Framework of contradictions shaping bank management: a conceptual paper

• Autorzy: Smuda-Kocoń Marlena

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2021.150.17

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The paper is an attempt to enter the discussion in the subject literature on elucidating problems in the non-systemic approach to managing the bank as an organization. The purpose of the paper is to identify the contradictions within which banks are managed, and which are aggravated in contingency situations. Due to the sensitive matter of the services they provide, banks are institutions that require special attention particularly now, when the COVID situation is radically testing management quality. Design/methodology/approach: The paper is the result of a literature review. Findings: The epistemological studies conducted have culminated in a framework of contradictory determinants shaping bank management during fast-paced changes in market conditions. The theoretical construct proposed may be a point of departure for empirical verification and further analytic work on the capacity of banks to reconcile the antinomies identified in the paper. Originality/value: The study makes it possible for managers to fill the knowledge gap with respect to areas and implications of the identified contradictions. Awareness of their existence and, as a result, management that supports processes for responding to a volatile environment is particularly useful in crisis situations. The proposed theoretical concept may be applied to identify antinomies or their lack in other areas of management research for various organization types.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

contradictions; bank management

PL

sprzeczności; zarządzanie bankiem

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: z. 150
• Strony: 225--236
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 45 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Smuda-Kocoń Marlena

• University of Economics in Katowice

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0468-5708

Bibliografia

• 1. Amankwah-Amoah, J., Khan, Z., Wood, G. (2020). COVID-19and business failures: The paradoxes of experience, scale and scope for theory and practice. European Management Journal, pp. 1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2020.09.002.
• 2. Bakalarczyk, S. (2013). Modern bank management. Lap Lambert Academic Publishing.
• 3. Bakalarczyk, S. (2014). Innovation Management by Banks. Warszawa: Difin.
• 4. Bennett, N., and Lemione, G.J. (2014). What a difference a word makes: Understanding threats to performance in a VUCA world. Business Horizons, pp. 1-7. doi:10.2139/ ssrn.2406676.
• 5. Bloodgood, J.M., and Chae, B. (2010). Organizational paradoxes: dynamic shifting and integrative management. Management Decision, Vol. 48 No. 1, pp. 85-104. https://doi.org/10.1108 / 00251741011014472.
• 6. Brandenburger, A.M., Nalebuff, B.J. (1996). Co-opetition. New York: Doubleday.
• 7. Bratnicki, M. (2004). Organizational Enterpreneurshipscape: Contradictions, Processes, Dimensions, Forms and Questions. Dabrowa Gornicza: Academy of Business in Dabrowa Gornicza.
• 8. Capiga, M. (2010). Zarządzanie bankiem. Warszawa: PWN.
• 9. Choudhry, M. (2018). An introduction to banking principles, strategy and risk management. Wiley: Chichester West Sussex.
• 10. Drucker, P.F. (1995). Zarządzanie w czasach burzliwych. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomiczne.
• 11. Eisenhardt, K.M., and Martin, J.A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, pp. 1105-1121.
• 12. Farjoun, M. (2010). Beyond dualism: Stability and change as a duality. Academy of Management Review, 35(2), pp. 202-225.
• 13. Flejterski, S. (1999). Różnicowanie struktur we współczesnej bankowości. Szczecin: WNUS.
• 14. Flejterski, S. (2012). Niestabilne equailibrium: w poszukiwaniu nowego paradygmatu w bankowości. In: I. Pyka and J. Cichorska (Eds.), Finanse w niestabilnym otoczeniu – dylematy i wyzwania: bankowość (pp. 39-46). Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego.
• 15. Grzegorczyk, W. (2001). Produkty bankowe. Rozwój i sprzedaż. Warszawa: Biblioteka Menedżera i Bankowca.
• 16. Gup, B.E. (1995). The Bank Director’s Handbook: The Board Member’s Guide to Banking & Bank Management, Hardcover: Irwin Professional Publishing.
• 17. Hampden-Turner, C., Trompenaars, A. (2000). Building cross-cultural competence: how to create wealth from conflicting values. Chichest: Wiley.
• 18. Jay, J. (2013). Navigating paradox as mechanisms of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), pp. 137-159.
