A review of stakeholder dynamics

• Autorzy: Koplyay T. , Lloyd D. , Feher-Toma E. , Fekete-Farkas M.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17512/pjms.2016.14.1.13

Warianty tytułu

PL

Przegląd dynamiki zainteresowanych stron

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Stakeholder relationships are a critical part of any businesses success, and should be properly managed to provide the best outcome for the firm during its market lifecycle. Our aim is to emphasize the importance of stakeholders along the firm lifecycle and present cultural dimensions of decision making with an overview of cultural aspects. The paper builds upon on the previous research of authors focusing on the very dynamic High-tech market in Canada. Our main statement is that the role and importance of stakeholders are changing and to show the directions or focus of stakeholders influence changes according to the stages in this market the interactions with, and among stakeholders’ changes remarkably depending on where the firm is in its market evolution or penetration. We also show the importance of stakeholders in the decision making process and analyzing the European market it can be seen that different cultural background even can affect the decisions also in a market with more similar background like Hungary and Germany. Market environment dictates the profile of the stakeholder ecosystem, and this reflects the profile of the marketplace. The relationship is mutually beneficial, or mutually destructive, and proper management is the only way to shift the latter to the former.

PL

Relacje pomiędzy zainteresowanymi stronami są kluczowym elementem sukcesu każdego przedsiębiorstwa i powinny być one odpowiednio zarządzane, aby zapewnić najlepsze rezultaty dla firmy w czasie jej istnienia na rynku. Celem autorów jest podkreślenie znaczenia relacji pomiędzy zainteresowanymi stronami dla funkcjonowania firmy. Relacje te dotyczą aspektów kulturowych podejmowania decyzji. Artykuł bazuje na wcześniejszych badaniach autorów koncentrujących się na bardzo dynamicznym rynku high-tech w Kanadzie. Wskazują oni kierunki lub koncentracje zmian wpływu zainteresowanych stron w zależności od rynku i stopnia jego zaawansowania oraz lokalizacji. Analizując rynek europejski można zauważyć, że różne środowiska kulturowe mogą również wpłynąć na decyzje na rynku o bardziej podobnym tle, jak na Węgrzech czy w Niemczech.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

stakeholder; market lifecycle; firm evolution; cultural difference

PL

interesariusz; zainteresowana strona; ewolucja firmy; różnice kulturowe

• Wydawca: Czestochowa University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Management Studies
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: Vol. 14, No. 1
• Strony: 140--151
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 27 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Koplyay T.

• Université du Québec en Outaouais

autor

Lloyd D.

• Szent Istvan University

autor

Feher-Toma E.

• Szent Istvan University

autor

Fekete-Farkas M.

• Szent Istvan University

Bibliografia

• 1. Alexander C.S., Miesing P., Parsons A.L., 2005, How Important are Stakeholder Relationships? “Academy of Strategic Management Journal”, 4.
• 2. Bourne L., 2009, Stakeholder relationship management, A maturity model for Organisational Implementation, UK, Aldershot: Gower Publishing Ltd.
• 3. Carroll A.B., Buchholtz A.K, 2012, Business and Society, Ethics, Sustainability and Stakeholder Management, 9th Edition, Cengage Learning.
• 4. Bryson J.M, 2004, What to do when stakeholders matter: stakeholder identification and analysis techniques, “Public Management Review”, 6.
• 5. Eloranta E., Huttunan K., 2001, Managing the Demand Chain: value innovations for supplier excellence, McKinsey & Company, Wiley & Sons.
• 6. Feher-Toma E., Agu Obinna K., Fekete Farkas M., 2014, Role of cultural differences in financial investment decisions, “Journal of International Scientific Publications, Economy & Business”, 8, (www.scientific-publictions.net).
• 7. Freeman E., 1984, Strategic management: A stakeholder approach, 1: Pitman.
• 8. Freeman R.E., 1999, Divergent stakeholder theory, “Academy of Management Review”, 24.
• 9. Fried V., Bruton G., Hisrich R., 1998, Strategy and the board of directors in venture capital-backed firms, “Journal of Business Venturing”, 13(6).
• 10. FTL, 2016, Financial Times Lexicon, Definition of stakeholders, Access on 28.10.2016. http://lexicon.ft.com/Term?term=stakeholders.
• 11. Jones M.T., Fleming P., 2003, Unpacking Complexity through Critical Stakeholder Analysis: The Case of Globalization, “Business Society”, 42(4).
• 12. Kaya H., Erden D., 2008, Firm-specific capabilities and foreign direct investment activities of Turkish manufacturing firms: An empirical study, “Journal of Management Development”, 27(7).
• 13. Kilsgard D., Nero M., Sundin E., 2008, Cultural differences when entering a new market: A study of Swedish companies entering the Eastern European markets, University Essay from Kristianstad University/Department of Business Studies.
• 14. Koplyay T., Levy-Mangin J-P., Li L., 2010, Quo Vadis entrepreneurs, Lessons from the Lifecycle, [In:] The Entrepreneurial Effect, Commoners Publishing.
• 15. Koplyay T., Lloyd D., Powers J., Sanchez L., 2011a, Dimensions in Decision Making in Evolving High Tech Companies, [In:] Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Congress of the American Society for Engineering Management to be held in Texas, October 21-23, 2011.
• 16. Koplyay T., Lloyd D., Sanchez L., 2011b, Human Resource Issues Evolution: A Case of the Hi Tech Industry, Szent István University, Global Management Conference, Gödöllő, Hungary.
• 17. Ladurantaye S., 2000, Crosskeys' quarter influenced by Newbridge, "Ottawa Business Journal”, March 22, Retrieved from http://www.obj.ca/Other/Archives/2000-03-22/article-2230026/Crosskeys-quarter-influenced-by-Newbridge/1.
• 18. Littau P., Jujagiri N., Adlbrecht G., 2010, 25 years of stakeholder theory in project management literature (1984-2009), “Project Management Journal”, 41.
• 19. Lloyd D., Chillingworth L., Koplyay T., 2011, Stakeholder Issues Along the Market Lifecycle, Institute of Economy, Finance and Statistics, Chisinau, Moldova 2011.
• 20. Mitchell R., Agle B., Wood D., 1997, Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts, “Academy of Management Review”, 22.
• 21. Moore G.A., 1995, Inside the Tornado: Marketing Strategies from Silicon Valley’s Cutting Edge, HarperCollins.
• 22. Ranf D.E., 2010, Cultural differences in project management, “Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomic”, 12(2).
• 23. Suntook F., Murphy J.A., 2008, The Stakeholder Balance Sheet. Profiting from Really Understanding Your Market, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Publication.
• 24. Toma E., Fekete-Farkas M., 2009., Effects of Cultural Differences in Business Environment Concerning the Flow of Working Capital, Second International Conference on Social Sciences, Readings in Social Sciences, Vol. 5, Izmir.
• 25. Watt A., 2014, Project Management, BCcampus Open Textbook, http://open.bccampus.ca.
• 26. Werther Jr.,W., Chandler D., 2011, Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility: Stakeholders in a Global Environment, Sage Publications.
• 27. Zech N., 2013, Stakeholder Relationship Management in the Context of Crisis Management, “New Challenges of Economic and Business Development”, May 9-11, Riga: University of Latvia.

Uwagi

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (zadania 2017).