Energy generation, transition and sustainable growth in Turkey

• Autorzy: Pashaev Ibragim

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.33223/epj/147317

Warianty tytułu

PL

Produkcja energii, transformacja i zrównoważony rozwój Turcji

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The structural economic problems of Turkey have led to the significant challenges for the development of the country, especially in the postcoronavirus economy. One of such challenges is the achievement of the sustainable development imperatives in combination with the preservation of the competitive advantages of the Turkish economy. The loss of the major drivers of the economy of the country, including tourism and logistics, in complex with the economic deterioration of the monetary system of the country are the major components of the current crisis. This controversy is analyzed in the paper along with the search for the best options of the energy sphere development in Turkey. This search covers economic aspects of the current situation in the country. The authors put forward and prove a hypothesis that Turkey energy system can be more influential on its economic development. This proof is based on the energy mix analysis and on the thorough review of the potential of the country for the green energy development and its economic effectiveness for the country. The key findings of the article include the proof that the sustainable development and the green energy development in Turkey are quite different processes, which are on intention divided by political measures, the proof that Turkey has serious issues in development of the energy sector due to its low influence on the economic development in its current state, the developed recommendations for the better structuring of the energy sector development.

PL

Strukturalne problemy gospodarcze Turcji doprowadziły do poważnych wyzwań dla rozwoju kraju, zwłaszcza w gospodarce po pandemii koronawirusa. Jednym z takich wyzwań jest osiągnięcie założeń zrównoważonego rozwoju w połączeniu z zachowaniem przewag konkurencyjnych tureckiej gospodarki. Utrata głównych sił napędowych gospodarki kraju, w tym turystyki i logistyki, w połączeniu z pogorszeniem się sytuacji gospodarczej systemu monetarnego kraju to główne elementy obecnego kryzysu. Kontrowersje te są analizowane w artykule wraz z poszukiwaniem najlepszych opcji rozwoju energetyki w Turcji. Poszukiwanie to obejmuje ekonomiczne aspekty aktualnej sytuacji w kraju. Autorzy stawiają i udowadniają hipotezę, że system energetyczny Turcji może mieć większy wpływ na jej rozwój gospodarczy. Dowód ten opiera się na analizie miksu energetycznego oraz na wnikliwym przeglądzie potencjału kraju dla rozwoju zielonej energii i jej efektywności ekonomicznej. Kluczowe wnioski z artykułu są takie, że zrównoważony rozwój i rozwój zielonej energii w Turcji to zupełnie różne procesy, które celowo dzieli się środkami politycznymi, powodując, że Turcja ma poważne problemy z rozwojem energetyki, ponieważ w obecnym stanie ma ona niewielki wpływ na rozwój gospodarczy. Zostały wypracowane rekomendacje, których realizacja pozwoli na lepsze ustrukturyzowanie rozwoju energetyki.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Turkey; energy sector; green energy; sustainable development; structure; transition

PL

Turcja; sektor energetyczny; zielona energia; zrównoważony rozwój; struktura; transformacja

• Wydawca: Instytut Gospodarki Surowcami Mineralnymi i Energią PAN
• Czasopismo: Polityka Energetyczna
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: T. 25, z. 1
• Strony: 23--38
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 31 poz., tab., rys., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Pashaev Ibragim

• International Institute of Energy Policy and Diplomacy, MGIMO University, Russia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0938-746X

