PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Issues of providing transport services to sparsely populated areas: a case study of the territory of the national Park Šumava in the Czech Republic

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
This paper deals with public transport services in sparsely populated areas. The definition of the term transport services and possible approaches to its provision is given in the introduction. The term sparsely populated area is subsequently defined. The problems that arise during the organization of transport services in these areas are further defined. These problems lie primarily in the variations in the number of people in the thousands in the area in the off-tourist season and in the summer tourist season. This affects the organization of transport and the organization of transport services. This paper proposes the technological procedure and measures for improving transport services in sparsely populated areas outside and during the summer tourist season. The proposals are applied in a selected sparsely populated area in the territory of the National Park Šumava and the Šumava Protected Landscape Area in the Czech Republic.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Strony
109--122
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 45 poz.
Twórcy
  • University of Pardubice, Faculty of Transport Engineering, Department of Transport Technology and Control, Studentská 95, Pardubice, 532 10, Czech Republic
  • University of Pardubice, Faculty of Transport Engineering, Department of Transport Technology and Control, Studentská 95, Pardubice, 532 10, Czech Republic
Bibliografia
  • 1. The European Parliament and the Council. 2007. Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 on public passenger transport services by rail and road. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2007/1370/oj.
  • 2. Samkova, L. & Navrâtil, J. Significance of the public transport for tourism development in destinations. Deturope-The Central European Journal of Regional Development and Tourism. 2023. Vol. 15. P. 158-189. DOI: 10.32725/det.2023.008.
  • 3. Yin, J. & Cheng, Y. & Ni, Y. Staging a comeback? The influencing mechanism of tourist crowding perception on adaptive behavior. Tourism Management. 2024. Vol. 100. P. 1-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2023.104827.
  • 4. Gonzales, R.M. & Roman, C. & Ortuzar, J. Preferences for sustainable mobility in natural areas: The case of Teide National Park. Journal of Transport Geography. Vol. 76. P. 1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.03.002.
  • 5. The Ministry of Transport of the Czech Republic. 2017. Methodology for ensuring the operation and development of public passenger transport systems supporting supra-regional integration.
  • 6. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2017. Available at: https://www.oecd.org.
  • 7. The Czech Statistical Office. 2023. Available at: https://www.czso.cz.
  • 8. Hoerler, R. & Haerri, F. & Hoppe, M. New solutions in sustainable commuting - the attitudes and experience of European stakeholders and experts in Switzerland. Social Science. 2019. Vol. 8. No. 7. DOI: 10.3390/socsci8070220.
  • 9. Dziaduch, I. The degree of sustainable development principles implementation in transportation based on an economic analysis of rail buses life cycle. Economia i srodowisko-economics and Environment. 2021. Vol. 78. No. 3. P. 8-29. DOI: 10.34659/2021/3/18.
  • 10. Fournier, G. & Baumann, M. & Gasde, J. & Yasin, K. Innovative mobility in rural areas - the case of the Black Forest. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management. 2018. Vol. 18. No. 3. P. 247-269. DOI: 10.1504/IJATM.2018.093420.
  • 11. Hajduk, S. Multi-Criteria Analysis in the Decision-Making Approach for the Linear Ordering of Urban Transport Based on TOPSIS Technique. Energies. 2022. Vol. 15. No. 1. DOI: 10.3390/en15010274.
  • 12. Jović, J. & Plazinić, BR. 2013. Transportation demand management in rural areas. In: Paper presented at the 4Th International Conference Towards a Humane City. 2013. Novi Sad, Serbia.
  • 13. Soder, M. & Peer, S. The potential role of employers in promoting sustainable mobility in rural areas: Evidence from Eastern Austria. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. 2018. Vol. 12. No. 7. P. 541-551. DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2017.1402974.
  • 14. Szymańska, E. & Panfulik, E. & Kiryluk, H. Innovative solutions for the development of sustainable transport and improvement of the tourist accessibility of peripheral areas: the case of the Białowieża Forest Region. Sustainability. 2021. Vol. 13(4). DOI: 10.3390/su13042381.
  • 15. Flipo, A. & Salustio, M. & Ortar, N. & Senil, N. Sustainable mobility and the institutional lock-in: the example of Rural France.” Sustainability. 2021. Vol. 13. No. 4. DOI: 10.3390/su13042189.
  • 16. Campisi, T. & Canale, A. & Ticali, D. & Tesoriere, G. Innovative solutions for sustainable mobility in areas of weak demand. Some factors influencing the implementation of the DRT system in Enna (Italy). In: AIP Conference Proceedings. Crete. 2021. P. 70-75.
  • 17. Rotaris, L. & Danielis, R. The role for carsharing in medium to small-sized towns and in less- densely populated rural areas. Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice. 2018. Vol. 115. P. 49-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2017.07.006.
  • 18. Klementschitz, R. & Roider, O. Active measures as part of dialogue marketing promoting the use of public transport in rural areas. Transport Problems. 2015. Vol. 10. No. 4. P. 57. DOI: 10.21307/tp-2015-048.
  • 19. Kiryluk, H. & Glińska, E. & Ryciuk, U. &Vierikko, K. & Sadowska, E. Stakeholders engagement for solving mobility problems in touristic remote areas from the Baltic Sea Region. Plos One. 2021. Vol. 16. No. 6. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253166.
