Ergonomics contribution in maintainability

• Autorzy: Teymourian K. , Seneviratne D. , Galar D.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1515/mspe-2017-0031

Warianty tytułu

PL

Wpływ ergonomii na łatwość konserwacji

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The objective of this paper is to describe an ergonomics contribution in maintainability. The economical designs, inputs and training helps to increase the maintainability indicators for industrial devices. This analysis can be helpful, among other cases, to compare systems, to achieve a better design regarding maintainability requirements, to improve this maintainability under specific industrial environment and to foresee maintainability problems due to eventual changes in a device operation conditions. With this purpose, this work first introduces the notion of ergonomics and human factors, maintainability and the implementation of assessment of human postures, including some important postures to perform maintenance activities. A simulation approach is used to identify the critical posture of the maintenance personnel and implements the defined postures with minimal loads on the personnel who use the equipment in a practical scenario. The simulation inputs are given to the designers to improve the workplace/equipment in order to high level of maintainability. Finally, the work concludes summarizing the more significant aspects and suggesting future research.

PL

Celem niniejszego artykułu jest opisanie wpływu ergonomii na łatwość konserwacji. Ekonomiczne wzorce, nakłady i szkolenia pomagają zwiększyć wskaźnik konserwacji urządzeń przemysłowych. Ta analiza może być pomocna, między innymi, do porównywania systemów w celu uzyskania lepszego projektu dotyczącego wymagań związanych z konserwacją, poprawy tej konserwacji w konkretnym środowisku przemysłowym oraz przewidywania problemów związanych z konserwacją, spowodowanych ewentualnymi zmianami warunków działania urządzenia. W tym celu praca ta na początku wprowadza pojęcie ergonomii i czynników ludzkich, łatwości konserwacji i wdrażania oceny pozycji ludzi, w tym kilka ważnych pozycji, w których przeprowadza się czynności konserwacyjne. Podejście symulacyjne jest wykorzystywane do identyfikacji krytycznej pozycji ciała personelu konserwacyjnego i wdrażania tych z minimalnym obciążeniem dla personelu, który wykorzystuje sprzęt w praktycznym scenariuszu. Dane wejściowe do symulacji są przekazywane projektantom aby poprawić miejsce pracy/wyposażenie w celu zapewnienia wysokiego poziomu konserwacji. Ostatecznie, niniejsze opracowanie kończą podsumowanie bardziej znaczących aspektów i sugestie dotyczące przyszłych badań.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

ergonomics; maintainability; human posture; human factors; ALBA simulation

PL

ergonomia; łatwość konserwacji; pozycje ludzkie; czynniki ludzkie; symulacja ALBA

• Wydawca: STE GROUP
• Czasopismo: Management Systems in Production Engineering
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: nr 3 (25)
• Strony: 217--223
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 29 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Teymourian K.

• Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmentaland Natural Resources Engineering, Division of Operation, Maintenance and Acoustics, Luleå 971 87 Luleå, SWEDEN

autor

Seneviratne D.

• Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmentaland Natural Resources Engineering, Division of Operation, Maintenance and Acoustics, Luleå 971 87 Luleå, SWEDEN

autor

Galar D.

• Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmentaland Natural Resources Engineering, Division of Operation, Maintenance and Acoustics, Luleå 971 87 Luleå, SWEDEN