• 19. Koch, T.W., MacDonald, S.S. (2010). Bank Management. Mason: Sounth Wester Cengage Learning.
• 20. Kotarbiński, T. (1957). Wybór pism, t. 1: Myśli o działaniu. Warszawa: PWN.
• 21. Kousholt, B. (2007). Project Management – Theory and Pracitice. Copenhagen: Narayana Press.
• 22. Ławrynowicz, W. (2013). Tożsamość organizacyjna banków spółdzielczych w Polsce. Ujęcie instytucjonalne. Warszawa: Poltext.
• 23. Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A. (2013), Contradiction as a medium and outcome of organizational change: a Foucauldian reading. Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 26, nr 3, pp. 556-572, https://doi.org/10.1108/09534811311328579.
• 24. Lewis, M.W. (2000). Exploring Paradox: Toward a More Comprehensive Guide. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), pp. 760-776. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2000.3707712.
• 25. Lichtarski, J.M. (2016). Antynomie w zarządzaniu projektami. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomiczne we Wrocławiu, nr 421, pp. 346-359.
• 26. Lim, Ch.Y., Woods, M., Humphrey, Ch., Seow, J.L. (2016). The paradoxes of risk management in the banking sector. The British Accounting Review, Vol. 49, pp. 75-90, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2016.09.002.
• 27. Luhmann, N. (1995). The paradoxy of observing system, Cultural Critique, No. 31, The Politics of Systems and Environments, Part II, pp. 37-55. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
• 28. Mack, O., Khare, A., Kramer, A., Burgartz, Th. (2016). Managing in a VUCA World. Cham Heidelberg: Springer.
• 29. Mechiche, M. (2019). Paradoxes of Business: Towards A Practice Model to Attend to Paradox Tensions in Organizations and Develop the Leaders of Tomorrow. International Journal of Applied Research in Management and Economics, 2(1), pp. 45-50.
• 30. Mesjasz, Cz. (2016). Paradoksy w systemowej teorii zarządzania. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, nr 421, pp. 397-417.
• 31. Meyer, R., De Vit, B. (2007). Strategy Synthesis: Resoving Strategy Paradoxes to Create Competitive Advantage. Cengage Learning EMEA.
• 32. Miron-Spektor, E., Gino, F., & Argote, L. (2011). Paradoxical frames and creative sparks: Enhancing individual creativity through conflict and integration. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116(2), pp. 229-240.
• 33. Mukherjee, S. (2019). Existence of Speculative Bubbles for the US at Times of Two Major Financial Crises in the Recent Past: An Econometric Check of BitCoin Prices. In: U. Hacioglu (Ed.), Blockchain Economics and Financial Market Innovation (pp. 475-486). Springer.
• 34. Nosowski, A. (2013). Modelowanie zorientowane biznesowo a kapitał intelektualny banku. Zarządzanie i Finanse, nr 2, pp. 406-417.
• 35. Oleksyn, T. (2013). Różne filozofie zarządzania. In: T. Oleksyn (Eds.), Filozofia a zarządzanie (pp. 63-66). Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
• 36. Piocha, S., Radlińska, K. (2008). Konkurencja i konkurencyjność sektora banków komercyjnych. Zeszyty Naukowe Wydziału Nauk Ekonomicznych Politechniki Koszalińskiej, nr 12, pp. 119-132.
• 37. Poole, M.S., van de Ven, A.H. (1989). Using Paradox to Build Management and Organization Theories. The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 562-578.
• 38. Raza-Ullah, T., Bengtsson, M., Kock, S. (2014). The coopetition paradox and tension in coopetition at multiple levels. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), pp. 189-198.
• 39. Schad, J., Lewis, M.W., Raisch, S., Smith, W.K. (2017). Paradox Research in Management Science: Looking Back to Move Forward. Academy of Management Annals, Vol. 10, No. 1, https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2016.1162422.
• 40. Senge, P.M. (1990). Piąta dyscyplina. Warszawa: PWN.
• 41. Smith, W.K., Lewis, M.W. (2011). Toward a Theory of Paradox: A Dynamic Equilibrium Model of Organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), pp. 381-403. doi: 10.5465/ AMR.2011.59330958.
• 42. Taleb, N.N. (2020). Antykruchość: jak żyć w świecie, którego nie rozumiemy. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Zysk i S-ka.
• 43. Waldman, D.A., Putnam, L.L., Miron-Spektor, E., Siegel, D. (2019). The role of paradox theory in decision making and management research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 155, pp. 1-6.
• 44. Wit, B., Meyer, R. (2010). Strategy Synthesis: Resolving Strategy Paradoxes to Create Competitive Advantage. Cengage Learning EMEA.
• 45. Zieleniewski, J. (1981). Organizacja i zarządzanie. Warszawa: PWN.