  • 20. Cejka, M. & Teleckÿ, M. Macroeconomic Effects on Development of Sparsely Populated Areas in Public Transport. NASE MORE. 2018. Vol. 65. No. 4. P. 240-245. DOI: 10.17818/NM/2018/4SI.14.
  • 21. Kapur, R. Problems and Challenges in Rural Areas. University of Delhi. 2019. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332187494_Problems_and_Challenges_in_Rural_Areas.
  • 22. Litman, T. Evaluating Accessibility for Transport Planning. Transport policy Institute. 2023. 65 p. Available at: https://www.vtpi.org/access.pdf.
  • 23. Pezzini, M. Rural policy lessons from OECD countries. Economics review. 2000. P. 47-57. Available at: https://www.kansascityfed.org/documents/1140/2000- Rural%20Policy%20Lessons%20from%20OECD%20Countries.pdf.
  • 24. Rostami, S. Application of the transport needs concept to rural New South Wels. Ph.D. diss. University of New South Wales. 2005.
  • 25. Radziszewski, P. & Nazarko, J. & Vilutiene, T. & Debkowska, K. & Ejdys, J. & et.al. Future trends in road pavement technologies development in the context of environmental protection. Baltic Journal of road and Bridge Engineering. 2016. Vol. 11. No. 2. P. 160-168. DOI: 10.3846/bjrbe.2016.19.
  • 26. Gutierrez, A. & Miravet, D. The Determinants of Tourist Use of Public Transport at the Destination. Sustainability. 2016. Vol. 8. No. 9. DOI: 10.3390/su8090908.
  • 27. Kuźmicz, K.A. & Ryciuk, U. & Glinska, E. & Kiriluk, H. & Sadowska, E. Perspectives of mobility development in remote areas attractive to tourist. Economics and Environment. 2022. Vol. 80. No. 1. DOI: 10.34659/eis.2022.80.1.440.
  • 28. Sip, J. Venkovsky cestovm ruch. Masarykova univerzita Brno. 2020. 146 p. [In Czech: Rural tourism].
  • 29. Jarolîmovâ, L. Cestovnz ruch Ceské republiky. Vysokâ skola ekonomickâ Praha. 2018. 111 p. [In Czech: Tourism of the Czech Republic].
  • 30. Kalâbovâ, M. Strategické plànovàm rozvoje cestovniho ruchu. Vysokâ skola ekonomickâ Praha. 2018. 125 p. [In Czech: Strategic planning of tourism development].
  • 31. Geurs, K. & Gkiotsalitis, K. & Fiorese, T. & Visser, G. & Veenstra, M. Chapter Three - The potential of a Mobility-as-a-Service platform in a depopulating area in the Netherlands: An exploration of small and big data. Advancet in Transport policy and Planing. 2018. Vol. 2. P. 57¬79. DOI: 10.1016/bs.atpp.2018.09.001.
  • 32. The Ministry of Transport of Czech Republic. 2021. Transport policy of the Czech Republic for the period 2021-2027 with a view to 2050.
  • 33. Timetable GW Train Regio. 2023. Available at: https://www.gwtr.cz/files/files/1670750976_14wl04b.pdf.
  • 34. Timetable bus carrier (CSAD AUTOBUSY Ceské Budejovice, a.s.). 2023. Available at: http://portal.idos.cz/Down.aspx?f=pdf/L370635_221211_341238.pdf.
  • 35. Server mapy.cz. 2023. Praha. Available at: https://mapy.cz/zakladni?l=0&x=14.1104114&y=48.7930820&z=11.
  • 36. Timetable bus carrier (CSAD AUTOBUSY Ceské Budejovice, a.s.). 2023. Available at: http://portal.idos.cz/Down.aspx?f=pdf/L330525_230305_345407.pdf.
  • 37. Miller, HJ. Movement analytics for sustainable mobility. Journal of Spatial Information Science. 2020. P. 115-123. DOI: 10.3390/socsci8070220.
  • 38. National Park Sumava.2023. Available at: https://www.npsumava.cz/en.
  • 39. Research of National Park Sumava. 2022. Available at: https://www.npsumava.cz/wp- content/uploads/2020/04/brozurka_socioekonom_cz_fin.pdf.
  • 40. Mcilroy, R.C. “This is where public transport falls down”: Place based perspectives of multimodal travel. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 2023. Vol. 98. P. 29¬46. DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2023.08.006.
  • 41. Petersen, T. Watching the Swiss: A network approach to rural and exurban public transport. Transport Policy. 2016. Vol. 52. P. 175-185. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.07.012.
  • 42. Schasché, S.E. & Sposato, R.G. & Hamp, N. The dilemma of demand-responsive transport services in rural areas: Conflicting expectations and weak user acceptance. Transport Policy. 2022. Vol. 126. P. 43-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.06.015.
  • 43. Azadeh, Shadi S. & Van Der Zee, J. & Wagenvoort, M. Choice-driven service network design for an integrated fixed line and demand responsive mobility system. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2022. Vol. 166. P. 557-574. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2022.10.016.
  • 44. Imhof, S. & Blattler, K. Assessing spatial characteristics to predict DRT demand in rural Switzerland. Research in Transportation Economics. 2023. Vol. 99. No. 101301. DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2023.101301.
  • 45. Mounce, R. & Beecroft, M. & Nelson, J.D. On the role of frameworks and smart mobility in addressing the rural mobility problem. Research in Transportation Economics. 2020. Vol. 83. No. 100956. DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2020.100956.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-2bf2e988-73e7-4049-aecb-a71642452fe7
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.