Sustainability of transport system: Case study of Greater Mumbai

• Autorzy: Juyal Shikha , Yedla Sudhakar

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.14254/jsdtl.2020.5-2.14

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Sustainable transport is about taking holistic approach by considering economic, society and environment along with the mobility and accessibility requirement of people. In case of Greater Mumbai, there is presence of inequity in provision of transport infrastructure and service. The first part of paper arrives at sustainability indicator by means of compounded economic, social & demographic, land use and transport access indicators. The second part of paper measures the extent of sustainability in various wards of Greater Mumbai. It was important to study the extent of sustainability by measuring the gap between sustainability & HDI indicator and sustainability & transport access indicator. In terms of transport access, the gap between transport access indicator and sustainability indicator is present in most of the wards of Greater Mumbai. The overall result proves that there is urgent need to address the provision of transport access in most of the wards of Greater Mumbai. Purpose: The main purpose of this paper is to arrive at sustainability indicator and to measures the extent of sustainability in various wards of Greater Mumbai in transport. Methodology: The paper arrives at sustainability indicator by developing compounded economic, social and demographic, land use and transport access indicators. In order to calculate economic, social & demographic, land-use and transport access indicator considered normalized value of each indicators derived from maximum point normalization across all wards. Finally equal weighted average of all indicators was taken to calculate the overall sustainability indicator. To measure the extent of sustainability in various wards of Greater Mumbai was done by comparing aggregate sustainable indicator with HDI indicator and transport access indicator. Result: The overall result proves that there is urgent need to address the provision of transport access in most of the wards of Greater Mumbai. The theoretical contribution: This paper arrives at sustainability indicator by compiling economic, social and demographic, land use and transport access indicators. Practical implications: This paper calculates ward level sustainability in Greater Mumbai and identifies the need to make provision of different transport infrastructure.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

sustainability; indicator; transport; Greater Mumbai

• Wydawca: Fundacja Centrum Badań Socjologicznych ; Scientific Publishing House "SciView"
• Czasopismo: Journal of Sustainable Development of Transport and Logistics
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: Vol. 5, No. 2
• Strony: 153--167
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 19 poz., rys., tab., wykr., wzory

Twórcy

autor

Juyal Shikha

• Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research , NITI Aayog (erstwhile Planning Commission), Government of India, India

autor

Yedla Sudhakar

• Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Goregaon (E), Mumbai 400065, India

Bibliografia

• Abhyankar, A. A., Paliwal, M., Patwardhan, A., & Inamdar, A. B. (2013). Identification of vulnerable area in municipal corporation of Greater Mumbai due to extreme events based on socio-economic indicators. Indian Journal of Geo-Marine Sciences.
• Baker, J., Basu, R., Cropper, M., Lall, S., & Takeuchi, A. (2005). Urban Poverty and Transport: The Case of Mumbai. World Bank Policy Research, Working Paper 3693.
• Baker, J. L., & Denning, W. (2005). Development of a Transport Module for Multi-topic Household Surveys (No. TP-5).
• Gannon, C., & Liv, Z. (1997). Poverty and Transport. World Bank Report (WB).
• Lawson, R. A., McMorrow, K., & Ghosh, B. (2013). Analysis of the non-motorized commuter journeys in major Irish cities. Transport Policy, 179-188.
• LEA. (2008). Comprehensive transportation study for Mumbai Metropolitan Region. Technical assistance by the World Bank, MMRDA.
• Litman, T., & Burwell, D. (2006). Issues in sustainable transportation. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 6(4), 331-347.
• MCGM. (n.d.). Draft Development Plan for Greater Mumbai. Preparatory Studies.
• MCGM. Index for the Greater Mumbai City Development Plan (2005 to 2025).
• MCGM. (2012). Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai Year Book.
• de Freitas Miranda, H., & da Silva, A. N. R. (2012). Benchmarking sustainable urban mobility: The case of Curitiba, Brazil. Transport Policy, 21, 141-151.
• Mundu, G. B., & Bhagat, R. B. (2008). Slum conditions in Mumbai with reference to the access of civic amenities. IIPS Mumbai ENVIS Center, 5(1), 3.
• Mumbai Human Development Report. (2009).
• Nathan, H. S. K., & Reddy, B. S. (2013). Urban transport sustainability indicators-application of multi-view black-box (MVBB) framework. International journal of environment and sustainable development, 12(3), 285-312.
• Nijkamp, P. et. al. (2009). Sustainable Transportation, An International Perspective. MIT Journal of Planning, 9.
• Reddy, S. B., & Balachandra, P. (2013). Benchmarking urban sustainability-a composite index for Mumbai and Bangalore. IGIDR, Working Paper.
• Shirgaokar, M. (2012). The rapid rise of Middle class vehicle ownership in Mumbai. A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in City and Regional Planning, University of California, Berkeley.
• UNEP. (2011). Promoting Low Carbon Transport in India, Macro and City Level Indicators for a Sustainable Transportation System in India. Expert Workshop on Indicators for Sustainable Transport.
• UN Habitat. (2013). Planning and Design for sustainable urban mobility: Policy directions. Global report on human settlements 2013, Abridged edition, United Nations Human settlements programme.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).