Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
The meaning of space for persons with disabilities is a research area in geography, urban planning, spatial planning and architecture, also in sociology and public policy. Accessibility has become a focus of interdisciplinary research. The development of accessibility standards and new technologies also presents challenges for legal science. GIS provides data for planning and implementation decisions by policy makers, and then evaluate the implementation. It also serves to enhance the effectiveness of the rights of persons with disabilities. Inadequate spatial planning means that the rights of persons with disabilities are not exercised despite being declared in the law. The use of GIS is growing ever more widespread, and their strengthened role in disability studies allows to enhance the autonomy of persons with disabilities and foster their integration into society. One of the key issue for the development of GIS in this area undoubtedly comes from the regulations that guarantee access to the physical environment, transport, other facilities, information and communication and public services. While the sources of legal regulation of accessibility standards and how to ensure accessibility in the traditional sense are known, the basics of GIS for people with disabilities are still insufficiently analyzed. However, it is also worth looking at the legal basis for the functioning of GIS itself. This article aims to examine the sources of law for the functioning of GIS and its application for people with disabilities in EU and Polish law.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
129--139
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 36 poz.
Twórcy
autor
- Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Faculty of Law and Administration, Warsaw, Poland
Bibliografia
- 1. Bachad E.W., Majid Z., Setan H., Chong A.K., Sulaiman N.S. (2012). GIS application and geodatabase for archaeological site documentation system: Bujang, Valley, Malaysia. In: A.A. Rahman, P. Bogusławski, C. Gold, M.N. Said, Developments in Multidimetional Spatial Data Models, Universiti Technologi Malaysia, pp. 173-189.
- 2. Bielecka E. (2006). Systemy informacji geograficznej. Teoria i zastosowania (Geographic information systems. Theory and applications). Warszawa, pp. 1-2.
- 3. Bielecka E. (2011). Implementacja dyrektywy INSPIRE w Polsce. Ustawa o infrastrukturze informacji przestrzennej (Implementation of the INSPIRE directive in Poland. Act on spatial information infrastructure). In: INSPIRE i Krajowa Infrastruktura Informacji Przestrzennej. Podstawy teoretyczne i aspekty praktyczne (INSPIRE and the Polish Spatial Information Infrastructure. Theoretical foundations and practical aspects). Warszawa, p. 87.
- 4. Bielecka E., Maj K. (2009). Systemy informacji przestrzennej. Podstawy teoretyczne (Geographic information systems. A theoretical background). Warszawa, p. 13.
- 5. Bird K. (2019). Addressing Spatial Poverty Traps, Chronic Poverty Advisory Network, London, p. 2.
- 6. Broderick A. (2020). Of rights and obligations: the birth of accessibility. The International Journal of Human Rights, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 398-407.
- 7. Chauvin T., Stawecki T., Winczorek P. (2021). Wstęp do prawoznawstwa (Introduction into legal theory). Warszawa, C.H. Beck, p. 155.
- 8. Committee on the Right of Persons with Disabilities (2015) Concluding observations on the initial report of the European Union, 2 October 2015, CRPD/C/EU/CO/1, para 18-19, 28.
- 9. Council Decision of 26 November 2009 concerning the conclusion, by the European Community, of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2010/48/EC), OJ L 23, 27.1.2010, p. 35-61.
- 10. Directive 2007/2/EC of The European Parliament and of The Council of 14 March 2007 establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE). OJ L 108, 25.4.2007, p. 1-14.
- 11. Dobrowolski Z. (2006). Społeczeństwo informacyjne i społeczeństwo wiedzy w świetle krytycznej teorii modernizacji Urlicha Becka (Information society and knowledge society in light of Urlich Beck’s critical theory of modernzation). In: B. Sosińska-Kaleta, E. Chuchro, W. Daszewski (ed.), Informacja w sieci. Problemy, metody, technologie (Information on the Web. Problems, methods, technologies). Warszawa, p. 26.
- 12. Felchner K., Jankowska M. (2013). Ustawa o infrastrukturze informacji przestrzennej. Komentarz (Act on spatial information infrastructure). LEX/el., commentary to Article 1. [access: 10.05.2022].
- 13. Gaździcki J. (1990). Systemy informacji przestrzennej (Geographic information systems) Warszawa-Wrocław, p. 9.
- 14. General comment No. 2 (2014). Article 9: Accessibility, Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities CRPD/C/GC/2, para 28.
- 15. Greco G.M. (2016). On Accessibility as a Human Right, with an Application to Media Accessibility. In: A. Matamala, P. Orero, Researching Audio Description. New Approaches, series: Palgrave Studies in Translating and Interpreting, Barcelona, p. 21.
- 16. INSPIRE Thematic Working Group Utility and Government Services (2013) D2.8.III.6 Data Specification on Utility and Government Services - Technical Guidelines, European Commision Joint Research Centre, p. 15, https://inspire.ec.europa.eu/id/document/tg/us [access: 20.05.2022].
