Test the relationship between strategic consensus and organizational performance

• Autorzy: Bareas Ahmed Kadim , Alhimyari Bashar Abbas , Aljanabi Adil Abbas Abed

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17512/pjms.2019.20.2.11

Warianty tytułu

PL

Interaktywna rola dynamiki rynkowej i uczenia się organizacji w działalności biznesowej

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of this research is to test the impact of organizational learning as a modified variable of the negative impact of market dynamics on the relationship between strategic consensus and organizational performance through a sample of 60 respondents from the administrative leaders in one of the Iraqi public companies. The data were collected through a questionnaire that was analyzed using a number of statistical methods. One of the most important results was that organizational learning can be used to transform the negative impact of market dynamics on the relationship between strategic consensus and organizational performance. The results provided guideline to the regulators that they should incorporate all measure regarding the firm performance.

PL

Celem tego badania jest przetestowanie wpływu uczenia się organizacji jako zmodyfikowanej zmiennej negatywnego wpływu dynamiki rynku na związek między strategicznym konsensusem a wynikami organizacyjnymi na próbie 60 respondentów z liderów administracyjnych w jednym z Irakijczyków spółki publiczne. Dane zebrano za pomocą kwestionariusza, który został przeanalizowany za pomocą szeregu metod statystycznych. Jednym z najważniejszych rezultatów było to, że uczenie się organizacji można wykorzystać do przekształcenia negatywnego wpływu dynamiki rynku na związek między strategicznym konsensusem a wynikami organizacji. Wyniki zapewniły organom regulacyjnym wytyczne, które powinny uwzględniać wszystkie środki dotyczące wyników firmy.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

market dynamics; organizational learning; performance measurement

PL

dynamika rynku; uczenie się organizacji; pomiar wydajności

• Wydawca: Czestochowa University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Management Studies
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: Vol. 20, No. 2
• Strony: 124--133
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 22 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Bareas Ahmed Kadim

• Department of Business Administration, University of Kerbala, Iraq

autor

Alhimyari Bashar Abbas

• Department of Business Administration, University of Kerbala, Iraq

autor

Aljanabi Adil Abbas Abed

• Department Business Administration, University of Babylon, Iraq

Bibliografia

• 1. Alipour, F., & Karimi, R. (2011). Mediation role of innovation and knowledge transfer in the relationship between learning organization and organizational performance. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(19).
• 2. Anttila, J., & Jussila, K. (2018). Organizational learning in developing the integrated quality management. Production Engineering Archives, 18(18), 3-13.
• 3. Baker, W. E., & Sinkula, J. M. (1999). The synergistic effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 27(4), 411-427.
• 4. García-Morales, V. J., Jiménez-Barrionuevo, M. M., & Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, L. (2012). Transformational leadership influence on organizational performance through organizational learning and innovation. Journal of Business Research, 65(7), 1040-1050.
• 5. González-Benito, J., Aguinis, H., Boyd, B. K., & Suárez-González, I. (2012). Coming to consensus on strategic consensus: A mediated moderation model of consensus and performance. Journal of Management, 38(6), 1685-1714.
• 6. Han, J. K., Kim, N., & Srivastava, R. K. (1998). Market orientation and organizational performance: is innovation a missing link? Journal of marketing, 62(4), 30-45.
• 7. Hanaysha, J. (2016). Testing the effects of employee engagement, work environment, and organizational learning on organizational commitment. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 229, 289-297.
• 8. Homburg, C., Krohmer, H., & Workman. Jr, J. P. (1999). Strategic consensus and performance: the role of strategy type and market-related dynamism. Strategic management journal, 20(4), 339-357.
• 9. Homburg, C., & Pflesser, C. (2000). A multiple-layer model of market-oriented organizational culture: Measurement issues and performance outcomes. Journal of marketing research, 37(4), 449-462.
• 10. Kanten, P., Kanten, S., & Gurlek, M. (2015). The effects of organizational structures and learning organization on job embeddedness and individual adaptive performance. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, 1358-1366.
• 11. Kellermanns, F. W., Walter, J., Floyd, S. W., Lechner, C., & Shaw, J. C. (2011). To agree or not to agree? A meta-analytical review of strategic consensus and organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 64(2), 126-133.
• 12. Kellermanns, F. W., Walter, J., Lechner, C., & Floyd, S. W. (2005). The lack of consensus about strategic consensus: Advancing theory and research. Journal of Management, 31(5), 719-737.
• 13. Liao, Y.-W., Wang, Y.-M., Wang, Y.-S., & Tu, Y.-M. (2015). Understanding the dynamics between organizational IT investment strategy and market performance: A system dynamics approach. Computers in Industry, 71, 46-57.
• 14. Lindenberg, M. (2001). Are we at the cutting edge or the blunt edge?: Improving NGO organizational performance with private and public sector strategic management frameworks. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 11(3), 247-270.
• 15. Mutahar, A. Y., Rasli, A. M., & Al-Ghazali, B. M. (2015). Relationship of transformational leadership, organizational learning and organizational performance. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 5(1S), 406-411.
• 16. Ngah, R., Tai, T., & Bontis, N. (2016). Knowledge management capabilities and organizational performance in roads and transport authority of Dubai: The mediating role of learning organization. Knowledge and Process Management, 23(3), 184-193.
• 17. Park, S. H., & Luo, Y. (2001). Guanxi and organizational dynamics: Organizational networking in Chinese firms. Strategic management journal, 22(5), 455-477.
• 18. Pokharel, M. P., & Ok Choi, S. (2015). Exploring the relationships between the learning organization and organizational performance. Management research review, 38(2), 126-148.
• 19. Rapert, M. I., Lynch, D., & Suter, T. (1996). Enhancing functional and organizational performance via strategic consensus and commitment. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 4(4), 193-205.
• 20. Wade, J. (1995). Dynamics of organizational communities and technological bandwagons: An empirical investigation of community evolution in the microprocessor market. Strategic management journal, 16(S1), 111-133.
• 21. West Jr, C. T., & Schwenk, C. R. (1996). Top management team strategic consensus, demographic homogeneity and firm performance: A report of resounding nonfindings. Strategic management journal, 17(7), 571-576.
• 22. Závadský, J., Závadská, Z., Veselovská, L., & Szczepańska-Woszczyna, K. (2016). Consistency of the Performance Management System and its Quantification Using the Z-Mesot Framework. International Journal for Quality Research, 10(4), 665-684.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).