Multy-criteria fuzzy analysis of regional development

• Autorzy: Zhalezka B. , Navitskaya K.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The article presents the possibility of Rusing multi-criteria fuzzy analysis for assessing the region al competitiveness. This estimation can be used for place marketing strategy development and based on results of socio-economic development. The proposed approach is characterized by comparative estimation, when the level of development of one region is determined by the development of other areas. The final evaluation is the level of the cluster which the object being analyzed belongs. This allows ignoring minor fluctuations in Total indexes. The results of robust and fuzzy groups of regions are analyzed. This grouping is characterized by similar levels of development and helps to define the directions of further development of the regions.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

membership function; classification; fuzzy clusters; Grodno counties; regional economy; sustainable development; regional competitiveness; place marketing

• Wydawca: Polish Academy of Sciences, Branch in Lublin
• Czasopismo: ECONTECHMOD : An International Quarterly Journal on Economics of Technology and Modelling Processes
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: Vol. 4, No 3
• Strony: 39--46
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 33 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Zhalezka B.

• Belarus State Economic University

autor

Navitskaya K.

• Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno

Bibliografia

• 1. Abdrazakov R. 2010. Multi-criteria approach to the organization’s competitiveness evaluation / Management in Russia and abroad, №2, 11–15. (in Russian).
• 2. Aivazyan S. 2001. Cross-country analysis of integral categories of quality of life (econometric approach), Moscow: CEMI RAS. 60. (in Russian).
• 3. Alves M., Lima B., Evsukoff A., Vieira I. 2009. Developing a fuzzy decision support system to determine the location of a landfill site / Waste Management & Research, 27, 641-651.
• 4. Arzhenovskij I. 2012. Marketing of regions. Available online at: <http://www.marketing.spb.ru/read/ article/a56.htm> (in Russian).
• 5. Barkley D., Dudensing R .M. 2011. Industrial Legacy Matters: Implications for the Development and Use of Indices of Regional Competitiveness / Economic Development Quarterly, vol. 25, 130- 142.
• 6. Blaževic B., Jelušic A. 2006. Modelling region al economic development / Kybernetes, Vol. 35 No 7/8, 1190–1202.
• 7. Boschma R. 2004. Competitiveness of Regions from an Evolutionary Perspective / Regional Studies, 38(9), 1001-1014.
• 8. Cherdantseva I., Dibrov A. 2012. The practice improvement of regional strategic planning and socioeconomic and innovation development / Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, №12 (127), 31-37. (in Russian).
• 9. Cohesion indicators. 2014. Available online at: <http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/cohesion_policy_indicators/ cohesion_indicators>.
• 10. Diaz B., Moniche L., Morillasa A. 2006. Fuzzy Clustering Approach to the Key Sectors of the Spanish Economy / Economic Systems Research, Vol. 18, No. 3, 299–318.
• 11. Dijkstra L., Annoni P., Kozovska K. 2011. A New European Regional Competitiveness Index: Theory, Methods and Findings. - Available online at: <http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/industrial-competi tiveness/competitiveness-analysis/seminars/files/bbs_annoni_dijkstra_paper_en.pdf>.
• 12. Golovikhin S.A., Nezhivenko E.A. 2012. Formation of theoretical approaches to the region al economic research, by identifying the concept of «competitiveness of the region» / Modern problems of science and education, №5. – 8. - Available online at: <www.science-education.ru/105-7101>. (in Russian).
• 13. Kovalyshyn O., Gabriel Yu. 2014. Development of a management systems model of automatic control by using fuzzy logic / Econtechmod. An international quarterly journal – Vol. 3. No. 4. 87-90.
• 14. Kuzmin O., Melnyk O., Chyrkova Yu. 2013. The instruments of the enterprises rating activity / Econtechmod. An international quarterly journal. - Vol. 2. No. 4. 39–46.
• 15. Kuznecova O., Kuznecov V. 2010. System diagnostics of regional economy. Moscow, Russia: Librocom. 232. (in Russian).
• 16. Lialikova V., Maskolus A. 2013. Competitiveness of regions of Republic of Belarus: key factors and estimation methodology / Problems of development of economy and services sphere, 77-80. (in Russian).
• 17. Marquardt D., Wegener S., Möllers J. 2010. Does the EU LEADER Instrument Support Endogenous Development and New Modes of Governance in Romania?: Experiences from Elaborating an MCDA Based Regional Development Concept / International Journal of Rural Management, 6 (2), 193-241.
• 18. Mawson J. 2007. Regional governance in England: past experience, future directions? / International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 20 Iss 6, 548–566.
• 19. Meyer-Stamer J. 2008. Systematic Competitiveness and Local Economic Development. In S.Bodhanya (Ed.) Large Scale Systemic Change: Theories, Modelling and Practices. Available online at: http://www.meyerstamer.de/2008/Systemic+LED_ SouthAfrica.pdf. – 31.
• 20. Nasser W. 2012. Regional Tourism Competitiveness. Knowledge Management in Tourism: Policy and Governance Applications, 4, 77-94.
• 21. National Strategy of Sustainable socioeconomic development of Republic of Belarus till 2020 (NSUR-2020). 2004. - Available online at: <http://www.economy.gov.by/dadvfiles/001251_290081_NSUR2020.doc> – 81. (in Russian).
• 22. Navitskaya K. 2014. Key factors of predicting of Grodno region’s GRP / Economics and management, №1: 111-115. (in Russian).
• 23. Program of Socio-Economic development of Republic of Belarus from 2011 till 2015. 2011. Presidential Decree of April, 11 2011 № 136 (in Russian).
• 24. Regulation (EC). 2003. No 1059/2003 of the European parliament and of the council of 26 May 2003 on the establishment of a common classification of territorial units for statistics (NUTS) (OJ L 154, 21.6.2003, p. 1).
• 25. Saaty T.L. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York: McGraw-Hill. - 287.
• 26. Schwab K. 2009. The Global Competitiveness Report 2009–2010. Geneva: World Economic Forum/ - Available online at: http://www.weforum.org/pdf/GCR09/GCR20092010fullreport.pdf. - 492.
• 27. Serebryakov L., Yanovsky V. 2010. Modern infrastructure and sustainable socio-economic development of region / Management consulting, №4, 113-130. (in Russian).
• 28. Servillo L., Atkinson R., Russo A.P. 2012. Territorial attractiveness in EU urban and spatial policy: a critical review and future research agenda / European Urban and Regional Studies, vol. 19, 4, 349-365.
• 29. Shtovba S. 2001. Introduction to the theory of fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic. Available online at: http://matlab.exponenta.ru/ fuzzylogic/book1/index.php. (in Russian).
• 30. United Nations. 1987. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development, General Assembly Resolution 42/187, 11 December 1987. Available online at: http://www.un-documents.net/a42r187.htm.
• 31. Viet V.Q. 2009. GDP by production approach: A general introduction with emphasis on an integrated economic data collection framework. - Available online at: http://unstats.un.org/unsd/China_UNSD_Project/ GDP%20by%20production%20approach.pdf. – 137.
• 32. Zhelezko B., Siniavskaya O., Ahrameiko A. 2004. Estimation of quality of objects with complex structure under uncertainty conditions / Computer Data Analysis and Modeling: Robustness and Computer Intensive methods, Vol. 2, 67-70.
• 33. Chukhray N. 2012. Competition as a strategy of enterprise functioning in the ecosystem of innovations / Econtechmod. An International Quarterly Journal. – Vol. 01, No. 3, 09–15.