- 17. Iwarsson S., Ståhl A. (2003). Accessibility, usability and universal design - positioning and definition of concepts describing person-environment relationships. Disability and Rehabilitation, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 57-66.
- 18. Janowski J. (2011). Informatyka prawa. Zadania i znaczenie w związku z kształtowaniem się elektronicznego obrotu prawnego (Legal informatics. Objectives and significance in connection with the emergence of electronic legal legal transactions). Lublin, pp. 240-258.
- 19. Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) 18 March 2014, C-363/12, EU:C:2014:159.
- 20. Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) 11 April 2013 - HK Danmark, acting on behalf of Jette Ring v. Dansk almennyttigt Boligselskab (C-335/11) and HK Danmark, acting on behalf of Lone Skouboe Werge v. Dansk Arbejdsgiverforening, acting on behalf of Pro Display A/S, in liquidation (C-337/11), ECLI:EU:C:2013:222.
- 21. Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) 9 March 2017, C-406/15, ECLI:EU:C:2017:198.
- 22. Kistowski M., Iwańska M. (1997). Systemy informacji geograficznej. Podstawy techniczne i metodyczne. Przegląd pakietów oprogramowania i zastosowań w badaniach środowiska przyrodniczego (Geographic information systems. Technical and methodological foundations. A review of software packages and applications in natural environment studies). Poznań, p. 9.
- 23. Kocaman S., Ozdemir N. (2020). Improvement of Disability Rights via Geographic Information Science. Sustainability, no. 12, p. 1, 3, 12.
- 24. Pohjankoski P. (2017). UN Disability Convention through the prism of EU law: boosting human rights but blurring responsibilities? Anti Discrimination Law Review, no. 2, pp. 28-43.
- 25. Projekt z 24 marca 2022 ustawy o dostępności niektórych produktów i usług (Draft of 24 March 2022 of an act on the accessibility of certain products and services), no UC 119, https://legislacja.gov.pl/docs//2/12358257/12865990/12865991/dokument5491 22.pdf [access: 22.05.2022].
- 26. Regulation (EU) 2021/2116 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 2 December 2021 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013, OJ L 435, 6.12.2021, pp. 187-261.
- 27. Roszewska K. (2018). Application of GIS in the area of Social Security. 25th Anniversary Conference Geographic Information Systems Conference and Exhibition GIS Odyssey 2018, Conference proceedings, 10th to 14th of September 2018, Perugia, Italy, pp. 420-426.
- 28. Roszewska K. (2019). The concept of an active social services platform, conference proceeding 26th Geographic Information Systems Conference and Exhibition GIS Odyssey 2019, pp. 249-255.
- 29. Roszewska K. (2021). Accessibility - One of the Human Rights or the Means of Their Implementation. Prawo i Więź, no. 3, vol. 37, pp. 158-176.
- 30. Salmen J.P.S. (2001). U.S. Accessibility Codes and Standards: Challenges for Universal Design. In: W.F.E. Preiser, K.H. Smith, Universal Design. Handbook, para 6.2, ebook.
- 31. Szpor G. (1998). Prawnoustrojowe uwarunkowania rozwoju systemów informacji przestrzennej (Legal and organisational conditions of spatial information systems development). In: Przetwarzanie i ochrona danych (Data processing and protection), Katowice, pp. 174, 178-182.
- 32. Szpor G. (2017). Jawność i jej ograniczenia. Idee i pojęcia (Transparency and its limitations. Ideas and concepts), vol. 1. Beck, wyd. elektr. Legalis, ch. 1, § 2.IV and § 4.IV.C; ch. 2, § 5.V [access: 14.05.2022].
- 33. Szpor G. (ed.) (2011). Restrukturyzacja regulacji infrastruktury informacyjnej (Restructuring of information infrastructure regulation). In: Internet. Ochrona wolności, własności i bezpieczeństwa (The Internet. Protection of freedom, property and security). Warszawa, p. 223.
- 34. Szpor G. (2012). Information in the land use planning process as an element of administrative legislation. In: D. Kereković, R. Źróbek, (ed.). GIS for Geoscientists. Croatian Information Technology Association - GIS Forum, University of Silesia, Zagreb, pp. 231-236.
- 35. URL:https://www.un.org/development/desa/dspd/wp- content/uploads/sites/22/2019/03/Spatial-poverty-traps-policy-responses- 2019.pdf [access: 22.05.2022].
- 36. World Report on Disability (2011). WHO, WB, Geneva, p. 170, 301, https://www.who.int/teams/noncommunicable-diseases/disability-and- rehabilitation/world-report-on-disability [access: 20.05.2022].
Uwagi
PL
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-2bf70d4b-bac9-42fd-b817-11a37b47ac6f