Bibliografia

• [1] G. Colombo, D. Regazzoni and C. Rizzi, “Virtual ergonomics to design auxiliary equipment for commercial refrigeration”, in Proc. of TMCE 2012, Karlsruhe, Germany, pp. 383-392, 2012.
• [2] G. Li and P. Buckle, “Current techniques for assessing physical exposure to work-related musculoskeletal risks with emphasis on posturebased methods”, Ergonomics, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 674-695, 1999.
• [3] D.B. Chaffin, “On simulating human reach motions for ergonomics analyses”, Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 235-247, 2002.
• [4] D.B. Chaffin, “Human motion simulation for vehicle and workplace design”, Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 475-484, 2007.
• [5] G. Colombo and U. Cugini, “Virtual Humans and Prototypes to Evaluate Ergonomics and Safety”, Journal of Engineering Design, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 195-207, 2005.
• [6] G. Colombo, G. Facoetti and C. Rizzi, “Virtual testing laboratory for lower limb prosthesis”, Computer-Aided Design and Applications, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 671-683, 2013.
• [7] D. Mavrikios et al., “An Approach to Human Motion Analysis and Modeling”, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 979-989, 2006.
• [8] S.Y. Baek and K. Lee, “Parametric Human Body Shape Modeling Framework for Human-Centered Product Design”, Computer Aided Design, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 56- 67, 2012.
• [9] M. Maguire, “Methods to Support Human-Centred Design, International Journal of Human Computer Studies, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 587-634, 2001.
• [10] T.C. Kuo, S.H. Huang and H.C. Zhang, “Design for Manufacture and Design for ’X’: Concepts, Applications, and Perspectives”, Computers and Industrial Engineering, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 241-260, 2001.
• [11] A. Skander, L. Roucoules and J.S. Klein Meyer, “Design and Manufacturing Interface Modeling for Manufacturing Processes Selection and Knowledge Synthesis in Design”, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 37, no. 5-6, pp. 443-454, 2008.
• [12] R.B. Stone, D.A. McAdams and V.J. Kayyalethekkel, “A Product Architecture-Based Conceptual DFA Technique”, Design Studies, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 301-325, 2004.
• [13] P. De Lit, A. Delchambre and J.M. Henrioud, “An Integrated Approach for Product Family and Assembly System Design”, EEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 324-334, 2003.
• [14] J. Fulton Suri, “Inclusive design through individual insight”, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proc., vol. 44, no. 38, pp. 897-900, 2000.
• [15] C.M. Haslegrave and K. Holmes, “Integrating ergonomics and engineering in the technical design process”, Applied Ergonomics, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 211-220, 1994.
• [16] G. O'neill, “Maintainability: Theory and Practice”, in System Health Management: With Aerospace Applications, S.B. Johnson, T.J. Gormley, S.S. Kessler, C.D. Mott, A. Patterson-Hine, K.M. Reichard and P.A. Scandura, Eds. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 309-317, 2011.
• [17] HFES website. (2016, November 12). Definitions of Human Factors and Ergonomics [Online]. Available: http://www.hfes.org/Web/EducationalResources/ HFEdefinitionsmain.html
• [18] C.D. Wickens, Engineering Psychology and Human Performance. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill, 1984.
• [19] O. Brown Jr., “Macroergonomic methods: participation”, in Macroergonomics: Theory, Methods, and Applications, H.W. Hendrick and B.M. Kleiner, Eds. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 25-44, 2002.
• [20] J.L. Cotton, Employee Involvement: Methods for Improving Performance and Work Attitudes, 1st edition. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications, 1993.
• [21] H.M. Haines and J.R. Wilson, Development of a Framework for Participatory Ergonomics. Sudbury: Health and Safety Executive, 1998.
• [22] B.S. Dhillon, Engineering Maintainability: How to Design for Reliability and Easy Maintenance. Houston, TX: Gulf Professional Publishing, 1999.
• [23] Designing and developing maintainable products and systems, volume I, U.S. Department of Defense, 1995.
• [24] Swedish Standards Institute website. (2016, November 12) SIS TS 16949 Quality management systems Standard [Online]. Available: http://www.sis.se/en/ management-system/quality-management-systems/ sis-iso-ts-169492009
• [25] US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. (2016, November 10). Fatal Injuries Among Grounds Maintenance Workers – United States: 2003- 2008, vol. 60, no. 17, pp. 542-546, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/ mmwrhtml/mm6017a3.htm
• [26] J.C. Blaise, K. Kuhl, K. Van den Broek and R. Graveling. (2017, February 22). Why is maintenance a high risk activity? [Online]. Available: https://oshwiki.eu/wiki/ Why_is_maintenance_a_high_risk_activity%3F
• [27] A. Rastegari, “Strategic Maintenance Management in Lean Environment: for Volvo Powertrain”, M.S. thesis, School of Innovation, Design and Engineering, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden, 2012.
• [28] D. Pascal, Lean Production Simplified, 2nd edition. Verlag: Productivity Press, 2007.
• [29] D.B. Chaffin, G.B.J. Andersson and B.J. Martin, Occupational Biomechanics, 4th edition. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2006.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (zadania 2017)