Comparison of Traditional and Integrated Bridge Design with SAGAT

• Autorzy: Motz F. , Dalinger E. , Widdel H. , Hockel S. , Mackinnon S.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Modular Integrated Navigation Systems (INS) according to the revised IMO performance stan­dards on INS combine and integrate the validated information of different sensors and functions and allow the presentation on the various displays according to the tasks. The aim of the investigations discussed within this paper was to assess the advantages of an INS design compared to a traditional bridge layout with respect to the execution of collision avoidance and route monitoring tasks. The Situation Awareness Global Assessment Technique (SAGAT) approach was applied to assess Situation Awareness (SA) during these operations while bridge design and out of window visibility were manipulated. Additionally, workload was measured by NASA-TLX with its six subscales. The experiment was con­ducted in a full immersive simulation environ­ment with 26 experienced mari­ners. The results indicate that SA is significantly higher with the INS bridge design in the reduced visibility condition compared to the traditional bridge design. Also, tendencies were found that workload and subdimensions are influenced by bridge design and visibility conditions.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Integrated Bridge Design; Integration of Navigation; Situation Awareness Global Assessment Technique (SAGAT) Situation Awareness (SA); Integrated Navigation System (INS); IMO Performance Standards; Navigational Bridge; Bridge Design

• Wydawca: Faculty of Navigation, Gdynia Maritime University
• Czasopismo: TransNav : International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation
• Rocznik: 2009
• Tom: Vol. 3, no. 1
• Strony: 67--72
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 7 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Motz F.

• Research Institute for Communication, Information Processing and Ergonomics, Wachtberg, Germany

autor

Dalinger E.

• Research Institute for Communication, Information Processing and Ergonomics, Wachtberg, Germany

autor

Widdel H.

• Research Institute for Communication, Information Processing and Ergonomics, Wachtberg, Germany

autor

Hockel S.

• Research Institute for Communication, Information Processing and Ergonomics, Wachtberg, Germany

autor

Mackinnon S.

• Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Canada

Bibliografia

• 1. Endsley, M.R. 1990. A methodology for the objective meas-urement of situation awareness. In Situational Awareness in Aerospace Operations (AGARD-CP-478): 1-9. Neuilly sur Seine, France: NATO- AGARD.
• 2 Endsley, M.R. 1995. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors 37: 32-64.
• 3 Endsley, M.R. 2000. Direct Measurement of Situation Aware-ness. In M.R. Endsley & D.J. Garland (eds.), Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement: 147-173. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• 4 Hart, S.G. & Staveland, L.E. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoreti-cal research. In P. Hancock & N. Meshkati (eds.), Human Mental Workload: 139-183. Amsterdam: North Holland.
• 5 IMO 2007. Revised performance standards for integrated navi-gation systems (INS). MSC.252(83). London: International Maritime Organization.
• 6 Motz, F., MacKinnon, S., Dalinger, E., Widdel, H. 2008. Ap-plication of SAGAT for Navigational Tasks on Ship Bridg-es. International Maritime Conference / ABCD Symposium on Human Performance at Sea. Sydney, Australia.
• 7 Strater, L. & Endsley, M.R. 2000. SAGAT- A situation aware-ness measurement tool for commercial airline pilots. In D.B. Kaber & M.R. Endsley (eds.), Proceedings of the first human performance, situation awareness, and automation: User-centered design for the new millennium conference: 360. Savannah, GA.