Wpływ wydobywania gazu łupkowego na środowisko wodne

• Autorzy: Pawłowski A. , Pawłowska M. , Baran S. , Gromiec M.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Impact of shale gas extraction on water environment

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

PL

W artykule omówiono występujące w gospodarce wodno-ściekowej problemy związane ze szczelinowaniem. Przede wszystkim przedstawiono rolę wody w procesie szczelinowania oraz charakterystykę ścieków powstających w wyniku tego procesu. Prezentując wpływ szczelinowania na środowisko, wskazano na pewne rodzaje badań, które są potrzebne w Polsce w tym zakresie.

EN

The article presents fracking-related issues occurring in the water-sewage management. The main presented problem was the role of water in the fracking process and characteristics of sewage generated as its result. While presenting the impact of fracking on the environment, the authors indicated also some types of research in this scope which are necessary in Poland.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

gaz łupkowy; środowisko wodne

EN

Shale gas; water environment

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo SIGMA-NOT
• Czasopismo: Gospodarka Wodna
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: Nr 8
• Strony: 241--245
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 24 poz., wykr., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Pawłowski A.

• Politechnika Lubelska Wydział Inżynierii Środowiska

autor

Pawłowska M.

• Politechnika Lubelska Wydział Inżynierii Środowiska

autor

Baran S.

• Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie Instytut Gleboznawstwa, Inżynierii i Kształtowania Środowiska Pracownia Rekultywacji Gleb i Gospodarki Odpadami

autor

Gromiec M.

• Wyższa Szkoła Ekologii i Zarządzania w Warszawie

Bibliografia

• 1. P. BOSCHEE, 2012, Handling Produced Water from Hydraulic Fracturing, Oil and Gas Fac., 1, 1,22-26.
• 2. M.C. BRITTINGHAM, K.O. MALONEY, A.M. FRAG, D.D. HARPER and Z.H. BOWEN, 2014, Ecological Risks Oil and Gas Development to wildlife, Aquatic Resources and their Habitats, Environ. Sci. Technolol., 48, 11034-11047.
• 3. B. CHASE, W. CHMILOWSKI, R. MARCINEW, C. MITCHELL, Y. DANG, K. KRAUSS, E. NELSON, T. LANTZ, C. PARHAM, J. PLUMMER 1997, Clear fracturing fluids for increased well productivity. Oilfield Review, 3: 20-33.
• 4. EIA(2013). US Energy Information Administration, Technically Recoverable Shale Oil and Shale Gas Resources: An Assessment of 137 Shale Formations in 41 Countries Outside the United States. www.advres.com/pdf/A_EIA_ARI_2013%20World%20Shale%20Gas%20 and%20Shale%20Oil%20Resource%20Assessment.pdf (latest access 17 June 2014).
• 5. S. ENTREKIN, M. EVANS-WHITE, B. JOHNSON and E. HAGENBUCH, (2011). Rapid expansion of natural gas development poses a threat to surface waters. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 9(9), 503-511, doi:10.1890/110053.
• 6. EPA. Hydraulic Fracturing Research Study. EPA/600/F-10/002. June 2010. Available at: http ://www.epa.gov/safewater/uic/pdfs/hfresearchstudyfs.pdf, Accessed May 12, 2011.
• 7. M. GRANOPS, Z. FIRLIT, M.M. MICHEL and J. GRANOPIS, 2013, Oczyszczalnia ścieków (płynu zwrotnego) powstających po szczelinowaniu hydraulicznym, Przem. Chem. 92,5, 675-683.
• 8. T. HAYES (2009) Sampling and Analysis of water streams associated with the development of Marcellus shale gas, Final Report.
• 9. A. HOFFMAN, G. OLSSON, A. LINDSTROM, 2014, Shale Gas and Hydraulic Fracturing: Framing the Water Issue, Report Nr. 34, SIWI, Stockholm.
• 10. N. HOUSTON, M. BLAUCH, D. WEAVER, D.S. MILLER, D. O'HARA, Fracture-stimulation in the Marcellus Shale-Lessons learned in fluid selection and execution, in SPE Eastern Regional Meeting Proceedings. Paper 125987. Charleston, WV: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2009.
• 11. IPCC (2014). lntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Fifth Assessment Report (AR5). Mitigation of Climate Change, Working group III. Available at www.ipcc.ch.
• 12. S. LANGSDORF, 2011, EU Energy Policy, From the ECSC to the energy Roadmap 2050, Heinrich Boli Sifting.
• 13. R. LINDZEN, 2010, Global Warming: The Origin and Nature of the Alleged Scientific Consensus, Problems of Sustainable development, 5, 2, 13-28.
• 14. P.D. LORD and R. LE BAS, 2013, Treatment Enables high-TDS Water Use as Base Fluid for Hydraulic Fracturing, J. Pet Tech., 65, 6, 30-33.
• 15. B.D. LUTZ, A.N. LEWIS, M.W. DOYLE, (2013) Generation, transport, and disposal of waste-water associated with Marcellus Shale gaś development., Water Resour. Res. 49, 647 (2013). doi: 10.1002/wrcr.20096.
• 16. NETL (2013). Modern Shale Gas Development in the United States: An Update. National Energy Technology Laboratory, US Department of Energy. Available at http://www.netl.doe.gov/File%20Library/Research/Oil-Gas/shale-gas-primer-update-2013.pdf (latest access 7 May 2014).
• 17. New York State Dept. of Environmental Conservation. Preliminary Revised Draft Supple mental Generic Environmental Impact Statement of the Oil, Gas and Solution Mining Regulatory Program: Well Permit Issuance for Horizontal Drilling and High-Volume Hydraulic Fracturing to Develop the Marcellus Shale and Other Low-Permeability Gas Reservoirs. 2009.
• 18. Report No 157 (2011). Oil and Gas Produced Water Management and Beneficial Use in the Western United states, Science and Technology Programme Report No 157.
• 19. D.J. ROZELL, S.J. Reaven (2011), Water Pollution Risk Associated with Natural Gas Extraction from the Marcellus Shale, Risk Analysis, 1-12.
• 20. J.M. SILVA, R.M. GETTINGS, W.L. KOSTE and V.H. WATKINGS (2014). Produced Water Hydrofracturing Challenges and Opportunities for Reuse and Recovery, Summary Issue i the Bridge on Shale Gas: Promises and Challenges, 44, no 2, 1-18.
• 21. M. STARK, R. ALLINGHAM, J. CALDER, LENNARTZ-WALKER, K. WAI, P. THOMI SON, S. ZHAO (2012). Water and Shale Gas Development, Accenture Report.
• 22. YING-KUE SUN, O.IAN-YUAN WU, HON -YING HU, JIE TIAN, 2009, Effect of bromide on the formation of disinfection by-products during wastewater chlorination, Water Res arch, 43, 2391-2398.
• 23. YUOIN MAO, XIAMAO WANG, HONGW YANG, HAOYU WANG, YUEFENG F. XIE, Effects of ozonation on disinfection byproduct formation and speciation during subsequent chlorination, Chemosphere 117, 515-520.
• 24. P.F. ZIEMKIEWICZ, 2013, Characterization Liquid Waste Streams from Shale Gaz Development, AGH Drilling Oil Gas, 30, 1, 297-31