled Carbon Fibers. Polymers, 12, 2020, 3003, 1-10
• 2. Dorigato A.. Recycling of thermosetting composites for wind blade application. Advanced Industrial and Engineering Polymer Research, 4(2), 2021, 116-132.
• 3. Katnam K.B., da Silva L.F.M., Young T.M. Bonded repair of composite aircraft structures: a review of scientific challenges and opportunities. Progress in Aerospace Sciences 61, 2013, 26-42.
• 4. Baldan A. Adhesively-bonded joints and repairs in metallic alloys, polymers and composite materials: adhesives, adhesion theories and surface pretreatment. Journal of Materials Science 39(1), 2004, pp. 1-49.
• 5. Abdalla H.A. Evaluation of deflection in concreto members reinforced with fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) bars. Composite Structures, 56, 2002, pp. 63-71.
• 6. Toutanji H.A., Saafi M. Flexural behavior of concrete beams reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars. ACI Structural Journal, 97(5), 2000, 712-719.
• 7. Bannister M. Challenges for composites into the next millenium – a reinforcement perspective. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 32(7), 2001, 901-910.
• 8. Kishore R.A.; Tiwari R.; and Singh I. Investigation of drilling in [(0/90)/0] s glass fibre reinforced plastics using taguchi method. Advances in Production Engineering and Manangement, 4(1-2), 2009, 7-46.
• 9. Hueber C., Horejsi K., Schledjewski R.: Review of cost estimation: methods and models for aerospace composite manufacturing. Advanc Manufact: Polymer Compos Sci. 2(1), 2016, pp. 1-13.
• 10. Doan Q.H., Thai D.K., Tran N.L. A numerical study of the effect of component dimensions on the critical buckling load of a GFRP composite strut under uniaxial compression. Materials, 13(4), 2020, 931.
• 11. Cintra G.G., Cardoso D.C.T., Vieira J.D. Parameters affecting local buckling response of pultruded GFRP I-columns: Experimental and numerical investigation. Composite Structures, 222, 2019, 110897.
• 12. Elchalakani M., Dong M., Karrech A., Li G., Ali M.S., Yang B. Experimental investigation of rectangular air-cured geopolymer concrete columns reinforced with GFRP bars and stirrups. Journal of Composites for Construction, 23, 2019, 4019011.
• 13. Stavrov D., Bersee H.E.N. Resistance welding of thermoplastic composites-an overview. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 36(1), 2005, 39-54.
• 14. Holden R, Haworth P, Kendrick I. Automated riveting cell for A320 wing panels with improved throughput and reliability (SA2). SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-3915, 2007.
• 15. Banea M.D., da Silva L.F.M. Adhesively bonded joints in composite materials: an overview, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers: Part L, 223, 2008, 1-18.
• 16. Baldan A. Adhesively-bonded joints and repairs in metallic alloys, polymers and composite materials: adhesives, adhesion theories and surface pretreatment. Journal of Materials Science, 39(1), 2004, 1-49.
• 17. Rośkowicz M, Smal T. The use of composite adhesives in repairing of aircraft semi-monocoque airframe. Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Composite Materials, Venice, 24-28.06.2012.
• 18. Adams R. D. and WakeW. C. Structural adhesive joints in engineering, 1984, vol. 15 (Elsevier, New York).
• 19. Godzimirski J., Komorek A., Smal T. Research of strength features of adhesive composites (In Polish). Maintenance Problems of Machines, 1(64), 2007, 157-165.
• 20. ASTM D 5573-99. Standard practice for classifying failure modes in fiber-reinforced-plastic (FRP) joints. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 15.03, 2002.
• 21. Kim K. S., Yoo J. S., Yi Y. M., Kim C.G. Failure mode and strength of uni-directional composite single lap bonded joints with different bonding methods. Composite Structures, 72, 2006, 477–485.
• 22. Kim J.K., Kim H S., Lee D.G. Investigation of optimal surface treatments for carbon/epoxy composite adhesive joints. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 17(3), 2003, 329–352.
• 23. Zielecki W., Kubit A., Kluz R., Trzepieciński T. Investigating the influence of the chamfer and fillet on the high-cyclic fatigue strength of adhesive joint of steel parts. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 31(6), 2017, 627-644.
• 24. da Silva L.F.M., Öchsner A., Adams R.D. (Eds). Handbook of Adhesion Technology. Berlin: Springer 2011.
• 25. Rośkowicz M., Smal T. Research on durability of composite materials used in repairing aircraft components. Maintenance and Reliability 2013; 15 (4): pp. 349–355.
• 26. Kłonica M. Comparative analysis of effect of thermal shock on adhesive joint strength. Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal 10 (32), 2016, 263-268.
• 27. Kłonica M. Analysis of the effect of selected factors on the strength of adhesive joints. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 393 (1), 2018, 012041.
• 28. Qin M.H. and Dzenis Y.A. Analysis of single lap adhesive composite joints with delaminated adherends. Composites Part B: Engineering, 34(2), 2003, 167–173.
• 29. Kubit A., Trzepiecinski T., Kłonica M., Hebda M., Pytel M. The infuence of temperature gradient thermal shock cycles on the interlaminar shear strength of fibre metal laminate composite determined by the short beam test. Composites Part B: Engineering, 176, 2019, 107217.
• 30. Kumar S.B., Sivashanker S., Bag A., Sridhar I. Failure of aerospace composite scarf-joints subjected to uniaxial compression. Materials Science and Engineering A: 412(1–2), 2005, 117–122.
• 31. Kumar S.B., Sridhar I., Sivashanker S., Osiyemi S.O., Bag A. Tensile failure of adhesively bonded CFRP composite scarf joints. Materials Science and Engineering B, 132(1–2), 2006, 113–120.
• 32. Kim K.S., Yi Y.M., Cho G.R., Kim C.G. Failure prediction and strength improvement of unidirectional composite single lap bonded joints. Composite Structures, 82(4), 2008, 513–520.
• 33. Guild F.J., Potter K.D., Heinrich J., Adams R.D., Wisonm M.R. Understanding and control of adhesive crack propagation in bonded joints between carbon fibre composite adherends, II. Finite element analysis. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 21, 2001, 445–453.
• 34. ASTM D3167 Adhesive Floating Roller Peel Testing.
• 35. Riul C., Tita V., de Carvalho J., Canto R.B. Processing and mechanical properties evaluation of glass fiber-reinforced PTFE laminates. Composites Science and Technology 72, 2012, 1451–1458.
• 36. ASTM D 1876, Standard test method for peel resistance of adhesives (T-Peel Test), Volume 15.06, ASTM Standards, 1999, pp. 105-107.
• 37. Broughton W.R., Mera R.D. Review of durability test methods and standards for assessing long term performance of adhesive joints. NPL Report CMMT(A)61, 1997.
• 38. Murafa A.V., Bobyreva N.I., Khozin V.G. Modification of polyester resins with active mineral fillers. Mechanics of Composite Materials, 32(1), 1996, 86-89.
• 39. Ramazan K., Sunarb M., Yilbas B. Influence of adhesive thickness and filler content on the mechanical performance of aluminum single-lap joints. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 205, 2008, 183–189.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).