Bibliografia

• Akan et al. 2008 – Akan, Y., Işık, C. and Arslan, I. 2008. The Impact of Tourism on Economic Growth: The Case of Turkey. Journal of Tourism IX, pp. 1–24.
• Aslan, M. 2005. Political economic analysis of Turkish economy: structural problems and the role of the state. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 6(2).
• Basit et al. 2016 – Basit, A., Hansen, A.D., Altin, M. Sorensen P.E. and Gamst, M. 2016. Compensating active power imbalances in power system with large-scale wind power penetration. Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy 4, pp. 229–237, DOI: 10.1007/s40565-015-0135-x.
• Bătaea et al. 2020 – Bătaea, O.M., Voicu Dan, D. and Feleagă, L. 2020. Environmental, social, governance (ESG), and financial performance of European banks. Accounting and Management Information Systems 19(3), pp. 480–501, DOI: 10.24818/jamis.2020.03003.
• Ceren, E. and Ozkaya, G. 2019. Turkey’s 2023 Energy Strategies and Investment Opportunities for Renewable Energy Sources: Site Selection Based on ELECTRE. Sustainability 11(7), DOI: 10.3390/su11072136.
• Cohen, P. 2021. How Did Turkey’s Economy Go So Wrong? [Online] https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/14/business/economy/turkey-inflation-economy-lira.html [Accessed: 2021-12-15].
• Enerdata 2020. Turkey Energy Information. [Online] https://www.enerdata.net/estore/energy-market/turkey [Accessed: 2021-12-15].
• Erat et al. 2021 – Erat, S., Telli, A., Ozkendir, O.M. et al. 2021. Turkey’s energy transition from fossil-based to renewable up to 2030: milestones, challenges and opportunities. Clean Techn Environ Policy 23, pp. 401–412, DOI: 10.1007/s10098-020-01949-1.
• Erşen, E. and Çelikpala, M. 2019. Turkey and the changing energy geopolitics of Eurasia. Energy Policy 128, pp, 584–592, DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.036.
• Esen, Ö. 2016. Security of the Energy Supply in Turkey: Prospects, Challenges and Opportunities. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 6(2), pp. 281–289.
• Ginevicius et al. 2021 – Ginevicius, R., Noga, G., Žemaitis, E., Piontek, B. and Šuhajda, K. 2021. Comparative Assessment of the Impact of Electricity Consumption in Different Economic Sectors on the Economic Development of the EU Member States. Energies 14(24), DOI: 10.3390/en14248335.
• GSA 2019. Turkey. [Online] https://globalsolaratlas.info/download/turkey [Accessed: 2021-12-15].
• Idsø, J. 2017. Small Scale Hydroelectric Power Plants in Norway. Some Microeconomic and Environmental Considerations. Sustainability 9(7), DOI: 10.3390/su9071117.
• IEA 2020. Turkey. Key energy statistics. [Online] https://www.iea.org/countries/turkey [Accessed: 2021- -12-15].
• Kalehsar, O.S. 2019. Energy Insecurity in Turkey: Opportunities for Renewable Energy. ADBI Working Paper 1058. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute. [Online] https://www.adb.org/publications/energy-insecurity-turkey-opportunities-renewable-energy [Accessed: 2021-12-15].
• Karasoy, A. 2019. Drivers of carbon emissions in Turkey: considering asymmetric impacts. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26, pp. 9219–9231, DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-04354-4.
• Kroll et al. 2019 – Kroll, C., Warchold, A. and Pradhan, P. 2019. Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Are we successful in turning trade-offs into synergies? Palgrave Communications 5, DOI: 10.1057/s41599-019-0335-5.
• Mensah, J.R. and Casadevall, S. 2019. Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human action: Literature review. Cogent Social Sciences 5(1), DOI: 10.1080/23311886.2019.1653531.
• Öge, K. 2019. Understanding Pipeline Politics in Eurasia: Turkey’s Transit Security in Natural Gas. Geopolitics 26(5) pp. 1510–1532, DOI: 10.1080/14650045.2019.1687447
• Ozdamar et al. 2020 – Ozdamar, L., Yaşa, E., Yaşa, E., Kavas, N. and Vardar, G. 2020. Renewable energy investment prospects in Turkey’s power generation sector International Journal of Renewable Energy Technology 11(1), pp. 1–12, DOI: 10.1504/IJRET.2020.106513.
• Saygin et al. 2021 – Saygin, D., Tör, O.B., Cebeci, M.E., Teimourzadeh, S. and Godron, P. 2021. Increasing Turkey’s power system flexibility for grid integration of 50% renewable energy share. Energy Strategy Reviews 34, DOI: 10.1016/j.esr.2021.100625.
• Shaffer, B. 2006. Turkey’s Energy Policies in a Tight Global Energy Market. Insight Turkey 8(2), pp. 1–8.
• Shuabiu et al. 2021 – Shuabiu, U.A., Usman, M.A.M. and Çavuşoğlu, B. 2021. The Nexus among Competitively Valued Exchange Rates, Price Level, and Growth Performance in the Turkish Economy; New Insight from the Global Value Chains. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 14(11), DOI: 10.3390/jrfm14110528.
• Sica, E. and Senturk, M. 2016. Economic growth and energy consumption in Turkey and Italy: a frequency domain causality analysis. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 9(4), pp. 107–119.
• Sogukpinar et al. 2018 – Sogukpinar, H., Bozkurt, I. and Cag, S. 2018. Turkey’s Energy Strategy for 2023 Targets after 2000 MW Giant Renewable Energy Contract. E3S Web Conf. 64, DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/20186401001.
• The World Bank 2021. [Online] https://data.worldbank.org [Accessed: 2021-12-15].
• Turkey: Electricity Market Law No. 6446, 2013. [Online] https://policy.asiapacificenergy.org/node/2308 [Accessed: 2021-12-15].
• Wondirad, A. 2019. Does ecotourism contribute to sustainable destination development, or is it just a marketing hoax? Analyzing twenty-five years contested journey of ecotourism through a meta-analysis of tourism journal publications. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research 24(11), pp. 1047–1065, DOI: 10.1080/10941665.2019.1665557.
• Yildirim, C. 2019. The development of service sector in Turkey after 2001 CRISIS. Abant Izzet Baysal University Journal Of Social Sciences Institute 19(2), pp. 347–363, DOI: 10.11616/basbed.v19i47045.552648.
• Yilmaz-Bozkus, R. 2018. Main determinants of Turkey’s foreign oil and natural gas strategy. Journal of Research in Economics Politics and Finance 3(2), pp. 114–132, DOI: 10.30784/epfad.426472.
• Yurukoglu, T. 2020. The Economy of Turkey A Review of Developments in 2019 and the Outlook for 2020.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).