PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Challenges to the Development of Unconventional Natural Gas – The Case of Shale Gas

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
URI
10.29227/IM-2023-02-19
Warianty tytułu
PL
Wyzwania rozwoju niekonwencjonalnych źródeł gazu ziemnego – przypadek gazu łupkowego
Konferencja
POL-VIET 2023 — the 7th International Conference POL-VIET
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The world is undergoing a radical transition to a low-carbon economy and natural gas is considered an important bridge in the transition of energy in the world. The potential for natural gas, especially unconventional gas, is very large, which will significantly affect the future energy structure in all regions of the world. However, the conditions for developing these resources are different between regions and countries. The development of unconventional gas is now facing many challenges, even opposition because the problem of extracting unconventional gas is very complex and the total impact is unknown. Therefore, at present, the expansion of unconventional gas remains a question for countries that possess and desire to exploit these resources. This article will analyze the opportunity and challenges of unconventional gas relying on the development of shale gas in recently.
Słowa kluczowe
Rocznik
Strony
113--120
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 46 poz., tab., wykr.
Twórcy
  • Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Hanoi University of Mining and Geology, Vietnam
  • Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Hanoi University of Mining and Geology, Vietnam
autor
  • Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Hanoi University of Mining and Geology, Vietnam
Bibliografia
  • 1. Absar S.M., Boulay A.-M., Campa M.F., Preston B.L., Taylor A., 2018. The tradeoff between water and carbon footprints of Barnett Shale gas. Journal of Cleaner Production 197, 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.140
  • 2. Barbier F., 2014. L’impact économique de l’exploitation de gaz de schiste. Assemblée Nationale.
  • 3. Boyer Ch. M., Frantz J.H., Jenkins C.D., 2007. Non-conventional gas. ENI, vol.3.
  • 4. BP, 2022. BP Statistical Review of world energy 2022.
  • 5. BP, 2016. BP Energy Outlook - 2016 edition.
  • 6. Bros, T., 2012. After the US shale gas revolution. Technip, Paris.
  • 7. Cantoni R., Klaes M.S., Lackerbauer S.I., Foltyn C., Keller R., 2018. Shale tales: Politics of knowledge and promises in Europe’s shale gas discourses. The Extractive Industries and Society 5, 535–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. exis.2018.09.004
  • 8. Department of Energy, 2011. Modern Shale Gas Development in the United States: A Primer - Geology, Regulations, Environmental Considerations, Hydraulic Fracturing, Protecting Groundwater, Pollution Threats. Progressive Management, S.l.
  • 9. EIA, 2023. Shale Gas Production [WWW Document]. URL https://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/NG_PROD_SHALEGAS_S1_A.htm (accessed 7.15.23).
  • 10. EIA, 2020. Where our natural gas comes from - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) [WWW Document]. URL https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/natural-gas/where-our-natural-gas-comes-from.php (accessed 12.25.20).
  • 11. EIA, 2015. U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) [WWW Document]. URL https://www.eia.gov/analysis/studies/worldshalegas/ (accessed 8.18.19).
  • 12. EIA, 2013a. Shale Oil and Shale Gas Resources: An Assessment of 137 Shale Formations in 41 Countries Outside the US. EIA.
  • 13. EIA, 2013b. Annual Energy Outlook 2013.
  • 14. EIA, 1998. Natural Gas 1998: Issues and Trends.
  • 15. ExxonMobil, 2016. The outlook for energy: a view to 2040.
  • 16. Gény F., 2010. Can unconventional gas be a game changer in European gas markets? Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, Oxford.
  • 17. Guoxin L., Zhengdong L., Weihong D., Hongyan W., Xingfan Z., Jian T., 2022. Progress, challenges and prospects of unconventional oil and gas development of CNPC. China Petroleum Exploration 27, 1. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672- 7703.2022.01.001
  • 18. He L., Chen Y., Li J., 2018. A three-level framework for balancing the tradeoffs among the energy, water, and air-emission implications within the life-cycle shale gas supply chains. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 133, 206–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.02.015
  • 19. Herrera H., 2020. The legal status of fracking worldwide: An environmental law and human rights perspective. URL https://gnhre.org/2020/01/the-legal-status-of-fracking-worldwide-an-environmental-law-and-human-rights-perspective/ (accessed 7.15.23).
  • 20. IEA, 2021. World Energy Outlook 2021.
  • 21. IEA, 2020. World Energy Outlook 2020.
  • 22. IEA, 2019. World Energy Outlook 2019.
  • 23. IEA, 2018. World Energy Outlook 2018.
  • 24. IEA, 2017. World Energy Outlook 2017. OECD Publishing, Paris.
  • 25. IEA, 2016. World energy outlook 2016. OECD/IEA, Paris.
  • 26. IEA, 2015. World Energy Outlook 2015. OECD Publishing.
  • 27. IEA, 2014. World energy outlook 2014. IEA.
  • 28. IEA, 2013. World Energy Outlook 2013.
  • 29. IEA, 2012a. World Energy Outlook 2012.
  • 30. IEA, 2012b. Des Règles d’or pour un Âge d’or du gaz. EIA.
  • 31. IEA, 2011. World Energy Outlook 2011.
  • 32. IEA, OECD, 2010. World energy outlook 2010. OECD/IEA, Paris.
  • 33. IGU, 2015. Prospects for Natural Gas: Identifying the key developments that will shape the gas market in 2050.
  • 34. International Monetary Fund, 2013. United States: staff report for the 2012 article IV consultation.
  • 35. IPCC, 2014. Climate change 2014.
  • 36. Le M.-T., 2018. An assessment of the potential for the development of the shale gas industry in countries outside of North America. Heliyon 4, e00516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00516
  • 37. Le M.T., Do H.T., Nguyen T.T., Nguyen T.K.N., 2021. What prospects for shale gas in Asia? Case of shale gas in China. The Journal of World Energy Law & Business 13, 426–440. https://doi.org/10.1093/jwelb/jwaa037
  • 38. Maya L., Roberto J., 2013. The United States experience as a reference of success for shale gas development: The case of Mexico. Energy Policy 62, 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.088
  • 39. McGlade C., Speirs J., Sorrell S., 2012. A review of regional and global estimates of unconventional gas resources. UK Energy Research Centre.
  • 40. More T., 2013. La révolution du gaz de schiste aura-t-elle lieu en europe? Analyse comparative dans 14 pays européens. Institut Thomas More.
  • 41. Nakano J., 2012. Prospects for shale gas development in Asia: examining potentials and challenges in China and India. Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington.
  • 42. OPECST, 2013. Rapport sur Les techniques alternatives à la fracturation hydraulique pour l’exploration et l’exploitation des hydrocarbures non conventionnels (No. 1581). Assemblée Nationale.
  • 43. Richardson N., Gottlieb M., Krupnick A.J., Wiseman H., 2013. The State of State Shale Gas Regulations. RFF.
  • 44. Spencer T., Sartor O., Mathieu M., 2014. Unconventional wisdom- economic analysis of US shale gas and implication for the EU. IDDRI.
  • 45. Wang Q., Chen X., Jha A.N., Rogers H., 2014. Natural gas from shale formation – The evolution, evidences and challenges of shale gas revolution in United States. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 30, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.065
  • 46. Szymanek A., de las Obras-Loscertales M., Pajdak A.Effect of sorbent reactivity on flue gas desulphurization in fluidized-bed boilers under air firing mode. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, Volume 96, April 2018, 895-902
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu „Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki” - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023)
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-2b4546ae-7f04-4e29-924c-ebb4a4b9e85a
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.