Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Enhanced oil recovery methods can significantly increase recovery from offshore oil reservoirs provided that the appropriate method is selected. Enhanced oil recovery methods aim to recover the remaining original oil in place by applying additional energy sources and minimalize flow resistance in the field. The application of these technologies results in enhancement, or replacement of natural or physical processes of displacement and modifies the composition and physical properties of formation fluids. The use of EOR technologies in offshore environment is limited compared to onshore fields. Constraints imposed by the offshore environment are associated with technical difficulties as well as economic risk. Before choosing the most appropriate EOR method for particular environmental conditions the restrictions associated with: large well spacing, disposal geological description as well as availability and cost of EOR agents, weight and space constrains or high capital cost requirements should be considered. Reservoir lithology is limiting the applicability of specific EOR methods. This paper presents a comprehensive review of EOR projects which are appropriate or possible for sandstone reservoirs containing light-oil in offshore field. The possibilities and limitations of selected methods are introduced.
Słowa kluczowe
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
99--116
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 19 poz., tab., wykr., rys.
Twórcy
autor
- AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Drilling, Oil and Gas, Kraków, Poland
autor
- AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Drilling, Oil and Gas, Kraków, Poland
Bibliografia
- [1] Aarra M. G., Martinsen H. A., Skauge A., 2002. FAWAG: A Breakthrough for EOR in the North Sea. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 29 September-2 October, San Antonio, Texas. SPE 77695.
- [2] Aladasani A., Bai B., 2010. Recent Developments and Updated Screening Criteria of Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques. International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China, 8-10 June, Beijing, China. SPE 130726.
- [3] Alvarado V, Izadi M, LantzM, Manrique E., Ravikiran R., Romero J., Thomas C., 2010. EOR: Current Status and Opportunities. SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, 24-28 April, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA. SPE 130113.
- [4] Alvarado V, Manrique E., 2010. Enhanced oil recovery. Field planning and development strategies. Elsevier Inc. (Gulf Professional Publishing), ISBN 978-1- 617-855-6.
- [5] Avasthi S. M., Bondor P.L., Hite J.R., 2005. Planning EOR Projects in Offshore Oil Fields. SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, 20-23 June, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. SPE 94637.
- [6] Ayirala S., ChinR., Raney K., VerbeekP., 2011. Surface and Subsurface Requirements for Successful Implementation of Offshore Chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery. Offshore Technology Conference, 2-5 May, Houston, Texas, USA. OTC 21188.
- [7] Awan A. R., Kleppe J., Teigland R., 2006. EOR Survey in the North Sea. SPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, 22-26 April, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA. SPE 99546.
- [8] Bath P. G. H., van der Burgh J., Ypma J. G. J., 1983. Enhanced Oil Recovery in the North Sea. 11th World Petroleum Congress, 28 August -2 September , London, UK. WPC 20219.
- [9] Bywater, D.R., Clancy, J.P., Cheng, L.H.K., 1985. Analysis of Nitrogen-Injection Projects to Develop Screening Guides and Offshore Design Criteria. Journal of Petroleum Technology 3''(6), 1097-1104.
- [10] Danquigny J., Guarrino A., Hunedi S., Maubeuge F., Morel D., 2005. Applicability of Enhanced Oil Recovery techniques on mature fields - Interest of gas injection. SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference, Mar 12 - 15, Kingdom of Bahrain. SPE 93368.
- [11] Hawboldt K., Iliyas A., Johansen T., Khan F., Thomas B., 2010. Towards Sustainable and Environmentally Friendly Enhanced Oil Recovery in Offshore Newfoundland, Canada. Offshore Technology Conference, 3-6 May, Houston, Texas, USA. OTC 20385.
- [12] Kosowski R, Rychlicki S., Stopa J., Wojnarowski R, 2010. Metody zwiększenia efektywności wydobycia ropy naftowej. Przemysł Naftowy w Polsce. AKNET, Kraków , s. 22-36.
- [13] Koundin A., Surguchev L. M., Yannimaras D., 1999. Air Injection - Cost Effective IOR Method to Improve Oil Recovery from Depleted and Waterflooded Fields. SPE Asia Pacific Improved Oil Recovery Conference, 25-26 October, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. SPE 57296.
- [14] Martin F. D., Seright, R. S. Taber J. J., 1997. EOR Screening Criteria Revisited -Part 1: Introduction to Screening Criteria and Enhanced Recovery Field Projects. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 12(3), 189-198.
- [15] Masoudi R, Talebian S. H., Tan I. M., Zitha P. L. I, 2013. Foam assisted CO2-EOR; Concepts, Challenges and Applications. 2013 SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Conference, Jul 02 - 04, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. SPE 165280.
- [16] Rychlicki S.(red.), 2010.Możliwości zwiększenia efektywności wydobycia ropy naftowej ze złóż karpackich. Wydawnictwa AGH, Kraków.
- [17] Rychlicki S., Stopa J., Ulisz-Misiak B., Zawisza 1., 2011. Kryteria typowania złóż do zastosowania zaawansowanej metody wydobycia ropy naftowej poprzez zatłaczanie CO2. Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi 27(3), 125-139.
- [18] Skauge A., Skauge T., Spildo K., 2010. Propagation of Colloidal Dispersion Gels (CDG) in Laboratory Corefloods. SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, 24-28 April, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA. SPE-129927-MS
- [19] Singhal A. K., Turta A.T., 2002. Field Foam Applications in Enhanced Oil Recovery Projects: Screening and Design Aspects. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 41(10).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-29c39b0e-2aff-47c2-b766-fc1622db18ef